Guibeault insists emissions cap delay due to novelty | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Business

Guibeault insists emissions cap delay due to novelty

Published

 on

Environment and Climate Change Minister Steven Guilbeault says the delay in announcing the details of his government’s proposed oil and gas sector emissions cap is due to the singularity of the scheme and wanting to get it right.

Guilbeault also points the finger at Opposition leader Pierre Poilievre, warning that the Conservatives would reverse the Liberals’ progress on fighting climate change.

On Thursday, the federal government announced its framework to cap oil and gas sector emissions at 35 to 38 per cent below 2019 levels by 2030, using a national cap-and-trade system starting in 2026.

There will also be some compliance flexibility to emit up to 20 to 23 per cent below 2019 levels if emitters buy carbon offsets or pay into a fund that promotes decarbonisation.

The federal government is expected to release the draft regulations for the cap next spring, with final regulations to follow in 2025.

But the Liberals first announced they planned to implement an emissions cap in 2021, with the federal government setting a target in its Emissions Reduction Plan last year of 42 per cent below 2019 levels.

Guilbeault told CTV’s Question Period host Vassy Kapelos — in an interview airing Sunday from the COP28 climate conference in Dubai — that the wait was because of the uniqueness of the program.

“It did take a bit more time to prepare this than we had initially anticipated, because it’s a first in Canadian history,” Guilbeault said. “No government has ever put in place regulations to ensure that the oil and gas sector reduces its overall pollution. It’s never been done.”

The announcement also comes on the heels of two recent court decisions that went against Liberal climate policies.

And when pressed on whether those decisions were a factor in taking more time to announce the emissions cap, or whether the risk of a 2025 election happening before the cap’s implementation was taken into consideration, Guilbeault insisted the delay was only to get the plan right.

“It did take more time because it’s novel,” he said. “Because no one else has done this on the planet.

“We wanted to take the time that was needed to ensure that we had all our ducks in a row,” Guilbeault added, pointing to consultations with experts, industry and other players.

However, the federal government is “not impervious” to the consequences of those recent court decisions, according to Guilbeault.

The premiers of Alberta and Saskatchewan have both said they plan to challenge the emissions cap.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith told reporters on Thursday the cap is, “in (her) view,” “a clear violation of the Constitution,” that steps on provincial jurisdiction, and she is “prepared to fight this one out in court.”

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe also told Kapelos, in a CTV’s Question Period interview airing Sunday, that the oil and gas sector doesn’t need more “layering on” of climate policy and regulations, and he believes it should be left to find its own ways to reach emissions targets.

Guilbeault, in his interview, specifically cited the 2021 Supreme Court ruling that the federal government’s carbon pricing system is constitutional, because the significant threat of climate change merits a coordinated national plan.

“We followed very closely the letter of that of that Supreme Court decision, which is why we feel that we’re on very solid, legal and constitutional grounds,” he said. “Alberta and Saskatchewan challenge just about everything we’ve done when it comes to fighting climate change in the courts. We can anticipate that this will be no exception.”

Guilbeault also took aim at Poilievre in his interview, saying the Conservative leader is a threat to progress on fighting climate change.

“The only way we get to meet our 2030 targets is if we continue systematically, every day, working to fight climate change pollution, which won’t happen under a Pierre Poilievre government,” he said. “Clearly we’ll go back decades in terms of investment in public transit, in clean technologies, in home energy retrofits, all of these things fly out the door.”

Guilbeault added he thinks the federal government has “a shot” at meeting its targets if it continues on its current path.

“The last thing we need is for a government to come in place and throw all of that out the door,” he said. “Then of course we’ll never get there.”

But, he added, he’s “confident” the federal government can achieve its targets if it stays on course.

“We have is a good plan, and it brings us closer to our 2030 targets,” he said. “But we’re not there yet. And the cap is an important element of this.”

With files from CTV’s Question Period Senior Producer Stephanie Ha

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Transat AT reports $39.9M Q3 loss compared with $57.3M profit a year earlier

Published

 on

 

MONTREAL – Travel company Transat AT Inc. reported a loss in its latest quarter compared with a profit a year earlier as its revenue edged lower.

The parent company of Air Transat says it lost $39.9 million or $1.03 per diluted share in its quarter ended July 31.

The result compared with a profit of $57.3 million or $1.49 per diluted share a year earlier.

Revenue in what was the company’s third quarter totalled $736.2 million, down from $746.3 million in the same quarter last year.

On an adjusted basis, Transat says it lost $1.10 per share in its latest quarter compared with an adjusted profit of $1.10 per share a year earlier.

Transat chief executive Annick Guérard says demand for leisure travel remains healthy, as evidenced by higher traffic, but consumers are increasingly price conscious given the current economic uncertainty.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TRZ)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Dollarama keeping an eye on competitors as Loblaw launches new ultra-discount chain

Published

 on

 

Dollarama Inc.’s food aisles may have expanded far beyond sweet treats or piles of gum by the checkout counter in recent years, but its chief executive maintains his company is “not in the grocery business,” even if it’s keeping an eye on the sector.

“It’s just one small part of our store,” Neil Rossy told analysts on a Wednesday call, where he was questioned about the company’s food merchandise and rivals playing in the same space.

“We will keep an eye on all retailers — like all retailers keep an eye on us — to make sure that we’re competitive and we understand what’s out there.”

Over the last decade and as consumers have more recently sought deals, Dollarama’s food merchandise has expanded to include bread and pantry staples like cereal, rice and pasta sold at prices on par or below supermarkets.

However, the competition in the discount segment of the market Dollarama operates in intensified recently when the country’s biggest grocery chain began piloting a new ultra-discount store.

The No Name stores being tested by Loblaw Cos. Ltd. in Windsor, St. Catharines and Brockville, Ont., are billed as 20 per cent cheaper than discount retail competitors including No Frills. The grocery giant is able to offer such cost savings by relying on a smaller store footprint, fewer chilled products and a hearty range of No Name merchandise.

Though Rossy brushed off notions that his company is a supermarket challenger, grocers aren’t off his radar.

“All retailers in Canada are realistic about the fact that everyone is everyone’s competition on any given item or category,” he said.

Rossy declined to reveal how much of the chain’s sales would overlap with Loblaw or the food category, arguing the vast variety of items Dollarama sells is its strength rather than its grocery products alone.

“What makes Dollarama Dollarama is a very wide assortment of different departments that somewhat represent the old five-and-dime local convenience store,” he said.

The breadth of Dollarama’s offerings helped carry the company to a second-quarter profit of $285.9 million, up from $245.8 million in the same quarter last year as its sales rose 7.4 per cent.

The retailer said Wednesday the profit amounted to $1.02 per diluted share for the 13-week period ended July 28, up from 86 cents per diluted share a year earlier.

The period the quarter covers includes the start of summer, when Rossy said the weather was “terrible.”

“The weather got slightly better towards the end of the summer and our sales certainly increased, but not enough to make up for the season’s horrible start,” he said.

Sales totalled $1.56 billion for the quarter, up from $1.46 billion in the same quarter last year.

Comparable store sales, a key metric for retailers, increased 4.7 per cent, while the average transaction was down2.2 per cent and traffic was up seven per cent, RBC analyst Irene Nattel pointed out.

She told investors in a note that the numbers reflect “solid demand as cautious consumers focus on core consumables and everyday essentials.”

Analysts have attributed such behaviour to interest rates that have been slow to drop and high prices of key consumer goods, which are weighing on household budgets.

To cope, many Canadians have spent more time seeking deals, trading down to more affordable brands and forgoing small luxuries they would treat themselves to in better economic times.

“When people feel squeezed, they tend to shy away from discretionary, focus on the basics,” Rossy said. “When people are feeling good about their wallet, they tend to be more lax about the basics and more willing to spend on discretionary.”

The current economic situation has drawn in not just the average Canadian looking to save a buck or two, but also wealthier consumers.

“When the entire economy is feeling slightly squeezed, we get more consumers who might not have to or want to shop at a Dollarama generally or who enjoy shopping at a Dollarama but have the luxury of not having to worry about the price in some other store that they happen to be standing in that has those goods,” Rossy said.

“Well, when times are tougher, they’ll consider the extra five minutes to go to the store next door.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:DOL)

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

U.S. regulator fines TD Bank US$28M for faulty consumer reports

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has ordered TD Bank Group to pay US$28 million for repeatedly sharing inaccurate, negative information about its customers to consumer reporting companies.

The agency says TD has to pay US$7.76 million in total to tens of thousands of victims of its illegal actions, along with a US$20 million civil penalty.

It says TD shared information that contained systemic errors about credit card and bank deposit accounts to consumer reporting companies, which can include credit reports as well as screening reports for tenants and employees and other background checks.

CFPB director Rohit Chopra says in a statement that TD threatened the consumer reports of customers with fraudulent information then “barely lifted a finger to fix it,” and that regulators will need to “focus major attention” on TD Bank to change its course.

TD says in a statement it self-identified these issues and proactively worked to improve its practices, and that it is committed to delivering on its responsibilities to its customers.

The bank also faces scrutiny in the U.S. over its anti-money laundering program where it expects to pay more than US$3 billion in monetary penalties to resolve.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 11, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TD)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version