Connect with us

Health

How to increase the productivity of creative work

Published

on

Creativity has a good image. Anyone who is creative has a lot of ideas, finds better solutions, and sometimes thinks outside the box. Creative work is all about the new ideas that take a lot of effort and time. Moreover, it requires brainstorming and often isolation for hours. The creative work is not as easy as it sounds, and it is not easy to incorporate creativity into every day. So is it possible to get the creative work done in short? Of course, yes! Read on how to increase the productivity of creative work.

 

 How can productivity and creativity be reconciled?

Productivity and creativity are like fire and water. Anyone who has ever tried to switch to creative directly after a very analytical work process will find that this does not work. Because here, two different areas of the brain are involved, between which it is not possible to switch immediately. Convergent (analytical/administrative) and divergent (creative) thinking cannot be easily combined.

Apart from that, creativity often contradicts the usual approach of doing all tasks as quickly as possible and in accordance with the high-quality standards. Creative thinking often means hours of unstructured thinking – and a lot of research without a guarantee of success. Creativity is difficult to measure, and therefore it is often neglected. To be successful in the long term, companies must give creativity a corresponding place in corporate processes.

How to increase the productivity of creative work

Creative Work takes a lot of time. You need time to discover, immerse, learn new things, and let your thoughts run free. And that also includes the courage to allow this creative work. Because there is no guarantee of brilliant ideas, and creativity is not necessarily productive. Therefore, it is difficult to design our working conditions so that creative ideas can develop. However, there are techniques you can use to increase the productivity of creative work:

  • Create time windows. The first step in promoting productivity is prioritization. Make sure you reserve time for creative work. For most of us, it will be difficult to find time in addition to “normal” work. But help 30 minutes a day to positively influence your creativity.
  • Be creative in the afternoon. Studieshave shown that fatigue has a positive effect on creativity. Give it a try. Block a time window right after the lunch break and let your creativity run free instead of indulging in your lunch break. So you are still productive but in a different way.
  • Take breaks. The basic principle of creative thinking is to build on your knowledge and use it innovatively. Current studiesshow that knowledge is more firmly established in our memory if we take a break immediately after studying. So plan a short break after each creative phase.
  • Integrate time-outs and brainstorming into your corporate culture. In the world of work, time-outs and brainstorming – just like creativity – are often not considered work. It can help leave the office to allow unstructured thoughts and rearrange them, as well as to let creativity run free. If this supervisor is encouraged, and employees are encouraged to incorporate creative thinking into their everyday work, this will have a positive effect on everyone and increase productivity.

 

  • Use Magic Mushrooms to increase productivity:

Imagination is the foundation of creativity, and mental performance plays an important to promote productivity in creative work. According to the research, magic mushrooms can improve productivity, focus, creativity, and overall well-being. The professionals of Silicon Valley find that magic mushrooms are to be effective in increasing productivity. Even ordinary people are also discovering that it is a great new way to enhance their creative work’s productivity.

 

Edited By Harry Miller

Continue Reading

Health

London-Middlesex may enter Stage 3 of reopening near the end of July: MLHU – Globalnews.ca

Published

on


London-Middlesex is on its way to enter Stage 3 of Ontario’s novel coronavirus reopening plan, according to London’s chief medical officer of health.

Dr. Chris Mackie said Monday that he’s hopeful the region will be given the green light to move ahead with the province’s reopening plan within the next few weeks.

“I think (we) could see a move to Stage 3 over the next two to three weeks. I would not be surprised at all to see that,” said Mackie.

Read more:
Dr. Chris Mackie no longer CEO amid management changes at Middlesex-London Health Unit

“I also think that it’s likely the province will choose to do a regional approach as they did with the Stage 2 reopening.”

Mackie also commented on Leamington and Kingsville in Essex county entering Stage 2 as of Tuesday, saying it is a sign that “this region is really getting COVID-19 under control.”

Story continues below advertisement

According to the Province of Ontario, in Stage 3 the province will consider opening more workplaces, dine-in restaurants, and indoor and outdoor recreational facilities, including playgrounds.

Read more:
154 new coronavirus cases, 0 deaths in Ontario; total cases at 35,948

Casinos, fitness facilities and amusement parks are also on the list, all with added public health measures in place.

London-Middlesex has not seen any new cases of COVID-19 for two days in a row. The last reported death in the region related to the virus was June 12.

As of Monday, there are 630 confirmed cases in the region, which includes 57 deaths and 515 recoveries.






1:00
Coronavirus: Ontario health minister says there’s ‘hope’ for move to stage 3 soon


Coronavirus: Ontario health minister says there’s ‘hope’ for move to stage 3 soon

© 2020 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Health

VCH warns of COVID-19 exposure at Downtown Vancouver club – Vancouver Is Awesome

Published

on


Vancouver Coastal Health is notifying people who visited the bar and nightclub areas of the Hotel Belmont about a possible exposure to COVID-19 during the nights of Monday, June 27 and Wednesday, June 29.

In a release, VCH states that individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 attended these areas of the Hotel Belmont (654 Nelson Street) on those dates.

However, the health authority adds that there is no known risk to anyone who attended the Hotel Belmont outside these two dates. In addition, there is no ongoing risk to the community.

As a precaution, VCH advises people who attended the bar and nightclub areas of the Hotel Belmont during the nights of Monday, June 27 and Wednesday, June 29 to monitor themselves for 14 days. As long as they remain healthy and do not develop symptoms, there is no need to self-isolate and they should continue with their usual daily activities.

If you have no symptoms, testing is not recommended because it is not accurate or useful. If you develop any of these symptoms of COVID-19, please seek COVID-19 testing and immediately self-isolate. Please call ahead and wear a mask when seeking testing. 

In June, VCH warned of a possible exposure to COVID-19 to people who were at Brandi’s Exotic Show Lounge between 9 p.m. and 3 a.m. from June 21 to 24. It says a number of people who tested positive for COVID-19 attended the lounge on those dates. However, the club has since passed a health inspection and reopened. 

COVID-19 is spread by respiratory droplets when a person who is sick coughs or sneezes. It can also be spread when a healthy person touches an object or surface (e.g. a doorknob or a table) with the virus on it, and then touches their mouth, nose or eyes before washing their hands. Most people who get COVID-19 have only mild disease, but a few people can get very sick and may need to go to hospital. The symptoms of COVID-19 may include fatigue, loss of appetite, fever, cough, sore throat, fatigue, runny nose, sore throat loss of smell and/or diarrhea.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Health

Scientists warn of overlooked danger from coronavirus-spreading airborne microdroplets – CTV News

Published

on


TORONTO —
Physical distancing and frequent handwashing are not enough to fully protect against airborne transmission of the novel coronavirus, hundreds of scientists say.

Virus-carrying microdroplets pose more of a danger than is currently being communicated, the scientists argue in a new medical commentary, and the result is that poor ventilation is easing the path of the pandemic.

The commentary has been accepted for publication in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases. It is signed by 239 scientists from 32 countries and a wide variety of science and engineering disciplines, according to a statement from the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) in Australia.

“We are concerned that people may think they are fully protected by following the current recommendations, but in fact, additional airborne precautions are needed to further reduce the spread of the virus,” lead author and QUT air quality expert Lidia Morawska said in the statement.

MICRODROPLETS EXPLAINED

It is not controversial to say that the virus that causes COVID-19 can spread through exhaled airborne droplets. This is why physical distancing was one of the earliest individual measures urged to stop the spread of the virus, because putting space between people allows for particles to fall to the ground rather than latch on to another person.

It is also normal for viruses to be passed through droplets. Measles, for example, has an airborne transmission pathway that poses far more of a danger than has thus far been found with COVID-19.

“I can be in a room with measles, and leave, and somebody walks in hours later and they can get measles,” Dr. Sumon Chakrabati, an infectious diseases physician based in Missisauga, Ont., said Monday on CTV News Channel.

The World Health Organization says the droplets that carry SARS-CoV-2 can be spread through actions including coughing, sneezing and speaking, and recommends that everyone keep a one-metre distance from others. Many countries, including Canada, have gone farther, recommending a distance of two metres.

However, there are signs that the smallest microdroplets can travel beyond the two-metre limit. One American study found that they can move three metres in 12 seconds, and a fourth metre as they linger in the air for up to a minute. Morawska said that there is significant evidence that microdroplets can travel even farther – into the tens of metres – especially when indoors.

“Studies by the signatories and other scientists have demonstrated beyond any reasonable doubt that viruses are exhaled in microdroplets small enough to remain aloft in the air and pose a risk of exposure beyond [one to two metres] by an infected person,” she said.

“Hand-washing and social distancing are appropriate, but … insufficient to provide protection from virus-carrying respiratory microdroplets released into the air by infected people.”

‘IS THERE A DANGER THERE?’

Advice from public health experts in Canada and elsewhere has largely downplayed the risk of airborne transmission of the virus, even as evidence mounts that it is a real threat. In one study cited in the commentary as an example, droplets were found to be the most likely source of transmission among three dining parties at a restaurant in China, in a case where surveillance video footage showed no direct or indirect contact between the groups.

The debate over droplets has been playing out since the pandemic took hold. Dr. Colin Furness, a Toronto-based infection control epidemiologist, described it as “a pretty serious fight, intellectually,” but said the commentary is unlikely to lead to significant changes in virus protection thinking.

“The concern is ‘Are we ignoring those small droplets? Is there a danger there? Are our interventions maybe not enough?'” he said Monday on CTV News Channel.

“It could be that a smaller dose, those smaller droplets, actually matter for [COVID-19] because it’s so good at getting a toehold in your body once it gets in there.”

In Chakrabati’s view, the possibility of airborne transmission is overshadowed by the evidence that Canada and other countries have been able to slow the spread of the virus with the current precautions and restrictions.

“Are there situations where the two metres is a bit too little, for example a karaoke bar or a choir, where you’re singing and your voice is propelling? Perhaps,” he said.

“But I think for the most part, the recommendations that have been there since the beginning are the ones that are truly preventing the spread of this virus.”

REDUCING THE RISK

Morawska said that effective ventilation systems are the best way to reduce the spread of microdroplets. She said the most effective systems minimize the use of recirculated air by bringing in as much clean air from outdoors as possible, and that even opening doors and windows can make a major difference.

These ventilation techniques can be augmented with the use of air filtration and exhaust devices, as well as ultraviolet (UV) lights that kill germs. Another way to lessen the risk of microdroplet transmission is to avoid situations of overcrowding, especially on public transport and in public buildings, Morawka said.

Furness agreed with the suggestion to use UV lights in air filtration systems, saying that there could be a “renaissance” in this practice because the light can be effective against the virus in a way that physical filters cannot.

“I think we will probably see a resurgence in the use of UV light within air circulation systems, because UV light will kill viruses and it doesn’t really matter how small they are,” he said.

Face masks do not play a role in protecting against microdroplets, Furness said, because the droplets are so small that they can fit through the holes in most masks.

“If we were really concerned about aerosol, if we were really concerned about airborne, we would also be finding that wearing face coverings typically didn’t have that much of an effect – but the evidence says that they do,” he said.

“It’s not that we dramatically need to change what we are doing, it’s a question of trying to better understand our adversary and better understand what some of those risks may be.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending