Connect with us

Tech

Google Missed A Major Opportunity With The Pixel 6 Pro – Forbes

Published

 on


Google has made a lot of noise about packing its new Pixel 6 with features that you won’t find on rival devices. But there is one glaring omission: 3D facial recognition. 

Despite leaked images that heavily indicated that the Pixel 6 will have 3D face unlock, it wasn’t included in the final device. It appears that the Google flagship doesn’t house the necessary radar technology to make 3D face unlock possible, which would include a dot projector, flood illuminator and IR cameras alongside the selfie camera. 

We may have to wait for a teardown to see if Google has stealthily added that hardware to the Pixel 6, but the lack of a notch that would house all of those sensors is a clear giveaway. It’s a disappointing omission because face unlock was one of the major upsides of the Pixel 4 when it launched, particularly because so few other Android devices had a similar feature. 

In 2021 facial biometric security remains largely unused technology in the Android world. It also happened to be one of the few perfectly executed features of the Pixel 4, which had fundamental problems as a handset. There are some technological hurdles that have to be cleared to make face unlock work – Google spent millions on developing its own version. Some display design principles need to be compromised too.

But the pay off is clearly worth it. The speed, ease and lack of interaction needed to unlock the phone, pay for things or verify user identity for necessary apps, isn’t quite the same with a fingerprint reader. 

When the Pixel 4’s face unlock is combined with Google’s in-house Soli technology – which preps the biometric sensors for use when it recognises a hand reaching for the phone – the experience is that of an elite smartphone. Breezing through London Underground with a glance, instead of fumbling to get a successful read with the under-screen fingerprint scanner, is simply better. Logging into password vaults, banking apps and anything that requires payment – without having to do anything other than look at your phone – is the superior option.

Regardless of how well implemented, a fingerprint scanner – particularly one under the screen – can often be much slower. Reviewers have pointed out that the fingerprint reader of the Pixel 6 can be slow and sometimes misreads attempts, which I’d say is fairly common for most in-screen fingerprint readers on smartphones.

In the time it takes to press your finger to the display – and hopefully find the right spot – the authentication is already completed with face unlock. Those seconds you save aren’t necessarily important, but the speed and accuracy of face unlock really adds to the idea of a premium experience. You feel like you have something genuinely futuristic and therefore you have spent your money well. Repeated unsuccessful fingerprint reads doesn’t. 

I understand why Google would leave it out. You need a significant notch to house all of those sensors, and it likely would mean a more expensive Pixel when Google clearly planned to price its flagship competitively. I suspect the huge increase in mask usage also informed Google’s decision, especially since Apple has struggled with finding a solution for masks interfering with Face ID.

Google said last year that removing face unlock in the Pixel 5 was about balancing premium features in the device. “We really felt that it was a good trade-off for users to go with the rear fingerprint sensors so that we could enable some of these other premium features that users are looking for in a device,” a Google product manager told the PA news agency (via TechRadar). This sounds like a roundabout way of saying costs had to be cut and that means some features had to be axed. Considering the Pixel 5 is a decidedly less technically impressive device than the Pixel 6, that’s not surprising. 

But if Google wants to cement its place at the top of the Android world with fast Android updates, unique AI-powered features and longer OS support, then it also needs to bring back one of the most premium features it has ever designed.

Got a tip or thoughts on the Pixel 6? Get in touch on Facebook or Instagram .

More on Forbes

Forget The Pixel 6 Specs, Google Has Bigger Plans

Has The Pixel 6 Finally Solved Google’s Recurring Pixel Problem?

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Is Ameca the future of AI in robots? – CGTN

Published

 on


01:05

This robot has human-like facial expressions and hand gestures. Could it be the future of AI technology? Meet Ameca, and learn her purpose.

Check out The China Report, our new weekly newsletter. Subscribe here!

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Facebook’s struggle with Gateway Pundit highlights challenge of containing disinformation

Published

 on

The Gateway Pundit, a far-right news site, has used its Facebook page – with more than 630,000 followers – to post bogus stories alleging the 2020 election was stolen from former President Donald Trump. Some commenters responded with threats of violence.

After Gateway Pundit posted a June story on Facebook that included debunked claims of voter fraud in Arizona, a commenter said the governor and secretary of state should be “fed feet first through a woodchipper.” A story featuring false claims of vote-rigging in Fulton County, Georgia, drew comments on Facebook calling for an election worker to be hanged or “shot for treason.”

For years, Facebook has imposed sanctions on Gateway Pundit’s account to limit the spread of its misinformation. But Gateway Pundit still uses its Facebook page to amplify its reporting and raise money: The page features a prominent appeal asking readers to buy subscriptions to support its “battle for survival.”

