Globe editorial: Don't block investment in Canadian oil. Do push it to slash emissions. And use lots less of it in Canada - The Globe and Mail | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Investment

Globe editorial: Don't block investment in Canadian oil. Do push it to slash emissions. And use lots less of it in Canada – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


Picture this: It’s 2035 and Canada is well on its way to reaching its climate goals.

The country’s power system is almost entirely clean – hydro and nuclear, and wind and solar. Natural gas has dwindled. Domestic oil demand is also down a lot, as electric vehicles – a government-subsidized curiosity back in 2022 – are commonplace.

But this picture of 2035 might also surprise: Canada still produces a lot of oil and gas – and remains a top exporter of both fossil fuels.

The policy and legal foundations for this potential future go back to the late 2010s. Of particular note was what happened in 2018: Ottawa imposed an economy-wide and escalating price on carbon; invested many billions in the export-capacity boosting Trans Mountain oil pipeline and expansion; and, with little public attention, started drawing up new climate rules for reviews of proposed industrial projects, dubbed the strategic assessment of climate change.

Some said it was contradictory for Canada to aim to slash greenhouse gas emissions at home, while continuing to sell volumes of gas and oil – the latter a source of national wealth that accounted for one-seventh of the country’s exports.

This spring, 2022, the many details of how to make these two big goals real started to take clearer shape.

Ottawa’s latest plan to reduce emissions landed in late March. It sketched out aggressive cuts in oil and gas emissions – but not production. The hope is to transform Canada’s relatively dirty oil sands into something relatively far better. In early April’s budget, there was $7.1-billion through 2030 to split the cost with industry to build up carbon capture.

On April 6 came another policy puzzle piece, and two examples of how more oil can – and can’t – work.

Seeing a global market that will in years ahead move away from fossil fuels, Ottawa is working on standards for “best-in-class” projects “to transform Canada into the cleanest global oil and gas producer.”

That’s why Ottawa approved the Bay du Nord offshore project in Newfoundland, which could start pumping oil in 2028, with peak production of 200,000 barrels a day. Per-barrel emissions would be low. At the same time, Ottawa told Suncor much more work was required on its plan to mine new ground, and 225,000 barrels of bitumen a day, in the oil sands in 2030, as old mines tap out.

Suncor’s initial submission included hefty climate-heating emissions of three megatonnes of carbon a year – about 12 times that of Bay du Nord. Ottawa told Suncor the plan would likely be rejected; Suncor asked for more time to come up with a smarter, lower-emission plan.

Ottawa’s response to Suncor and Bay du Nord – an openness to new oil projects, if they meet reasonable yet top-tier climate standards – is the right approach.

This is the bargain and the reality: Canada can only affect demand within its borders. That’s the basis of international climate deals from Kyoto onward. We need to hammer down domestic use of fossil fuels, but so long as global demand continues, Canada should have no qualms about capturing an ever greater share of it – while aiming to make this country’s oil the world’s least polluting.

In the International Energy Agency’s reckoning of net zero in 2050, the world will use a quarter of the oil it does today, and half the gas. The industry will shrink. Competition will intensify. For Canada, getting ready, and fast, is essential.

It’s time to get more ambitious. The oil sands in large part exist because of government support. Back in the 1960s, Suncor was the first miner of the vast expanses of bitumen on the banks of the Athabasca River. This was a lead-gold alchemy, turning tarry muck into synthetic oil to be refined into gasoline. Canada showed real tech savvy.

Let’s do it again. The oil sands industry promises net zero in 2050. Why not 2040?

This sort of politics isn’t easy to talk about today. Conservatives shout that Liberals are anti-oil, which isn’t quite true. But the Liberals mostly want to talk about climate – their brand – and not how important the oil industry is to our economy. The way forward, for a country built on natural resources, is in the difficult middle ground.

Picture this: It’s 2035, and Canada uses barely any fossil fuels at home and still exports a bunch of oil and gas. And the oil sands are five years – not 15 – away from net zero.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Energy stocks help lift S&P/TSX composite, U.S. stock markets also up

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was higher in late-morning trading, helped by strength in energy stocks, while U.S. stock markets also moved up.

The S&P/TSX composite index was up 34.91 points at 23,736.98.

In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 178.05 points at 41,800.13. The S&P 500 index was up 28.38 points at 5,661.47, while the Nasdaq composite was up 133.17 points at 17,725.30.

The Canadian dollar traded for 73.56 cents US compared with 73.57 cents US on Monday.

The November crude oil contract was up 68 cents at US$69.70 per barrel and the October natural gas contract was up three cents at US$2.40 per mmBTU.

The December gold contract was down US$7.80 at US$2,601.10 an ounce and the December copper contract was up a penny at US$4.28 a pound.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 17, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:GSPTSE, TSX:CADUSD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

S&P/TSX gains almost 100 points, U.S. markets also higher ahead of rate decision

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Strength in the base metal and technology sectors helped Canada’s main stock index gain almost 100 points on Friday, while U.S. stock markets climbed to their best week of the year.

“It’s been almost a complete opposite or retracement of what we saw last week,” said Philip Petursson, chief investment strategist at IG Wealth Management.

In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 297.01 points at 41,393.78. The S&P 500 index was up 30.26 points at 5,626.02, while the Nasdaq composite was up 114.30 points at 17,683.98.

The S&P/TSX composite index closed up 93.51 points at 23,568.65.

While last week saw a “healthy” pullback on weaker economic data, this week investors appeared to be buying the dip and hoping the central bank “comes to the rescue,” said Petursson.

Next week, the U.S. Federal Reserve is widely expected to cut its key interest rate for the first time in several years after it significantly hiked it to fight inflation.

But the magnitude of that first cut has been the subject of debate, and the market appears split on whether the cut will be a quarter of a percentage point or a larger half-point reduction.

Petursson thinks it’s clear the smaller cut is coming. Economic data recently hasn’t been great, but it hasn’t been that bad either, he said — and inflation may have come down significantly, but it’s not defeated just yet.

“I think they’re going to be very steady,” he said, with one small cut at each of their three decisions scheduled for the rest of 2024, and more into 2025.

“I don’t think there’s a sense of urgency on the part of the Fed that they have to do something immediately.

A larger cut could also send the wrong message to the markets, added Petursson: that the Fed made a mistake in waiting this long to cut, or that it’s seeing concerning signs in the economy.

It would also be “counter to what they’ve signaled,” he said.

More important than the cut — other than the new tone it sets — will be what Fed chair Jerome Powell has to say, according to Petursson.

“That’s going to be more important than the size of the cut itself,” he said.

In Canada, where the central bank has already cut three times, Petursson expects two more before the year is through.

“Here, the labour situation is worse than what we see in the United States,” he said.

The Canadian dollar traded for 73.61 cents US compared with 73.58 cents US on Thursday.

The October crude oil contract was down 32 cents at US$68.65 per barrel and the October natural gas contract was down five cents at US$2.31 per mmBTU.

The December gold contract was up US$30.10 at US$2,610.70 an ounce and the December copper contract was up four cents US$4.24 a pound.

— With files from The Associated Press

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 13, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:GSPTSE, TSX:CADUSD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

S&P/TSX composite down more than 200 points, U.S. stock markets also fall

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was down more than 200 points in late-morning trading, weighed down by losses in the technology, base metal and energy sectors, while U.S. stock markets also fell.

The S&P/TSX composite index was down 239.24 points at 22,749.04.

In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was down 312.36 points at 40,443.39. The S&P 500 index was down 80.94 points at 5,422.47, while the Nasdaq composite was down 380.17 points at 16,747.49.

The Canadian dollar traded for 73.80 cents US compared with 74.00 cents US on Thursday.

The October crude oil contract was down US$1.07 at US$68.08 per barrel and the October natural gas contract was up less than a penny at US$2.26 per mmBTU.

The December gold contract was down US$2.10 at US$2,541.00 an ounce and the December copper contract was down four cents at US$4.10 a pound.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 6, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:GSPTSE, TSX:CADUSD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version