Media
Group of Mexican workers issues letter to the President of Mexico
|
Canada – Today, on International Migrants Day, Mexican migrant workers in Canada’s Seasonal Agricultural Workers Program (SAWP) are demanding that the Mexican government protect their rights.
Leonel Nava, who drafted the letter, is a migrant worker who worked in the Christmas tree sector in Nova Scotia this past season.
Here is an excerpt from the letter, which he plans to personally deliver to the Mexican President:
“Citizen President of the Republic of the United Mexican States
Andrés Manuel López Obrador and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada.
Dear President and Prime Minister:
A group of Migrant Farm Workers present the reality of working and living in Canada and demand Permanent Residency for All,
Since its creation, this program was only created to satisfy the lack of Canadian labor and to be able to supply its internal demand for food, and from there it has escalated to a billion dollar industry, all thanks to the migration of labor to perform field work that really requires physical and mental effort due to the distance from family, customs, culture, friends, food and the lack of knowledge of the language for many.
President, you are responsible for our welfare, so we ask you to do the following:
– Pressure the Canadian government to implement and enforce the National Housing Standards;
– Protect us at work by implementing an anonymous system to report abusive employers who put our safety and/or our jobs at risk. We ask that when we make a complaint, you stand up and represent us;
– Ensure greater job security and put an end to the practice of employers making observations in our files that are not factual and often result in workers being expelled from the program without the possibility of appeal or transfer;
– Ensure that Mexican consulates in Canada do their job to look after the welfare of Mexican workers abroad, that the consuls have contact with us not with the employers, create a commission of migrant workers to evaluate the work of the consulate because no one supervises them and they can do what they want with us,
– Allow us to represent ourselves and our interests in contract negotiations;
– Provide education about the contracts we sign, what our rights are in Canada and support us in accessing and enforcing our rights;
– Allow access to benefits that we pay for through deductions and taxes, such as: regular unemployment insurance benefits, parental benefits as it was before the amendment to the law in 2012, full pension benefits and survivor benefits for our families in case of death, tax benefits for our children that any Canadian citizen can get and for that reason;
– Ask the Canadian government to grant Permanent Resident Status to all immigrants upon arrival, including seasonal agricultural workers.
As agricultural workers in Canada we experience abuses, unjustified dismissals, deportations, mistreatment and above all intimidation, because without permanent status in Canada we have to endure all of the above with the vague hope that next year we will return.
Pressure the Canadian government to change our status and surprise consular visits to the farms to see the reality of the precariousness of living in overcrowding and sometimes even among pests as well as the lack of interest in health on the part of employers, for example, working without personal protection or any training in handling chemicals, just to mention some of many.
We invite you to be part of history and be part of the social justice we deserve and give us the place we deserve both in Mexico and Canada.
With thanks in advance and best regards
Sincerely,
Agricultural Workers in Canada”
No One Is Illegal – Nova Scotia Canada (NOII-NS) supports and endorses the demands of the Mexican workers. Moreover, NOII-NS echoes the call of migrant workers in Nova Scotia for immediate access to the public health care system, which in the province of Nova Scotia is not provided to seasonal agricultural workers. This was one of the top provincial priorities of migrant workers in Nova Scotia according to a survey conducted by NOII-NS in 2021.
Media
India’s media – captured and censored
|
Across almost every form of media in India – social, broadcast and print – Narendra Modi and the BJP hold sway.
With India amid a national election campaign, its news media is in sharp focus. Until recently it was believed that the sheer diversity of outlets ensured a range of perspectives, but now, India’s mainstream media has largely been co-opted by the Bharatiya Janata Party and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Just how did the media in India get to this point and what does it mean for the upcoming elections?
Featuring:
Ravish Kumar – Former Host, NDTV
Shashi Shekhar Vempati – Former CEO, Prasar Bharati
Pramod Raman – Chief Editor, MediaOne
Amy Kazmin – Former South Asia Bureau Chief, Financial Times
Meena Kotwal – Founder, The Mooknayak
Media
Social media lawsuit launched by Ontario school boards
|
Premier Doug Ford says that lawsuits launched by four Ontario school boards against multiple social media platforms are “nonsense” and risk becoming a distraction to the work that really matters.
The school boards, including three in the Greater Toronto Area, have launched lawsuits seeking $4.5 billion in damages against Snapchat, TikTok, and Meta, the owner of both Facebook and Instagram, for creating products that they allege negligently interfere with student learning and have caused “widespread disruption to the education system.”
But at an unrelated news conference in Ottawa on Friday, Ford said that he “disagrees” with the legal action and worries it could take the focus away from “the core values of education.”
“Let’s focus on math, reading and writing. That is what we need to do, put all the resources into the kids,” he said. “What are they spending lawyers fees to go after these massive companies that have endless cash to fight this? Let’s focus on the kids, not this other nonsense that they are looking to fight in court.”
Four separate but similar statements of claim were filed in Ontario’s Superior Court of JusticSocial media lawsuit launched by Ontario school boards pervasive problems such as distraction, social withdrawal, cyberbullying, a rapid escalation of aggression, and mental health challenges,” Colleen Russell-Rawlins, the director of education with the Toronto District School Board, said in a news release issued Thursday.
“It is imperative that we take steps to ensure the well-being of our youth. We are calling for measures to be implemented to mitigate these harms and prioritize the mental health and academic success of our future generation.”
The school boards are represented by Toronto-based law firm Neinstein LLP and the news release states that school boards “will not be responsible for any costs related to the lawsuit unless a successful outcome is reached.”
