adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Business

Meta receives US$1.3 billion fine over privacy breach

Published

 on

LONDON –

The European Union slapped Meta with a record US$1.3 billion privacy fine Monday and ordered it to stop transferring users’ personal information across the Atlantic by October, the latest salvo in a decadelong case sparked by U.S. cybersnooping fears.

The penalty of 1.2 billion euros is the biggest since the EU’s strict data privacy regime took effect five years ago, surpassing Amazon’s 746 million euro fine in 2021 for data protection violations.

Meta, which had previously warned that services for its users in Europe could be cut off, vowed to appeal and ask courts to immediately put the decision on hold.

300x250x1

The company said “there is no immediate disruption to Facebook in Europe.” The decision applies to user data like names, email and IP addresses, messages, viewing history, geolocation data and other information that Meta — and other tech giants like Google — use for targeted online ads.

“This decision is flawed, unjustified and sets a dangerous precedent for the countless other companies transferring data between the EU and U.S.,” Nick Clegg, Meta’s president of global affairs, and chief legal officer Jennifer Newstead said in a statement.

It’s yet another twist in a legal battle that began in 2013 when Austrian lawyer and privacy activist Max Schrems filed a complaint about Facebook’s handling of his data following former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden’s revelations of electronic surveillance by U.S. security agencies. That included the disclosure that Facebook gave the agencies access to the personal data of Europeans.

The saga has highlighted the clash between Washington and Brussels over the differences between Europe’s strict view on data privacy and the comparatively lax regime in the U.S., which lacks a federal privacy law. The EU has been a global leader in reining in the power of Big Tech with a series of regulations forcing them police their platforms more strictly and protect users’ personal information.

An agreement covering EU-U.S. data transfers known as the Privacy Shield was struck down in 2020 by the EU’s top court, which said it didn’t do enough to protect residents from the U.S. government’s electronic prying. Monday’s decision confirmed that another tool to govern data transfers — stock legal contracts — was also invalid.

Brussels and Washington signed a deal last year on a reworked Privacy Shield that Meta could use, but the pact is awaiting a decision from European officials on whether it adequately protects data privacy.

EU institutions have been reviewing the agreement, and the bloc’s lawmakers this month called for improvements, saying the safeguards aren’t strong enough.

The Ireland’s Data Protection Commission handed down the fine as Meta’s lead privacy regulator in the 27-nation bloc because the Silicon Valley tech giant’s European headquarters is based in Dublin.

The Irish watchdog said it gave Meta five months to stop sending European user data to the U.S. and six months to bring its data operations into compliance “by ceasing the unlawful processing, including storage, in the U.S.” of European users’ personal data transferred in violation of the bloc’s privacy rules.

In other words, Meta has to erase all that data, which could be a bigger problem than the fine, said Johnny Ryan, senior fellow at the Irish Council for Civil Liberties, a nonprofit rights group that has worked on digital and data issues.

“This order to delete data is really a headache for Meta,” Ryan said. If the company has to scrub data for hundreds of millions of European Union users going back 10 years, “it is very hard to see how it will be able to comply with that order.”

If a new transatlantic privacy agreement does take effect before the deadlines, “our services can continue as they do today without any disruption or impact on users,” Meta said.

Schrems predicted that Meta has “no real chance” of getting the decision materially overturned. And a new privacy pact might not mean the end of Meta’s troubles, because there’s a good chance it could be tossed out by the EU’s top court, he said.

“Meta plans to rely on the new deal for transfers going forward, but this is likely not a permanent fix,” Schrems said in a statement. “Unless U.S. surveillance laws gets fixed, Meta will likely have to keep EU data in the EU.”

Schrems said a possible solution could be a “federated” social network, where European data stays in Meta’s data centers in Europe, “unless users for example chat with a U.S. friend.”

Meta warned in its latest earnings report that without a legal basis for data transfers, it will be forced to stop offering its products and services in Europe, “which would materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.”

The social media company might have to carry out a costly and complex revamp of its operations if it’s ultimately forced to stop the transfers. Meta has a fleet of 21 data centers, according to its website, but 17 of them are in the United States. Three others are in the European nations of Denmark, Ireland and Sweden. Another is in Singapore.

Other social media giants are facing pressure over their data practices. TikTok has tried to soothe Western fears about the Chinese-owned short video sharing app’s potential cybersecurity risks with a US$1.5 billion project to store U.S. user data on Oracle servers.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

BC short-term rental rules take effect May 1 – CityNews Vancouver

Published

 on


Premier David Eby says that as B.C. inches closer to new short-term rental rules taking effect, 17 communities have decided to opt into the restrictions.

