The COVID-19 pandemic has dealt a devastating blow to the economy, creating an urgent need to stimulate a sustainable recovery that creates good jobs. A new study shows building a Macro Grid across the Eastern United States could create 6 million high-wage jobs across the region, while dramatically reducing harmful greenhouse gas emissions.
But despite myriad demonstrated economic and climate benefits, significant policy barriers stand in the way of planning, permitting, and paying for new transmission projects.
President-elect Joe Biden can get to work overcoming these barriers on day one, starting with actions by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and Department of the Interior (DOI). By developing a coordinated and comprehensive strategy to harness the economic opportunity of renewable energy across our grid systems, the federal government can accelerate transmission development and avoid delays while fairly allocating costs and benefits.
Aging infrastructure and a fragmented transmission system
The U.S. transmission system is the “interstate highway” of electricity delivery, transferring power long distances to the distribution lines supplying homes and businesses. But most of this system was constructed in the 1950s and 60s and is well past its life expectancy. This system is also highly fragmented – a mishmash of regional, state, and local authorities oversees transmission system operation and development.
A new study from Americans for a Clean Energy Grid (ACEG) shows wide benefits from building a cleaner, more interconnected Eastern U.S. electricity grid. Consumer, Employment, and Environmental Benefits of Electricity Transmission Expansion in the Eastern U.S. examines varying levels of renewable energy deployment and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reductions in the Eastern Interconnect – the largest of the three regional U.S. grids.
The analysis compared renewable and transmission deployment under modest CO2 emission reductions in the electricity sector against renewable and transmission deployment to reach a 95% reduction by 2050. An interconnected Eastern power grid would unleash up to $7.8 trillion in private investment, create 6 million good-paying jobs, and reduce consumer costs while meeting Paris Agreement climate goals.
Expanding transmission unlocks the lowest cost energy resources
Rapidly declining costs, state policies, and consumer demand have ushered in an era of rapid renewable energy growth, but a safe climate future demands accelerating renewables deployment. This requires connecting dense population centers needing clean energy to where the country’s renewable energy resources and usable land are most abundant. The 15 states between the Rocky Mountains and the Mississippi River represent 88% of U.S. wind potential and 56% large-scale solar photovoltaic potential, yet only represent 30% of projected 2050 electricity use.
The ACEG study found an interconnected Eastern U.S. grid could provide access to a broader diversity of low-cost renewables across the entire region, enabling wind and solar to supply more than 80% of the region’s electricity by 2050, while enhancing reliability. The modeling highlights interconnection’s benefits where wind and solar variability are offset by geographic diversity: Wind and sunshine are generally available somewhere at any given time. They key is connecting these regions with adequate transmission.
Expanding Transmission Delivers Cost Savings for Businesses and Consumers
The ACEG study found an integrated transmission system, where wind and solar provide 80% of electricity, would deliver cumulative savings of more than $105 billion through 2050, reducing customer electric bills a third from current levels and saving a typical household more than $300 a year.
Recent National Renewable Energy Laboratory modeling found similar results, showing investments to strengthen connections between the Eastern and Western Interconnections would return more than $2.50 for every dollar invested and save customers at least $3.6 billion a year by 2038 by sharing low-cost wind and solar resources while enhancing regional flexibility. And yet another recent study found inter-state coordination and transmission expansion would reduce the cost of a 100%-renewable U.S. power system 46% compared with a state-by-state approach.
The modeling is reinforced by the value generated by real-world transmission projects. In 2017, the CapX2020 initiative built 800 miles of new transmission across Minnesota, North and South Dakota, and Wisconsin. The $2 billion project added $4 billion in regional economic benefits, returning nearly $2 for every $1 invested to customers and $150 million in revenue for state and federal taxes. The Southwest Power Pool has similarly seen massive transmission investments quickly paid off as lower cost wind enters the market, delivering lower costs for consumers.
Transmission Investment = Job Creation
Investments in a cleaner, more interconnected grid are significant job creators: CapX2020 alone created 8,000 construction jobs. ACEG’s study finds expanding and modernizing the Eastern U.S. transmission grid would create 1 million new net electricity sector jobs by 2030 and 6.5 million new net jobs by 2050, spread broadly over the entire region.
Many of these jobs are in transmission, but the majority come from wind and solar investments unlocked by transmission. Most of the wind and solar resources in America’s rural areas are currently stranded because insufficient transmission exists to deliver their power to market. Building out that grid will enable private investors to develop those clean resources, creating millions of new jobs.
“This is not just about job creation, it’s about creating quality jobs that people can count on to do more than just put food on the table but also to be a ladder into the middle class,” explained Jason Walsh, Executive Director of BlueGreen Alliance in response to the ACEG study. Clean energy jobs pay 25% more than the national median wage and are more likely to health insurance and retirement benefits.
A Vision For A Safe Climate And Safe Communities
Clean energy infrastructure and transmission investments are also a climate imperative. ACEG found an expanded and modernized grid would facilitate a 65% reduction in electricity sector emissions by 2035, and more than 95% by 2050.
Transmission infrastructure that delivers clean energy can displace highly polluting coal-fired power plants that are often located in or near communities of color. ACEG modeling shows dangerous particulate matter from electricity generation, along with other harmful pollutants like sulfur dioxide, all drop to near zero by 2030 as dirty coal can no longer compete with clean energy. Integrating renewable energy with a more robust transmission system will have far-reaching benefits for public health, especially in historically disadvantaged communities.
Policy Change Is Needed to Modernize the American Grid
Obstacles stand in the way of achieving the opportunities of more interconnected, cleaner electricity grid, and our current regulatory and planning regime has not evolved to meet this opportunity. Most transmission projects drag on for more than a decade, while new solar and wind generation can be built in just around two years. While regional interstate transmission lines will benefit all consumers and the air we breathe, policies must evolve to meet this challenge.
The lack of a single decision-maker responsible for siting and approving these projects is arguably the largest barrier to grid modernization. Building across state lines requires siting approval from multiple government entities and faces potential legal challenges or objections in each jurisdiction.
Paying for transmission is the other primary barrier. Regional transmission authorities in Texas and the Midwest have pioneered successful policies to proactively plan transmission that maximizes economic and reliability benefits while broadly allocating transmission costs to those who benefit. These regions are now national leaders in renewable energy.
President-elect Joe Biden can get to work solving these challenges on day one, starting with new leadership at DOE and FERC developing a long-range, comprehensive electricity infrastructure strategy designed to harness the economic opportunity of rapid wind, solar, and transmission.
DOE and DOI leadership can immediately begin developing new national energy corridors and renewable energy zones – continuous strips of federal land across jurisdictional boundaries suitable for renewable energy and transmission development. Sites would receive prior review under the National Environmental Policy Act, speeding up federal permitting while robust stakeholder engagement creates local buy-in and avoid unanticipated conflicts. This is already happening in 11 Western states through the federal West-wide Energy Corridors planning process, and succeeded in Texas’ Competitive Renewable Energy Zones.
FERC should also initiate new rulemaking to ensure transmission planning and cost allocation more accurately accounts for these realities, requiring planners to engage in comprehensive transmission planning that proactively plans for state clean energy standards, environmental regulations, rapidly declining costs of renewables, and new clean energy technologies. FERC can also provide backstop authority to resolve cost allocation disputes, eliminating a key barrier to regional transmission development.
Building back better
Time is not on our side when it comes to the clean energy transition. Though renewables are beating dirty fossil fuels on cost and are preferred by energy customers, without the infrastructure to support a rapid wind and solar buildout, we will not reduce electricity emissions in time to avoid climate catastrophe.
At the same time, investing in a modern, climate-resilient transmission system offers the opportunity to build back better and stronger with cleaner air and millions of new jobs. Transmission investments more than pay for themselves, and billions of private investment dollars are waiting to be spent. All policymakers need to do is unleash it.
TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was up more than 100 points in late-morning trading, helped by strength in base metal and utility stocks, while U.S. stock markets were mixed.
The S&P/TSX composite index was up 103.40 points at 24,542.48.
In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 192.31 points at 42,932.73. The S&P 500 index was up 7.14 points at 5,822.40, while the Nasdaq composite was down 9.03 points at 18,306.56.
The Canadian dollar traded for 72.61 cents US compared with 72.44 cents US on Tuesday.
The November crude oil contract was down 71 cents at US$69.87 per barrel and the November natural gas contract was down eight cents at US$2.42 per mmBTU.
The December gold contract was up US$7.20 at US$2,686.10 an ounce and the December copper contract was up a penny at US$4.35 a pound.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 16, 2024.
TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was up more than 200 points in late-morning trading, while U.S. stock markets were also headed higher.
The S&P/TSX composite index was up 205.86 points at 24,508.12.
In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was up 336.62 points at 42,790.74. The S&P 500 index was up 34.19 points at 5,814.24, while the Nasdaq composite was up 60.27 points at 18.342.32.
The Canadian dollar traded for 72.61 cents US compared with 72.71 cents US on Thursday.
The November crude oil contract was down 15 cents at US$75.70 per barrel and the November natural gas contract was down two cents at US$2.65 per mmBTU.
The December gold contract was down US$29.60 at US$2,668.90 an ounce and the December copper contract was up four cents at US$4.47 a pound.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 11, 2024.
TORONTO – Canada’s main stock index was little changed in late-morning trading as the financial sector fell, but energy and base metal stocks moved higher.
The S&P/TSX composite index was up 0.05 of a point at 24,224.95.
In New York, the Dow Jones industrial average was down 94.31 points at 42,417.69. The S&P 500 index was down 10.91 points at 5,781.13, while the Nasdaq composite was down 29.59 points at 18,262.03.
The Canadian dollar traded for 72.71 cents US compared with 73.05 cents US on Wednesday.
The November crude oil contract was up US$1.69 at US$74.93 per barrel and the November natural gas contract was up a penny at US$2.67 per mmBTU.
The December gold contract was up US$14.70 at US$2,640.70 an ounce and the December copper contract was up two cents at US$4.42 a pound.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 10, 2024.