George Galloway’s Comeback Tests UK’s Febrile Politics Over War in Gaza - BNN Bloomberg | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

George Galloway’s Comeback Tests UK’s Febrile Politics Over War in Gaza – BNN Bloomberg

Published

 on


(Bloomberg) — Left-wing serial disrupter George Galloway’s return to Parliament throws more volatility into the already febrile mix in British politics, as the Israel-Hamas war upends community cohesion and parties grapple for a stance on the conflict that doesn’t alienate supporters.

The 69-year-old’s by-election victory in Rochdale, northwest England was yet another dramatic moment in a parliamentary cycle with no shortage of them. Though it provides limited lessons for the Conservative-Labour battle in the looming general election, few Members of Parliament will welcome Galloway’s amplified voice causing trouble ahead of the vote. He used his victory speech early Friday to attack those parties’ leaders.

“Keir Starmer and Rishi Sunak are two cheeks of the same backside and they both got well and truly spanked tonight,” Galloway said after the seventh parliamentary election win in his constituency-hopping career. He began his address taking aim at Labour’s internal strife on the war in the Middle East, saying: “Keir Starmer, this is for Gaza.”

It will be Starmer who feels the immediate pain from Galloway’s reemergence. Kicked out of the party about two decades ago, Galloway has pent-up resentment, and his political views overlap with Labour’s socialist wing that Starmer has worked hard to quash since taking over in 2020.

Gaza is Starmer’s biggest vulnerability. The conflict has poked at long-running Labour pressure points, including allegations of antisemitism that dogged the party under his left-wing predecessor Jeremy Corbyn.

Starmer’s electoral pitch, which has seen Labour hold a lead fluctuating around 20 points over Sunak’s Tories for months, is built around how much he has changed the party since the Corbyn era — it’s more pro-business, and in Starmer’s own words, it’s now “about government not protest.”

The task of presenting Labour as a government-in-waiting has rubbed plenty of nerves, especially on the party’s left. Starmer’s reluctance to call for an immediate cease-fire in Gaza in November, which angered his MPs, was at least in part about signaling how Labour has changed, showing voters the party was ready to act like a government on complicated foreign policy.

“Although most Labour supporters don’t take a side in the current conflict in the Middle East, those who do — both Muslim and non-Muslim — are much more likely to support the Palestinian side,” John Curtice, a professor of politics at Strathclyde University, told the BBC. He said the wider electoral impact will be limited because Labour typically has big majorities in constituencies with large Muslim communities.

Labour’s tensions spilled out in Rochdale, and Galloway took advantage. Though it was too late to change the ballot papers, Labour had no candidate after ditching Azhar Ali over remarks he made implying that Israel was complicit in Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack. While Starmer’s party will fancy its chances of recovering a seat it had held since 2010 at the general election, Galloway’s win points to months of discomfort.

There were echoes of Galloway’s past wins in the Rochdale election, which he won with a 40% vote share, on a turnout of just under 40%. He was expelled from Labour in 2003, while the party was in government under Tony Blair, over his condemnation of the Iraq war. He later won two parliamentary elections for the Respect Party — in east London in 2005 and then in Bradford, northern England, in 2012. He has long been criticized for whipping up division, particularly in areas with substantial Muslim populations.

For years before that, though, Galloway was building a reputation as a renegade voice. He famously met Iraqi President Saddam Hussein in Baghdad in 1994, three years after the first Gulf War in which allied forces had driven Iraqi invaders out of Kuwait – a conflict he opposed. “I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability,” Galloway told Hussein.

He gained a wider audience in 2005, when he appeared before a US Senate hearing to counter allegations he had profited from sales of Iraqi oil. Galloway denied that and told the panel that “$8.8 billion of Iraq’s wealth went missing on your watch” and that the “real sanctions busters were your own companies with the connivance of your own government.”

The question hanging over British politics is how much Galloway, in the social media era, can replicate his record of bending narratives. In Rochdale, he said his Workers Party of Britain will target more seats in the general election. When it was put to him that a single MP could have little influence, he replied: “Do you think so, do you really think so?”

That’s a warning that will reverberate beyond Labour. For all their politicking, little separates them on the Israel-Hamas war — Labour, the Tories and the Scottish National Party all want some sort of cease-fire in Gaza, though for party-management reasons, they differ on the wording.

