adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Investment

How companies can find 'best fit' ESG investment – IR Magazine

Published

 on


‘This is the biggest capital reallocation since the Industrial Revolution,’ said Nicholas Stern to the Financial Times recently. Stern, an influential academic on the economics of climate change, is not alone in his thinking. 

Few would argue. We see this shift of capital already happening. Investors are divesting, pledging new strategies of investment and reallocating capital to less risky, more forward-thinking ESG options. For example, more than 1,480 institutions have publicly committed to at least some form of fossil fuel divestment, representing an enormous $39.2 tn of assets under management. The People’s Pension is divesting £226 mn ($304 mn) from companies that fail to meet ESG standards. And a recent PwC survey revealed that half of investors are prepared to divest if companies fail to address ESG.

300x250x1

The creators of the European Commission’s action plan on sustainable finance can certainly take some credit for initiating this transition. Simply by requiring the calculation and disclosure of risk, as is required by the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), investors are being made aware of the financial impact ESG issues can have on their share prices and returns.

Some companies – those that are leaders in ESG, in a green sector or part of the green revolution – will likely have no shortage of investment. But what about the companies that are not in such a position? How much risk do they face? Will they see major shareholders divesting and share prices falling?

How to determine the level of investor risk
Part of the job of the investor relations team in this new era of ESG is understanding the risk of shareholders divesting. Ninety-one percent of European investors have a company-wide policy on responsible investing or ESG issues. And recent changes to these policies, spurred on by the SFDR’s requirement for light/dark green classifications and principle adverse impact disclosures, could impact decisions on their current investments. It is not just ESG funds that are currently evaluating ESG criteria.

Even if you are speaking to fund managers annually and feel confident you understand their plans, their strategy may change in this quickly evolving environment, particularly as the pledges institutional investors are making trickle down. Moreover, you need data – data you can give to the board and C-suite that indicates the level of risk in hard, cold numbers, not a conversation.

A risk analysis is the most comprehensive approach, which you can do yourself or outsource. To analyze the risk, you will need to look at what your investors, on a fund-by-fund basis, are actually doing – not saying – as that is the only true indicator of their future behavior.

The metrics used to analyze such behavior could include things like carbon risk across their portfolio compared with yours, controversy levels across their portfolio compared with yours, governance scores across their portfolio compared with yours, and the pledges they have made as a signatory to a global agreement such as the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative or Climate 100+ that may be at odds, or in alignment, with your own commitments. Additional financial metrics that compare your performance against the fund’s portfolio would help provide an even more complete picture as to who is potentially likely to divest.

By doing this on a fund-by-fund basis across your entire shareholder base, you will then be able to group together funds by level of risk, and relay to management what percentage of shares in issue (or free float) could potentially sell in the near term due to a discrepancy on ESG and/or performance.

How to find best-fit investment
Being proactive in finding investors that align with your company across a wide variety of metrics, including ESG (what we call best fit), would not only help to protect against the risk of current investors selling, but also help create demand for your stock and fuel fair market valuation.

This can be done by taking a set of metrics similar to those used to calculate the risk across your shareholder base and flipping them around to evaluate those funds that are not yet invested in you but could be. To create the initial list of those that are not invested in you but could be, a good starting point is to find those that are invested in your peers, sector, region or market cap. Crucially, you will then need to remove the funds that are already invested and those that you are ineligible for due to location, size, and so on. Having an accurate fund-level shareholder identification report is required at this stage, otherwise you may end up targeting current investors as if they were not invested.

After this process is complete, you can apply your ESG metrics to determine which are your best-fit investors. Comparing yourself with the funds across each of these data points will give a very clear indication of which funds you are aligned with and which you aren’t. Balancing these metrics is critical, however, as you may match on some, but not others. As such, a qualitative assessment across the entire spectrum of comparison points is an important last step in determining your final best-fit target list.

Conclusion
It probably goes without saying that there is no perfect process for identifying potential investors. But with an accurate shareholder identification report, good ESG data and an experienced eye, you will be able to create a best-fit target list. In an era deemed the ‘biggest capital reallocation since the Industrial Revolution’, that might be a good list to have.

www.cmi2i.com

CMi2i

This content is provided by CMi2i and did not involve IR Magazine journalists.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Deutsche Bank's Investment Bankers Step Up as Rate Boost Fades – Yahoo Canada Finance

Published

 on

By


(Bloomberg) — Deutsche Bank AG relied on its traders and investment bankers to make up for a slowdown in income from lending, as Chief Executive Officer Christian Sewing seeks to deliver on an ambitious revenue goal.

Most Read from Bloomberg

Fixed income trading rose 7% in the first quarter, more than analysts had expected and better than most of the biggest US investment banks. Income from advising on deals and stock and bond sales jumped 54%.

300x250x1

ADVERTISEMENT

Revenue for the group rose about 1% as the prospect of falling interest rates hurt the corporate bank and the private bank that houses the retail business.

Sewing has vowed to improve profitability and lift revenue to €30 billion this year, a goal some analysts view with skepticism as the end of the rapid rate increases weighs on revenue from lending. In the role for six years, the CEO is cutting thousands of jobs in the back office to curb costs while building out the advisory business with last year’s purchase of Numis Corp. to boost fee income.

“We are very pleased” with the investment bank, Chief Financial Officer James von Moltke said in an interview with Bloomberg TV. The trends of the first quarter “have continued into April,” he said, including “a slower macro environment” that’s being offset by “momentum in credit” and emerging markets.

While traders and investment bankers did well, revenue at the corporate bank declined 5% on lower net interest income. Private bank revenue fell about 2%. Both units benefited when central banks raised interest rates over the past two years, allowing them to charge more for loans while still paying relatively little for deposits.

With inflation slowing and interest rates set to fall again, that effect is reversing, though markets have scaled back expectations for how quickly and how deep central banks are likely to cut. That’s lifted shares of Europe’s lenders recently, with Deutsche Bank gaining 25% this year.

“Deutsche Bank reported a reasonable set of results,” analysts Thomas Hallett and Andrew Stimpson at KBW wrote in a note. “The investment bank performed well while the corporate bank and asset management underperformed.”

–With assistance from Macarena Muñoz and Oliver Crook.

(Updates with CFO comments in fifth paragraph.)

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek

©2024 Bloomberg L.P.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

How Can I Invest in Eco-friendly Companies? – CB – CanadianBusiness.com

Published

 on

By


Welcome to CB’s personal-finance advice column, Make It Make Sense, where each month experts answer reader questions on complex investment and personal-finance topics and break them down in terms we can all understand. This month, Damir Alnsour, a lead advisor and portfolio manager at money-management platform Wealthsimple, tackles eco-friendly investments. Have a question about your finances? Send it to [email protected].


Q: It’s Earth Month! And… there’s a climate crisis. How can I invest in companies and portfolios funding causes I believe in?

Earth Day may have been introduced in 1970, but today it’s more relevant than ever: In a 2023 survey, 72 per cent of Canadians said they were worried about climate change. Along with carpooling, ditching single-use plastics and composting, you can celebrate Earth Month this year by greening your investment portfolio.

Green investing, or buying shares in projects, companies, or funds that are committed to environmental sustainability, is an excellent way to support projects and businesses that reflect your passions and lifestyle choices. It’s growing in favour among Canadian investors, but there are some considerations investors should be mindful of. Let’s review some green investing options and what to look out for.

300x250x1

Green Bonds

Green bonds are a fixed-income instrument where the proceeds are put toward climate-related purposes. In 2022, the Canadian government launched its first Green Bond Framework, which saw strong demand from domestic and global investors. This resulted in a record $11 billion green bonds being sold. One warning: Because it’s a smaller market, green bonds tend to be less liquid than many other investments.

It’s also important to note that a “green” designation can mean a lot of different things. And they’re not always all that environmentally-guided. Some companies use broad, vague terms to explain how the funds will be used, and they end up using the money they raised with the bond sale to pay for other corporate needs that aren’t necessarily eco-friendly. There’s also the practice of “greenwashing,” labelling investments as “green” for marketing campaigns without actually doing the hard work required to improve their environmental footprint.

To make things more challenging, funds and asset managers themselves can partake in greenwashing. Many funds that purport to be socially responsible still hold oil and gas stocks, just fewer of them than other funds. Or they own shares of the “least problematic” of the oil and gas companies, thereby touting emission reductions without clearly disclosing the extent of those improvements. As with any type of investing, it’s important to do your research and understand exactly what you’re investing in.

Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) and Impact Investing

SRI and impact investing portfolios hold a mix of stocks and bonds that are intended to put your money towards projects and companies that work to advance progressive social outcomes or address a social issue—i.e., investing in companies that don’t wreak havoc on society. They can include companies promoting sustainable growth, diverse workforces and equitable hiring practices.

The main difference between the two approaches is that SRI uses a measurable criteria to qualify or disqualify companies as socially responsible, while impact investing typically aims to help an enterprise produce some social or environmental benefit.

Related: Climate Change Is Influencing How Young People Invest Their Money

Some financial institutions use the two approaches to build well-diversified, low-cost, socially responsible portfolios that align with most clients’ environmental and societal preferences. That said, not all portfolios are constructed with the same care. As with evaluating green bonds, it’s important to remember that a company or fund having an SRI designation or saying it partakes in impact investing is subjective. There’s always a risk of not knowing exactly where and with whom the money is being invested.

All three of these options are good reminders that, even though you may feel helpless to enact environmental or social change in the face of larger systemic issues, your choices can still support the well-being of society and the planet. So, if you have extra funds this April (maybe from your tax return?), green or social investing are solid options. As long as you do thorough research and understand some of the limitations, you’re sure to find investments that are both good for the world and your finances.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

MOF: Govt to establish high-level facilitation platform to oversee potential, approved strategic investments

Published

 on

KUALA LUMPUR: A meeting with 70 financial fund investors and corporate members at the recently concluded Joint Investors Meeting in London has touched on the MADANI government’s immediate action to stimulate strategic investment in important technologies, according to the Ministry of Finance (MoF).

In a statement today, it said that the government is serious about making investments a national agenda through the establishment of a high-level investment facilitation platform to ensure the implementation of potential and approved strategic investments through a “Whole of Government” approach.

Minister of Finance II Datuk Seri Amir Hamzah Azizan (pix), who led the Malaysian delegation to the Joint Investors Meeting from April 20 to 22, said that the National Investment Council (MPN) chaired by the Prime Minister is an integrated action that reflects how serious the government is in making Malaysia an investment hub in the region.

Among the immediate actions taken by the government is establishing the National Semiconductor Strategic Committee (NSSTF) to facilitate cooperation between the government, industry players, universities, and relevant stakeholders to place the Malaysian semiconductor industry at the forefront and ensure the continued growth of the electronics & electrical industry, especially the semiconductor sector, as a major contributor to the Malaysian economy.

300x250x1

The government also aims to empower Malaysia as a preferred green investment destination as well as remove barriers and bureaucracy in the provision and accessibility to renewable energy, especially for the new technology industry, including data centres, said Amir Hamzah.

He also said that the country’s investment prospects have reached an extraordinary level, with approved investments surging to RM329.5 billion in 2023 from RM268 billion in 2022.

He said about 74 per cent of manufacturing projects approved between 2021 and 2023 have been completed or are in process.

In addition, Amir Hamzah said the greater initial stage construction work completed in 2023 (RM31.5 billion) and 2022 (RM26.3 billion) shows a positive trend for future investment opportunities.

“From a total of 5,101 investment projects approved in 2023, as many as 81.2 per cent or 4,143 projects are in the services sector, 883 projects in the manufacturing sector, and 75 projects in other related sectors,” he said.

Before this, Amir Hamzah met with international investors in New York and Washington to clarify the direction of the implementation of the MADANI Economic framework to improve investors’ confidence in Malaysia’s economic level and strengthen the perception and investment sentiment of foreign investors towards the country.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending