Fed members, shaping the 2024 campaign economy, head to Capitol Hill | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

Fed members, shaping the 2024 campaign economy, head to Capitol Hill

Published

 on

WASHINGTON, June 21 (Reuters) – U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and nominees for three Fed Board seats will testify on Capitol Hill Wednesday, laying out over several hours of hearings a set of views that could broadly shape the economic conditions facing the country during a contentious presidential election campaign next year.

The themes will likely sound familiar given the consensus currently driving central bank policy: Inflation is too high and interest rates need to remain restrictive to fight it; the job market remains strong and may even need to weaken some for prices to cool; bank failures in March haven’t rattled the financial system in a fundamental way.

But next year’s economic landscape, when the U.S. may face an era-defining rematch between incumbent Democrat Joe Biden and Republican former President Donald Trump, could well be made or broken by upcoming Fed decisions over how much higher interest rates need to rise, and whether the bias remains towards controlling inflation even at the possible cost of a recession.

“The economy faces multiple challenges, including inflation, banking-sector stress, and geopolitical instability. The Federal Reserve must remain attentive to them all,” Fed Governor Philip Jefferson said in prepared testimony released on Tuesday, ahead of Wednesday’s 10 a.m. (1400 GMT) Senate Banking Committee confirmation hearing for his nomination as vice chair. “Inflation has started to abate, and I remain focused on returning it to our 2% target.”

Fed Governor Lisa Cook is up for appointment to a full 14-year term on the seven-seat Board of Governors, and Adriana Kugler, the U.S. executive director to the World Bank and the first Fed board nominee of Hispanic heritage, has been nominated to an open board seat.

Across the Capitol complex, Powell will appear before the House Financial Services Committee in one of his regularly scheduled twice-yearly monetary policy updates, also to begin at 10 a.m.

Despite the consensus on lowering inflation, the Fed is also reaching a point where opinions about the need for and timing of additional interest rate increases may start to diverge. As it did for past presidential incumbents, how that debate gets resolved could make the difference between a benign election-year economy and a corrosive one.

For Biden, the success or failure of Fed policy could mean a “soft landing” of continued economic growth, lower inflation and only modestly higher unemployment, or it could force him to campaign against a backdrop of increasing joblessness, stubbornly higher prices, and punishing interest rates for anyone trying to buy a home or car or finance a business.

The outcome of the Fed’s inflation battle may still take months to spool out, and “the closer it happens to election day the worse it is for Biden,” said Preston Mui, senior economist with Employ America, a research and advocacy group that focuses on full-employment policies.

Mui said recent data have made the achievement of a “soft landing” seem more likely, though the Fed still is primed for further rate increases that could raise the possibility of a recession or an unnecessary increase in unemployment.

The Fed at its meeting last week held its benchmark interest rate steady at between 5% and 5.25%, but officials projected rates will have to increase another half percentage point by year’s end because inflation has been falling so slowly and remains more than double the Fed’s 2% target.

JOBS AND INFLATION

At this point in his first term Biden is given particularly low marks for his management of the economy, despite near-record-low unemployment, steady job gains and rising wages.

Rising prices, which at one point or another have touched food and gas as well as discretionary goods and a variety of services, may be one reason why.

In a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted June 2-5, just 35% of respondents approved of Biden’s economic stewardship. Some 53% disapproved, according to the poll, which had a three-percentage point margin of error.

Just 25% of respondents approved of how Biden has handled inflation.

In large part that job has fallen to the Fed, but it is a central bank of Biden’s making. If the current crop of nominees is approved five of seven board members would be Biden appointees. It would also be the most diverse board in the Fed’s history, with two Black board members including the vice chair, the first Hispanic, and as many women, three, as white men, the Fed’s traditional recruitment pool.

Powell was initially elevated to Fed chair by Trump but reappointed by Biden.

The Fed under Powell has raised interest rates faster than at any time since former Fed Chair Paul Volcker’s inflation fights of the 1970s and 1980s.

Though Fed officials and economists disagree over whether there needs to be a tradeoff with unemployment to control inflation – a deeply rooted concept in economics, with labor “slack” seen loosening the pressure on prices – policymakers at last week’s central bank meeting projected the jobless rate will continue to rise from now through 2024.

The increases are modest, from the current 3.7% to 4.1% by the end of this year. But the rate also continues increasing through the election year, to 4.5% – the equivalent of about 1.3 million lost jobs from today’s level.

For U.S. electoral politics, a backdrop of rising unemployment is hard on incumbents, and data from May show some of the risk for Biden. The unemployment rate for Black Americans, a constituency central to his 2020 victory, jumped nearly a full percentage point – an increase which, if sustained or added to, could raise the political stakes around the Fed’s inflation fight.

Reporting by Howard Schneider; Additional reporting by Jason Lange; Editing by Dan Burns and Andrea Ricci

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

September merchandise trade deficit narrows to $1.3 billion: Statistics Canada

Published

 on

OTTAWA – Statistics Canada says the country’s merchandise trade deficit narrowed to $1.3 billion in September as imports fell more than exports.

The result compared with a revised deficit of $1.5 billion for August. The initial estimate for August released last month had shown a deficit of $1.1 billion.

Statistics Canada says the results for September came as total exports edged down 0.1 per cent to $63.9 billion.

Exports of metal and non-metallic mineral products fell 5.4 per cent as exports of unwrought gold, silver, and platinum group metals, and their alloys, decreased 15.4 per cent. Exports of energy products dropped 2.6 per cent as lower prices weighed on crude oil exports.

Meanwhile, imports for September fell 0.4 per cent to $65.1 billion as imports of metal and non-metallic mineral products dropped 12.7 per cent.

In volume terms, total exports rose 1.4 per cent in September while total imports were essentially unchanged in September.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version