adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Investment

Low-carbon investing is not a simple decision – Investment Executive

Published

 on


This can understandably be confusing for investors, acknowledged John Cook, senior vice-president, portfolio manager and investor engagement team co-lead with the Greenchip Team at Toronto-based Mackenzie Investments.

Cook draws a distinction between ESG investing, which focuses on each company’s environment, social and governance policies; and environmental thematic investing, whereby investors put their money into renewable energy, energy efficiency, clean technologies and sustainable agriculture companies.

300x250x1

Environmental thematic investing often gets referred to in the media, incorrectly, as ESG investing, Cook said.

Institutional investors that employ an ESG strategy may be investing in oil producers but may “demand to see the company’s ESG policy and demand that there is an offset, or that there is a target carbon-neutral policy with a specific date,” said Ilana Schonwetter, investment advisor with BlueShore Financial in North Vancouver, B.C.

Saurabh Suryavanshi, portfolio manager with Dixon Mitchell Investment Counsel in Vancouver, believes in an engagement strategy over an exclusion strategy. “The world is not going to stop producing oil just because you don’t [invest in] one of the producers,” he said. “[Through] engagement, the executives of the companies can be encouraged for setting a strategy and target to reach carbon neutrality and adoption of ESG-linked executive compensation metrics.”

When institutional investors that use an ESG strategy (as opposed to an environmental thematic strategy) invest in oilsands producers, Cook said, those investors look at various issuers and determine which of them has the best ESG score. For example, Company A might use less energy, produce lower emissions, use less water and have a more diverse board when compared with Company B.

Schonwetter emphasized the influence shareholders can have on the decisions made by corporate executives. “Shareholder engagement, in my opinion, has had a very significant positive impact in demanding that oil and gas companies restore or minimize the environmental impact of what they are doing and how they are doing it,” she said.

Conor Chell, a lawyer with MLT Aikins LLP in Calgary, agrees. “What most investors are looking at is [an issuer’s] decarbonization plan — whether that involves changing the asset mix, changing its operations [or] things like carbon capture,” Chell said.

In particular, investors are asking for details about an issuer’s “net zero” plan (a goal whereby greenhouse gases [GHG] added to the atmosphere minus GHG removed equals zero), Chell said: “What investors are looking for are achievable net-zero plans with actual milestones.”

ESG investors also want to know if the executives at energy firms are being paid to reach GHG emissions targets. “The behaviour of the executives will change if they have part of their compensation linked to those targets,” Suryavanshi said, adding that 50% of the oilsands producers in Canada link executive compensation to ESG metrics.

So, can your clients invest responsibly if they are still buying shares in energy firms? The answer is “not as binary as people would want it to be,” said Marie-Justine Labelle, head of responsible investment (RI) with Desjardins Investments Inc. in Montreal. “It’s a very difficult question.”

Labelle suggested examining “the company’s willingness to change their business model to be compatible with the Paris Agreement, [making] sure it is backed up with clear business plans to do so, [and checking whether] the capital expenditure plan of the business is aligned with the goals they’re talking about publicly.”

(The Paris Agreement, which took effect in 2016, requires signatories to reduce global GHG emissions to limit the global temperature increase in this century to 2°C.)

With some Desjardins Investments funds, RI means excluding producers and specialized transporters of fossil fuels, as well as companies in the civilian firearms, nuclear energy and tobacco industries.

Desjardins’ SocieTerra family of funds “excludes fossil-fuel companies on the basis that our members and clients who invest in that line felt that [investing in fossil fuels] was incompatible with their convictions and with key thematics like climate change,” Labelle said.

In the SocieTerra Environment Fund, for example, the top five holdings, as of the end of February, were: Microsoft Corp.; Mastercard Inc.; Linde PLC, an industrial gas manufacturer based in Ireland; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., a biotech vendor based in Massachusetts; and IQVIA Holdings Inc., a life sciences IT vendor based in North Carolina. In the Desjardins SocieTerra Canadian Equity Fund, the top five holdings, as of the end of February, were big banks and Toronto-based Brookfield Asset Management Inc.

Mackenzie Greenchip invests thematically in industries such as renewable energy. But this might mean a client’s money is invested in a firm that produces significant carbon emissions when compared with a financial services firm, for example.

