Indictment of Donald Trump unsealed | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Indictment of Donald Trump unsealed

Published

 on

It was billed as the gravest legal threat to Donald Trump and now we know why: He faces criminal charges that are sweeping in scope — and staggering in their severity.

An indictment unsealed Friday details 37 charges against the former U.S. president, related to national security for improperly stashing classified documents, showing them off, and then lying to authorities about them.

The potential risk to Trump extends far beyond his 2024 presidential run.

Put simply, in the words of a Fox News legal analyst, digesting on air what he referred to as a damning indictment: A conviction could result in Trump spending his final years in prison.

The case before a Florida court accuses Trump of storing secret information on U.S. nuclear programs, military vulnerabilities, and retaliation strategies of the U.S. and its allies — all kept at a property being visited by tens of thousands of people: Trump’s Mar-a-Lago dwelling and club.

They were stored in a bathroom, a ballroom, his bedroom, a shower, and a storage room. Some even sat scattered on the floor, including one document belonging to Five Eyes, the intelligence alliance that includes Canada.

They were stored in a bathroom, a ballroom, his bedroom, a shower and a storage room. Some even sat scattered on the floor, including one document belonging to Five Eyes, the intelligence alliance that includes Canada.

Documents were stored in a bathroom and other places at Mar-a-Lago. Sometimes they were mixed with newspaper clippings. Authorities allege sheets spilled out of boxes in this storage closet, including one secret document belonging to the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, which includes Canada. (U.S. Department of Justice)

The indictment further accuses Trump of improperly showing off these documents — to writers working on a book and to an ally in a political action committee.

In these conversations, federal authorities say, Trump explicitly stated that he knew he shouldn’t be showing these documents, a potentially incriminating detail authorities will use in court.

One of those conversations was allegedly recorded.

“This is secret information. Look at this,” Trump was allegedly heard saying, speaking to authors working with his former chief of staff on a book.

“Isn’t that incredible? … As president, I could have declassified it. … Now I can’t, you know, but this is still a secret.”

He allegedly showed those authors details of a military attack plan against an undisclosed country, which U.S. media reports say involved Iran.

A staff member interjected, according to the indictment, to say: “Now we have a problem.”

Former U.S. president Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate is seen on June 8, 2023, in Palm Beach, Fla. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Potentially, it turns out, a serious problem.

Several of the alleged crimes carry a maximum of 20 years in prison. The counts range from violations of the Espionage Act for wilful retention of defence documents, to corruptly concealing public records, to obstruction of justice.

In a months-long cat-and-mouse game with federal officials, the indictment says Trump instructed aides to hide documents, making comments like, “Wouldn’t it be better if we just told them we don’t have anything here?”

As he unsealed the 49-page indictment Friday, special counsel Jack Smith, the prosecutor, invited members of the public to explore it before making up their minds about the case.

“I invite everyone to read it in full to understand the scope and the gravity of the crimes charged,” Smith said in a brief media appearance.

The charging document accuses Trump of imperilling the country’s security, relations with foreign allies and human sources who work to collect intelligence.

Smith insisted his process was independent and apolitical, with the charges approved by a grand jury. He sought to pre-empt inevitable accusations that it amounts to a partisan political hit: “Our nation’s commitment to the rule of law sets an example for the world.”

Mindful of the looming presidential election, he promised to seek a speedy trial.

Special Counsel Jack Smith speaks to the media at the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., on Friday, announcing the unsealing of the indictment against former U.S. president Donald Trump. Trump was indicted Friday on 37 counts in the Mar-a-Lago documents case, accused of keeping top secret files on U.S. nuclear and weapons programs and defence plans after leaving the White House. (Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images)

The former president had announced Thursday he’d been indicted and ordered to appear in a Miami court next Tuesday.

As with all things Trump, chaotic news has kept coming: In the span of hours, Trump declared an aide, Walt Nauta, will also be charged; announced a shakeup of his legal team as some lawyers resigned for unstated reasons; and most — but not all — top Republicans furiously closed ranks around him.

“I’m an innocent man,” Trump said in a video late Thursday. “This is warfare for the law. We can’t let it happen.”

So the breaker of political barriers is about to bust a new one. The first president to be impeached twice. He recently became the first ex-president charged with a crime. On Friday, he became the first ex-president charged twice, and the first charged with federal crimes.

ABC News reports that the judge assigned to the initial hearing has a history with this case; Aileen Cannon is the same Trump-appointed judge who sided with him earlier in procedural decisions that slowed the investigation, until she was overturned and criticized by an appeals court.

This is the gravest legal threat Trump has ever faced, the one most likely to rattle his political comeback and imperil his freedom. It’s in a different legal league than his earlier arrest this spring on New York state charges of hush money payments to hide a sexual affair.

Even some vocal Trump critics questioned that earlier arrest, calling those charges weak. His former attorney general, Bill Barr, called it a miscarriage of justice.

Trump and William Barr, his attorney general, arrive at Andrews Air Force Base, Md., on Sept. 1, 2020, after a trip to Kenosha, Wis. (Evan Vucci/The Associated Press)

Barr views this case differently.

“I’ve said for a while that I think this is the most dangerous legal risk facing the former president,” Barr told CBS earlier this week, speaking of the documents investigation.

“From what I’ve seen there’s substantial evidence there.… There’s no excuse for what he did here.”

Trump argues he had the right to take the documents and, if he’s charged, why wouldn’t President Joe Biden be too, given his own mishandling of numerous classified documents?

Source link

News

Alberta Premier Smith aims to help fund private school construction

Published

 on

 

EDMONTON – Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says her government’s $8.6-billion plan to fast-track building new schools will include a pilot project to incentivize private ones.

Smith said the ultimate goal is to create thousands of new spaces for an exploding number of new students at a reduced cost to taxpayers.

“We want to put all of the different school options on the same level playing field,” Smith told a news conference in Calgary Wednesday.

Smith did not offer details about how much private school construction costs might be incentivized, but said she wants to see what independent schools might pitch.

“We’re putting it out there as a pilot to see if there is any interest in partnering on the same basis that we’ll be building the other schools with the different (public) school boards,” she said.

Smith made the announcement a day after she announced the multibillion-dollar school build to address soaring numbers of new students.

By quadrupling the current school construction budget to $8.6 billion, the province aims to offer up 30 new schools each year, adding 50,000 new student spaces within three years.

The government also wants to build or expand five charter school buildings per year, starting in next year’s budget, adding 12,500 spaces within four years.

Currently, non-profit independent schools can get some grants worth about 70 per cent of what students in public schools receive per student from the province.

However, those grants don’t cover major construction costs.

John Jagersma, executive director of the Association of Independent Schools and Colleges of Alberta, said he’s interested in having conversations with the government about incentives.

He said the province has never directly funded major capital costs for their facilities before, and said he doesn’t think the association has ever asked for full capital funding.

He said community or religious groups traditionally cover those costs, but they can help take the pressure off the public or separate systems.

“We think we can do our part,” Jagersma said.

Dennis MacNeil, head of the Public School Boards Association of Alberta, said they welcome the new funding, but said money for private school builds would set a precedent that could ultimately hurt the public system.

“We believe that the first school in any community should be a public school, because only public schools accept all kids that come through their doors and provide programming for them,” he said.

Jason Schilling, president of the Alberta Teachers’ Association, said if public dollars are going to be spent on building private schools, then students in the public system should be able to equitably access those schools.

“No other province spends as much money on private schools as Alberta does, and it’s at the detriment of public schools, where over 90 per cent of students go to school,” he said.

Schilling also said the province needs about 5,000 teachers now, but the government announcement didn’t offer a plan to train and hire thousands more over the next few years.

Alberta NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi on Tuesday praised the $8.6 billion as a “generational investment” in education, but said private schools have different mandates and the result could be schools not being built where they are needed most.

“Using that money to build public schools is more efficient, it’s smarter, it’s faster, and it will serve students better,” Nenshi said.

Education Minister Demetrios Nicolaides’ office declined to answer specific questions about the pilot project Wednesday, saying it’s still under development.

