Globe editorial: The economy according to Justin Trudeau | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

Globe editorial: The economy according to Justin Trudeau

Published

 on

The Trudeau government’s economic catechism goes something like this. In the years before Canadians came to their senses and returned the Liberals to power, the nation suffered under the Conservatives’ obsession with balancing the federal budget. The economy stalled, prosperity was eroded and working Canadians suffered. The Liberals rescued the country from that economic purgatory by focusing their efforts on the middle class, and those working hard to join it. Amen.

Last week, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was back at it, reciting that catechism in a speech that was nominally about Australia-Canada relations. “We saw what happened in 2008 and its aftermath,” he said, “ … when GDP started to rise again, wages stayed stagnant. Inequality rose and a lot of hard-working people were being left behind. The middle class was being hollowed out, and people were growing disillusioned.” A compelling catechism indeed – if true. Mr. Trudeau made three claims: wages did not rise; inequality increased; and the middle class was shrinking in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. But the numbers do not back up those claims.

Let’s start with the claim of stagnant wages. The average hourly wage, adjusted for inflation, rose by 1.04 per cent a year, after 2007 through to 2015, the last year of the Harper government, according to Statistics Canada data. That doesn’t sound terribly impressive, but the pace of wage gains during that period was higher than in the preceding nine years (an average annual increase of 0.56 per cent) or during the first term of the Trudeau government (the average hourly wage rose by 0.68 per cent after 2015 through to 2019).

Only if the pandemic years of 2020 and 2021 are included does the Trudeau government’s record on wages best that of the Harper government, barely, with a 1.09-per-cent annual increase over six years. But that is a distorted picture. Wages rose in 2020 and remained high in 2021, largely because huge numbers of lower-paid workers lost their jobs and so were not counted in the average.

Mr. Trudeau’s first claim is not only incorrect, it is a reverse of the truth: wage growth slowed under the Liberals’ supposed growth-boosting policies. Strike one.

What about inequality, supposedly rising during the Harper years? The gold standard of measuring inequality is the Gini coefficient (a society with perfect income equality would have a Gini coefficient of zero.) During the Harper years, Canada’s Gini coefficient barely budged, and actually declined slightly once government programs and taxes are taken into account, Statscan data say. So, inequality dropped marginally – again, a stark contrast with Mr. Trudeau’s claim. So far, the Prime Minister is 0 for 2.

Last, Mr. Trudeau claims the middle class shrank after the financial crisis. Again, the statistics say the opposite. From 2008 through to 2015, the share of income for middle-income deciles, including the effects of government transfers and taxes, rose marginally. The highest-income decile saw its share of income decline modestly. Mr. Trudeau is 0 for 3.

If Mr. Trudeau were merely reciting his catechism as an ego-bolstering exercise, none of the above would much matter. The problem is such misinformation remains the basis for the Liberals’ economic approach of higher spending, high taxes, more regulations and more government intervention.

Inflation-adjusted gross domestic product per capita (a reasonable stand-in for living standards) doesn’t make an appearance in the Liberal economic catechism, and for good reason – the Trudeau government’s performance on that measure is breathtakingly bad, and getting worse.

A TD Economics report this month had two sobering statistics. The first was to point out that Canada enjoyed an edge in GDP per capita over most advanced economies, and was about even with the United States, as recently as the early 1980s. By 2000, the U.S. had pulled ahead and other advanced countries had closed the gap with Canada. By 2022, the U.S. and other advanced economies had pulled further ahead.

Recent history is bad; the future looks worse. Real GDP per capita has contracted for the past three quarters, and is projected to decline through to the end of 2024, TD says. All told, that is two years of a shrinking standard of living.

Mr. Trudeau, understandably one supposes, would rather dwell on the largely mythical shortcomings of the Harper government than face the fact that his economic program has been in fact a formula for declining prosperity – the very sin for which he wrongly excoriates his predecessor.

 

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version