“A four- to six-megawatt wind turbine has about 250 tons of materials, mostly steel and concrete, and concrete produces lots of emissions when you make it,” Cook said. Solar energy production is similar because “the main ingredient in solar is polysilicon, which is basically crushed quartz.”

“If you are a low-carbon investor, you actually steer capital away from [wind and solar electricity] solutions,” Cook said. “That’s the strange thing.”

But environmental thematic investing aims for lower carbon emissions over the long term rather than avoiding investments in renewable energy simply because manufacturing parts for wind turbines and solar panels is carbon-intensive.

When comparing two funds, an RI investor might intuitively choose the one showing lower carbon emissions, Cook said. But the higher-carbon fund might invest in renewable energy and be “doing a better job getting us to a more sustainable future” — making the latter fund a better fit for a thematic portfolio.

Some fund companies with smaller lineups, however, “pick whichever [fund] is most convenient for them and call it ‘sustainable,’” Cook said. “Or even worse, ‘ESG.’”

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Deutsche Bank's Investment Bankers Step Up as Rate Boost Fades – Yahoo Canada Finance

Published

 on

By


(Bloomberg) — Deutsche Bank AG relied on its traders and investment bankers to make up for a slowdown in income from lending, as Chief Executive Officer Christian Sewing seeks to deliver on an ambitious revenue goal.

Most Read from Bloomberg

Fixed income trading rose 7% in the first quarter, more than analysts had expected and better than most of the biggest US investment banks. Income from advising on deals and stock and bond sales jumped 54%.

300x250x1

ADVERTISEMENT

Revenue for the group rose about 1% as the prospect of falling interest rates hurt the corporate bank and the private bank that houses the retail business.

Sewing has vowed to improve profitability and lift revenue to €30 billion this year, a goal some analysts view with skepticism as the end of the rapid rate increases weighs on revenue from lending. In the role for six years, the CEO is cutting thousands of jobs in the back office to curb costs while building out the advisory business with last year’s purchase of Numis Corp. to boost fee income.

“We are very pleased” with the investment bank, Chief Financial Officer James von Moltke said in an interview with Bloomberg TV. The trends of the first quarter “have continued into April,” he said, including “a slower macro environment” that’s being offset by “momentum in credit” and emerging markets.

While traders and investment bankers did well, revenue at the corporate bank declined 5% on lower net interest income. Private bank revenue fell about 2%. Both units benefited when central banks raised interest rates over the past two years, allowing them to charge more for loans while still paying relatively little for deposits.

With inflation slowing and interest rates set to fall again, that effect is reversing, though markets have scaled back expectations for how quickly and how deep central banks are likely to cut. That’s lifted shares of Europe’s lenders recently, with Deutsche Bank gaining 25% this year.

“Deutsche Bank reported a reasonable set of results,” analysts Thomas Hallett and Andrew Stimpson at KBW wrote in a note. “The investment bank performed well while the corporate bank and asset management underperformed.”

–With assistance from Macarena Muñoz and Oliver Crook.

(Updates with CFO comments in fifth paragraph.)

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek

©2024 Bloomberg L.P.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

How Can I Invest in Eco-friendly Companies? – CB – CanadianBusiness.com

Published

 on

By


Welcome to CB’s personal-finance advice column, Make It Make Sense, where each month experts answer reader questions on complex investment and personal-finance topics and break them down in terms we can all understand. This month, Damir Alnsour, a lead advisor and portfolio manager at money-management platform Wealthsimple, tackles eco-friendly investments. Have a question about your finances? Send it to [email protected].


Q: It’s Earth Month! And… there’s a climate crisis. How can I invest in companies and portfolios funding causes I believe in?

Earth Day may have been introduced in 1970, but today it’s more relevant than ever: In a 2023 survey, 72 per cent of Canadians said they were worried about climate change. Along with carpooling, ditching single-use plastics and composting, you can celebrate Earth Month this year by greening your investment portfolio.

Green investing, or buying shares in projects, companies, or funds that are committed to environmental sustainability, is an excellent way to support projects and businesses that reflect your passions and lifestyle choices. It’s growing in favour among Canadian investors, but there are some considerations investors should be mindful of. Let’s review some green investing options and what to look out for.

300x250x1

Green Bonds

Green bonds are a fixed-income instrument where the proceeds are put toward climate-related purposes. In 2022, the Canadian government launched its first Green Bond Framework, which saw strong demand from domestic and global investors. This resulted in a record $11 billion green bonds being sold. One warning: Because it’s a smaller market, green bonds tend to be less liquid than many other investments.

