It was only three months ago that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau delivered one of the most serious allegations a Canadian government has ever levelled against an ostensible ally – and then proceeded to not provide any evidence to this effect whatsoever.
News
U.S. provides what Canada never could — evidence against India
Canada loudly accused India of an assassination plot without evidence. The U.S. brought loads of evidence … and made the accusation quietly
On Sept. 18, Trudeau opened a sitting of the House of Commons by issuing a surprising announcement that the Indian government was responsible for the June shooting death of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Sikh separatist figure based in B.C.
As Indo-Canadian relations immediately descended into a swamp of mutual recrimination and tit-for-tat diplomat ejections, Trudeau didn’t back up his claims with video, phone transcripts, a description of the alleged plot or even an official confirmation from his own intelligence agencies.
All the public got was a line that investigators were “actively pursuing credible allegations of a potential link.” And when India balked at the charge, Trudeau could only respond that they should treat this issue “with the utmost seriousness.”
But just this week, the U.S. did what Canada couldn’t: It provided a detailed summary of an alleged conspiracy to assassinate Sikh extremists based in North America, as well as the evidence purporting to tie it to the Government of India.
Details of the U.S. case were revealed Wednesday in an unsealed indictment against 52-year-old Indian national Nikhil Gupta, whom prosecutors accuse of orchestrating a “murder for hire” plot for the Indian government.
“In or about May 2023, (an Indian government employee) recruited Gupta to orchestrate the assassination of the Victim in the United States,” reads a Wednesday statement from the U.S. Department of Justice.
The “Victim” is Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, an attorney based in New York State with a long history of calls for the creation of Khalistan, a Sikh nation that would be carved out of the Indian state of Punjab.
Pannun is considered a terrorist by the Indian government, and has occasionally made headlines in Canada for orchestrating non-official Khalistan referenda in B.C. In September, he was officially condemned by members of the federal cabinet after he released a video telling Hindus to “leave Canada.”
The indictment also contains key details about the killing of Nijjar.
Investigators purport to have emails and phone conversations sent between Gupta and his Indian government handler, who is identified in the documents as CC-1.
After Nijjar’s killing, the handler reportedly sent images of Nijjar’s corpse to Gupta, which he appears to have then forwarded to his fake hitman. According to documents, Gupta said in a clandestinely recorded call that Pannun was one just one target among many, and “we have so many targets.”
Gupta was arrested a mere 10 days later on an international warrant, shortly after he had arrived in the Czech Republic.
The charges have not been tried before a court, but the indictment is based on a ream of video, text, and audio intercepts.
During a discussion about the killing of Nijjar, Gupta reportedly said “we didn’t give (the U.S. hitman) this job, so some other guy did this job.”
What the indictment doesn’t contain is anything linking the alleged plot to the top levels of the Indian government. The only Indian official involved is CC-1, who is identified only as a “Senior Field Officer” who once mentioned being a member of India’s Central Reserve Police Force.
This distinction – and the sheer volume of evidence in the indictment – might be why India has been much friendlier with the U.S. allegation than it was with Canada’s.
Trudeau’s accusation of an Indian murder plot prompted outright denials from New Delhi, counter-accusations that Canada was a hotbed for Sikh terrorism, a significant fraying of Canada’s diplomatic relationship with India – as well as a wave of anti-Trudeau coverage on Indian media.
But against the U.S. allegation, India’s foreign ministry said it had set up a committee to probe the matter directly, calling it “a matter of concern” and “against government policy.”
Two of the Trudeau government’s favourite issues – reconciliation and carbon pricing – will soon be facing off in court. The Chiefs of Ontario and the Attawapiskat First Nation are suing the federal government over allegations that their carbon pricing scheme is “discriminatory and anti-reconciliatory.” The federal carbon tax functions by dinging you at the gas pump, and then refunding most of that money via regular CRA rebates. But the Chiefs of Ontario note that on-reserve First Nations don’t pay income taxes for any income earned on reserve – thus, they’re paying the carbon tax but not getting the rebates. This would be easy to fix with a carbon tax carve-out for anyone flashing a status card at the gas station – but the Liberals are somewhat constrained by their promise to never, ever approve any additional carbon tax carveouts following that one they just greenlit for Atlantic Canada.
It was over the summer that Google first announced the seismic news that it planned to bar all Canadian news content from its search engine as a direct response to the Trudeau government’s Online News Act. The act barred internet giants such as Google from circulating Canadian news links on their platforms unless they figured out a way to compensate the creators of said links (such as yours truly). To this came the somewhat predictable reaction that Google and Facebook would simply stop dealing in Canadian news links. But a compromise position was reached this week; Google won’t shut off the news taps, and in exchange they’ll only have to hand over about $100 million a year instead of the $175 million that was expected under the Online News Act’s original formula.
If you’re reading this near Oshawa, Ont. and you see a kangaroo out the window, it’s not your imagination. One of the marsupials escaped from Oshawa Zoo handlers on Friday morning and remains at large as of press time.
Continue Reading
Outside of sports and a “Cold front coming down from Canada,” American news media only report on Canadian events that they believe are, or will be, influential to the US. Therefore, when Justin Trudeau’s announcement, having finally read the room, that Canada will be reducing the number of permanent residents admitted by more than 20 percent and temporary residents like skilled workers and college students will be cut by more than half made news south of the border, I knew the American media felt Trudeau’s about-face on immigration was newsworthy because many Americans would relate to Trudeau realizing Canada was accepting more immigrants than it could manage and are hoping their next POTUS will follow Trudeau’s playbook.
Canada, with lots of space and lacking convenient geographical ways for illegal immigrants to enter the country, though still many do, has a global reputation for being incredibly accepting of immigrants. On the surface, Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver appear to be multicultural havens. However, as the saying goes, “Too much of a good thing is never good,” resulting in a sharp rise in anti-immigrant sentiment, which you can almost taste in the air. A growing number of Canadians, regardless of their political affiliation, are blaming recent immigrants for causing the housing affordability crises, inflation, rise in crime and unemployment/stagnant wages.
Throughout history, populations have engulfed themselves in a tribal frenzy, a psychological state where people identify strongly with their own group, often leading to a ‘us versus them’ mentality. This has led to quick shifts from complacency to panic and finger-pointing at groups outside their tribe, a phenomenon that is not unique to any particular culture or time period.
My take on why the American news media found Trudeau’s blatantly obvious attempt to save his political career, balancing appeasement between the pitchfork crowd, who want a halt to immigration until Canada gets its house in order, and immigrant voters, who traditionally vote Liberal, newsworthy; the American news media, as do I, believe immigration fatigue is why Kamala Harris is going to lose on November 5th.
Because they frequently get the outcome wrong, I don’t take polls seriously. According to polls in 2014, Tim Hudak’s Progressive Conservatives and Kathleen Wynne’s Liberals were in a dead heat in Ontario, yet Wynne won with more than twice as many seats. In the 2018 Quebec election, most polls had the Coalition Avenir Québec with a 1-to-5-point lead over the governing Liberals. The result: The Coalition Avenir Québec enjoyed a landslide victory, winning 74 of 125 seats. Then there’s how the 2016 US election polls showing Donald Trump didn’t have a chance of winning against Hillary Clinton were ridiculously way off, highlighting the importance of the election day poll and, applicable in this election as it was in 2016, not to discount ‘shy Trump supporters;’ voters who support Trump but are hesitant to express their views publicly due to social or political pressure.
My distrust in polls aside, polls indicate Harris is leading by a few points. One would think that Trump’s many over-the-top shenanigans, which would be entertaining were he not the POTUS or again seeking the Oval Office, would have him far down in the polls. Trump is toe-to-toe with Harris in the polls because his approach to the economy—middle-class Americans are nostalgic for the relatively strong economic performance during Trump’s first three years in office—and immigration, which Americans are hyper-focused on right now, appeals to many Americans. In his quest to win votes, Trump is doing what anyone seeking political office needs to do: telling the people what they want to hear, strategically using populism—populism that serves your best interests is good populism—to evoke emotional responses. Harris isn’t doing herself any favours, nor moving voters, by going the “But, but… the orange man is bad!” route, while Trump cultivates support from “weird” marginal voting groups.
To Harris’s credit, things could have fallen apart when Biden abruptly stepped aside. Instead, Harris quickly clinched the nomination and had a strong first few weeks, erasing the deficit Biden had given her. The Democratic convention was a success, as was her acceptance speech. Her performance at the September 10th debate with Donald Trump was first-rate.
