How the coronavirus took North Vancouver’s Lynn Valley Care Centre - The Globe and Mail | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Health

How the coronavirus took North Vancouver’s Lynn Valley Care Centre – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


The Lynn Valley Care Centre is pictured in Lynn Valley in North Vancouver, on March 16, 2020. All but five of Canada’s 13 coronavirus deaths as of Friday afternoon can be traced to Lynn Valley.

JONATHAN HAYWARD/The Canadian Press

Ruth was outraged when the colleague she was driving to work told her rumours were flying that a nurse at their North Vancouver care home had tested positive for COVID-19.

“I said, ‘What? They have coronavirus here? Why didn’t they let us know? What are we going to do now?’”

Ruth, an aide at the facility, recalls her conversation as they pulled into the facility for the graveyard shift on the night of Thursday, March 5.

Story continues below advertisement

Ruth immediately asked her supervisor of the wing of the Lynn Valley Care Centre known as “the lodge” about the concerning rumour. Ruth says she received no special instructions for the next eight hours.

As the sun rose on Friday, March 6, a half dozen concerned aides and nurses waited around after their shift to press the director of care about whether COVID-19 had arrived at the North Vancouver nursing home.

The director confirmed that, the day before, their co-worker had tested positive. The staff, almost all middle-aged Filipina-Canadians, were shocked and then angered.

“’The only thing you need to do is wash your hands – wash your hands,’” is what Ruth recalls the director telling everyone. Ruth seethed.

“Why didn’t you let us know?” she asked.

To mitigate any potential spread of the virus, staff cut out the communal breakfast on the second floor of the lodge and began “tray service,” delivering meals to rooms there, according to Ruth, a staff member who would later test positive for the virus, told The Globe. She spoke on the condition of using a pseudonym because she was worried about losing her job and ashamed of the stigma associated with the virus.

As panic set in among staff at the 200-bed facility, nurses scrambled to swab three residents showing symptoms of the virus that day and sent the samples off to be tested, according to other staff members who spoke with The Globe. After the morning shift was done around 2 p.m., the director of care held a more formal meeting and told a larger group of employees that their co-worker, whose last day at Lynn Valley was a week earlier on Feb. 29, had just tested positive.

Story continues below advertisement

Anyone with flu-like symptoms needed to stop working and get tested, she added.

Two days after receiving word that the virus had reached the care home, British Columbia’s Provincial Health Officer Bonnie Henry stood before a scrum of reporters on March 7 to declare an outbreak at the facility due to the novel coronavirus. Two residents and one health-care worker had tested positive for COVID-19.

“This is one of the scenarios that we have been, of course, most concerned about,” Dr. Henry said.

The next day, March 8, one of the residents would die, becoming the first person in Canada to succumb to COVID-19. In the ensuing two weeks, another seven would die, and 36 residents of the facility and 18 health-care workers linked to it would be infected by the virus.​

All but five of Canada’s 13 coronavirus deaths as of Friday afternoon can be traced to Lynn Valley, where the average age of residents is roughly 87 years old.

The fatal outbreak marked a grim turning point in the country’s battle against COVID-19. The province reacted by prohibiting all but essential visits to long-term care homes while acknowledging that the increased isolation could damage the delicate mental health of many seniors.

The local health authority, which has direct oversight of the provincially funded facility, is still piecing together how and when the virus was introduced into Lynn Valley and why it spread so quickly.

To understand what was happening there in the days before Canada’s deadliest outbreak, The Globe reached out to workers and families of people either killed by the virus or still living at Lynn Valley. Five workers spoke to The Globe, but all of them, like Ruth, did so on the condition of using a pseudonym. Their accounts offer a glimpse into how easily the highly contagious virus can devastate a nursing home, the form of housing in Canada that appears most vulnerable in this global pandemic.

The local Sherkat family has long owned the nursing home, and their company North Shore Private Hospital Ltd. was incorporated in 1985 to run the facility.

In a full-page letter sent from the nursing home’s e-mail account, an unnamed representative detailed how heartbroken everyone at the facility is at the mounting death toll.

“We are deeply thankful to each and every member of our staff, and their families, for their tireless and continued efforts to keep residents safe, and ensure we get through this difficult time together,” the letter stated. “The Lynn Valley Care Centre has been in operation since 1963, and under the same ownership since the mid 1980s.

“Our residents, their families, our staff, and their families feel like part of our family.”

Story continues below advertisement

The letter stated the centre is meeting daily with local health officials and is concentrating all its efforts on stopping the current outbreak and minimizing its harms. Once the world is “on the other side of the COVID-19 emergency,” the centre said it is committed to commissioning an independent review into how events unfolded on its property and sharing as much as possible of the resulting report into the outbreak.

The crisis in North Vancouver has revealed the devastating toll that the virus is having on the elderly, as well as those who care for them. The precarious nature of employment in many private nursing homes may have also contributed to the spread of the coronavirus.

Many employees in the sector supplement their low wages by working at multiple facilities – an arrangement that has already led to one Lynn Valley employee being suspected of spreading the virus to a second long-term care home in nearby West Vancouver. This week, the province announced the virus has also infected a resident at a third nursing home, Haro Park Centre in Vancouver.

The workers who spoke with The Globe worry that the weak initial response by management and the health authority will inflate the ultimate death toll.


Lynn Valley Care Centre sits midway up the striking North Shore, nestled in between Grouse and Seymour mountains, which attract hikers, mountain bikers and skiers throughout the year.

The private facility houses 139 government-subsidized beds and 65 private pay rooms and suites in a wood-framed lodge and a newer and much larger concrete tower called “the manor.” The outbreak has so far been contained to the lodge, which contains roughly half the units at Lynn Valley.

Story continues below advertisement

The Sherkat family has had no recent complaints or outbreaks of any kind, according to an October, 2019, report from the province’s seniors advocate, whose role is to monitor seniors services and make recommendations to government and service providers to address systemic issues.

Two-thirds of Lynn Valley’s residents live with some degree of dementia and about 58 per cent receive medication for depression, which is 10 per cent higher than the B.C. average, according to the 2018-19 annual report from the independent provincial watchdog.

A third of B.C.’s 27,000 provincially funded nursing-home units are owned and operated by the various health authorities in the province. The rest are run by non-profit organizations and for-profit companies contracted by these health authorities.

The wages and working conditions in the sector vary greatly between the different homes.

Long-time workers at Lynn Valley say they once were unionized, but over the past decade or so have been rehired by subcontractors that offered less money and rolled back benefits for the people who clean the facility, prep and bus meals in the communal dining room, and feed and bathe residents.

Nurses in the province’s long-term care homes have stayed unionized over the past 20 years, as stipulated under provincial legislation that opened up the possibility of privatizing those services.

Story continues below advertisement

Lena, a long-time aide at Lynn Valley, says management there ditched an agreement with her union several years ago and the private firm that rehired her to do the same job paid her $2 less an hour and cut the number of sick days she was allowed each year from 10 to three. Vacation days – a potential buffer for sickness – were also cut from 22 days a year to 10, according to Lena.

The chief executive of her Vancouver-based employer, Carecorp Seniors Services, deferred any comment to Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH), the Lower Mainland health authority.

She has three sick days a year, which is why, when she finished her shift on Feb. 29 and felt a cold coming on strong, she decided to take just two days off before returning to work.

“We don’t have enough sick time,” Lena said. “Even if people are sick, we are still working, and that’s the truth.”

Lena (not her real name) poses for a photograph in her apartment window. Lena is a medical worker at the Lynn Valley Care Home, the centre of B.C.’s first COVID-19 outbreak. She asked that her real name not be used because she fears being fired for speaking out about how the care home managed the outbreak.

Jesse Winter/The Globe and Mail

After working the first day with a stubborn fever, Lena visited a North Vancouver walk-in clinic, where a doctor checked her lungs, ears, throat and temperature before diagnosing her with the flu.

Lena, who regularly remits money back to her family in the Philippines, continued working, but her illness kept getting worse. Her fever was paired with a dry, nagging cough and a troubling shortness of breath.

Story continues below advertisement

It was apparent residents were sick as well: Those on the second floor of the lodge were asked to stay in their rooms on the evening of Thursday, March 5, according to several workers.

There were whispers among them that the coronavirus had reached Lynn Valley, but Lena wasn’t notified formally until the Friday afternoon meeting with the director of care.

Lena’s heart sank. She suspected she had been infected, too. The following day, she went to a hospital close to her home, where she explained her situation and was given a nasopharyngeal test – an uncomfortable swab of the nose and upper throat – for the coronavirus. At that point, the virus was confirmed to have infected around 20 people in B.C.

“Deep inside my heart, I knew I was positive because I had pneumonia and pneumonia is one of the serious symptoms,” said Lena, whose test later proved her hunch correct.

She was afraid for her friends and co-workers, some of whom she carpooled with. When Lena called in sick that weekend, she was joined by several other colleagues now self-isolating with symptoms consistent with COVID-19.

On Saturday, Dr. Henry, the province’s top health official, declared an outbreak at the Lynn Valley Care Centre. Two residents and one health-care worker had tested positive.

“This is one of the scenarios that we have been, of course, most concerned about,” Dr. Henry said.

Short-staffed, some subcontractors offered double wages to entice people to come back to work, but there were few takers and the facility limped along without a full complement of workers that weekend, according to several staff members and relatives of residents who spoke with The Globe.

As signs were posted to the care home’s doors warning of an outbreak and a team from VCH arrived on site to assess everyone on Saturday, March 7, worried family members of residents helped frazzled health-care workers with feeding and other duties.

Signs posted to the doors of the Lynn Valley Care Centre warning of a coronavirus outbreak.

Jesse Winter/The Globe and Mail

VCH personnel helped the nursing home try to stop the spread of the virus by implementing an outbreak protocol that ended communal meals in the lodge’s dining room and suspended recreational exercises.

In a letter sent to residents and their families that day, VCH’s deputy medical health officer, Mark Lysyshyn, said those with COVID-19 had been isolated to their rooms. The facility would still accept visitors as long as they were not sick, restricted their visits to one room or resident and obeyed all infection-control signage posted around the facility.

Bold letters emphasized a promise: “Residents who develop symptoms will receive the care that they need.”

Story continues below advertisement

At Dr. Henry’s news conference, it was revealed that the facility first appeared on health investigators’ radar two days earlier, after a woman with no recent travel history was confirmed to have COVID-19 – the first confirmed case of community spread in B.C. She had earlier visited her physician, complaining of flu-like symptoms, and was administered a COVID-19 test, which had recently been added to the province’s regular influenza surveillance in efforts to pro-actively detect cases of the new disease.

The health investigators then learned she was a health-care worker at Lynn Valley.


That Sunday, March 8, staff reported the situation getting increasingly dire.

Around 1 p.m., Janine, an aide, brought an egg salad sandwich into the room of an elderly woman and was startled to see a tray of toast and scrambled eggs laying untouched and out of reach. The bedridden woman beamed up at her with gratitude, but Janine couldn’t help bursting into tears as she began feeding her lunch.

After, in the dining room of the lodge, Janine and the two other workers on shift confronted their manager as to what the plan was for dealing with the nearly 50 residents on one floor of the building, some of whom hadn’t been fed or helped to the bathroom for many hours.

“I don’t know,” her boss said as she herself wept. She explained that their subcontracted company had not received any guidance from management. Janine thought that was strange, given that she had seen an official with the local health authority buzzing around earlier that Sunday with a public health nurse and the home’s director of care.

Another sign of the chaos, she noticed, was that a trio of relatives were pitching in to help feed the remaining guests of the lodge, despite VCH’s warning that any guests needed to restrict their visits to a single room or resident. Still, she was grateful for their help that Sunday because many of her co-workers stayed home battling symptoms of the virus.

That Sunday evening, a resident of the facility, an 83-year-old liked by everyone, became the first in Canada to die of COVID-19.

His daughter Kelly, who asked that her real name not be used to protect her deceased father’s wish for privacy, said her dad loved nothing more than gardening in the acidic soil of North Vancouver or strolling through the local mountain paths with their family dog. Though he was frail and often battling one ailment or another, he was lucid enough to understand what was going on around him.

“He was very weak, but he still said ‘please’ and ‘thank you,’ ” Kelly told The Globe last week in a phone interview.

Her mother knew something was wrong at the nursing home when she went to visit her husband that Friday and was told now may not be the best time.

On Saturday, someone at VCH called Kelly, her dad’s second family contact, to tell them he had tested positive.

Story continues below advertisement

By Sunday afternoon, his condition had deteriorated rapidly. When Kelly and her brother donned full protective gear to enter his room, they saw him connected to a ventilator struggling to breathe, hours away from death.

She said the exhausted staff on site at the lodge that Sunday were incredible in their attempts to help the residents, but the understaffing gave the building the feeling of a ghost town.

“If you’re trying to serve more people than they really can and every time they have to go into that particular room and another you’ve got to suit all up to give them some water – it’s just not happening,” Kelly said of the overwhelmed facility.

For a while, she had known the next common cold could fell their father, so his death at the hands of the coronavirus was not inconceivable.

“The saddest part, given his age, given his frailty, is just thinking there was any fear or discomfort that was unnecessary because of the lack of levels of care,” Kelly said. “But maybe he can be the one contribution to improving the level of care in these homes. … [Staff] are run off their feet, there’s not enough of them.”

The next day, Monday, March 10, Dr. Lysyshyn of VCH issued another letter to families of residents at the centre’s lodge, expressing sadness over the death.

“As a family member to one of the residents at the lodge, we understand that this is concerning information,” he wrote.

He explained that the lodge was under outbreak precautions and that a medical health officer was working with staff to ensure appropriate infection-control precautions were in place.

By that point, health officials had revealed that two more residents and an additional health-care worker at the facility had tested positive. Friends and family of the nurse who first tested positive also were notified that they had the virus. Medical officials are working to determine how the virus was introduced into the care home.

Cleaning staff outside the Lynn Valley Care Centre on Monday, March 16, 2020.

JONATHAN HAYWARD/The Canadian Press

When word that a Lynn Valley staffer had tested positive began circulating in the community, people began speculating about how it happened, said Christine Sorensen, president of the BC Nurses’ Union, which represents several licensed practical nurses at the care home.

“There were some criticisms from members of the public about whether the nurse had brought it in, or if they were bringing it out into the community,” she said.

“Some of [the nurses] couldn’t get rides to work. Taxis wouldn’t pick them up to go to Lynn Valley, or come to pick them up from Lynn Valley to go home. Some members had difficulty finding child care because once they were known that they worked at Lynn Valley, then their children were asked to be excluded from child care.”

Story continues below advertisement

On March 12, Dr. Henry delivered further bad news. “Most concerning for us is we do now have a second long-term care home that has an outbreak that is involved with COVID-19,” she said.

A resident of the Hollyburn House Retirement Residence in West Vancouver, a man in his 90s, had tested positive for the disease, she said. A health-care worker who worked shifts at both facilities had accidentally spread the virus.

The day after the first resident died, Gordo Bone pulled his anxious 85-year-old mother out of Lynn Valley after a short stint recuperating from a bad fall. He brought her back to his home in Pender Harbour on B.C.’s Sunshine Coast, where she is isolating now without symptoms. His dad is also asymptomatic, but the 87-year-old remains in the care home, where he has been staying on a more long-term basis.

Both were living in the newer and larger manor building.

Mr. Bone said that when he visited his parents at the outset of the outbreak, the centre seemed short-staffed with care providers working double shifts, but that has since improved. Additional safety protocols have been put in place – visitors are restricted and meals are taken to all residents’ rooms to avoid communal dining, he said.

