Evan Saugstad: Wildlife management in B.C. - Politics rule - Alaska Highway News | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Evan Saugstad: Wildlife management in B.C. – Politics rule – Alaska Highway News

Published

 on


In the spring of 2018, B.C.’s NDP government announced it would ban the hunting of grizzly bears, except by indigenous peoples. Government freely admitted this ban was pure politics and supported by their public opinion polls.

There was no science behind their decision. It was not implemented for conservation reasons. Just like their promise to give B.C. residents $500 during the 2020 election, my opinion is this ban was implemented to buy votes.

article continues below

I have written several columns in the Alaska Highway News as to what this means and why it happened.

Last year, this same government signed and implemented an agreement with two First Nations in B.C.’s South Peace respecting local caribou populations and placing limiting on the use of Crown lands by others. This despite no meaningful consultation or agreement with many other First Nations, communities, organizations, or local business, and industry.

I also wrote on this secretive and political process, and some of the potential outcomes.

Last spring, this same government also announced it would begin culling moose, including cows and calves, as one of its centre pieces to save the caribou. Interestingly, they did find some of their internal biologists in full support of this decision, which was much to the chagrin of most reputable biologists and left B.C. residents shaking their heads trying to understand why.

One decision this government did not make for political expediency was to end the wolf reduction programs the previous government implemented in respect to caribou conservation. This despite extensive lobbying by their most favoured ENGO organizations and a few thousand letters to editors.

What saved this program was not that the biologist or hunting community supported it, but was directly attributable to the widespread support of first nations.

Interestingly, since the initial furor over the cow and calf moose cull, many first nations have stated their opposition to these cow/calf seasons, at least until local moose population can sustain such a hunt. It remains to be seen if the 2021 hunting regulations quietly drop this or if the ignorance of those who oversee managing our wildlife takes precedence.

Moose in the South Peace. – Evan Saugstad

Although it can be said that everything boils down to politics and is subject to voter sentiment, it shouldn’t be. Not everything should be left to public opinion polls, or to the belief that unless it is good for voters in Metro Vancouver, it is not good for B.C.

Wildlife and habitat management used to be in the control of local and regional managers. Part of their job used to be to meaningfully consult with those who lived and worked here. Local managers would develop a good understanding on what was happening and understood that local people wished to sustain their way of life.

They consulted and listened to rod and gun clubs, local guide/outfitters, trappers, first nations, local communities, and industries that could be affected by their decisions.

Local managers would take input and, as the statutory decision maker, make decisions in terms of hunting seasons, quotas, harvest levels, closures, or restrictions relatively free from political interference from Victoria. Most of these decisions focused on the consumptive uses (hunting, fishing, trapping), as the belief was if you responsibly managed what you took from the environment, your populations and habitats would be sustained by what you retained.

This began to change when the non-consumptive users realized their best way to implement the changes they wished for (i.e., stop hunting, trapping, fishing, etc.) was to engage politicians in Victoria. Some of our more naive politicians agreed, as this represented voters in their ridings and began to support taking away of decision-making powers from regions and centralizing them with the responsible Minister.

Once Ministers exerted this power, their field staff fell in line and just agreed with what the Minister wanted, as that is how government works. Tell the Minister they are wrong gets you a ticket out of town, so just agree, shut up, and keep your head down.

Now, we must reverse this process and give more staff, budget, and responsibility back to the regions, and begin making local decisions that are best for the diversity we have across our province.

What may be good for northeast B.C. may not be the best solution for the Chilcotin or the Kootenays, and vice versa.

A whitetail deer in the South Peace. – Evan Saugstad

By bringing these decisions making powers back to where they belong, we will also begin to address the many outstanding concerns we have about there not being enough steelhead, salmon, mule deer, mountain goats, or moose, or about there being too many wolves, and black and grizzly bears.

Let us determine the requirements for our respective areas: what to do with the lack of orcas in the Georgia Straight, spotted owls in the Fraser Canyon, or marmots on Vancouver Island. 

There is hope.

Last fall, the NDP made an election promise to create a “Fish, Wildlife and Habitat Coalition.” Within this plan was the commitment to:

“In the first 100 days of the new government’s mandate it will:

“1. Introduce legislation to create a Fish, Wildlife and Habitat endowment.

“2. Dedicate all hunting, guide-outfitting and trapping license fees to wildlife management.”

Those 100 days are now ending, so we’ll see what is done, as it is a start.

But much more is needed.

Evan Saugstad is a former mayor of Chetwynd, and is one of hundreds of thousands of B.C.’s hunters and fishers. He lives in Fort St. John.

Read more:

Wildlife management in B.C., Part 1 – Who cares?

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version