Gateway Pundit’s continuing presence on Facebook illustrates the platform’s worldwide struggle to stop the spread of disinformation and to balance content-policing with free-speech concerns. Facebook has taken a barrage of criticism this year from critics and a company whistleblower who say its practices stoke anger and division to increase user engagement.

In a statement to Reuters, Facebook said it seeks to label misinformation and “reduce its spread.” The company uses fact checkers and artificial intelligence to identify false or misleading material and warns readers who try to share it. Facebook partners with about 80 organizations, including Reuters, to independently fact-check content that appears on its site.

Facebook said repeat offenders, such as the Gateway Pundit, are subject to tougher sanctions, including having their posts pushed to the bottom of users’ news feeds (the lists of posts they see), and being barred from Facebook’s content-promotion services.

But Facebook almost never removes the offending posts or shuts down the pages – that happens only in rare circumstances, such as posts pushing COVID misinformation, the company says. Sites that directly threaten violence also may be shut down, but account holders are not held responsible for comments on their pages.

Twitter has taken a more aggressive approach with Gateway Pundit, permanently suspending the @gatewaypundit account of Jim Hoft, the site’s founder and editor, as well as the account of his twin brother, Joe Hoft, a writer.

Jim Hoft declined a request for comment; Joe Hoft did not respond to comment requests.

Facebook and Twitter both have been blasted by right-leaning politicians for what they call censorship of conservative voices. Jim Hoft testified in a 2018 congressional hearing that his site’s traffic from Facebook had tanked after the platform imposed restrictions on the spread of the Pundit’s content, saying such sanctions make “book burning” look benign.

Yet Gateway Pundit’s traffic has boomed: In the wake of the 2020 election, it peaked at nearly 50 million visits a month, according to one estimate, illustrating the power of viral disinformation. Reuters found the site’s often-debunked election-fraud claims were cited in about 100 of more than 800 threatening or harassing messages sent to election officials since last November.

Facebook has long recognized Gateway Pundit as a source of false and divisive content. A July 2019 internal report on “potential misinformation and polarization risks” listed the site as one of Facebook’s “common misinfo offenders.” The report was among a cache of documents provided to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Congress by Frances Haugen, a former Facebook product manager who left the company in May and has been a leading public critic of its practices.

Reuters identified a dozen Gateway Pundit stories on Facebook that contained baseless election-fraud claims, two of which Facebook labeled as containing false information. Under four of those stories, nine Facebook users called for the execution of election workers or officials. Only one of those four stories was flagged by Facebook for containing false information.

In August, Gateway Pundit reported that a Milwaukee official had been threatened after being featured in Pundit stories alleging voter fraud. The result? Even more threats. On the site’s Facebook page, one reader commented: “There is only one punishment acceptable for traitors, being drawn and quartered.”

(Reporting by Peter Eisler; additional reporting by Jazon Szep; editing by Brian Thevenot)

Continue Reading

Tech

PlayStation is reportedly working on its own version of Xbox Game Pass – MobileSyrup

Published

 on


Sony is reportedly working on its own PlayStation video game subscription service to take on Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass, according to Bloomberg‘s very reliable Jason Schreier.

Codenamed internally at Sony as ‘Spartacus,’ subscribers would pay a monthly fee to subscribe to a library of new and classic titles. According to Bloomberg‘s sources, the service will be available on the PlayStation 4 and the PlayStation 5.

The service, reported to launch this spring, will merge PlayStation Plus and PlayStation Now under one subscription platform. PlayStation Plus is Sony’s online gaming platform that offers some monthly titles for free, and PlayStation Now lets users stream games via the internet and download select games. Bloomberg says that this new service will still be called PlayStation Plus, but the PlayStation Now brand will be phased out.

Spartacus is rumoured to feature three tiers: the first will offer a standard PlayStation Plus subscription, the second reportedly gives access to PlayStation 4 and PlayStation 5 titles and the third features a library of PS1, PS2, PS3 and PSP games, game streaming and demos.

This isn’t the first time we’ve heard about Sony’s Xbox Game Pass-like ambitions. According to David Jaffe, the God of War series’ outspoken creator, Sony has been working on a “counterpunch” to Xbox Game Pass for quite some time.

Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass Ultimate subscription tier remains one of the best deals in gaming, especially with the addition of Forza Horizon 5 and, soon, Halo Infinite, the Xbox brand’s marquee title.

Xbox Game Pass is available on Xbox One, Xbox Series X/S, PC, Android, and iOS in betaGame Pass for Console and Game Pass for PC each cost $11.99/month.

Meanwhile, Xbox Game Pass Ultimate costs $16.99/month and is required for streaming. On top of that, this tier includes Game Pass for both Console and PC, an Xbox Live Gold subscription and access to EA Play.

It’s unclear how much Sony plans to charge for its new expanded PlayStation Plus offering. The service currently costs $69.99/year.

Source: Bloomberg

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending