MARTHA MUZYCHKA: 'West Wing’ revisited — imagining politics on a higher plane - The Journal Pioneer | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

MARTHA MUZYCHKA: 'West Wing’ revisited — imagining politics on a higher plane – The Journal Pioneer

Published

 on


Jed Bartlet, I’m sorry to say, was never real. It’s just that millions of people, including some who wouldn’t agree with his politics, wish he was.

Especially now, maybe.

Bartlet, as played by Martin Sheen, was the president on the TV series “The West Wing,” which aired on NBC from 1999 to 2006.

The show was about the day-to-day work of the inner circle of the White House, and the issues the staff tackled, and just as often, the issues that tackled the staff.

Our family has been revisiting the series this fall, and it’s been so enjoyable to rediscover Aaron Sorkin’s crisp dialogue, the talents of the cast, the “walk with me” sequences that moved the characters and issues around the corridors of the set.

What has really amazed me is how timely many of the plotlines are, if not prescient: climate change, racism, violence against women, police brutality, poverty, gun control, Supreme Court vacancies, the inherent corruption of political fundraising. The list goes on, and we’re still in Season 2.

It’s startling to compare the scenes and plots with what’s been reported from the White House over the last few years.

Some of the issues and dialogue do not age well, and that’s a good thing. For example, in one episode, the usually wise Leo makes a crack to the president’s aging secretary about “turn(ing) back the Indians” with a musket.

Although not as diverse a show as ones today (and we’re still needing to do better), “The West Wing” modelled a presidency as it could and should be: diplomatic, thoughtful, well-researched and not abusive, profane or derogatory.

At the time, The West Wing was widely criticized as a Hollywood fantasy of the White House, one featuring a Nobel-Prize winning economics professor as president and who wore his Liberal politics on his sleeve, unafraid of being ripped a new one by the religious right, outsmarting them with takedowns that were as jam-packed with words as they were funny.

Today, it’s impossible not to think of “The West Wing” in light of the Trump era (and the election that is only three weeks away).

The characters on the show are a model for disagreement. They talk out their differences, and often they hold each other accountable. There are the sneaky political moments, like the one in the first season where the press secretary C.J. Cregg inadvertently lies to the press about troop movements on the India-Pakistan border because her colleagues in the Oval Office don’t trust her.

Scenes like that stick with you because they’re relatable, even if the stakes we face will never be so high.

It’s startling to compare the scenes and plots with what’s been reported from the White House over the last few years.

Surely it’s not a fantasy to imagine a political leadership that asks for research, and from multiple sources no less, before making a decision. Or one that consults widely before blurting out a thought, or that knows when it’s crossed a line.

With a reunion episode airing this week on HBO (surviving actors recreated a third-season episode on a stage, in an effort to promote voting in November’s elections), “The West Wing” does indeed feel timely again. The show is on magazine covers; interviews are posted to YouTube. There are podcasts (yes, plural) devoted to the show.

There’s no doubt the show was idealistic, perhaps even unrealistically so. But ideals, the common good, and responsible government are things we should respect. I read recently there were people so inspired by the show two decades ago, they chose public service and public policy as their career.

Jed Bartlet doesn’t exist, and sadly, neither does C.J., she of the quick wit and sharper mind. Perhaps though, we need to stop thinking of their aspirations — to make the world a better and safer place — as the stuff of fiction, but reality, as our blueprint for positive change now and in the future.

Martha Muzychka is a writer, columnist and occasional mask maker. Email: socialnotes@gmail.com


RELATED:

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Politics

Gould calls Poilievre a ‘fraudster’ over his carbon price warning

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Liberal House leader Karina Gould lambasted Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre as a “fraudster” this morning after he said the federal carbon price is going to cause a “nuclear winter.”

Gould was speaking just before the House of Commons is set to reopen following the summer break.

“What I heard yesterday from Mr. Poilievre was so over the top, so irresponsible, so immature, and something that only a fraudster would do,” she said from Parliament Hill.

On Sunday Poilievre said increasing the carbon price will cause a “nuclear winter,” painting a dystopian picture of people starving and freezing because they can’t afford food or heat due the carbon price.

He said the Liberals’ obsession with carbon pricing is “an existential threat to our economy and our way of life.”

The carbon price currently adds about 17.6 cents to every litre of gasoline, but that cost is offset by carbon rebates mailed to Canadians every three months. The Parliamentary Budget Office provided analysis that showed eight in 10 households receive more from the rebates than they pay in carbon pricing, though the office also warned that long-term economic effects could harm jobs and wage growth.

Gould accused Poilievre of ignoring the rebates, and refusing to tell Canadians how he would make life more affordable while battling climate change. The Liberals have also accused the Conservatives of dismissing the expertise of more than 200 economists who wrote a letter earlier this year describing the carbon price as the least expensive, most efficient way to lower emissions.

Poilievre is pushing for the other opposition parties to vote the government down and trigger what he calls a “carbon tax election.”

The recent decision by the NDP to break its political pact with the government makes an early election more likely, but there does not seem to be an interest from either the Bloc Québécois or the NDP to have it happen immediately.

Poilievre intends to bring a non-confidence motion against the government as early as this week but would likely need both the Bloc and NDP to support it.

Gould said she has no “crystal ball” over when or how often Poilievre might try to bring down the government

“I know that the end of the supply and confidence agreement makes things a bit different, but really all it does is returns us to a normal minority parliament,” she said. “And that means that we will work case-by-case, legislation-by-legislation with whichever party wants to work with us. I have already been in touch with all of the House leaders in the opposition parties and my job now is to make Parliament work for Canadians.”

She also insisted the government has listened to the concerns raised by Canadians, and received the message when the Liberals lost a Toronto byelection in June in seat the party had held since 1997.

“We certainly got the message from Toronto-St. Paul’s and have spent the summer reflecting on what that means and are coming back to Parliament, I think, very clearly focused on ensuring that Canadians are at the centre of everything that we do moving forward,” she said.

The Liberals are bracing, however, for the possibility of another blow Monday night, in a tight race to hold a Montreal seat in a byelection there. Voters in LaSalle—Émard—Verdun are casting ballots today to replace former justice minister David Lametti, who was removed from cabinet in 2023 and resigned as an MP in January.

The Conservatives and NDP are also in a tight race in Elmwood-Transcona, a Winnipeg seat that has mostly been held by the NDP over the last several decades.

There are several key bills making their way through the legislative process, including the online harms act and the NDP-endorsed pharmacare bill, which is currently in the Senate.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Voters head to the polls for byelections in Montreal and Winnipeg

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canadians in two federal ridings are choosing their next member of Parliament today, and political parties are closely watching the results.

Winnipeg’s Elmwood —Transcona seat has been vacant since the NDP’s Daniel Blaikie left federal politics.

The New Democrats are hoping to hold onto the riding and polls suggest the Conservatives are in the running.

The Montreal seat of LaSalle—Émard—Verdun opened up when former justice minister David Lametti left politics.

Polls suggest the race is tight between the Liberal candidate and the Bloc Québécois, but the NDP is also hopeful it can win.

The Conservatives took over a Liberal stronghold seat in another byelection in Toronto earlier this summer, a loss that sent shock waves through the governing party and intensified calls for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to step down as leader.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Next phase of federal foreign interference inquiry to begin today in Ottawa

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – The latest phase of a federal inquiry into foreign interference is set to kick off today with remarks from commissioner Marie-Josée Hogue.

Several weeks of public hearings will focus on the capacity of federal agencies to detect, deter and counter foreign interference.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and key government officials took part in hearings earlier this year as the inquiry explored allegations that Beijing tried to meddle in the 2019 and 2021 federal elections.

Hogue’s interim report, released in early May, said Beijing’s actions did not affect the overall results of the two general elections.

The report said while outcomes in a small number of ridings may have been affected by interference, this cannot be said with certainty.

Trudeau, members of his inner circle and senior security officials are slated to return to the inquiry in coming weeks.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 16, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version