The update comes as the regulations surrounding how many and what kinds of short-term rentals are allowed in B.C. come into effect on May 1.

The BC NDP tabled the legislation in October of last year which, once in effect, aims to return short-term rentals to the long-term rental market.

300x250x1

As of May 1, the province is requiring short-term rental platforms, like Airbnb and VRBO, to share data and to remove listings without business licenses and registration numbers “quickly.”

It is also limiting short-term rentals to a property owner’s principal residence — plus one additional unit or suite on that property — for municipalities with more than 10,000 people. Municipalities with fewer than 10,000 people, or those designated as resort municipalities, will be able to opt into the legislation.

Those communities that have opted in, like the resort municipality of Tofino, will see the new laws come into effect on Nov. 1. Some other communities that have agreed to the new rules are Kent, Gabriola Island, Bowen Island, Osoyoos, and Pemberton.

The province says through regulations, the fines for hosts breaking municipal by-law rules will increase to $3,000 from $1,000, per infraction, per day.

“Short-term rentals themselves are not the problem,” Eby said in the update Thursday. “What has been the problem is inadequate oversight over this sector. And a group of people who have … said I’d like to actually buy up a whole bunch of homes that would otherwise be rented by people, or what other otherwise be purchased by families looking for a place to live, and I’d like to operate a private hotel chain through Airbnb or VRBO.”

“To give you a sense of the scale of the problem we face in British Columbia with this kind of activity [from] this small group of individuals, we have 19,000 entire homes in our province that are available year-round on short-term rental platforms,” he continued.

“And I can tell you that there are 19,000 families and individuals that are looking for a place to live, to buy, to rent right now, that are in competition with people that are looking to operate homes as hotels.”

Data from McGill University released in 2023 showed that the top 10 per cent of hosts in B.C. earn nearly half of all revenue created.

Eby added that, starting Thursday, a portal will be available for people to report operators for going against the new rules, and also giving hosts a platform to check their requirements of operation.

“These rules balance the need for long-term homes, including people and tourism and hospitality industry where the need to accommodate guests. As the premier mentioned, people are seeing long-term homes open up for rent, and more short-term rentals are being listed for sale or becoming long-term homes for families and individuals,” Housing Minister Ravi Kahlon said.

The province reiterated Thursday that short-term rentals are still “welcomed” in B.C., as long as they operate within provincial and local rules.

“We encourage people to continue to explore beautiful British Columbia and stay in legal short-term rental accommodations. We want guests, hosts, local governments, and platforms to know what to expect May 1,” Kahlon added.

Short-term rentals create big economic impacts: Airbnb

In a statement Thursday, Airbnb claimed a newly released economic analysis shows it generated more than $2.5 billion “in economic impact across BC in 2023,” and supported more than 25,000 jobs in the province.

“The analysis shows that for every $100 spent on an Airbnb stay, guests spent an additional $229 on other goods and services such as local businesses, restaurants, attractions, shops, and more,” the short-term rental agency said.

Airbnb believes the new “strict” short-term rental laws are “putting at risk billions in tourism spending and economic benefits.”

“BC’s new short-term rental law is going to significantly impact the province’s tourism sector, just as peak tourism season arrives – taking extra income away from residents, limiting accommodation options for guests, and potentially putting at risk billions in tourism spending and economic impact,” said Nathan Rotman, Airbnb Canada policy lead in the statement.

“At a time when BC is facing record deficits and economic growth is slowing, these new rules hurt resident hosts, tourists, communities and the economy as a whole.”

Airbnb is also contributing to tax revenue in the province, the agency claimed, explaining, “British Columbian Hosts on the platform generated approximately $93 million in taxes in 2023, bringing much-needed tax revenue for a province that’s projected to face a record high $7.9 billion deficit.”

You can watch CityNews 24/7 live or listen live to CityNews 1130 to keep up to date with this story. You can also subscribe to breaking news alerts sent directly to your inbox.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

'It's disgusting:' Doug Ford lashes out at oil companies over double-digit gas price hike – CityNews Toronto

Published

 on


Premier Doug Ford lashed out at the gas companies for the double-digit overnight increase in the price of gas across the GTA, calling it unacceptable and disgusting.

Speaking at an unrelated announcement in Oakville, Ont., on Thursday, Ford took a moment to vent on behalf of “16 million people” across the province.

“You go out last night and you’re sitting there for 20 minutes in the lineup to get gas. It’s unacceptable,” said Ford. “Everywhere I was going it was a $1.59. You wake up this morning and it’s $1.80. It’s absolutely disgusting.”

300x250x1

Prices at the pumps surged 14 cents overnight to 178.9 cents/litre at most GTA stations. Analysts attribute the increase to the annual changeover from winter gas to summer gas.