And the front-line staff – or “heroes” as he calls them – are doing their best to stop the potential spread of the virus among the remaining residents. But that is hard because many residents are suffering dementia and other debilitating conditions, he said.

An elderly woman sits in a room at the Lynn Valley Care Centre on Saturday, March 14, 2020.

DARRYL DYCK/The Canadian Press

Roger Wong, a clinical professor in geriatric medicine at the University of British Columbia, said seniors are more vulnerable to developing infections in part because immune function declines with age. As well, underlying health conditions may predispose them to developing infections more easily.

“Seniors who live in seniors homes are intrinsically more at risk,” Dr. Wong said.


The outbreak at Lynn Valley had one other impact on the health-care workers. A directive, confirmed by Dr. Henry, to only work at one facility – a measure aimed at mitigating the spread of the virus – meant that those who worked casual shifts in more than one setting suddenly had their income slashed.

“We’re looking at the impacts at that,” said Ms. Sorensen, of the nurses’ union, “not only on staffing numbers – because if you don’t get to work in the other facility, that reduces the number of nurses in that other facility, which could compromise patient care – but also the financial impacts if nurses aren’t able to work in both of their facilities.”

For Lena, the Lynn Valley staffer still battling the virus while quarantined in her own home, this crisis shows how urgently the sector needs to be reformed to improve wages and benefits such as sick days and vacation time. That would cut down on workers travelling to multiple facilities in a day, she said.

“This is the right time for us to come together so the government will see the situation of the health-care workers who are the front-liners who work hard,” she said.

Story continues below advertisement

Carecorp Seniors Services, a dietary aide subcontractor, directed all media queries to Vancouver Coastal Health. Pro Vita Care Management Inc., a care aide subcontractor, and WestCana Services Inc., the company contracted for housekeeping duties at Lynn Valley, did not respond to interview requests.

In a statement to The Globe, VCH said Lynn Valley is operating “very near target staffing levels” and that the health authority is working with the operator to add additional staff as needed. “We recognize the stepped-up outbreak response precautions delayed the delivery of some services, including meals,” the statement said. “We’re committed to providing residents the care they need and we thank the families for their patience, kindness and understanding.”

JONATHAN HAYWARD/The Canadian Press

Janine, an aide at Lynn Valley, said she has more pressing concerns than whether her pay will one day increase.

Her husband also has tested positive for COVID-19 and the couple is now trying their best to stop their seven-year-old son from contracting the virus while isolating him to a separate room of their two-bedroom basement suite.

“No one is helping my son,” she wrote in a text message exchange Wednesday. “I’m still preparing his food. I just washed my hand and don’t talk without mask on.

“I’m just thankful my son has a good immune system.”


A timeline of the COVID-19 outbreak at Lynn Valley Care Centre

February 29: Nurse who would later test positive works her last shift at the North Vancouver facility known as Lynn Valley Care Centre.

March 5: Provincial Health Officer Bonnie Henry announces that a woman in her 50s with no recent travel history or known links to confirmed cases has tested positive for the new coronavirus. This makes her the first confirmed case of community transmission in B.C. – and evidence that the virus is spreading undetected. That evening, rumours swirl among staff at Lynn Valley that the virus had arrived at the facility.

March 6: A half-dozen concerned aides and nurses at Lynn Valley confront the centre’s director of care at the end of the graveyard shift. The director confirms that one of their co-workers had tested positive. The others are shocked and angered to learn the news this way. A more formal meeting is held that afternoon.

March 7: Dr. Henry announces an outbreak at Lynn Valley Care Centre. Health officials tracing the contacts of the woman who tested positive two days earlier had learned she was a health-care worker at the centre. There, they find two residents are also positive for the virus. The local health authority dispatches a team to assess people on site and implement outbreak protocol.

March 8: One of those residents, an 83-year-old man, dies. He is the first person in Canada to die of COVID-19.

March 9: Dr. Henry announces the man’s death at a news conference. Another health-care worker at Lynn Valley tests positive, as well as two close contacts of the initial health-care worker.

Story continues below advertisement

March 10: Two more health-care workers at Lynn Valley test positive: a woman in her 40s, and a woman in her 50s.

March 11: Another two health-workers are confirmed to have the virus. They are a man in his 20s and a woman in her 50s.

March 12: An outbreak is declared at Hollyburn House Retirement Residence in West Vancouver, where one resident and one health-care worker have tested positive. Health officials confirm it is linked to the outbreak at Lynn Valley.

March 13: An outbreak is declared at Lions Gate Hospital in North Vancouver, where three administrative staff tested positive for the virus. They have no known link to Lynn Valley, and had no regular contact with patients. Another close contact of a Lynn Valley worker tests positive.

March 14: Five more cases linked to Lynn Valley are confirmed. By now, four residents and a dozen staff members have been infected. Due to a soaring number of cases in the province, the B.C. government has stopped providing details of individual cases.

March 16: Three more residents of Lynn Valley die. Lions Gate Hospital escalates its outbreak response and accepts only emergency patients.

March 17: Two more Lynn Valley residents die.

March 18: A resident of Haro Park Centre, an independent housing, assisted living and long-term care centre in downtown Vancouver, tests positive.

March 19: Another Lynn Valley resident dies.

March 20: Asked about cases at the care home, Dr. Henry said 36 residents had tested positive to date, and eight had died. As well, 18 health-care workers at Lynn Valley had tested positive but all of those cases were mild. A new outbreak was declared at the Dufferin Care Centre in Coquitlam, where a staff member tested positive.

If you have further information about this story, please email mhager@globeandmail.com and andreawoo@globeandmail.com.

With research from Stephanie Chambers and Rick Cash

Story continues below advertisement

Sign up for the Coronavirus Update newsletter to read the day’s essential coronavirus news, features and explainers written by Globe reporters.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Health

What’s the greatest holiday gift: lips, hair, skin? Give the gift of great skin this holiday season

Published

 on

Give the gift of great skin this holiday season

Skinstitut Holiday Gift Kits take the stress out of gifting

Toronto, October 31, 2024 – Beauty gifts are at the top of holiday wish lists this year, and Laser Clinics Canada, a leader in advanced beauty treatments and skincare, is taking the pressure out of seasonal shopping. Today, Laser Clincs Canada announces the arrival of its 2024 Holiday Gift Kits, courtesy of Skinstitut, the exclusive skincare line of Laser Clinics Group.

In time for the busy shopping season, the limited-edition Holiday Gifts Kits are available in Laser Clinics locations in the GTA and Ottawa. Clinics are conveniently located in popular shopping centers, including Hillcrest Mall, Square One, CF Sherway Gardens, Scarborough Town Centre, Rideau Centre, Union Station and CF Markville. These limited-edition Kits are available on a first come, first served basis.

“These kits combine our best-selling products, bundled to address the most relevant skin concerns we’re seeing among our clients,” says Christina Ho, Senior Brand & LAM Manager at Laser Clinics Canada. “With several price points available, the kits offer excellent value and suit a variety of gift-giving needs, from those new to cosmeceuticals to those looking to level up their skincare routine. What’s more, these kits are priced with a savings of up to 33 per cent so gift givers can save during the holiday season.

There are two kits to select from, each designed to address key skin concerns and each with a unique theme — Brightening Basics and Hydration Heroes.

Brightening Basics is a mix of everyday essentials for glowing skin for all skin types. The bundle comes in a sleek pink, reusable case and includes three full-sized products: 200ml gentle cleanser, 50ml Moisture Defence (normal skin) and 30ml1% Hyaluronic Complex Serum. The Brightening Basics kit is available at $129, a saving of 33 per cent.

Hydration Heroes is a mix of hydration essentials and active heroes that cater to a wide variety of clients. A perfect stocking stuffer, this bundle includes four deluxe products: Moisture 15 15 ml Defence for normal skin, 10 ml 1% Hyaluronic Complex Serum, 10 ml Retinol Serum and 50 ml Expert Squalane Cleansing Oil. The kit retails at $59.

In addition to the 2024 Holiday Gifts Kits, gift givers can easily add a Laser Clinic Canada gift card to the mix. Offering flexibility, recipients can choose from a wide range of treatments offered by Laser Clinics Canada, or they can expand their collection of exclusive Skinstitut products.

 

Brightening Basics 2024 Holiday Gift Kit by Skinstitut, available exclusively at Laser Clincs Canada clinics and online at skinstitut.ca.

Hydration Heroes 2024 Holiday Gift Kit by Skinstitut – available exclusively at Laser Clincs Canada clinics and online at skinstitut.ca.

Continue Reading

Health

Here is how to prepare your online accounts for when you die

Published

 on

 

LONDON (AP) — Most people have accumulated a pile of data — selfies, emails, videos and more — on their social media and digital accounts over their lifetimes. What happens to it when we die?

It’s wise to draft a will spelling out who inherits your physical assets after you’re gone, but don’t forget to take care of your digital estate too. Friends and family might treasure files and posts you’ve left behind, but they could get lost in digital purgatory after you pass away unless you take some simple steps.

Here’s how you can prepare your digital life for your survivors:

Apple

The iPhone maker lets you nominate a “ legacy contact ” who can access your Apple account’s data after you die. The company says it’s a secure way to give trusted people access to photos, files and messages. To set it up you’ll need an Apple device with a fairly recent operating system — iPhones and iPads need iOS or iPadOS 15.2 and MacBooks needs macOS Monterey 12.1.

For iPhones, go to settings, tap Sign-in & Security and then Legacy Contact. You can name one or more people, and they don’t need an Apple ID or device.

You’ll have to share an access key with your contact. It can be a digital version sent electronically, or you can print a copy or save it as a screenshot or PDF.

Take note that there are some types of files you won’t be able to pass on — including digital rights-protected music, movies and passwords stored in Apple’s password manager. Legacy contacts can only access a deceased user’s account for three years before Apple deletes the account.

Google

Google takes a different approach with its Inactive Account Manager, which allows you to share your data with someone if it notices that you’ve stopped using your account.

When setting it up, you need to decide how long Google should wait — from three to 18 months — before considering your account inactive. Once that time is up, Google can notify up to 10 people.

You can write a message informing them you’ve stopped using the account, and, optionally, include a link to download your data. You can choose what types of data they can access — including emails, photos, calendar entries and YouTube videos.

There’s also an option to automatically delete your account after three months of inactivity, so your contacts will have to download any data before that deadline.

Facebook and Instagram

Some social media platforms can preserve accounts for people who have died so that friends and family can honor their memories.

When users of Facebook or Instagram die, parent company Meta says it can memorialize the account if it gets a “valid request” from a friend or family member. Requests can be submitted through an online form.

The social media company strongly recommends Facebook users add a legacy contact to look after their memorial accounts. Legacy contacts can do things like respond to new friend requests and update pinned posts, but they can’t read private messages or remove or alter previous posts. You can only choose one person, who also has to have a Facebook account.

You can also ask Facebook or Instagram to delete a deceased user’s account if you’re a close family member or an executor. You’ll need to send in documents like a death certificate.

TikTok

The video-sharing platform says that if a user has died, people can submit a request to memorialize the account through the settings menu. Go to the Report a Problem section, then Account and profile, then Manage account, where you can report a deceased user.

Once an account has been memorialized, it will be labeled “Remembering.” No one will be able to log into the account, which prevents anyone from editing the profile or using the account to post new content or send messages.

X

It’s not possible to nominate a legacy contact on Elon Musk’s social media site. But family members or an authorized person can submit a request to deactivate a deceased user’s account.

Passwords

Besides the major online services, you’ll probably have dozens if not hundreds of other digital accounts that your survivors might need to access. You could just write all your login credentials down in a notebook and put it somewhere safe. But making a physical copy presents its own vulnerabilities. What if you lose track of it? What if someone finds it?

Instead, consider a password manager that has an emergency access feature. Password managers are digital vaults that you can use to store all your credentials. Some, like Keeper,Bitwarden and NordPass, allow users to nominate one or more trusted contacts who can access their keys in case of an emergency such as a death.

But there are a few catches: Those contacts also need to use the same password manager and you might have to pay for the service.

___

Is there a tech challenge you need help figuring out? Write to us at onetechtip@ap.org with your questions.

Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Pediatric group says doctors should regularly screen kids for reading difficulties

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Paediatric Society says doctors should regularly screen children for reading difficulties and dyslexia, calling low literacy a “serious public health concern” that can increase the risk of other problems including anxiety, low self-esteem and behavioural issues, with lifelong consequences.

New guidance issued Wednesday says family doctors, nurses, pediatricians and other medical professionals who care for school-aged kids are in a unique position to help struggling readers access educational and specialty supports, noting that identifying problems early couldhelp kids sooner — when it’s more effective — as well as reveal other possible learning or developmental issues.

The 10 recommendations include regular screening for kids aged four to seven, especially if they belong to groups at higher risk of low literacy, including newcomers to Canada, racialized Canadians and Indigenous Peoples. The society says this can be done in a two-to-three-minute office-based assessment.

Other tips encourage doctors to look for conditions often seen among poor readers such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; to advocate for early literacy training for pediatric and family medicine residents; to liaise with schools on behalf of families seeking help; and to push provincial and territorial education ministries to integrate evidence-based phonics instruction into curriculums, starting in kindergarten.

Dr. Scott McLeod, one of the authors and chair of the society’s mental health and developmental disabilities committee, said a key goal is to catch kids who may be falling through the cracks and to better connect families to resources, including quicker targeted help from schools.

“Collaboration in this area is so key because we need to move away from the silos of: everything educational must exist within the educational portfolio,” McLeod said in an interview from Calgary, where he is a developmental pediatrician at Alberta Children’s Hospital.

“Reading, yes, it’s education, but it’s also health because we know that literacy impacts health. So I think that a statement like this opens the window to say: Yes, parents can come to their health-care provider to get advice, get recommendations, hopefully start a collaboration with school teachers.”

McLeod noted that pediatricians already look for signs of low literacy in young children by way of a commonly used tool known as the Rourke Baby Record, which offers a checklist of key topics, such as nutrition and developmental benchmarks, to cover in a well-child appointment.

But he said questions about reading could be “a standing item” in checkups and he hoped the society’s statement to medical professionals who care for children “enhances their confidence in being a strong advocate for the child” while spurring partnerships with others involved in a child’s life such as teachers and psychologists.

The guidance said pediatricians also play a key role in detecting and monitoring conditions that often coexist with difficulty reading such as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, but McLeod noted that getting such specific diagnoses typically involves a referral to a specialist, during which time a child continues to struggle.

He also acknowledged that some schools can be slow to act without a specific diagnosis from a specialist, and even then a child may end up on a wait list for school interventions.

“Evidence-based reading instruction shouldn’t have to wait for some of that access to specialized assessments to occur,” he said.

“My hope is that (by) having an existing statement or document written by the Canadian Paediatric Society … we’re able to skip a few steps or have some of the early interventions present,” he said.

McLeod added that obtaining specific assessments from medical specialists is “definitely beneficial and advantageous” to know where a child is at, “but having that sort of clear, thorough assessment shouldn’t be a barrier to intervention starting.”

McLeod said the society was partly spurred to act by 2022’s “Right to Read Inquiry Report” from the Ontario Human Rights Commission, which made 157 recommendations to address inequities related to reading instruction in that province.

He called the new guidelines “a big reminder” to pediatric providers, family doctors, school teachers and psychologists of the importance of literacy.

“Early identification of reading difficulty can truly change the trajectory of a child’s life.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 23, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version