adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

Letter to the editor: Endless coverage of tragedies is media overkill – Ottawa Sun

Published

 on


Here are today’s Ottawa Sun letters to the editor.

Article content

MEDIA OVERKILL

Advertisement 2

Article content

As this is written, it has been a few days since a demented gunman opened fire at a Tops grocery in Buffalo and we still have unrelenting news coverage.

300x250x1

We cannot just quickly move on and forget the horrors of this tragedy. It affects not just the direct victims, but survivors, their families, bystanders and communities far beyond Buffalo. Nevertheless, when is enough media too much? I refer not to the need to report, to express and address issues associated with and investigate this crime, or search for ways to prevent repetition (good luck with that unless politicians enact really draconian measures to deal with firearms). I refer to reporting overkill in repeating the same old info.

For more than 30 minutes, CTV News Channel broadcast speaker after speaker in Buffalo. They droned on, repeating the same sentiments — thanking police, first responders, expressing condolences, announcing actions or donations local groups have undertaken, etc., but not adding any information on new developments. It’s a self-congratulatory PR exercise with all the wonderful announcements and reactions that still won’t prevent the next mass shooting.

Advertisement 3

Article content

Adding insult to injury, Power Play takes over at 5 p.m. and immediately continues 20 minutes of the same regurgitated info and interviews. Most of them simply parrot the same platitudes we hear every time out, what we (authorities/politicians) must do to end these attacks, but never follow through.

Once more, some media go way out of proportion with excessive repetitive coverage of an event to the point of obsession, like a dog with a bone. This continuing repetition of the same news clips only gives the acts of twisted perpetrators unwarranted media coverage.

MIKE ALAIN

OTTAWA

(You could always change the channel.)

GRANDSTANDING PM

I’m another one who thinks Justin Trudeau’s “surprise” visit to Ukraine was a bit of grandstanding. I believe he has deservedly lost a lot of respect and credibility on the international stage. I agree we should do everything we can to help the Ukrainians, but, on the other hand, Trudeau didn’t have the decency to acknowledge or even listen to his own Canadian trucker citizens. They had a legitimate reason to at least be heard. What a hypocrite.

Advertisement 4

Article content

GISELE LAVICTOIRE

ORLÉANS

(Perhaps if they had found a different way to deliver their message, people would have been more inclined to listen.)

SHOULD HAVE BEEN BLOCKED

The commentators for Monday’s Ontario election debate were terrible. Steven Del Duca and Andrea Horwath continually interrupted Doug Ford when he was talking. They should have been blocked several times. Very unprofessional.

ROGER POWER

OTTAWA

(Isn’t it better to let their true colours shine through?)

LILLEY LOST HIS WAY

Re: LILLEY: Poilievre ran in favour of carbon taxes multiple times in his career, online, May 16

At one time I thought Brian Lilley was an excellent reporter, especially when he was on Sun TV. Of late, it is difficult to understand exactly what he stands for as he comes across as being very pro-Liberal policies. He has even been singing the praises of Justin Trudeau on occasion. What Lilley fails to point out in his hit job on Pierre Poilievre is his stating he will do away with Trudeau’s carbon tax if he becomes prime minister. This is in stark contrast with Jean Charest and Patrick Brown, who Lilley seems to be in awe of and who have no such plan. Most Liberals, who view Poilievre as being the greatest threat to ending Trudeau’s rein of bad governance, view Charest and Brown as weaker opponents, so they are singing their praises.

LARRY COMEAU

OTTAWA

(Opinions can ebb and flow over time and sometimes even change tack.)

Advertisement 1

Comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

India’s media – captured and censored

Published

 on

Across almost every form of media in India – social, broadcast and print – Narendra Modi and the BJP hold sway.

With India amid a national election campaign, its news media is in sharp focus. Until recently it was believed that the sheer diversity of outlets ensured a range of perspectives, but now, India’s mainstream media has largely been co-opted by the Bharatiya Janata Party and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Just how did the media in India get to this point and what does it mean for the upcoming elections?

Featuring:

Ravish Kumar – Former Host, NDTV
Shashi Shekhar Vempati – Former CEO, Prasar Bharati
Pramod Raman – Chief Editor, MediaOne
Amy Kazmin – Former South Asia Bureau Chief, Financial Times
Meena Kotwal – Founder, The Mooknayak

300x250x1

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Social media lawsuit launched by Ontario school boards

Published

 on

Premier Doug Ford says that lawsuits launched by four Ontario school boards against multiple social media platforms are “nonsense” and risk becoming a distraction to the work that really matters.

The school boards, including three in the Greater Toronto Area, have launched lawsuits seeking $4.5 billion in damages against Snapchat, TikTok, and Meta, the owner of both Facebook and Instagram, for creating products that they allege negligently interfere with student learning and have caused “widespread disruption to the education system.”

But at an unrelated news conference in Ottawa on Friday, Ford said that he “disagrees” with the legal action and worries it could take the focus away from “the core values of education.”

“Let’s focus on math, reading and writing. That is what we need to do, put all the resources into the kids,” he said. “What are they spending lawyers fees to go after these massive companies that have endless cash to fight this? Let’s focus on the kids, not this other nonsense that they are looking to fight in court.”

300x250x1

Four separate but similar statements of claim were filed in Ontario’s Superior Court of JusticSocial media lawsuit launched by Ontario school boards pervasive problems such as distraction, social withdrawal, cyberbullying, a rapid escalation of aggression, and mental health challenges,” Colleen Russell-Rawlins, the director of education with the Toronto District School Board, said in a news release issued Thursday.

“It is imperative that we take steps to ensure the well-being of our youth. We are calling for measures to be implemented to mitigate these harms and prioritize the mental health and academic success of our future generation.”

The school boards are represented by Toronto-based law firm Neinstein LLP and the news release states that school boards “will not be responsible for any costs related to the lawsuit unless a successful outcome is reached.”

These lawsuits come as hundreds of school districts in the United States file similar suits.

“A strong education system is the foundation of our society and our community. Social media products and the changes in behaviour, judgement and attention that they cause pose a threat to that system and to the student population our schools serve,” Duncan Embury, the head of litigation at Neinstein LLP, said in the new release.

“We are proud to support our schools and students in this litigation with the goal of holding social media giants accountable and creating meaningful change.”

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Ontario school boards sue social media giants for $4.5B

Published

 on

Four major Ontario school boards are taking some of the largest social media companies to court over their products, alleging the way they’re designed has negatively rewired the way children think, behave and learn and disrupted the way schools operate.

The public district school boards of Toronto, Peel and Ottawa-Carleton, along with Toronto’s Catholic counterpart, are looking for about $4.5 billion in total damages from Meta Platforms Inc., Snap Inc. and ByteDance Ltd., which operate the platforms Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok respectively, according to separate but similar statements of claim filed Wednesday.

“These social media companies … have knowingly created a product that is addictive and marketed to kids,” said Rachel Chernos Lin, the chair of the Toronto District School Board, on CBC Radio’s Metro Morning on Thursday.

“We need them to be held accountable and we need them to create safer products.”

300x250x1

Social media giants ‘knowingly’ harming children, TDSB chair says in wake of lawsuit

3 hours ago

Duration 5:53

Four of Ontario’s largest school boards, including the Toronto District School Board (TDSB), have launched lawsuits against social media giants behind Meta, Snapchat and TikTok for allegedly causing harm to students. Metro Morning host David Common spoke with TDSB chair Rachel Chernos Lin about the action.

The allegations have yet to be proven in court, and there is no set date for when they will be heard. CBC Toronto has reached out to the companies named for comment.

The school boards, speaking under a new coalition called Schools for Social Media Change, allege students are experiencing an “attention, learning, and mental health crisis” because of “prolific and compulsive use of social media products,” in a news release.

They allege the platforms facilitate and promote cyberbullying, harassment, hate speech and misinformation, and have a part in escalating physical violence and conflicts in schools, according to the statements of claim.

They also argue these apps are “purposefully designed” to deliver harmful content to students dealing with topics such as suicidal ideation, drugs, self-harm, alcohol, eating disorders, hate speech and sex — particularly content encouraging “non-consensual” sexual activity.

Trying to respond to those problems has caused “massive strains” on the boards’ funds, including in additional mental health programming and staff, IT costs and administrative resources, the release says. The boards call on the social media giants to “remediate” the costs to the larger education system and redesign their products to keep students safe.

Lawsuit may be first of its kind in Canada

Hundreds of school boards in the United States, along with some states, have launched similar lawsuits against social media companies.

Last fall, over 30 states accused Meta Platforms Inc. of harming young people’s mental health and contributing to the youth mental health crisis by knowingly designing features on Instagram and Facebook that cause children to be addicted to its platforms.

In an email, a spokesperson for Snap said Snapchat was “intentionally designed to be different from traditional social media.”

“Snapchat opens directly to a camera — rather than a feed of content — and has no traditional public likes or comments. While we will always have more work to do, we feel good about the role Snapchat plays in helping close friends feel connected, happy and prepared as they face the many challenges of adolescence.”

What social media scrolling is doing to kids’ brains

5 months ago

Duration 7:52

With most children and teenagers spending hours a day on a smartphone, CBC’s Christine Birak breaks down what research shows about how using social media is changing kids’ behaviour, if it’s rewiring their brains and what can be done about it.

Neinstein LLP, a Toronto-based firm, is representing the school boards. The boards will not be responsible for any costs related to the suit unless a successful outcome is reached, the release says.

Duncan Embury, a partner and head of litigation at Neinstein, told CBC News the named companies are “mainly responsible” for the social media products that kids use, and share “common” designs or algorithms that lead to “problematic use.”

To his knowledge, this is the first case of its kind in Canada.

“Based on what we’re seeing and what we’re hearing from our educators, I think this is a problem that is pervasive across our system and I wouldn’t be surprised if there [were] more boards that took this step,” said Embury.

Ford ‘disagrees’ with move

At an unrelated news conference on Thursday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford said he “disagrees” with the schools boards’ lawsuits.

“What are they spending on lawyer fees to go after these massive companies that have endless cash to fight this? Let’s focus on the kids, not about this other nonsense that they’re looking to fight in court,” he said.

WATCH | Ford disagrees with school board lawsuits against social media companies:

Ford disagrees with school board lawsuits against social media companies

2 hours ago

Duration 0:41

Ontario Premier Doug Ford responded to news Thursday that four major school boards in the province are suing some of the largest social media companies over alleged harm to young people, saying he disagrees with the boards’ action. “Let’s focus on the kids, not about this other nonsense,” he told reporters.

CBC News spoke to parents with children who attend schools in the Toronto District School Board. While they all agree social media apps are a problem, they differ in what approach they think should be used to regulate them.

“Just take the phones away,” said Gillian Henderson.

“I don’t think we need to sue anybody, that seems like a long, expensive process. Just take away their phones in class and give them back to them when they need them.”

The board has recently moved to develop a policy to limit cellphone use in classrooms, which includes potential phone bans and social media restrictions. It previously said staff had problems enforcing policies stating students should only use phones for educational purposes only.

Two separate pictures of a woman and a man shown together.
Gillian Henderson and Shyon Baumann have children who attend schools in the Toronto District School Board. Henderson thinks schools should take students’ phones away in class, while Baumann says it may be helpful to force tech giants to decrease harm from their apps through the court system. (Paul Smith/CBC)

Shyon Baumann said school boards could use some help in reducing screen time.

“If the school boards can do what they can trying to police it, that would be great. But it would be also great if the app creators did what they could to make the harms decrease,” he said.

“If they’re not going to make voluntary changes, then maybe doing it through the courts is the most effective way.”

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending