Inflation Peaks, Economy Weakens; The Fed's Last Hurrah - Forbes | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

Inflation Peaks, Economy Weakens; The Fed's Last Hurrah – Forbes

Published

 on


It was a down week for equity markets due to the ugly CPI print (+9.1% Y/Y) on Wednesday (July 13). Some recovery occurred on Friday with markets using the +1.0% M/M Retail Sales number as the latest hope that the economic slowdown will result in a soft-landing.

While the coincident and lagging indicators make it appear that the economy is just slowing, nearly all the leading indicators are flashing caution (see chart above). Thus, our view continues to be that markets get oversold and rally on the hopes of a soft landing. But we remain doubtful that one will be achieved. For example, the 1% growth in nominal retail spending looks great on the surface, but when set against the backdrop of a 1.3% rise in the CPI, Real Retail Sales were negative in volume terms.

Viewing Future Inflation

The June CPI spike was due to soaring energy prices which peaked right around the time the June price surveys were conducted. The PPI (Producer Price Index) was also hot for June coming in at +1.1% M/M with the energy segment up a whopping +9.9% M/M. Because food and energy prices are often volatile (no kidding!), inflation watchers look at “core” CPI and PPI which exclude food and energy. The table shows “core” Y/Y inflation data.

While the reductions are not dramatic (yet), the trend is in the right direction.

Of course, food and energy are essential to everyday life, so, if these continue to skyrocket, it’s a big problem. Let’s also acknowledge that inflation is a rate of change, not a level, so if all the prices were suddenly frozen at their current levels, inflation would be 0% even though prices would still be high.

Here is the good news! The price of oil (WTI crude for August delivery) which was $123.70/bbl. on March 7 and $122.11 as late as June 7, closed at $97.57 on Friday (July 15). That’s a -21% fall from the peak. According to AAA, the national average for a gallon of regular gasoline in mid-June was $5.01. In mid-July it had fallen to $4.58, an -8.5% drop. While not as dramatic (yet) as the fall in WTI, it is still coming down, (Yes, gas prices always go up much faster than they come down!) The good news is that there will continue to be downward pressure in prices at the pump. The chart shows that the price of WTI crude has fallen in four of the past five weeks.

The good news doesn’t stop there. In the agricultural trading pits, the 2022 pop in ag prices has completely reversed (see chart) and this is substantially true for all commodities (see second chart).

Remember, inflation is the change in prices. So, the implication of what we are seeing in the oil, ag, and commodity pits are future falling prices, i.e., a bit of welcome deflation. Here are some specific examples: Between July 1 and July14, oil: -13%; base metals: -13%, food commodities: -11%, and, as noted above, between mid-June and mid-July prices at the pump: -8.5%. We have also seen downward price pressures in the cost of shipping. The Baltic Dry Index, which measures the cost of shipping dry bulk materials, has fallen -64% from its recent peak.

Causes

What’s causing this? Part of the fall in commodity prices, especially in the metals complex, is the stagnation in China’s economy as a result of their zero-Covid policy. Their city shut-downs have been well publicized. They just reported Q2 Real GDP at +0.4% and there is much skepticism about that number among China watchers. Europe’s economy is already in Recession and perhaps headed for Depression. And, as noted below, the U.S. economy is less than healthy. The result is that futures prices are in a state of “backwardation” as traders in the commodity pits see lower future demand and lower future prices.

To sum up the good news, it does appear that the rate of inflation peaked in June and will fall rather quickly in the foreseeable future, i.e., through the end of the year.

The Labor Market’s Health

As we noted in our last blog, the unemployment rate is calculated from the Household Survey which showed -315K job losses (although that number was completely ignored by the media). The unemployment rate stayed at 3.6% because the denominator, the labor force, supposedly shrunk. The Household Survey showed up with negative numbers in two of the last three months and, historically, has been a better indicator of the health of the labor market than the headline Payroll Survey (+372K). Unemployment is a lagging indicator. Because employee turnover is expensive, businesses hold on to their employees for as long as they can, first reducing hours worked (and that’s what we are seeing). And that’s why employment data are lagging indicators. Thus, when the weekly Initial and Continuing Unemployment Claims begin to rise, one knows something sinister is afoot.

Initial Unemployment Claims rose +21K the week of July 8 (Not Seasonally Adjusted; +9K Seasonally Adjusted). Until this most recent report, Initial Claims had been rising, but slowly. But now, since the low point last spring, Initial Claims are up nearly +80K. Historically, once Initial Claims rise above 60K, recessions have typically followed. Initial Claims are a flow variable, meaning that Claims are now rising 80K per week. Doing the math, at the current rate, in 13 weeks (one GDP Quarter), there will be a million+ more people unemployed. So, this is not trivial.

Continuing Claims (those unemployed more than one week) also jumped +72K in the July 1 week (Continuing Claims are reported with a week-lag). That’s 72,000 people that were previously laid off who haven’t found another job. The total out of work for more than a week is now 1.4 million. What has happened to that tight labor market?

Not Keeping Up

To make matters worse, inflation has eaten into America’s standard of living. The first chart below shows that Average Weekly Earnings have been negative on a Y/Y basis since April 2021.

The next chart shows that the average employee is no better off today than they were in April 2019; that’s more than three years ago and prior to the Pandemic.

We also note that credit card balances have spiked as consumers have attempted to maintain their living standards. This, however, won’t last as credit limits are approached.

For several blogs, we have highlighted the University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index. The overall survey is at the lowest level in its 70+ year history.

And, it doesn’t look any better for the housing industry, the auto industry, or for the manufacturers and sellers of big-ticket items, like appliances, carpeting, home improvement etc. We’ve included the chart for houses below and note that recent headlines have bemoaned the fact that housing markets are cooling as interest rates have risen, and there have even been the first signs of falling housing prices in some formerly hot markets.

Final Thoughts

The next set of Fed meetings are the week of July 25. The bloated CPI numbers (remember, this is a lagging indicator) have put a 100-basis point (1 pct. point) rise in the Fed Funds rate into play. There are two possible reasons this Fed might raise the Fed Funds rate from its current 1.50%-1.75% range to 2.50%-2.75%. The first is that it is truly fixated on the 9.1% Y/Y rise in the CPI, a lagging indicator, which, as explained above, will be the peak for this cycle. The second, and in our view, more credible reason, is that they may want to get to a “neutral” policy position, which economists have calculated in the 2.50% range. Give the rapid deteriorating data, the July meeting may be their last chance to do so if, as we expect, the data shows Recession and falling inflation by the time they are scheduled to meet again (September).

In any case, we believe that at least a 75-basis point rate hike is a lock for the July meeting, but also believe that it will be the final or near final rate hike of this cycle because, by September, even the lagging economic indicators will have deteriorated to the point where they can’t be ignored and the inflation data will be moving to the downside. Finally, if indeed this scenario plays out (an end to rate hikes) after the Fed’s September meeting, the equity markets may respond positively.

(Joshua Barone contributed to this blog)

Adblock test (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

B.C.’s debt and deficit forecast to rise as the provincial election nears

Published

 on

 

VICTORIA – British Columbia is forecasting a record budget deficit and a rising debt of almost $129 billion less than two weeks before the start of a provincial election campaign where economic stability and future progress are expected to be major issues.

Finance Minister Katrine Conroy, who has announced her retirement and will not seek re-election in the Oct. 19 vote, said Tuesday her final budget update as minister predicts a deficit of $8.9 billion, up $1.1 billion from a forecast she made earlier this year.

Conroy said she acknowledges “challenges” facing B.C., including three consecutive deficit budgets, but expected improved economic growth where the province will start to “turn a corner.”

The $8.9 billion deficit forecast for 2024-2025 is followed by annual deficit projections of $6.7 billion and $6.1 billion in 2026-2027, Conroy said at a news conference outlining the government’s first quarterly financial update.