It’s also important to note that a “green” designation can mean a lot of different things. And they’re not always all that environmentally-guided. Some companies use broad, vague terms to explain how the funds will be used, and they end up using the money they raised with the bond sale to pay for other corporate needs that aren’t necessarily eco-friendly. There’s also the practice of “greenwashing,” labelling investments as “green” for marketing campaigns without actually doing the hard work required to improve their environmental footprint.

To make things more challenging, funds and asset managers themselves can partake in greenwashing. Many funds that purport to be socially responsible still hold oil and gas stocks, just fewer of them than other funds. Or they own shares of the “least problematic” of the oil and gas companies, thereby touting emission reductions without clearly disclosing the extent of those improvements. As with any type of investing, it’s important to do your research and understand exactly what you’re investing in.

Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) and Impact Investing

SRI and impact investing portfolios hold a mix of stocks and bonds that are intended to put your money towards projects and companies that work to advance progressive social outcomes or address a social issue—i.e., investing in companies that don’t wreak havoc on society. They can include companies promoting sustainable growth, diverse workforces and equitable hiring practices.

The main difference between the two approaches is that SRI uses a measurable criteria to qualify or disqualify companies as socially responsible, while impact investing typically aims to help an enterprise produce some social or environmental benefit.

Related: Climate Change Is Influencing How Young People Invest Their Money

Some financial institutions use the two approaches to build well-diversified, low-cost, socially responsible portfolios that align with most clients’ environmental and societal preferences. That said, not all portfolios are constructed with the same care. As with evaluating green bonds, it’s important to remember that a company or fund having an SRI designation or saying it partakes in impact investing is subjective. There’s always a risk of not knowing exactly where and with whom the money is being invested.

All three of these options are good reminders that, even though you may feel helpless to enact environmental or social change in the face of larger systemic issues, your choices can still support the well-being of society and the planet. So, if you have extra funds this April (maybe from your tax return?), green or social investing are solid options. As long as you do thorough research and understand some of the limitations, you’re sure to find investments that are both good for the world and your finances.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

MOF: Govt to establish high-level facilitation platform to oversee potential, approved strategic investments

Published

 on

KUALA LUMPUR: A meeting with 70 financial fund investors and corporate members at the recently concluded Joint Investors Meeting in London has touched on the MADANI government’s immediate action to stimulate strategic investment in important technologies, according to the Ministry of Finance (MoF).

In a statement today, it said that the government is serious about making investments a national agenda through the establishment of a high-level investment facilitation platform to ensure the implementation of potential and approved strategic investments through a “Whole of Government” approach.

Minister of Finance II Datuk Seri Amir Hamzah Azizan (pix), who led the Malaysian delegation to the Joint Investors Meeting from April 20 to 22, said that the National Investment Council (MPN) chaired by the Prime Minister is an integrated action that reflects how serious the government is in making Malaysia an investment hub in the region.

Among the immediate actions taken by the government is establishing the National Semiconductor Strategic Committee (NSSTF) to facilitate cooperation between the government, industry players, universities, and relevant stakeholders to place the Malaysian semiconductor industry at the forefront and ensure the continued growth of the electronics & electrical industry, especially the semiconductor sector, as a major contributor to the Malaysian economy.

300x250x1

The government also aims to empower Malaysia as a preferred green investment destination as well as remove barriers and bureaucracy in the provision and accessibility to renewable energy, especially for the new technology industry, including data centres, said Amir Hamzah.

He also said that the country’s investment prospects have reached an extraordinary level, with approved investments surging to RM329.5 billion in 2023 from RM268 billion in 2022.

He said about 74 per cent of manufacturing projects approved between 2021 and 2023 have been completed or are in process.

In addition, Amir Hamzah said the greater initial stage construction work completed in 2023 (RM31.5 billion) and 2022 (RM26.3 billion) shows a positive trend for future investment opportunities.

“From a total of 5,101 investment projects approved in 2023, as many as 81.2 per cent or 4,143 projects are in the services sector, 883 projects in the manufacturing sector, and 75 projects in other related sectors,” he said.

Before this, Amir Hamzah met with international investors in New York and Washington to clarify the direction of the implementation of the MADANI Economic framework to improve investors’ confidence in Malaysia’s economic level and strengthen the perception and investment sentiment of foreign investors towards the country.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending