Looking Ahead To 2021 And The Economic Impact Of Covid-19 - Forbes | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

Looking Ahead To 2021 And The Economic Impact Of Covid-19 – Forbes

Published

 on


by Linda Yueh, Adjunct Professor of Economics, London Business School

With the rollout of vaccines for Covid-19 last week, the control of the pandemic has begun. The dramatic speed of the development of the vaccines will need to be matched by production and distribution. AstraZeneca has announced that its vaccine developed with the University of Oxford will make two billion doses which will help developing countries. It will take a considerable amount of time until mass vaccinations have occurred everywhere in the world, but governments are now in a better position to plan for the economic recovery.

There will be need for government spending to reduce the risk of permanent damage to the economy from the shock of this global pandemic, which has caused contractions in GDP that are unparalleled in modern history for most economies.

For developed and emerging economies, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that national output will contract by nearly 6% in 2020, except for China which is forecast to grow. But the speed of recovery is vastly different. For developed economies, GDP is forecast to be a sizeable -4.7% before the pre-pandemic level in 2019. But for emerging economies, excluding China, the loss in output will be a staggering -8.1%.

Central bank policies are pointing to a prolonged recovery as well. The Federal Reserve has signalled that it will keep interest rates at rock bottom until at least the end of 2023. The European Central Bank has extended its pandemic emergency purchase programme until March 2022 while reinvesting its proceeds, i.e., continuing to inject cash, until at least the end of 2023. Both central banks are indicating they are supporting the economy with loose monetary policy for the next three years. It’s a reflection of the scale of economic damage from the pandemic.

Most countries will also need fiscal policies that boost growth to prevent the loss in output from becoming permanent. Some economies are fiscally constrained so they will have limited ability to borrow to spend, which captures some of the differences between the recovery trajectories between advanced economies and emerging economies. While developed economies face record low borrowing costs, a number of developing economies are in need of debt relief and have less capacity to use fiscal policy which will hamper their recoveries.

In terms of the recovery, the spending should be tailored to jobs. To prevent hysteresis, which is when an unemployment shock lowers growth potential, government spending will need to support jobs and try to prevent discouraged workers which in turn lowers the labour force participation in the economy. The extension of various furlough schemes in Europe into the next year or so as well as the new US stimulus package that is being debated in Congress are both aimed at this issue.

Keeping viable businesses, which are also employers, is another important aspect. For instance, the UK is planning to create a permanent new state-backed loan scheme for SMEs starting in January to replace the Covid-19 programme, which at £65 billion was a sizeable part of the government support.

For advanced economies, the recovery spending can also be designed to support longer-term growth aims (e.g., green growth) and address long-standing challenges (e.g., low productivity). The IMF has changed its emphasis during Covid-19 to encourage countries which can afford to do so to borrow to invest, shifting the emphasis from fiscal discipline to promoting economic growth that can take advantage of record low interest rates.

In their latest World Economic Outlook, the IMF estimated that during periods of high uncertainty such as a global pandemic, 1% of GDP spent on public infrastructure will generate 2.7% in GDP growth and raise employment by 1.2% after two years as well as boost private investment. That translates into between two to eight jobs for each million dollar invested in traditional infrastructure. But, if it is on green infrastructure, such as green electricity or R&D, there would be a bigger impact of five to 14 jobs created by every $1 million invested by the state. The lower capital stock and higher technological component of green investments could generate a larger effect than traditional infrastructure. But there is variation there as well. For instance, digital infrastructure could provide better access and faster broadband that supports remote working and greater e-commerce. Better transport links would help with hybrid working and online deliveries.

In short, creating jobs and boosting greener growth would focus the extraordinary amounts of government spending on both near-term needs and longer-term aims.

Additionally, if governments were to distinguish between current and capital spending, then bond investors can assess whether there will be a longer-term growth impact from the latter spending. Raising the growth rate of the economy relative to the increase in debt would help with the debt-to-GDP ratio typically used in debt sustainability analysis. It won’t be the final word on public finances, but the countries which have spent strategically may be assessed more favourably by creditors.

At the end of 2020, even though the upcoming winter months will be challenging, due to the speed of vaccine development, it is possible to look ahead and start planning more rigorously for the recovery phase.

Linda Yueh is Adjunct Professor of Economics at London Business School and the author of The Great Economists: How Their Ideas Can Help Us Today.

Discover insights from some of the world’s top business leaders and researches at Think at London Business School

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version