“That is why prices are going up so significantly all at once is essentially we’re seeing discounts on winter gasoline to get rid of it but now that we’ve made the jump, summer gasoline inventories are much lower and thus a much higher price,” Patrick De Haan, the head of petroleum analysis at Gas Buddy tells CityNews.

That explanation, Ford said, was simply a way for the gas companies to gouge people.

“It’s absolutely disgusting what the oil companies are doing,” said an agitated Ford as he questioned whether the gas companies are waiting for the tanks to drain at gas stations before filling them up with the new summer formulation. “Or are you using the old gas and charging the higher cost.”

“I have my opinion that it’s not physically possible to drain every single gas station to put the fresh stuff in. So either you’re putting the fresh stuff in last month or you’re gouging the people right now.”

Ford went on to say that after consulting with some friends in the United States, he found that gas prices were trending around $3.80 per gallon. “Folks, let’s do the math – it’s a $1.80 (a litre) that’s $7.20 (a US gallon).”

Mike Eppel, 680 News Radio Toronto Senior Business Editor, says it also comes down to a refining capacity issue in this country.

“So there’s lots of oil, that’s not the issue – oil supplies are high. It’s the refining capacity. We haven’t had a refinery built in eastern Canada since whenever – you can’t get a pipeline built. And anytime there is any disruption in the system, up goes the price for gas.”

Ford did not limit his anger on rising gas prices to just the oil companies, closing his rant by taking a shot at the federal government’s carbon tax, which took effect on April 1 and pushed gas prices up three cents a litre.

“This goes back to the federal government sticking their hands in the people’s pockets, they don’t care that we have some of the highest prices in North America on the carbon tax, they jack it up 17.5 per cent,” explained Ford. “And then of course the oil companies thought they’d hop on board, no one’s going to notice, because if I remember … just a few months ago I remember filling up for $1.30 to $1.34. Did the barrel of oil go up 30 per cent? The answer is no. So where is the 30 per cent.”

While the price of gas is expected to fall by four cents/litre on Friday, prices will continue to fluctuate with no real relief in sight until June or July.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Google fires 28 employees who protested $1.2B contract with Israeli – National Post

Published

 on


Article content

Google has fired 28 employees after a number of staffers protested the company’s cloud contract with the Israeli government.

The workers were terminated after staging protests inside Google’s offices in New York and Sunnyvale, California, per CNN.

Article content

300x250x1

In a statement, Google’s parent company Alphabet said that “physically impeding other employees’ work and preventing them from accessing our facilities is a clear violation of our policies, and completely unacceptable behavior.”

Recommended from Editorial

  1. The document by a York University Department of Politics committee makes it clear that the principles of “academic freedom” and “free speech” should not apply to anybody supportive of Israel or having any peripheral connection to Israel whatsoever.

    York University faculty group recommends defining support of Israel as ‘racism’

  2. On October 7, Hamas terrorists threw a live grenade into the couple's safe room. Netta Epstein  jumped onto it to save Irene Shavit.

    A Canadian-Israeli planned to marry this month. He died saving his fiancée from Hamas

The protests were organized by the No Tech For Apartheid campaign and protesters held signs that read “No More Genocide For Profit” and “We Stand with Palestinian, Arab and Muslim Googlers.”

The company said it would continue to investigate and take action as needed, reports The Guardian.

The protesters say that Project Nimbus, a $1.2 billion contract granted to Google and Amazon.com in 2021, provides cloud services to the Israeli government and aids in the creation of military applications.

A form letter on the campaign’s website demands that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy, Amazon Web Services CEO Adam Selipsky, Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian “end all ties with Israeli apartheid and cut the Project Nimbus contract.”

Article content

Google says the Nimbus contract “is not directed at highly sensitive, classified, or military workloads relevant to weapons or intelligence services.” It added that Google Cloud “supports numerous governments around the world, including the Israeli government.”

“We have been very clear that the Nimbus contract is for workloads running on our commercial cloud by Israeli government ministries, who agree to comply with our Terms of Service and Acceptable Use Policy.”

The No Tech for Apartheid campaign called the firings a “flagrant act of retaliation” and a “clear indication that Google values its $1.2 billion contract with the genocidal Israeli government and military more than its own workers.”

The campaign added that some of the individuals fired did not directly participate in the protests.

Despite what its critics allege, Israel has attempted to warn and shield civilians as the IDF hunts the Hamas terrorists who hid themselves among Gaza’s civilian population and infrastructure after the group’s October 7 attack. As well, critics who call Israel an apartheid state ignore the freedoms enjoyed by the democratic country’s Arab citizens, who play major roles in business, the judiciary and even the Knesset.

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.

Share this article in your social network

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending