Art
From Duchamp to AI: the transformation of authorship in art
|
The 19th century concept of authorship revolved around the romantic view of the artist as a lone genius. In this model, every stroke of the brush, every note played and every word written was the product of a singular creative mind, bearing the unique imprint of its creator.
However, the landscape of artistic creation began to shift dramatically with the advent of the 20th century, with artists like Marcel Duchamp, John Cage and William S. Burroughs pioneering new creative approaches such as aleatoricism, the cut-up technique and “randomness” which began recast the role of the author.
Now, AI technology looks likely to cause as much disruption as the previous revolutions combined.
Just as the artists of the last revolution grappled with their age’s social and spiritual upheavals, our artists today must rise to the challenge and engage the shock of the new that now confronts us all. AI will force artists (along with the rest of us) to examine what it means to be a “creator” and, ultimately, perhaps what it means to be human.
Disrupting the artistic landscape
Conceptual art pioneer Marcel Duchamp radically altered the artistic landscape with his work, Fountain (1917) – a urinal signed “R. Mutt”.
He argued that art wasn’t confined to traditional craftsmanship but could spring from the act of selection and presentation.

Wikipedia, CC BY
Composer John Cage took this artistic revolution a step further. His composition 4’33 (1952), where the performer remains silent for four minutes and 33 seconds, is a powerful example of a work that questions the definition of music itself. Cage’s piece isn’t just any random stretch of silence – it is art because Cage himself, a human, framed it, turning the act of listening into a creative process.
Following suit, William S. Burroughs disrupted traditional narratives with his cut-up technique, emphasising the non-linear progression of storytelling and demonstrating that authorship could extend to the reassembling of pre-existing material.

Wikipedia, CC BY
David Bowie famously used this technique for writing lyrics in some of his songs, especially in his work from the 1970s. Songs from albums like Diamond Dogs and Young Americans used cutups to create distinctive, unexpected, and often cryptic lyrics. Bowie would cut up his writings or other texts, rearrange them, and use the resulting fragments as the starting point for his songwriting. This allowed him to break free from linear thought and traditional songwriting cliches and to explore more abstract and unpredictable forms of expression.
These early disruptions laid the groundwork for today’s art and machine learning intersection. They questioned the traditional concept of authorship. Now, technology is challenging it again.
Moreover, this time around, even the role of the audience is likely to change.
Modern art
Jason M. Allen, a digital artist from Pueblo West, became one of the first creators to win a prize for AI generated art. His role was to input a text prompt into the AI tool, which then transformed it into a hyper-realistic graphic based on its training from millions of previously processed images.
In this process, Allen’s creativity came into play in formulating the correct prompts to instruct the AI, effectively guiding or curating the AI’s output.
In this case, the artist becomes a sort of co-pilot, steering the AI’s capabilities to produce a desired output. This new process raises questions about authorship and authenticity in art. It underscores how technology redefines the traditional artistic process, with artists becoming more like orchestrators of complex AI systems.

Jason Allen/Discord, CC BY
Modern artists like Laurie Anderson have begun to harness machine learning to create novel works. Anderson’s work, Scroll (2021), is a fusion of religious text and her distinctive linguistic style generated through AI.
In both of these examples, the artist functions like a curator. The manual toil of writing, drawing or composing is replaced by an iterative process of discovery, filtering and refinement of instructions to the system.
These artists are pioneering a shift in the artist’s role. Instead of being the sole creators, artists now guide, shape and direct the creative output of machine learning systems. This transition certainly presents challenges, but it also uncovers a world of new artistic competencies and opportunities.

Laurie Anderson, CC BY
The future
Looking to the future, we can expect the interplay of art and technology to deepen. Artists who embrace this ever-evolving landscape will contribute their unique perspectives to the development of machine learning and shape our collective relationship with it.
This time around, the revolution will also extend to the audience’s role. Passive viewers become participants in the making and remaking of the art. The very same AI systems that empower artists can empower the audience.
Audience members can utilise AI tools to generate art, even if they do not have traditional artistic skills. AI democratises the art-making process, making it accessible to anyone with access to the technology.
This could significantly expand the art world, as more people can become creators, contributing their own perspectives and ideas. One example is a project called Tamper (2019), developed by John Underkoffler for the AMPAS, Getty and other museums. This project lets museum visitors build collages out of material taken from a museum’s collection.
We must prepare the coming generations for this rapidly changing creative landscape, fostering their ability to co-pilot with AI systems. As we move further into the age of machine learning, artists must reclaim their position at the forefront of creative thought and innovation.





Art
In apparent first, Croatia restores looted art to grandson of Holocaust victim
|
In the first reported case of its kind in Croatia, three museums have restored several pieces of art stolen from a Jewish businessman during the Holocaust to his grandson, according to a report Friday.
The move marks the end of a 70-year struggle by the descendants of Dane Reichsmann, who was a wealthy owner of a department store in the country’s capital Zagreb before the Nazi-led genocide and was deported and murdered at Auschwitz along with his wife.
“This seems almost beyond belief,” Andy Reichsman, Dane’s grandson, and inheritor of the looted works told The New York Times. “I thought that our chances would be one in a million. They never had any interest in giving anything back to Jews.”
The artworks returned include paintings by André Derain, “Still Life With a Bottle,” and Maurice de Vlaminick’s “Landscape by the Water,” which were held by the National Museum of Modern Art, and lithographs from the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts by Pablo Picasso, Pierre-Auguste Renoir, Paul Cézanne and Pierre Bonnard.
A bronze plaque, copper tray, and bowl from the Zagreb Museum of Arts and Crafts was also restored. However, 19 additional pieces from the institution are still being pursued by Reichsman’s lawyer.
The pieces were looted by the ruling Croatian fascist group, the Ustaše.


