adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

How these female politicians dealt with the ‘unspeakable loneliness’ of Ottawa – TVO

Published

 on


Anyone who’s even somewhat followed national politics over the past few years knows that Jane Philpott experienced one of the most unusual terms ever as a parliamentarian.

Elected for the first time in the 2015 contest that saw the Liberals catapult from third place to majority government, Philpott quickly became known as one of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s most talented and effective problem solvers. An opioid crisis? Get Jane on it. Twenty-five thousand Syrian refugees to resettle? Get Jane on it. Too many First Nations reserves where you still can’t drink the water? Get Jane on it.

And, of course, you know that it all ended very suddenly. Ten months ago, Philpott resigned from cabinet because of a dispute over how the PM was handling the SNC-Lavalin scandal. She ran for re-election last October as an independent, but a loss brought her political career to an end (at least for now) after just one term.

Philpott consistently demonstrated a strength of conviction not often seen in partisan politics. Whether you supported her decision to resign on a point of principle or thought she deserved expulsion from the Liberal caucus for showing inadequate loyalty to her political tribe, you can’t think she lacked backbone.

And, yet, this week, she told a story about having to build up her nerve before a recent appearance at a prestigious Commonwealth Fund conference in Washington, D.C. — which involved speaking in front of a roomful of some of the smartest academics in the world.

“Just as I was leaving my hotel room to go down to the conference, I looked at myself in the mirror, and I said out loud, ‘You rock. And you belong.’”

Philpott told that story on Monday night at Victoria College at a symposium of the David Peterson Program in Public Sector Leadership, a lecture series supported by Ontario’s 20th premier and former chancellor of the University of Toronto.

The evening featured three of Canada’s most prominent former female MPs: Philpott, Lisa Raitt (Conservative MP, 2008-19), and Megan Leslie (NDP MP, 2008-15). What was astonishing about the evening was how refreshingly and brutally honest all three ex-politicians were about their former public lives.

Moderator Paul Wells, of Maclean’s, brought his characteristically impish sense of humour to the proceedings, introducing the trio by saying, “They all have something in common — they were all defeated at the polls by Liberals.”

Despite being known as three of the strongest and most talented politicians on Parliament Hill, all three women confessed to having struggled with feelings of inadequacy after their elections.

“I walked into caucus after winning the 2008 election,” Leslie recalled. “There’s Jack Layton. There’s Olivia Chow. And all I could do was ask myself, ‘How did I get here?’ Talk about suffering from imposter syndrome.”

For Leslie and so many other women in public life, there just haven’t been enough female political role models over the years to give newbies the confidence that they belong.

Lisa Raitt shared that she hadn’t been able to “get my head around the politics of the job” — the need to be so resolutely tribal. Leslie said she’d also found that a challenge.

“There’s this thing about female friendship,” Leslie began. “I’d get together with Lisa Raitt and [Conservative MP] Michelle Rempel, and people would say to me, ‘How can you hang out with them? They’re the devil!’”

Leslie went on to reveal that “you have to find allies where you can find them.” One time, she was embroiled in a traumatic situation on the Hill and found she just couldn’t confide in any fellow New Democratic caucus mates, because they were either men or much older than she was. (Leslie was only 35 years old when first elected.)

“I needed someone to talk to,” she recalled, “and I didn’t call my leader Tom Mulcair. I called Lisa Raitt in tears. To think, I called a Conservative! But I trusted her. I knew she wouldn’t stab me in the back. And she talked me off the wall.”

“And then you called for my resignation!” Raitt laughed.

“That was the voice of Tom Mulcair speaking!” Leslie came back.

“What you quickly realize,” Raitt continued, “is that when you’re put in a pressure situation, we actually have a lot in common.”

More than a quarter century ago, former prime minister Kim Campbell referred to the “unspeakable loneliness of Ottawa,” something Raitt said she could relate to.

“It’s very lonely,” she confessed. Her children were four and seven when she first won election, and, she said, “They were my refuge. I just wanted to be a normal hockey mom, but, because you’re a politician, it’s hard for anyone to see you as normal.”

As a New Democrat, Leslie never experienced life as a cabinet minister, but as deputy leader of her party, she did come to understand the limits placed on what she could say. “I wasn’t super-comfortable in what that turned into,” she said. Leslie got into politics to fight for social justice, for the poor, and for sex workers. “I stopped paying as much attention to those issues because I was nervous about saying things as deputy leader on behalf of the party. I just wanted to be the biggest team player.”

Leslie feared she was becoming “more and more plastic” and said that,  if she hadn’t been defeated in 2015, she’d almost certainly have declined to run again in 2019.

Both Raitt and Philpott were cabinet ministers, and both noted that, even in a world of gender-balanced cabinets, some roles still seem to be reserved for men. For example, there have been 42 finance ministers since Confederation — not one has been a woman. In Ontario, there have been 37 finance ministers since 1867 — only two have been female.

“Not all cabinet jobs are equal,” Raitt said. “Women tend not to get line-item responsibility.”

And, beyond that, many women are nervous about exercising their authority — although, as Paul Wells pointed out, Philpott doesn’t seem to have been one of them.  

“Life is short,” Philpott said. “Maybe subconsciously, I knew I wasn’t going to be there forever. I felt the burden of opportunity.”

Before getting into politics, Philpott had been a doctor in Stouffville. “Three days after getting elected, I was surprised to get a call saying I was being vetted for a cabinet job,” she recalled. Soon after, she was appointed minister of health in a country where six to eight people were dying of opioid overdoses every day. “And I had the opportunity to make decisions to help save lives,” she said. So she did.

“Being a cabinet minister is the hardest I’ve worked in my life,” Philpott said. “It’s 18 hours a day.”

“And every minute of your day is owned by someone else,” Raitt echoed.

To be clear, these ex-MPs weren’t complaining about the job. They referenced former prime minister Paul Martin’s line that “you can get more done in a week in government than you can in a year on the outside.” Having said that, Raitt admitted that, by the time she’d lost her seat in the 2019 election, she was “quite burned out,” adding, “The job is all-consuming. And you should be burned out when you’re done. There’s no work-life balance. But that’s not the job.”

“It’s not really a job,” Leslie added. “It’s a vocation. It’s a calling.”

Nowadays, Leslie is CEO of the World Wildlife Fund; Raitt just got a job this month with CIBC as vice-chair of global investment banking; and Philpott is serving as a volunteer special adviser on health for Nishnawbe Aski Nation (she’s a former Indigenous Services minister). She’ll also be doing some speaking, writing, and teaching until she settles down into a more formal and permanent gig. 

These three women are proving three things: there is life after politics; they do rock; and they do belong. And, no doubt, they’re serving as role models for other women who are wondering whether there’s a place for them in the public life of this country.  

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Politics

N.B. election debate: Higgs defends major tax cut promise as services struggle

Published

 on

 

MONCTON, N.B. – New Brunswick’s Liberal leader challenged her Progressive Conservative opponent on Wednesday night to explain how his plan to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes will help fund a health system struggling to care for a growing population.

Susan Holt, the Liberal Opposition leader trying to deny Blaine Higgs a third term in office, said his promise to cut the harmonized sales tax by two percentage points — to 13 per cent — is irresponsible and risks pushing the province toward privatized health care.

“The premier has made the single most expensive campaign commitment of anyone on this stage … more expensive than the entire platform that a Holt government is going to put forward,” she told the leaders debate in Moncton, N.B., hosted by CBC.

When fully implemented, the tax cut will cost $450 million a year, a number Holt said will put services at risk, especially health care, at a time when tens of thousands of residents are without a family doctor — and the province’s population is growing rapidly, mostly by immigration.

And she took aim at Higgs’s claim that his tax cuts reflect the reality that “people can spend money better than government.”

Holt said, “to hear him say that New Brunswickers are better at spending their money themselves — sounds a lot to me like he thinks we’re moving into private health care.”

