In Saturday night’s loss to the Winnipeg Jets, the Toronto Maple Leafs were issued a bench minor in the third period. The score was 4-2 at the time, and Nikolaj Ehlers had just scored on the power play for Winnipeg after Morgan Rielly had been called for interference.
Off the faceoff, Zach Hyman moved in to prevent the Jets from getting to the puck and knocked a few of them over. There’s no question that’s interference. The only question is how consistently is it called. Every person has their own answer to that.
Backing up, Morgan Rielly, who is not a complainer about penalties all that often, was upset by the call against him:
Now, onto the Hyman penalty:
The quote Omar and the rest of us can lipread there is obvious. So is the bit later where Sheldon Keefe says something like, “Fuck you, ref,” or “Fucking crap,” it’s hard to tell. That’s the part where he got the bench minor.
39.1 General Description – A player, goalkeeper, Coach or non-playing person shall not challenge or dispute the rulings of an official before, during or after a game. A player, goalkeeper, Coach or non-playing person shall not display unsportsmanlike conduct including, but not limited to, obscene, profane or abusive language or gestures, comments of a personal nature intended to degrade an official, or persist in disputing a ruling after being told to stop or after being penalized for such behavior.
and…
39.3 Bench Minor Penalty – A bench minor penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct shall be assessed under this rule for the following infractions:
(i) Any Coach or non-playing person who bangs the boards with a stick or other object at any time, showing disrespect for an official’s decision. If this is done in order to get the attention of the on-ice officials for a legitimate reason (i.e. serious injury, illness, etc.), then discretion must be exercised by the Referees.
(ii) Any unidentifiable player or any Coach or non-playing person who uses obscene, profane or abusive language or gesture directed at an on or off-ice official or uses the name of any official coupled with any vociferous remarks. (see also 39.5 (ii))
(iii) Any player, Coach, or non-playing person interferes in any manner with any game official including the Referees, Linesmen, Game or Penalty Timekeepers or Goal Judges in the performance of their duties.
It’s clear that 39.3 (ii) is being applied in the game. What isn’t clear is if Keefe ever used the name of the referee.
The game misconduct rule in section 39.5, which for a coach means ejection, would only come into play if Keefe had kept going after the ref assessed the penalty.
The last section of the rule is this one:
39.6 Reports – It is the responsibility of all game officials and all club officials to send a confidential report to the Commissioner setting out the full details concerning the use of obscene gestures or language by any player, Coach or non-playing Club personnel. The Commissioner shall take such further disciplinary action as he shall deem appropriate.
Like a lot of rules in the NHL, this one gives the Commissioner broad discretion to apply fines or other sanctions.
Many people may recall that there is automatic supplementary discipline written into the rules, but that is under Rule 40 for Physical Abuse of Officials. There is no requirement for a fine to be levied in this case. But there can be one.
Some things to consider:
The term abuse can be defined to mean whatever you like, and expectations can be made about what referees should be subject to in the workplace, a very emo workplace to be sure. But your inference doesn’t matter. All that matters is the rules. And it’s very clear, particularly in this season where a lot of on-ice conversation is suddenly audible, that the referees don’t impose this rule with any more strictness than they do interference or there’d be no five-on-five play in a game.
The rule contains language about not using the name of the referee because the referee is not meant to be held personally to account. Players and coaches are supposed to interact with them in their role as referee, as an official, not Joe or Bob or Graham. They are performing a function, and it’s up to their departmental head to assess their performance personally.
The concepts of profane, obscene and abusive are never defined, and the NHL is an international league with players from all over the world in it, and there is no consensus on what any of those things mean or which words are bad across borders. There is, in my experience, a very stark divide between Canada and the USA in terms of how public reaction to profanity plays out.
Needless to say, if you want a bench minor, Keefe certainly showed the way. Any referee is likely to assess that situation the same way, particularly after Rielly’s disputing of his penalty. If only the NHL had made removing the mask a bench minor this season, none of this conversation would even be happening.
As for knowing when interference will be called… I got nothing. But I don’t think Keefe will get a fine for this one.
TORONTO – Reigning PWHL MVP and scoring champ Natalie Spooner will miss the start of the regular season for the Toronto Sceptres, general manager Gina Kingsbury announced Tuesday on the first day of training camp.
The 33-year-old Spooner had knee surgery on her left anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) after she was checked into the boards by Minnesota’s Grace Zumwinkle in Game 3 of their best-of-five semifinal series on May 13.
She had a goal and an assist in three playoff games but did not finish the series. Toronto was up 2-1 in the semifinal at that time and eventually fell 3-2 in the series.
Spooner led the PWHL with 27 points in 24 games. Her 20 goals, including five game-winners, were nine more than the closest skater.
Kingsbury said there is no timeline, as the team wants the Toronto native at 100 per cent, but added that “she is doing really well” in her recovery.
The Sceptres open the PWHL season on Nov. 30 when they host the Boston Fleet.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 12, 2024.
LAHORE, Pakistan (AP) — A top official of the Pakistan Cricket Board declined Friday to confirm media reports that India has decided against playing any games in host Pakistan during next year’s Champions Trophy.
“My view is if there’s any problems, they (India) should tell us in writing,” PCB chairman Mohsin Naqvi told reporters in Lahore. “I’ll share that with the media as well as with the government as soon as I get such a letter.”
Indian media reported Friday that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has communicated its concerns to all the Champions Trophy stakeholders, including the PCB, over the Feb. 19-March 9 tournament and would not play in arch-rival Pakistan.
The Times of India said that “Dubai is a strong candidate to host the fixtures involving the Men in Blue” for the 50-over tournament.
Such a solution would see Pakistan having to travel to a neutral venue to play India in a group match, with another potential meeting later in the tournament if both teams advanced from their group. The final is scheduled for March 9 in Pakistan with the specific venue not yet decided.
“Our stance is clear,” Naqvi said. “They need to give us in writing any objections they may have. Until now, no discussion of the hybrid model has happened, nor are we prepared to accept one.”
Political tensions have stopped bilateral cricket between the two nations since 2008 and they have competed in only multi-nation tournaments, including ICC World Cups.
“Cricket should be free of politics,” Naqvi said. “Any sport should not be entangled with politics. Our preparations for the Champions Trophy will continue unabated, and this will be a successful event.”
The PCB has already spent millions of dollars on the upgrade of stadiums in Karachi, Lahore and Rawalpindi which are due to host 15 Champions Trophy games. Naqvi hoped all the three stadiums will be ready over the next two months.
“Almost every country wants the Champions Trophy to be played here (in Pakistan),” Naqvi said. “I don’t think anyone should make this a political matter, and I don’t expect they will. I expect the tournament will be held at the home of the official hosts.”
Eight countries – Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, England, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and Afghanistan – are due to compete in the tournament, the schedule of which is yet to be announced by the International Cricket Council.
“Normally the ICC announces the schedule of any major tournament 100 days before the event, and I hope they will announce it very soon,” Naqvi said.
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia – Ottawa‘s Gabriela Dabrowski and Erin Routliffe of New Zealand are through to the doubles final at the WTA Finals after a 7-6 (7), 6-1 victory over Nicole Melichar-Martinez of the United States and Australia’s Ellen Perez in semifinal action Friday.
Dabrowski and Routliffe won a hard-fought first set against serve when Routliffe’s quick reaction at the net to defend a Perez shot gave the duo set point, causing Perez to throw down her racket in frustration.
The second seeds then cruised through the second set, winning match point on serve when Melichar-Martinez couldn’t handle Routliffe’s shot.
The showdown was a rematch of last year’s semifinal, which Melichar-Martinez and Perez won in a super tiebreak.
Dabrowski and Routliffe will face the winner of a match between Katerina Siniakova and Taylor Townsend, and Hao-Ching Chan and Veronika Kudermetova in the final on Saturday.
Dabrowski is aiming to become the first Canadian to win a WTA Finals title.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.