Conroy said lower corporate income tax and natural resource revenues and the increased cost of fighting wildfires have had some of the largest impacts on the budget.

“I want to acknowledge the economic uncertainties,” she said. “While global inflation is showing signs of easing and we’ve seen cuts to the Bank of Canada interest rates, we know that the challenges are not over.”

Conroy said wildfire response costs are expected to total $886 million this year, more than $650 million higher than originally forecast.

Corporate income tax revenue is forecast to be $638 million lower as a result of federal government updates and natural resource revenues are down $299 million due to lower prices for natural gas, lumber and electricity, she said.

Debt-servicing costs are also forecast to be $344 million higher due to the larger debt balance, the current interest rate and accelerated borrowing to ensure services and capital projects are maintained through the province’s election period, said Conroy.

B.C.’s economic growth is expected to strengthen over the next three years, but the timing of a return to a balanced budget will fall to another minister, said Conroy, who was addressing what likely would be her last news conference as Minister of Finance.

The election is expected to be called on Sept. 21, with the vote set for Oct. 19.

“While we are a strong province, people are facing challenges,” she said. “We have never shied away from taking those challenges head on, because we want to keep British Columbians secure and help them build good lives now and for the long term. With the investments we’re making and the actions we’re taking to support people and build a stronger economy, we’ve started to turn a corner.”

Premier David Eby said before the fiscal forecast was released Tuesday that the New Democrat government remains committed to providing services and supports for people in British Columbia and cuts are not on his agenda.

Eby said people have been hurt by high interest costs and the province is facing budget pressures connected to low resource prices, high wildfire costs and struggling global economies.

The premier said that now is not the time to reduce supports and services for people.

Last month’s year-end report for the 2023-2024 budget saw the province post a budget deficit of $5.035 billion, down from the previous forecast of $5.9 billion.

Eby said he expects government financial priorities to become a major issue during the upcoming election, with the NDP pledging to continue to fund services and the B.C. Conservatives looking to make cuts.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 10, 2024.

Note to readers: This is a corrected story. A previous version said the debt would be going up to more than $129 billion. In fact, it will be almost $129 billion.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Mark Carney mum on carbon-tax advice, future in politics at Liberal retreat

Published

 on

 

NANAIMO, B.C. – Former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney says he’ll be advising the Liberal party to flip some the challenges posed by an increasingly divided and dangerous world into an economic opportunity for Canada.

But he won’t say what his specific advice will be on economic issues that are politically divisive in Canada, like the carbon tax.

He presented his vision for the Liberals’ economic policy at the party’s caucus retreat in Nanaimo, B.C. today, after he agreed to help the party prepare for the next election as chair of a Liberal task force on economic growth.

Carney has been touted as a possible leadership contender to replace Justin Trudeau, who has said he has tried to coax Carney into politics for years.

Carney says if the prime minister asks him to do something he will do it to the best of his ability, but won’t elaborate on whether the new adviser role could lead to him adding his name to a ballot in the next election.

Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland says she has been taking advice from Carney for years, and that his new position won’t infringe on her role.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 10, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Nova Scotia bill would kick-start offshore wind industry without approval from Ottawa

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – The Nova Scotia government has introduced a bill that would kick-start the province’s offshore wind industry without federal approval.

Natural Resources Minister Tory Rushton says amendments within a new omnibus bill introduced today will help ensure Nova Scotia meets its goal of launching a first call for offshore wind bids next year.

The province wants to offer project licences by 2030 to develop a total of five gigawatts of power from offshore wind.

Rushton says normally the province would wait for the federal government to adopt legislation establishing a wind industry off Canada’s East Coast, but that process has been “progressing slowly.”

Federal legislation that would enable the development of offshore wind farms in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador has passed through the first and second reading in the Senate, and is currently under consideration in committee.

Rushton says the Nova Scotia bill mirrors the federal legislation and would prevent the province’s offshore wind industry from being held up in Ottawa.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 10, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version