Reichsman’s aunt Danica Scodoba and father Franz Reichsman fled Europe before the outbreak of World War II to London and the United States, respectively (Franz dropped the extra N from his family name “Reichsmann” when he immigrated).
Reichsman took up the struggle of his aunt, who tried for half a century to reclaim the property. He recalled that “she traveled to Zagreb every summer and met with gallery directors, government officials and anyone she felt could help her in her attempts to retrieve the art.”
Scodoba died more than two decades ago and was unable to witness a Zagreb Municipal Court ruling in December 2020 that determined the pieces legally belonged to her.
A subsequent decision in 2021 affirmed her nephew as her heir.
Reichsman’s Croatian laywer, Monja Matic, said she valued her client’s patience after she had worked on the case for some 20 years.
“This is a positive step in dealing with outstanding Holocaust Era restitution issues in Croatia,” said Gideon Taylor, President of the World Jewish Restitution Organization.
The National Museum of Modern Art said in a Facebook statement it was “working intensively on researching provenance” of artworks suspected of being looted during the war.
The institution regretted that the resolution took as long as it did.
Croatia rebuffed restitution claims by descendants of Holocaust victims until last year when its government and the World Jewish Restitution Organization published a joint report detailing the looting of art by the fascist regime. Stolen property was subsequently seized and nationalized by the country’s communist government.
The Nazi-allied Ustaše regime, which ran the Independent State of Croatia from 1941 to 1945, persecuted and killed hundreds of thousands of ethnic Serbs, Jews, Roma and anti-fascist Croatians.





Art
Can David Salle Teach A.I. How to Create Good Art?
|
The totem pole previously displayed at the Orillia Opera House has officially and permanently been removed from the city’s public art collection.
Created by artists Jimi McKee and Wayne Hill more than 20 years ago, the formerly prominently displayed work tells the story of Orillia from the days of the ancient fishing weirs at The Narrows through the present, in the fashion of totem poles created by west coast Indigenous communities.

Last summer, after the piece developed deep cracks and structural instability, the city received two public complaints regarding the structural issues and its “insensitivity” to west coast Indigenous communities.
Council voted to remove it from the Opera House for health and safety reasons, and to undertake consultation with relevant Indigenous groups regarding potential repairs or updates to the work.
In Friday’s council information package, city staff announced the piece would be permanently removed from the city’s public art collection after consultation with McKee and experts from the Museum of Anthropology at the University of British Columbia (UBC).
“The subject experts from the Museum of Anthropology at UBC support deaccessioning the piece from the city’s collection due to concerns surrounding cultural appropriation and misrepresentation of Indigenous cultures from the West,” staff wrote.
City staff said they support UBC and the city’s art in public places committee (APPC) recommendation to remove the totem pole to help ensure the city’s public spaces are “welcoming and inclusive.”
“Given the feedback from subject experts at UBC, the sacred nature of the totem pole, and the health and safety concerns identified by the joint health and safety committee, staff support the APPC’s recommendation to remove the artwork from the (Opera House) and deaccession the art from the city’s permanent collection,” staff wrote.
“As understanding of Indigenous culture grows, this step looks to ensure the municipality’s public spaces are welcoming and inclusive places for our Indigenous peoples who visit and call Orillia home.”





Art
Opera House totem pole permanently removed from city’s art collection
|
The totem pole previously displayed at the Orillia Opera House has officially and permanently been removed from the city’s public art collection.
Created by artists Jimi McKee and Wayne Hill more than 20 years ago, the formerly prominently displayed work tells the story of Orillia from the days of the ancient fishing weirs at The Narrows through the present, in the fashion of totem poles created by west coast Indigenous communities.

Last summer, after the piece developed deep cracks and structural instability, the city received two public complaints regarding the structural issues and its “insensitivity” to west coast Indigenous communities.
Council voted to remove it from the Opera House for health and safety reasons, and to undertake consultation with relevant Indigenous groups regarding potential repairs or updates to the work.
In Friday’s council information package, city staff announced the piece would be permanently removed from the city’s public art collection after consultation with McKee and experts from the Museum of Anthropology at the University of British Columbia (UBC).
“The subject experts from the Museum of Anthropology at UBC support deaccessioning the piece from the city’s collection due to concerns surrounding cultural appropriation and misrepresentation of Indigenous cultures from the West,” staff wrote.
City staff said they support UBC and the city’s art in public places committee (APPC) recommendation to remove the totem pole to help ensure the city’s public spaces are “welcoming and inclusive.”
“Given the feedback from subject experts at UBC, the sacred nature of the totem pole, and the health and safety concerns identified by the joint health and safety committee, staff support the APPC’s recommendation to remove the artwork from the (Opera House) and deaccession the art from the city’s permanent collection,” staff wrote.
“As understanding of Indigenous culture grows, this step looks to ensure the municipality’s public spaces are welcoming and inclusive places for our Indigenous peoples who visit and call Orillia home.”





-
News15 hours ago
India-Canada news: How the visa office suspension affects travellers
-
News16 hours ago
Why is rent going up faster in Brampton than everywhere else in Canada?
-
Business18 hours ago
Vote “No” to Unifor’s sellout Ford Canada contract! Build rank-and-File committees to fight for a North America-wide strike against the Detroit Three!
-
News14 hours ago
India-Canada news LIVE updates: Justin Trudeau says evidence was shared ‘many weeks ago’
-
News13 hours ago
Canada is still processing visas for Indian nationals
-
Art21 hours ago
Opera House totem pole permanently removed from city’s art collection
-
Art21 hours ago
Can David Salle Teach A.I. How to Create Good Art?
-
Economy18 hours ago
Weak Euro-Area PMI Data Suggest Economy Facing Contraction