These lawsuits come as hundreds of school districts in the United States file similar suits.
“A strong education system is the foundation of our society and our community. Social media products and the changes in behaviour, judgement and attention that they cause pose a threat to that system and to the student population our schools serve,” Duncan Embury, the head of litigation at Neinstein LLP, said in the new release.
“We are proud to support our schools and students in this litigation with the goal of holding social media giants accountable and creating meaningful change.”
Media
Ontario school boards sue social media giants for $4.5B
|
Four major Ontario school boards are taking some of the largest social media companies to court over their products, alleging the way they’re designed has negatively rewired the way children think, behave and learn and disrupted the way schools operate.
The public district school boards of Toronto, Peel and Ottawa-Carleton, along with Toronto’s Catholic counterpart, are looking for about $4.5 billion in total damages from Meta Platforms Inc., Snap Inc. and ByteDance Ltd., which operate the platforms Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok respectively, according to separate but similar statements of claim filed Wednesday.
“These social media companies … have knowingly created a product that is addictive and marketed to kids,” said Rachel Chernos Lin, the chair of the Toronto District School Board, on CBC Radio’s Metro Morning on Thursday.
“We need them to be held accountable and we need them to create safer products.”
The allegations have yet to be proven in court, and there is no set date for when they will be heard. CBC Toronto has reached out to the companies named for comment.
The school boards, speaking under a new coalition called Schools for Social Media Change, allege students are experiencing an “attention, learning, and mental health crisis” because of “prolific and compulsive use of social media products,” in a news release.
They allege the platforms facilitate and promote cyberbullying, harassment, hate speech and misinformation, and have a part in escalating physical violence and conflicts in schools, according to the statements of claim.
They also argue these apps are “purposefully designed” to deliver harmful content to students dealing with topics such as suicidal ideation, drugs, self-harm, alcohol, eating disorders, hate speech and sex — particularly content encouraging “non-consensual” sexual activity.
Trying to respond to those problems has caused “massive strains” on the boards’ funds, including in additional mental health programming and staff, IT costs and administrative resources, the release says. The boards call on the social media giants to “remediate” the costs to the larger education system and redesign their products to keep students safe.
Lawsuit may be first of its kind in Canada
Hundreds of school boards in the United States, along with some states, have launched similar lawsuits against social media companies.
Last fall, over 30 states accused Meta Platforms Inc. of harming young people’s mental health and contributing to the youth mental health crisis by knowingly designing features on Instagram and Facebook that cause children to be addicted to its platforms.
In an email, a spokesperson for Snap said Snapchat was “intentionally designed to be different from traditional social media.”
“Snapchat opens directly to a camera — rather than a feed of content — and has no traditional public likes or comments. While we will always have more work to do, we feel good about the role Snapchat plays in helping close friends feel connected, happy and prepared as they face the many challenges of adolescence.”
Neinstein LLP, a Toronto-based firm, is representing the school boards. The boards will not be responsible for any costs related to the suit unless a successful outcome is reached, the release says.
Duncan Embury, a partner and head of litigation at Neinstein, told CBC News the named companies are “mainly responsible” for the social media products that kids use, and share “common” designs or algorithms that lead to “problematic use.”
To his knowledge, this is the first case of its kind in Canada.
“Based on what we’re seeing and what we’re hearing from our educators, I think this is a problem that is pervasive across our system and I wouldn’t be surprised if there [were] more boards that took this step,” said Embury.
Ford ‘disagrees’ with move
At an unrelated news conference on Thursday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford said he “disagrees” with the schools boards’ lawsuits.
“What are they spending on lawyer fees to go after these massive companies that have endless cash to fight this? Let’s focus on the kids, not about this other nonsense that they’re looking to fight in court,” he said.
WATCH | Ford disagrees with school board lawsuits against social media companies:
CBC News spoke to parents with children who attend schools in the Toronto District School Board. While they all agree social media apps are a problem, they differ in what approach they think should be used to regulate them.
“Just take the phones away,” said Gillian Henderson.
“I don’t think we need to sue anybody, that seems like a long, expensive process. Just take away their phones in class and give them back to them when they need them.”
The board has recently moved to develop a policy to limit cellphone use in classrooms, which includes potential phone bans and social media restrictions. It previously said staff had problems enforcing policies stating students should only use phones for educational purposes only.
Shyon Baumann said school boards could use some help in reducing screen time.
“If the school boards can do what they can trying to police it, that would be great. But it would be also great if the app creators did what they could to make the harms decrease,” he said.
“If they’re not going to make voluntary changes, then maybe doing it through the courts is the most effective way.”
-
Politics24 hours ago
Alberta Politics: UCP ahead of NDP by 15-points. Naheed Nenshi is the most well-known and well-liked NDP.
-
News24 hours ago
Canada to get ‘Renters’ Bill of Rights’: Justin Trudeau
-
Real eState12 hours ago
A settlement in a U.S. lawsuit could upend the cornerstone of real estate industry: commissions
-
Media24 hours ago
Is the US media layoffs phenomenon the next housing crisis?
-
News21 hours ago
Why Canada's record population growth is helping – and hurting – the economy – CTV News
-
Media19 hours ago
Four Ontario school boards sue social-media giants for products that harm students' behaviour and education – The Globe and Mail
-
Economy20 hours ago
Opinion: The future economy will suffer if Canada axes the carbon tax – The Globe and Mail
-
Real eState10 hours ago
The Homeowners Who Beat the National Association of Realtors