“Options and considerations for making capital more affordable for independent schools are being explored,” a spokesperson said. “Further information on this program will be forthcoming in the near future.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 18, 2024.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Health Minister Mark Holland appeals to Senate not to amend pharmacare bill

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Health Minister Mark Holland urged a committee of senators Wednesday not to tweak the pharmacare bill he carefully negotiated with the NDP earlier this year.

The bill would underpin a potential national, single-payer pharmacare program and allow the health minister to negotiate with provinces and territories to cover some diabetes and contraceptive medications.

It was the result of weeks of political negotiations with the New Democrats, who early this year threatened to pull out of their supply-and-confidence deal with the Liberals unless they could agree on the wording.

“Academics and experts have suggested amendments to this bill to most of us here, I think,” Independent Senator Rosemary Moodie told Holland at a meeting of the Senate’s social affairs committee.

Holland appeared before the committee as it considers the bill. He said he respects the role of the Senate, but that the pharmacare legislation is, in his view, “a little bit different.”

“It was balanced on a pinhead,” he told the committee.

“This is by far — and I’ve been involved in a lot of complex things — the most difficult bit of business I’ve ever been in. Every syllable, every word in this bill was debated and argued over.”

Holland also asked the senators to move quickly to pass the legislation, to avoid lending credence to Conservative critiques that the program is a fantasy.

When asked about the Liberals’ proposed pharmacare program for diabetes and birth control, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has often responded that the program isn’t real. Once the legislation is passed, the minister must negotiate with every provincial government to actually administer the program, which could take many months.

“If we spend a long time wordsmithing and trying to make the legislation perfect, then the criticism that it’s not real starts to feel real for people, because they don’t actually get drugs, they don’t get an improvement in their life,” Holland told the committee.

He told the committee that one of the reasons he signed a preliminary deal with his counterpart in British Columbia was to help answer some of the Senate’s questions about how the program would work in practice.

The memorandum of understanding between Ottawa and B.C. lays out how to province will use funds from the pharmacare bill to expand on its existing public coverage of contraceptives to include hormone replacement therapy to treat menopausal symptoms.

The agreement isn’t binding, and Holland would still need to formalize talks with the province when and if the Senate passes the bill based on any changes the senators decide to make.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 18, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Nova Scotia NDP accuse government of prioritizing landlord profits over renters

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia’s NDP are accusing the government of prioritizing landlords over residents who need an affordable place to live, as the opposition party tables a bill aimed at addressing the housing crisis.

NDP Leader Claudia Chender took aim at the Progressive Conservatives Wednesday ahead of introducing two new housing bills, saying the government “seems to be more focused on helping wealthy developers than everyday families.”

The Minister of Service Nova Scotia has said the government’s own housing legislation will “balance” the needs of tenants and landlords by extending the five per cent cap on rent until the end of 2027. But critics have called the cap extension useless because it allows landlords to raise rents past five per cent on fixed-term leases as long as property owners sign with a new renter.

Chender said the rules around fixed-term leases give landlords the “financial incentive to evict,” resulting in more people pushed into homelessness. She also criticized the part of the government bill that will permit landlords to issue eviction notices after three days of unpaid rent instead of 15.

The Tories’ housing bill, she said, represents a “shocking admission from this government that they are more concerned with conversations around landlord profits … than they are about Nova Scotians who are trying to find a home they can afford.”

The premier’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Also included in the government’s new housing legislation are clearer conditions for landlords to end a tenancy, such as criminal behaviour, disturbing fellow tenants, repeated late rental payments and extraordinary damage to a unit. It will also prohibit tenants from subletting units for more than they are paying.

The first NDP bill tabled Wednesday would create a “homelessness task force” to gather data to try to prevent homelessness, and the second would set limits on evictions during the winter and for seniors who meet income eligibility requirements for social housing and have lived in the same home for more than 10 years.

The NDP has previously tabled legislation that would create a $500 tax credit for renters and tie rent control to housing units instead of the individual.

Earlier this week landlords defended the use of the contentious fixed-term leases, saying they need to have the option to raise rent higher than five per cent to maintain their properties and recoup costs. Landlord Yarviv Gadish, who manages three properties in the Halifax area, called the use of fixed-term leases “absolutely essential” in order to keep his apartments presentable and to get a return on his investment.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 18, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version