Ian Bremmer: The dangerous, dysfunctional state of American politics | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Ian Bremmer: The dangerous, dysfunctional state of American politics

Published

 on

Dread is on the rise across the United States as the nation slides toward its next tempestuous election. The mood is dark. Just 23 per cent of Americans say the country is on the “right track,” according to a New York Times poll published on Aug. 1, and 65 per cent say the nation is headed in the “wrong direction.” President Joe Biden’s approval rating stands at about 40 per cent, and half of voters who align with his Democratic party don’t want him to seek re-election next year. Also on Aug. 1, twice-impeached former president Donald Trump was indicted for the third time, in this case for trying to steal the 2020 election. His national approval numbers are even lower than Biden’s.

Despite all this, a Biden-Trump rematch next year appears increasingly inevitable, given the lack of credible alternative candidates within their respective parties. That same New York Times survey found national support for the two candidates deadlocked at 43 per cent each.
This is just the latest bit of headshaking evidence that, for all its cultural dynamism, innovative energy and resilient economy, politics in the United States over the past 25 years has become more dysfunctional than in any other wealthy democracy — and the problem is getting worse. America is now what Abraham Lincoln called “a house divided.” The worldviews of urban and rural voters, of those with traditional social values versus those more progressive and those who are more globalist in their outlook versus those more populist, now have vanishingly little in common.

These gaps in perception have predictably created a deep polarization among elected officials in Washington. Today, because the political debate is so polarized, there is far less ideological overlap between the most liberal elected Republicans and the most conservative Democrats, leaving politicians with less political incentive for cross-party compromise, much less collaboration.

The nation’s pessimism and partisan furies are not the result of a struggling economy or genuine threats to the nation’s security. Despite fears of a slowdown, or even of recession, the U.S. economy now has the highest growth rate among the G7 group of industrialized nations. The official unemployment rate stands at its lowest point since the 1960s. Economic inequality, though still a problem, is narrowing. In July, U.S. consumer sentiment surged to a two-year high. There have been no major terrorist attacks in the country in years, and the immigration crisis at its southern border has quieted. Most Americans support Ukraine in its war against Russian invaders, but the conflict’s dangers and worst economic effects feel far away.

Instead, Americans have experienced a cascading flood of both misinformation (undiluted media injections of partisan political propaganda) and disinformation (deliberately false reporting designed to sow confusion and anger among voters). Americans now consume information from media outlets, people and institutions that confirm their prejudices, while hearing few unfiltered voices that challenge their assumptions — about life in America and the world beyond.

This trend was driven first by political talk radio starting in the ’80s, cable news since the ’90s, the blogosphere since the early 2000s and now social media algorithms. This newest media platform draws advertising dollars from content designed to provoke strong emotional reactions, a process fundamentally incompatible with a well-informed and emotionally healthy society. It’s a business model that maximizes profit with the use of bots and trolls, promotes extremism and deliberately spreads false information.

Making matters worse, neither the tech companies that profit from this anger nor the politicians who raise campaign cash from angry citizens have incentives to limit the inevitable damage to American society.

This trend has sharply undermined American public confidence in virtually all the country’s leading institutions. In recent surveys, fewer than half of Americans say they have confidence in the nation’s police officers, doctors, religious leaders, education system, trade unions, banks, judges, technology companies or the media itself. But the effects of the bitter partisanship stoked by misinformation and disinformation in the United States aren’t limited to election results or political discussions.

Americans are now far less likely to form and keep close friendships or to date someone sympathetic to the other party. In 1960, just four per cent of Americans said they would be unhappy if their child married someone from another party; by 2021, it was 40 per cent. Only four per cent of marriages today occur between a Republican and Democrat. Politics has become tribal as never before.

America’s polarization isn’t just a problem for Americans. Allies and partners know they cannot trust the next U.S. president to follow the path created by the current chief executive.

Throughout modern U.S. history, power in Washington has oscillated between the country’s two major parties. But Republicans and Democrats once agreed that U.S. alliances were crucial to the nation’s security, that cross-border trade boosted prosperity and that the integrity of America’s most important political institutions must be protected. These certainties are gone. The differences between Biden and Trump — and between Democratic and Republican voters — over both America’s identity and its role in the world are becoming starker

One more ominous sign worth watching: a survey published in June by the University of Chicago found that 12-million Americans say they would support violence to help return Donald Trump to power, and 22-million Americans say violence would be justified if it could restore abortion rights that were sharply limited by recent Supreme Court rulings.

In short, 2024 will be a dangerous year for politics in America and for the nation’s relationships around the world. But the toxic impact of the nation’s polarized media guarantees that these problems will remain no matter who wins next November.

 

Politics

NDP caving to Poilievre on carbon price, has no idea how to fight climate change: PM

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the NDP is caving to political pressure from Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre when it comes to their stance on the consumer carbon price.

Trudeau says he believes Jagmeet Singh and the NDP care about the environment, but it’s “increasingly obvious” that they have “no idea” what to do about climate change.

On Thursday, Singh said the NDP is working on a plan that wouldn’t put the burden of fighting climate change on the backs of workers, but wouldn’t say if that plan would include a consumer carbon price.

Singh’s noncommittal position comes as the NDP tries to frame itself as a credible alternative to the Conservatives in the next federal election.

Poilievre responded to that by releasing a video, pointing out that the NDP has voted time and again in favour of the Liberals’ carbon price.

British Columbia Premier David Eby also changed his tune on Thursday, promising that a re-elected NDP government would scrap the long-standing carbon tax and shift the burden to “big polluters,” if the federal government dropped its requirements.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 13, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Quebec consumer rights bill to regulate how merchants can ask for tips

Published

 on

 

Quebec wants to curb excessive tipping.

Simon Jolin-Barrette, minister responsible for consumer protection, has tabled a bill to force merchants to calculate tips based on the price before tax.

That means on a restaurant bill of $100, suggested tips would be calculated based on $100, not on $114.98 after provincial and federal sales taxes are added.

The bill would also increase the rebate offered to consumers when the price of an item at the cash register is higher than the shelf price, to $15 from $10.

And it would force grocery stores offering a discounted price for several items to clearly list the unit price as well.

Businesses would also have to indicate whether taxes will be added to the price of food products.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Youri Chassin quits CAQ to sit as Independent, second member to leave this month

Published

 on

 

Quebec legislature member Youri Chassin has announced he’s leaving the Coalition Avenir Québec government to sit as an Independent.

He announced the decision shortly after writing an open letter criticizing Premier François Legault’s government for abandoning its principles of smaller government.

In the letter published in Le Journal de Montréal and Le Journal de Québec, Chassin accused the party of falling back on what he called the old formula of throwing money at problems instead of looking to do things differently.

Chassin says public services are more fragile than ever, despite rising spending that pushed the province to a record $11-billion deficit projected in the last budget.

He is the second CAQ member to leave the party in a little more than one week, after economy and energy minister Pierre Fitzgibbon announced Sept. 4 he would leave because he lost motivation to do his job.

Chassin says he has no intention of joining another party and will instead sit as an Independent until the end of his term.

He has represented the Saint-Jérôme riding since the CAQ rose to power in 2018, but has not served in cabinet.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 12, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version