Harris’ Achilles heel is she’s now making promises she could have made and implemented while VP, making immigration and the economy Harris’ liabilities, especially since she’s been sitting next to Biden, watching the US turn into the circus it has become. These liabilities, basically her only liabilities, negate her stance on abortion, democracy, healthcare, a long-winning issue for Democrats, and Trump’s character. All Harris has offered voters is “feel-good vibes” over substance. In contrast, Trump offers the tangible political tornado (read: steamroll the problems Americans are facing) many Americans seek. With Trump, there’s no doubt that change, admittedly in a messy fashion, will happen. If enough Americans believe the changes he’ll implement will benefit them and their country…
The case against Harris on immigration, at a time when there’s a huge global backlash to immigration, even as the American news media are pointing out, in famously immigrant-friendly Canada, is relatively straightforward: During the first three years of the Biden-Harris administration, illegal Southern border crossings increased significantly.
The words illegal immigration, to put it mildly, irks most Americans. On the legal immigration front, according to Forbes, most billion-dollar startups were founded by immigrants. Google, Microsoft, and Oracle, to name three, have immigrants as CEOs. Immigrants, with tech skills and an entrepreneurial thirst, have kept America leading the world. I like to think that Americans and Canadians understand the best immigration policy is to strategically let enough of these immigrants in who’ll increase GDP and tax base and not rely on social programs. In other words, Americans and Canadians, and arguably citizens of European countries, expect their governments to be more strategic about immigration.
The days of the words on a bronze plaque mounted inside the Statue of Liberty pedestal’s lower level, “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free…” are no longer tolerated. Americans only want immigrants who’ll benefit America.
Does Trump demagogue the immigration issue with xenophobic and racist tropes, many of which are outright lies, such as claiming Haitian immigrants in Ohio are abducting and eating pets? Absolutely. However, such unhinged talk signals to Americans who are worried about the steady influx of illegal immigrants into their country that Trump can handle immigration so that it’s beneficial to the country as opposed to being an issue of economic stress.
In many ways, if polls are to be believed, Harris is paying the price for Biden and her lax policies early in their term. Yes, stimulus spending quickly rebuilt the job market, but at the cost of higher inflation. Loosen border policies at a time when anti-immigrant sentiment was increasing was a gross miscalculation, much like Trudeau’s immigration quota increase, and Biden indulging himself in running for re-election should never have happened.
If Trump wins, Democrats will proclaim that everyone is sexist, racist and misogynous, not to mention a likely White Supremacist, and for good measure, they’ll beat the “voter suppression” button. If Harris wins, Trump supporters will repeat voter fraud—since July, Elon Musk has tweeted on Twitter at least 22 times about voters being “imported” from abroad—being widespread.
Regardless of who wins tomorrow, Americans need to cool down; and give the divisive rhetoric a long overdue break. The right to an opinion belongs to everyone. Someone whose opinion differs from yours is not by default sexist, racist, a fascist or anything else; they simply disagree with you. Americans adopting the respectful mindset to agree to disagree would be the best thing they could do for the United States of America.
______________________________________________________________
Nick Kossovan, a self-described connoisseur of human psychology, writes about what’s
on his mind from Toronto. You can follow Nick on Twitter and Instagram @NKossovan.
CALGARY – Sam Edney and Jesse Lumsden sat on a bench on Parliament Hill during an athlete celebration after the 2014 Winter Olympic Games.
Having just represented Canada in their sliding sports — Lumsden in bobsled and Edney in luge — the two men pondered their futures together.
“There was actually one moment about, are we going to keep going? Talking about, what are each of us going to do? What’s the next four years look like?” Edney recalled a decade later.
“I do remember talking about that now. That was a big moment,” Lumsden said.
As the two men were sounding boards for each other as athletes, they are again as high-performance directors of their respective sliding sports.
Edney, an Olympic relay silver medallist in 2018 and the first Canadian man to win a World Cup gold medal, became Luge Canada’s HPD upon his retirement the following year.
Lumsden, a world and World Cup bobsled champion who raced his third Olympic Games in 2018, leaned on his sliding compatriot when he returned from five years of working in the financial sector to become HPD at Bobsleigh Canada Skeleton in July.
“The first person I called when BCS reached out to me about the role that I’m in now is Sam,” Lumsden said recently at Calgary’s WinSport, where they spent much of their competitive careers and now have offices.
“It’s been four months. I was squatting in the luge offices for the first two months beside him.
“We had all these ideas about we’re going to have weekly coffees and workouts Tuesday and Thursday and in the four months now, we’ve had two coffees and zero workouts.”
Canada has won at least one sliding-sport Olympic medal in each of the last five Winter Games, but Edney and Lumsden face a challenge as team leaders that they didn’t as athletes.
WinSport’s sliding track, built for the 1988 Winter Olympics in Calgary and where Edney and Lumsden did hundreds of runs as athletes, has been closed since 2019 needing a $25-million renovation.
There is no sign that will happen. WinSport took the $10 million the provincial government offered for the sliding track and put the money toward a renovation of the Frank King Lodge used by recreational skiers and snowboarders.
Canada’s only other sliding track in the resort town of Whistler, B.C., has a fraction of Calgary’s population from which to recruit and develop athletes.
“The comparison is if you took half the ice rinks away in the country, hockey and figure skating would be disarray,” Edney said.
“It just changes the dynamic of the sports completely, in terms of we’re now scrambling to find ways to bring people to a location that’s not as easy to get to, or to live out of, or to train out of full time.
“We’re realizing how good we had it when Calgary’s (track) was here. It’s not going to be the end of us, but it’s definitely made it more difficult.”
Lumsden, a former CFL running back as well as an Olympian, returned to a national sport organization still recovering from internal upheaval that included the athlete-led ouster of the former president and CEO after the 2022 Winter Olympics, and Olympic champion pilot Kaillie Humphries suing the organization for her release to compete for the U.S. in 2019.
“NSOs like Luge Canada and Bobsleigh Canada Skeleton, they’re startups,” Lumsden said. “You have to think like a startup, operate like a startup, job stack, do more with less, especially in the current environment.
“I felt it was the right time for me to take my sporting experience and the skill set that I learned at Neo Financial and working with some of the most talented people in Canada and try to inject that into an NSO that is in a state of distress right now, and try to work with the great staff we have and the athletes we have to start to turn this thing around.”
Edney, 40, and Lumsden, 42, take comfort in each other holding the same roles in their sports.
“It goes both ways. I couldn’t have been more excited about who they hired,” Edney said. “When Jesse was coming in, I knew that we were going to be able to collaborate and work together and get things happening for our sports.”
Added Lumsden: “We’ve been friends for a long time, so I knew how he was going to do in his role and before taking the role, having the conversation with him, I felt a lot of comfort.
“I asked ‘are you going to be around for a long time?’ He said ‘yeah, I’m not going anywhere.’ I said ‘OK, good.'”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 4, 2024.
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia – Canada’s Gabriela Dabrowski and New Zealand’s Erin Routliffe remain undefeated in women’s doubles at the WTA Finals.
The 2023 U.S. Open champions, seeded second at the event, secured a 1-6, 7-6 (1), (11-9) super-tiebreak win over fourth-seeded Italians Sara Errani and Jasmine Paolini in round-robin play on Tuesday.
The season-ending tournament features the WTA Tour’s top eight women’s doubles teams.
Dabrowski and Routliffe lost the first set in 22 minutes but levelled the match by breaking Errani’s serve three times in the second, including at 6-5. They clinched victory with Routliffe saving a match point on her serve and Dabrowski ending Errani’s final serve-and-volley attempt.
Dabrowski and Routliffe will next face fifth-seeded Americans Caroline Dolehide and Desirae Krawczyk on Thursday, where a win would secure a spot in the semifinals.
The final is scheduled for Saturday.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published on Nov. 5, 2024.
The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
News13 mins ago
Justin Trudeau’s Announcing Cuts to Immigration Could Facilitate a Trump Win
News22 mins ago
Former athletes lean on each other to lead Canada’s luge, bobsled teams
News23 mins ago
Canada’s Dabrowski and New Zealand’s Routliffe pick up second win at WTA Finals
Investment5 years ago
dynaCERT Inc. Invites You to Join Us at the Vancouver Resource Investment Conference | INN – Investing News Network
Sports5 years ago
AP source: Bears acquiring quarterback Nick Foles from Jaguars – Sportsnet.ca
Media1 year ago
12 Bizarre Things People Did Just To Make Social Media Content
-
News21 hours agoJacques Villeneuve calls thieves of late father’s bronze monument soulless idiots
-
News21 hours agoB.C. port employers to launch lockout at terminals as labour disruption begins
-
Politics21 hours agoRFK Jr. says Trump would push to remove fluoride from drinking water. ‘It’s possible,’ Trump says
-
News21 hours agoNova Scotia Liberals release four-year $2.3-billion election platform
-
News21 hours agoPoilievre asks premiers to axe their sales taxes on new homes worth under $1 million
-
News21 hours ago‘Canada is watching’: New northern Alberta police service trying to lead by example
-
News21 hours agoAlabama Gov. Kay Ivey treated for dehydration at campaign rally
-
News21 hours agoFormer winners Kyle Bekker, Tristan Borges among finalists for CPL top player award
