With the tablet-like Galaxy Fold, Samsung’s embraced the saying, “Go big or go home.” But its second foldable phone — rumored to be called the — is almost guaranteed to be cheaper, smaller, vertically bending and outfitted with half the cameras. I couldn’t be more excited.
There’s something about foldable phones that still feels magical to me, a sensation that’s hard to come by after nearly 14 years working with phones. I thought I’d seen it all: phones that , , , even phones . But a screen that’s both thin and strong enough to bend in half without breaking feels like the future come to life.
Where the Galaxy Fold was a luxury device designed to make a splash as the first major foldable phone, the Z Flip (internal code name: Motorola Razr as a more affordable phone that highlights not the luxury, but the practicality of a foldable phone. It’s likely Samsung will unveil the Galaxy Z Flip at it .) will take on the
For Samsung, the Z Flip will give the company a dramatic lead in the foldable space, with a large premium device (the Galaxy Fold) followed by a simpler phone with a smaller screen. That’s two pathways for Samsung to secure interest from early adopters. For the rest of us, there are several practical reasons to train our eyes on the Galaxy Z Flip, or whatever it winds up being called, that go way beyond the novelty of a foldable phone.
The first foldable phone with a glass screen?
One rumor suggests that the Galaxy Z Flip will be the. That’s momentous if true. The first generation of foldables use plastic displays, which are much more susceptible to damage.
It’d be interesting to see how completely a glass screen would bend. Could the two sides really fold flat? I’d also love to test firsthand the screen’s ability to keep the electronic display underneath safe from pressure, scratches, drops, dust and water damage.
Foldable phones are still a proof of concept
Right now, foldable phones inhabit a zone of uncertainty. They’re expensive, fragile and few. At this point it’s hard to believe that they could replace the large-screen rectangles we carry today, but there are hints it just might work.
The more foldable phones exist — both in design and in total number of units made — the more we can see if they’ll actually take off. Or if they’re just fun, expensive toys. The Z Flip will be one more effort that helps determine the fate of the category.
The variety we see already in early foldable designs is crucial. We’ve seen commercial devices and prototypes for small foldables like the Razr, which can slip into a pocket, all the way up to a.
It will be through real-time trial and error that the industry determines which designs work best, how to fix common weaknesses and what it is that people actually want in a foldable phone. Only then can companies collectively begin to perfect them.
This is Samsung’s chance to prove it can make a sturdy foldable
An embarrassment for Samsung, the Galaxy Fold’s overshadowed its historic debut. Samsung delayed the initial sale date for months, , scaled back production and dropped two colors. Now with the rumored Galaxy Z Flip, Samsung gets a second chance.
Choosing a radically different design — the Galaxy Z Flip should be a vertical flip phone with a smaller screen than the 7.3-inch Galaxy Fold — gives Samsung an opportunity to apply the lessons it learned from the Fold’s early mistakes.
Tight seals between the display and the folding mechanism, tamper-proof cover material and a reinforced OLED display will go a long way toward reestablishing its reputation in the foldable space. It should also have fewer cameras and a cheaper price tag than the Fold’s $1,980 starting price.
Finding the limits of a small outer screen
Like the Galaxy Fold and the Motorola Razr, the Galaxy Z Flip should have an external display, and I’m interested to see how Samsung will design it. On both the Fold and the Razr, the screen was relatively small, making it fine for viewing alerts and initiating quick tasks, but less ideal to actually use.
If the Galaxy Z Flip goes even smaller than the Galaxy Fold’s 4.6-inch exterior screen, I’ll have a few questions. Will you still be able to use every app on the outer display and open it to reveal the app inside, or will your actions and activities be more limited?
I’ll have to wait for its debut to find out.
Lower prices will make foldable phones more accessible
With the Galaxy Fold priced at $1,980, the foldable Z Flip is expected to cost significantly less.
Samsung was clear about calling the Galaxy Fold a luxury handset, which somewhat cushioned the news that it would cost nearly $2,000. The messaging was this: It’s worth it for a futuristic device that’s big enough to replace a tablet.
The Galaxy Z Flip is sure to be another case entirely. One rumor suggested it could cost around $850, which is half the price of the Motorola Razr and more than half the price of the Galaxy Fold.
We’ll see what happens, but one thing is clear: The more affordable they are, the more Samsung and its competitors will snag more real-world buyers (or “testers”). And the more people who use these early foldable phones, the faster we’ll know where their future truly lies — in pockets and purses all over the globe, or in a museum of futuristic tech that never panned out.
Originally published earlier today.
Apple may have ditched encrypted backups, but Google hasn't – Android Central
A bombshell report from Reuters suggests Apple ditched end-to-end encryption for iCloud backups at the behest of the FBI. Citing several former Apple employees and FBI officials, the publication notes that Apple planned to switch to end-to-end encryption for iCloud — putting it on the same level as iPhones and iPads — but reversed course after consulting with the FBI.
iCloud data is also encrypted by default, but Apple holds a key to decrypt it. So in a scenario where an iCloud user is locked out of their account for whatever reason, Apple has the ability to decrypt the contents of that iCloud library. It is this reasoning that Tim Cook gave in defence of the move last year:
We do this because some users lose or forget their key and then expect help from us to get their data back.
According to Reuters, Apple was considering switching to end-to-end encryption wherein it won’t be able to recover data even when served with a court order. However, the company ultimately decided to not do so:
More than two years ago, Apple told the FBI that it planned to offer users end-to-end encryption when storing their phone data on iCloud, according to one current and three former FBI officials and one current and one former Apple employee.
Under that plan, primarily designed to thwart hackers, Apple would no longer have a key to unlock the encrypted data, meaning it would not be able to turn material over to authorities in a readable form even under court order.
In private talks with Apple soon after, representatives of the FBI’s cyber crime agents and its operational technology division objected to the plan, arguing it would deny them the most effective means for gaining evidence against iPhone-using suspects, the government sources said.
When Apple spoke privately to the FBI about its work on phone security the following year, the end-to-end encryption plan had been dropped, according to the six sources.
It isn’t clear if FBI was able to persuade Apple to not switch, or whether the company decided of its own volition. What is clear though is that Apple has the means to provide law enforcement agencies access to your data should a court require it.
Here’s where Google comes in. The search giant quietly enabled end-to-end encryption for Android backups back in 2018, with a Titan security chip housed in Google’s datacenter ensuring data integrity. The system ensures that only you have access to your data, and should you lose your client device (your phone), there won’t be any way to recover the information as Google doesn’t hold a decrypt key. Here’s how the system works:
Starting in Android Pie, devices can take advantage of a new capability where backed-up application data can only be decrypted by a key that is randomly generated at the client. This decryption key is encrypted using the user’s lockscreen PIN/pattern/passcode, which isn’t known by Google. Then, this passcode-protected key material is encrypted to a Titan security chip on our datacenter floor.
The Titan chip is configured to only release the backup decryption key when presented with a correct claim derived from the user’s passcode. Because the Titan chip must authorize every access to the decryption key, it can permanently block access after too many incorrect attempts at guessing the user’s passcode, thus mitigating brute force attacks.
The limited number of incorrect attempts is strictly enforced by a custom Titan firmware that cannot be updated without erasing the contents of the chip. By design, this means that no one (including Google) can access a user’s backed-up application data without specifically knowing their passcode.
Basically, your phone PIN or passcode acts as a decryption key for the Titan module, and without it you won’t be able to access your data. So if you are looking for end-to-end encryption for backups, Google is the way to go.
A key distinction here is that the system only works for application backups and not content stored in your Google Drive. If you want to secure your data in Drive, you should look at Cryptomator or try rclone if you like to tinker.
Harder Difficulties And Permadeath Return To DOOM Eternal – Nintendo Life
Updated – Wed 22nd Jan, 2020 03:30 GMT: DOOM has always been known for having multiple difficulty settings that will give even the most seasoned gamer a tough time. When DOOM Eternal is released, it’ll continue this tradition. Shacknews recently went hands-on with a preview build of the game and spotted a “top-tier” Nightmare difficulty, which supposedly adds “roguelike” elements to the game. Most of all, you’ll only get one life per run. So, if you die, it’s a complete restart.
It sounds very similar to the Ultra-Nightmare mode in DOOM 2016, which resulted in permadeath and the player losing their save file the second they were killed in battle. According to Shacknews, the latest take on this mode will encourage players to compete against each other (a bit similar to games like Super Mario Maker 2 and Dark Souls) and allow you to also see how far other Doom Slayers got.
Are you looking forward to the arrival of this game? Comment down below.
Report Claims Apple Left a Backdoor Open at FBI's Request – Gizmodo
As tensions escalate in a public spat between Apple and federal officials over the company’s apparent refusal to unlock two iPhones belonging to the Pensacola shooter, a new report claims that Apple recently killed a plan to fully encrypt iPhone backups in iCloud following pressure from government agencies.
Citing Apple and FBI sources familiar with the matter, Reuters reported Tuesday that the company approached the FBI “more than two years ago” to inform the agency that it planned to allow users to end-to-end encrypt the backups, a security measure that would better protect user data but would mean Apple would not be able to access it. Of course, this would also mean that Apple would no longer be able to hand over data to law enforcement officials, a fact that evidently did not sit well with the FBI.
Reuters reported that the project, which it said was “variously code-named Plesio and KeyDrop,” was killed sometime after. While a former Apple employee told Reuters the encryption plan could have been killed for reasons unrelated to the FBI talks, such as users struggling to access to their own data, two former officials with the agency told Reuters that Apple was swayed by the FBI’s position that access to iPhone data can prove to be of paramount importance in some investigations.
Currently, data access can be tricky for the FBI, and relies on a range of tools that can’t always do the trick. Besides exploiting unpatched vulnerabilities to gain access to an iPhone, one of the non-Apple resources that the FBI uses to brute-force its way into iPhones is a tool called GrayKey, a kind of password-cracker. But the process for this tool can be limited by the specific password settings on the phone, such as the length of passcode and whether it’s alphanumeric.
The biggest argument against giving law enforcement a key for the data stored on iPhones is that it could open up devices to attacks by bad actors. In a statement to Gizmodo last week, Apple said “there is no such thing as a backdoor just for the good guys. Backdoors can also be exploited by those who threaten our national security and the data security of our customers.”
Apple’s ditched plans for end-to-end iCloud encryption is, as Reuters noted, a massive benefit to the FBI, which hasn’t been able to get into two phones belonging to the shooter in the Pensacola case. Officials have engaged in some highly questionable dramatics over the company’s refusal to unlock the phones. Yet Apple said last week, specifically with respect to the Pensacola, that FBI requests for data “resulted in many gigabytes of information that we turned over to investigators. In every instance, we responded with all of the information that we had.”
Cryptographer Matthew Green made a really good argument in a 2012 blog post about Apple’s encryption process, namely that it behooves Apple to create a cloud service that prioritizes “recoverability over security.” Much like the current one in place. But that also means that, quite unfortunately, Apple holds your data for you and can share it with the government as it sees fit, as evidenced by the 1,568 cases in which it handed data over user data to the government during the first half of last year alone. It’s not necessarily a backdoor, but it definitely feels like one.
Apple has positioned itself repeatedly as a benevolent data lord that prioritizes the privacy of its users above all else. And certainly in many ways, it does. But with respect to the end-to-end encryption plan, one former FBI official who spoke to Reuters said “Apple was convinced” of the agency’s arguments for maintaining some level of access to iPhone data.
“Outside of that public spat over San Bernardino, Apple gets along with the federal government,” the official said.
We’ve reached out to Apple for comment and will update should we hear back.
Larry Walker becomes second Canadian elected to Baseball Hall of Fame – Yahoo Canada Sports
Apple may have ditched encrypted backups, but Google hasn't – Android Central
The "Twin Threats" Facing Big Oil – OilPrice.com
- Tech22 hours ago
Looks like the party's over, folks: Global PC sales set to shrink as Windows 10 upgrade cycle tails off, says Gartner – The Register
- Media14 hours ago
Britain must work with social media companies to protect citizens – PM's spokesman – National Post
- Science11 hours ago
Greenhouse gas 12,000 times worse than CO2 shows surprise rise in the atmosphere – CBC.ca
- Investment24 hours ago
Alberta Securities Commission warns investors of top investment risks for 2020 – Hanna Herald
- Media9 hours ago
Prince Harry and Meghan’s Plan to Change Their Media Coverage Has Already Hit a Major Snag – Vanity Fair
- Investment23 hours ago
MSCI Urges Industry to Incorporate ESG Considerations into Investment Processes – Financial Post
- Media8 hours ago
UK's Prince Harry and Meghan warn media over paparazzi shots – National Post
- Science23 hours ago
Asteroids: NASA spots asteroid hurtling towards Earth at over 37000 mph – EconoTimes