Sunak’s Conservatives are embroiled in an Islamophobia row related to protests around the conflict. The furor was triggered when Tory MP Lee Anderson, who just weeks ago was the Conservative Party’s deputy chairman, said Islamists have “got control of London” and that the Labour mayor Sadiq Khan — a Muslim — had “given our capital city away to his mates.”

He was suspended from the parliamentary party, but Sunak faced a backlash especially from right-wing Tories who want to take over after the election.

Then there’s the wider backdrop of intimidation against MPs, which saw the government promise more funding for security and Sunak warn this week that “mob rule is replacing democratic rule.” Adding a voice like Galloway’s into the political zeitgeist risks fueling extremes on both sides of his argument.

While Galloway has denied antisemitism, a spokesperson for the Board of Deputies of British Jews called his victory a “dark day for the Jewish community.”

Critics point to his short-term appeal where he won in the past — voters in Bradford and Bethnal Green removed him at their first opportunity — and the divisiveness that alienates all but his most ardent followers.

But it’s events in Gaza that are likely to have the biggest say over Galloway’s impact. A pause in the fighting there in November took some of the heat out of British politics, and it won’t be just Starmer hoping that talks about a cease-fire are successful in the coming days. 

“There aren’t 100 George Galloways, there are not even three, four, five, six,” John McTernan, a former adviser to Blair, told BBC radio. The Rochdale result, he said, was down to parties unable to reach a unified voice that matches the public view on Gaza, that the fighting should stop. “That’s a force in British politics that nobody in Parliament is able to channel properly.”

–With assistance from Alex Morales.

©2024 Bloomberg L.P.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Politics

Trump is consistently inconsistent on abortion and reproductive rights

Published

 on

 

CHICAGO (AP) — Donald Trump has had a tough time finding a consistent message to questions about abortion and reproductive rights.

The former president has constantly shifted his stances or offered vague, contradictory and at times nonsensical answers to questions on an issue that has become a major vulnerability for Republicans in this year’s election. Trump has been trying to win over voters, especially women, skeptical about his views, especially after he nominated three Supreme Court justices who helped overturn the nationwide right to abortion two years ago.

The latest example came this week when the Republican presidential nominee said some abortion laws are “too tough” and would be “redone.”

“It’s going to be redone,” he said during a Fox News town hall that aired Wednesday. “They’re going to, you’re going to, you end up with a vote of the people. They’re too tough, too tough. And those are going to be redone because already there’s a movement in those states.”

Trump did not specify if he meant he would take some kind of action if he wins in November, and he did not say which states or laws he was talking about. He did not elaborate on what he meant by “redone.”

He also seemed to be contradicting his own stand when referencing the strict abortion bans passed in Republican-controlled states since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Trump recently said he would vote against a constitutional amendment on the Florida ballot that is aimed at overturning the state’s six-week abortion ban. That decision came after he had criticized the law as too harsh.

Trump has shifted between boasting about nominating the justices who helped strike down federal protections for abortion and trying to appear more neutral. It’s been an attempt to thread the divide between his base of anti-abortion supporters and the majority of Americans who support abortion rights.

About 6 in 10 Americans think their state should generally allow a person to obtain a legal abortion if they don’t want to be pregnant for any reason, according to a July poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Voters in seven states, including some conservative ones, have either protected abortion rights or defeated attempts to restrict them in statewide votes over the past two years.

Trump also has been repeating the narrative that he returned the question of abortion rights to states, even though voters do not have a direct say on that or any other issue in about half the states. This is particularly true for those living in the South, where Republican-controlled legislatures, many of which have been gerrymandered to give the GOP disproportionate power, have enacted some of the strictest abortion bans since Roe v. Wade was overturned.

Currently, 13 states have banned abortion at all stages of pregnancy, while four more ban it after six weeks — before many women know they’re pregnant.

Meanwhile, anti-abortion groups and their Republican allies in state governments are using an array of strategies to counter proposed ballot initiatives in at least eight states this year.

Here’s a breakdown of Trump’s fluctuating stances on reproductive rights.

Flip-flopping on Florida

On Tuesday, Trump claimed some abortion laws are “too tough” and would be “redone.”

But in August, Trump said he would vote against a state ballot measure that is attempting to repeal the six-week abortion ban passed by the Republican-controlled Legislature and signed by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis.

That came a day after he seemed to indicate he would vote in favor of the measure. Trump previously called Florida’s six-week ban a “terrible mistake” and too extreme. In an April Time magazine interview, Trump repeated that he “thought six weeks is too severe.”

Trump on vetoing a national ban

Trump’s latest flip-flopping has involved his views on a national abortion ban.

During the Oct. 1 vice presidential debate, Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social that he would veto a national abortion ban: “Everyone knows I would not support a federal abortion ban, under any circumstances, and would, in fact, veto it.”

This came just weeks after Trump repeatedly declined to say during the presidential debate with Democrat Kamala Harris whether he would veto a national abortion ban if he were elected.

Trump’s running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, said in an interview with NBC News before the presidential debate that Trump would veto a ban. In response to debate moderators prompting him about Vance’s statement, Trump said: “I didn’t discuss it with JD, in all fairness. And I don’t mind if he has a certain view, but I don’t think he was speaking for me.”

‘Pro-choice’ to 15-week ban

Trump’s shifting abortion policy stances began when the former reality TV star and developer started flirting with running for office.

He once called himself “very pro-choice.” But before becoming president, Trump said he “would indeed support a ban,” according to his book “The America We Deserve,” which was published in 2000.

In his first year as president, he said he was “pro-life with exceptions” but also said “there has to be some form of punishment” for women seeking abortions — a position he quickly reversed.

At the 2018 annual March for Life, Trump voiced support for a federal ban on abortion on or after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

More recently, Trump suggested in March that he might support a national ban on abortions around 15 weeks before announcing that he instead would leave the matter to the states.

Views on abortion pills, prosecuting women

In the Time interview, Trump said it should be left up to the states to decide whether to prosecute women for abortions or to monitor women’s pregnancies.

“The states are going to make that decision,” Trump said. “The states are going to have to be comfortable or uncomfortable, not me.”

Democrats have seized on the comments he made in 2016, saying “there has to be some form of punishment” for women who have abortions.

Trump also declined to comment on access to the abortion pill mifepristone, claiming that he has “pretty strong views” on the matter. He said he would make a statement on the issue, but it never came.

Trump responded similarly when asked about his views on the Comstock Act, a 19th century law that has been revived by anti-abortion groups seeking to block the mailing of mifepristone.

IVF and contraception

In May, Trump said during an interview with a Pittsburgh television station that he was open to supporting regulations on contraception and that his campaign would release a policy on the issue “very shortly.” He later said his comments were misinterpreted.

In the KDKA interview, Trump was asked, “Do you support any restrictions on a person’s right to contraception?”

“We’re looking at that and I’m going to have a policy on that very shortly,” Trump responded.

Trump has not since released a policy statement on contraception.

Trump also has offered contradictory statements on in vitro fertilization.

During the Fox News town hall, which was taped Tuesday, Trump declared that he is “the father of IVF,” despite acknowledging during his answer that he needed an explanation of IVF in February after the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law.

Trump said he instructed Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., to “explain IVF very quickly” to him in the aftermath of the ruling.

As concerns over access to fertility treatments rose, Trump pledged to promote IVF by requiring health insurance companies or the federal government to pay for it. Such a move would be at odds with the actions of much of his own party.

Even as the Republican Party has tried to create a national narrative that it is receptive to IVF, these messaging efforts have been undercut by GOP state lawmakers, Republican-dominated courts and anti-abortion leaders within the party’s ranks, as well as opposition to legislative attempts to protect IVF access.

___

The Associated Press receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP’s democracy initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan Party’s Scott Moe, NDP’s Carla Beck react to debate |

Published

 on

 

Saskatchewan‘s two main political party leaders faced off in the only televised debate in the lead up to the provincial election on Oct. 28. Saskatchewan Party Leader Scott Moe and NDP Leader Carla Beck say voters got a chance to see their platforms. (Oct. 17, 2024)

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan political leaders back on campaign trail after election debate

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan‘s main political leaders are back on the campaign trail today after hammering each other in a televised debate.

Saskatchewan Party Leader Scott Moe is set to make an announcement in Moose Jaw.

Saskatchewan NDP Leader Carla Beck is to make stops in Regina, Saskatoon and Prince Albert.

During Wednesday night’s debate, Beck emphasized her plan to make life more affordable and said people deserve better than an out-of-touch Saskatchewan Party government.

Moe said his party wants to lower taxes and put money back into people’s pockets.

Election day is Oct. 28.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version