Higgs said Holt’s suggestion that his policies were leading to private health care is baseless — “no foundation whatsoever.”

The government, he said, is spending $1 billion more a year on health care than it was five years ago. “But there would be those who say ‘spend more money on health care and it will get better.’ And I say we need to find a way to do health care better.”

He said his government will find innovative ways to bring health services to citizens, such as expending the scope of practice of nurses and pharmacists.

Green Party Leader David Coon, meanwhile, said his party would end the centralization and privatization of the health system, promising to grant more autonomy to regional hospitals.

“We have a state of emergency in our health care system. It is Code Orange. Everyone has to get on deck. And it’s going to require a generational investment to fix our health-care system” said Coon, whose party has promised to spend $380 million a year on health care.

“That’s the money that Mr. Higgs wants to eliminate from an HST cut,” the Green leader said.

The debate marks a key milestone in the provincial election campaign, which started last Thursday and will end with a provincewide vote on Oct. 21. But there wasn’t that much actual debating Wednesday night — the format precluded leaders from challenging each other. In fact, one of the moderators said at the start of the evening, “there will be no open debate.”

Instead, viewers were offered a series of quasi speeches by leaders, peppered with retorts to each other’s statements. Among the issues they discussed were safe injection sites and changes to the province’s policy on sexual orientation and gender identity in schools.

New Brunswick has one safe injection site in Moncton, and in response to a moderator’s question about whether a Liberal government would open more, Holt said she was not aware of any applications for others. “But what we do need is real treatment for people who are struggling,” she said.

Coon said his government would “never” prohibit the use of a safe injection site, adding that substance use was a symptom of trauma.

Higgs, meanwhile, said his party will not open any new sites and will review the mission and results of the one that exists.

A highly contentious issue in the province is a requirement by the Higgs government that teachers get permission of parents before they can use the preferred names and pronouns of students under 16. Higgs said this policy respects “parents rights,” while his critics say it discriminates against trans youth.

During the debate, a moderator mentioned an anti-abortion group called the Campaign Life Coalition, which has mailed about 160,000 flyers claiming “gender ideology” was being taught in schools and that it was leading to “surgical mutilation.”

Higgs said that while he has no connection to the group, those flyers are protected by free speech. “I find it really shocking that the discussion around parents and their involvement with their minor age children is such a debate,” he said.

The Green and Liberal leaders said there is a severe shortage of teachers, who are now being accused of abusing children by activist groups. Holt said it was disappointing that Higgs refused to condemn the flyers; Coon also criticized the Tory leader for not speaking out against the “vile pamphlets.”

“Mr. Higgs seems to be quite comfortable with these pamphlets circulating,” Coon said. “He hasn’t condemned them as we have, and he should if he thinks they’re a problem. … There are big challenges in the education system, and Mr. Higgs has gone looking for problems where they don’t exist. He’s not a problem solver. He’s a problem creator.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 25, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Liberal government survives non-confidence vote, as Bloc sets deadline

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – The minority Liberal government survived a non-confidence vote in the House of Commons on Wednesday, but if the prime minister wants to avoid an election before Christmas the Bloc Québécois said he will have to meet its demands by the end of next month.

Bloc Leader Yves-François Blanchet and his caucus joined the Liberals and NDP in voting down the Conservative motion of non-confidence but said earlier in the day that the Liberals have until Oct. 29 to pass two Bloc bills or he’ll start talking to other parties about toppling the government.

One bill increases the old age security pension for seniors and the other seeks to protect Canada’s supply management system during international trade negotiations.

“What we are proposing is good for retired persons in Quebec, but also in Canada. It’s good for milk and eggs and poultry (producers) in Quebec, but also in Canada. So that’s good for everybody,” Blanchet said at a news conference Wednesday.

The Liberals haven’t said how they will respond to the Bloc’s demands. Liberal House leader Karina Gould said she doesn’t negotiate in public, but that she is always negotiating with parties behind the scenes.

Her party didn’t have to negotiate much to get through the first confidence test since the NDP backed out of the supply-and-confidence deal earlier this month.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre introduced a motion declaring non-confidence in the government and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, but it failed Wednesday by a count of 211-120.

Poilievre’s own caucus voted for it, as did two independents, but all other MPs voted no.

If the non-confidence motion had passed it would have defeated the government and very likely triggered an immediate election campaign.

“I think today is a good day for Canadians because parliamentarians, except for the Conservative Party of Canada, are committed to getting to work,” Gould told reporters after the vote.

This is not the final test for the Liberals, though. A Liberal motion to support the government’s changes to capital gains taxes was scheduled to be voted on Wednesday evening, and is considered a confidence matter because it is related to the budget. The NDP is expected to support the government on that vote.

The Conservatives have also promised there will be confidence motions to come, and already put the House of Commons on notice that two such votes are coming. The party has another chance to introduce a motion Thursday.

The House has been riddled with tension and name-calling since it resumed following the summer break, behaviour that continued in question period on Wednesday.

Trudeau accused a Conservative MP of making homophobic remarks after someone shouted a comment about Trudeau and Canada’s consul general in New York, Tom Clark, being in a bathtub together.

“Standing up to bullies requires standing up to their crap sometimes,” Trudeau said, leading to an uproar.

He ultimately withdrew the word at the request of the Speaker, admitting it was unparliamentary language, but expressed his anger over the comment he said came from a Conservative.

After question period, NDP MP Blake Desjarlais asked the Speaker to review the tapes and come back with a ruling on the alleged homophobic remark.

How long this will go on is an open question after the Bloc’s declaration on Wednesday. The party is looking to capitalize on its new-found power to make gains for its voters in Quebec.

It wants the government to help it pass Bill C-319, which would increase old-age security payments by 10 per cent for seniors between the ages of 65 and 74 and raise the exemption of employment income used to determine guaranteed income supplement payments from $5,000 to $6,500.

The Liberals, who increased old-age security for seniors aged 75 and older in 2022, voted against that bill during second reading. It is now under consideration at a House of Commons committee. A costing note done for the House suggests the move would cost in excess of $3 billion a year.

The other bill the Bloc wants passed is C-282, which would limit the government’s ability to make concessions on products protected by supply management during trade negotiations. The bill passed the House of Commons with support from the Liberals, NDP and about half the Conservatives caucus. It is under consideration at a Senate committee.

NDP House leader Alexandre Boulerice said both bills will have the support of his party.

“We agree with the fact that we should help seniors in our country that are struggling with the increased cost of living,” he said Wednesday.

“We are strong supporters of the supply management for many, many years.”

Blanchet said if the government agrees to its demands, the Liberals will avoid an election before the end of the year.

However, he emphasized that his party will not blindly support the government’s agenda even if the Liberals agree to the Bloc’s conditions.

“We will not ever support any motion or vote that would go against who we are — and who we are is well known,” Blanchet said, noting that his party will vote against motions and bills that the Bloc perceives to be against the interests of Quebec.

“So the government has to remain pretty careful.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 25, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

B.C. party leaders talk mining promises on campaign trail

Published

 on

 

British Columbia’s New Democrats and Conservatives issued their plans for the mining industry while campaigning in the province’s resource-rich communities.

Both NDP Leader David Eby and Conservative Leader John Rustad say they will support the industry by improving permitting, with the NDP committing to permit review timelines and the Conservatives proposing “One Project, One Permit.”

In Terrace, Eby said an NDP government would upgrading key highway infrastructure in the northwest, while Rustad in Kimberley, in the southeast, said his government would invest in gaps in rural infrastructure.

Sonia Furstenau of the BC Greens will be the last party leader to announce plans for the carbon tax at an event in Victoria today.

Eby has said he would end the carbon tax on consumers if the federal mandate requiring such a tax is removed and Rustad has pledged “the complete removal of the carbon tax” in the province.

Furstenau, meanwhile, has said a price on carbon pollution is one piece of addressing the enormous costs that come with climate change.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 25, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending