Israeli politics in the time of the coronavirus: A moment of moral clarity or cynical politics - Haaretz | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Israeli politics in the time of the coronavirus: A moment of moral clarity or cynical politics – Haaretz

Published

 on


Benny Gantz’s statement on Thursday night that he would support the establishment of a national emergency government to confront the outbreak of coronavirus in Israel “that would include representation of all parts of the house (Knesset)” is a significant moment in Israeli history. For the first time, the leader of a major mainstream Israeli party is calling for the inclusion in government of the Arab-dominated parties of the Joint List which has never been part of a coalition.

This may turn out to be a fleeting moment which will be quickly lost in the rapidly escalating crisis. Netanyahu has already let it be known that he told Gantz in their late-night phone conversation that “there is no place for supporters of terror, in routine times and during emergency.” Gantz may yet back down under public pressure for a “unity.” It could have been just a momentary virtue gesture. And Netanyahu’s offer of an emergency government may well have been a political ruse to begin with.

It took a global pandemic for Israel’s leading centrist politician to obliquely admit that the political representatives of the 20 percent of Israeli citizens who are Arab should at least have a place in an emergency government. But in one short statement, Gantz has challenged the country’s oldest political taboo.

Just over a year since he started his career in politics, Gantz’s true beliefs are still inscrutable. Nearly everything he has said in public over this time has been dictated by campaign strategists and then agonized over by Kahol Lavan’s “cockpit,” the quadrumvirite of Gantz: Yair Lapid, Moshe Yaalon and Gabi Ashkenazi. It’s impossible to say whether Gantz’s statement was down to his true convictions or a calculated move, quite possibly both.

Netanyahu’s offer earlier in the evening, while he monopolized airtime with his banal advice to the public on how to blow their noses, was obviously a trap. The “national emergency government” was not an offer to recognize the fact that only last week, over half of the Israeli electorate voted for parties opposed to Netanyahu, and that he has now failed in three consecutive elections to win a majority. Netanyahu, who refuses to accept the basic fact that he is merely a caretaker prime minister and has been since December 2018, was simply offering Gantz to join his cabinet as an adornment. Not to appoint senior members of the opposition to key ministerial roles in place of his toady allies.

But Gantz was aware that even among his own voters, and some of his MKs, there is a desire for a stable government at this time, even if it is lead by Netanyahu. Refusing to engage with the prime minister’s offer because it didn’t include meaningful appointments for him and his colleagues, and the other opposition parties, would have seemed at a time like this as “small politics.” Making the “all parts of the house” condition was his best way of putting the ball back in Netanyahu’s court while portraying himself both as open to “unity” and a responsible grown-up.

We will soon see whether Gantz was serious or just cynically using the Arab-Israeli lawmakers, with whom he has yet to meet openly.

Gantz’s election campaign was hardly honorable. The only thing it had going for it was that placed next to Netanyahu’s orgy of smear and incitement, it was pretty clean. But as far as his repeated protestations that he would not be forming a government with the help of the Joint List go, when it was clear that without the MKs of the Arab parties, he simply wouldn’t have a coalition, it was practically bare-faced lying coupled with implied racism. Sure, it was nothing next to Netanyahu’s brazen dog-whistling, but it still was dishonest and immoral. Nevertheless, it didn’t work and the hoped-for “soft right” voters, upon realizing that Gantz wasn’t really offering anything new, went back to the original and voted Likud.

Are we now seeing the real Benny Gantz, liberated from the shackles of his political advisors? Insisting on all parties of the Knesset, especially the third-largest one which is now the sole representative of Arab-Israelis, being members of a national-emergency government is the right thing to do, both for moral, and political reasons.

Netanyahu’s proxies are already trying to frame it as yet another example of Gantz’s left-wing barminess they’ve been warning about for so long. Whether or not the move works is also dependent on Gantz explaining to the public that there’s no point in him joining the government just for show. It won’t help the nation fight coronavirus. He needs to highlight the fact that it’s not Netanyahu’s daily briefings which are keeping Israelis safe, but the medical teams, among which the Arab-Israeli voters of the Joint List are heavily represented.

It also remains to be seen whether the Joint List MKs can overcome their own taboo of serving in a “Zionist” government, especially under Netanyahu. Netanyahu is almost certainly not about to give them the chance, but a clear statement from them that if did, they would be willing, would be even more significant than Gantz’s statement.

Ultimately, if the more apocalyptic epidemiological predictions are borne out, the makeup of the cabinet will probably be the least of our worries and Netanyahu will be judged by much harsher standards than whether he dealt honestly with Gantz. His rush to take ownership of this crisis may prove his undoing, but that will only come after many have died and then he’ll be blamed for other things than his racism.

But whether this moment proves to be pivotal for Israeli society, or ends up in just a footnote to the Netanyahu era, the history of the Jewish people will record that when a plague threatened all the inhabitants of the land, the man who claimed to be the leader of the Jews refused to include the non-Jews in his national emergency government

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version