adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Science

NASA is closer than ever to generating nuclear power on the moon – Freethink

Published

 on


NASA and the Department of Energy (DOE) have given three companies $5 million each to make it possible to put nuclear power on the moon by 2031 — and potentially provide future Mars colonists with tons of reliable electricity.

The challenge: It’s been 50 years since NASA last sent astronauts to the moon as part of its Apollo missions, and none of those visits lasted more than 12 days.

The moon-based reactor will need to provide 40 kilowatts of power for at least 10 years.

Through its Artemis missions, the agency plans to return humans to the moon as soon as three years from now — 2025. This time, it wants to establish a long-term presence there, so astronauts have plenty of time to explore the lunar surface and conduct research that could one day help us reach Mars.

300x250x1

Astronauts will need a reliable source of power while on the moon, and while solar panels can help meet that need, they won’t work during the long lunar nights or underground — and subterranean lava tubes are among the moon’s most scientifically intriguing features.

Nuclear option: More than a decade before NASA astronauts first set foot on the moon, people here on Earth were building massive power plants that used nuclear fission — the process of splitting atoms to release energy — to generate clean, weather-independent electricity.

Nuclear reactors don’t have to be massive, though. In November 2021, NASA and the DOE solicited proposals from US companies for “mini” reactor concepts theoretically capable of generating nuclear power on the moon. 

The reactors would need to be lightweight and capable of continuously providing astronauts with 40 kilowatts of power — enough for 30 households here on Earth — for 10 years. They would also need to be ready for an actual demonstration on the moon by 2031.

A illustration of a Martian nuclear reactor. Credit: NASA

On July 21, NASA and the DOE announced that they were giving three companies — IX, Westinghouse, and Lockheed Martin — each approximately $5 million to further develop their submitted design concepts over the next 12 months.

“The Fission Surface Power project is a very achievable first step toward the United States establishing nuclear power on the moon,” said John Wagner, director of the DOE’s Idaho National Laboratory. “I look forward to seeing what each of these teams will accomplish.”

The big picture: Like so many of NASA’s endeavors, there’s no established blueprint for generating nuclear power on the moon — the agency and its partners will have to learn as they go, and the project could fail at any stage of development.

If it’s a success, though, a moon-based fission reactor could not only give astronauts a way to power their tech on the lunar surface, but also lay the groundwork for generating electricity on Mars and beyond — helping make humanity a multi-world species. 

We’d love to hear from you! If you have a comment about this article or if you have a tip for a future Freethink story, please email us at [email protected].

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Science

Is space science worth the money? – The Planetary Society

Published

 on


Why space science is worth the money

Although governments around the world understand the value of basic science, it can be hard to prioritize its funding given the variety of competing needs within a nation. NASA’s space science programs in 2024 amount to roughly 0.1% of annual U.S. spending, which represents a decrease in recent years. As such, space science sometimes needs to rely on justifications beyond its intrinsic value. 

In a famous 2007 speech, former NASA Administrator Mike Griffin differentiated between the “real” and “acceptable” reasons for exploring space. “Acceptable” reasons for space exploration are logical, quantifiable, policy-friendly justifications. The “real” reasons, on the other hand, are intuitive, grand, emotional, and difficult to quantify. Both types of reasons are valid, and together they help explain why space science is worth the investment.

Some of the “acceptable” reasons for space science involve economic payoffs. Research has found that countries that invest more in basic research, including space science, see a return on investment in their overall economic performance and growth. This effect is dispersed throughout the economy through highly skilled, well-paying jobs. It also has an indirect effect on the economy: Discovery leads to technology and invention, which leads to new products, jobs, and industries. While technology development isn’t the primary goal of space science, this kind of progress would eventually stagnate if basic scientific research were neglected.

300x250x1

Another policy-friendly reason to invest in space science is that many scientific missions are internationally collaborative and contribute to allyship with other nations. There is also the very pragmatic goal of understanding Earth, the planet on which we all depend, by studying other planets and their histories. Venus, for example, was once an Earth-like world that eventually devolved into an inhospitable hellscape. By understanding that planet, we can work to prevent a similar fate for our own. 

But, as Griffin explains, much of what humans do, from falling in love with one’s spouse to enjoying one genre of music more than another, is based on emotional and intuitive motivations. This is a human characteristic, and it plays out in our drive to understand the Universe and our place within it. In many ways, this is why we invest in space science: we want to go to new places and discover new things, witness the beauty and majesty of the Cosmos, understand where we came from and what might be possible in our future, and achieve astonishing feats. 

Awe, wonder, and inspiration are among the “real” reasons for conducting space science. These are benefits that people can enjoy but that are impossible to quantify or justify on a budget balance sheet. Still, they are some of the most powerful motivators for studying the Universe and our place within it.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Science

Space exploration: A luxury or a necessity? – Phys.org

Published

 on


Space exploration: A luxury or a necessity?

300x250x1

This article has been reviewed according to Science X’s
editorial process
and policies.
Editors have highlighted
the following attributes while ensuring the content’s credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

written by researcher(s)

proofread

This photo provided by NASA shows, from left to right, Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch and CSA (Canadian Space Agency) astronaut Jeremy Hansen during a test at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida on Sept. 20, 2023. These astronauts are scheduled to fly to the moon in 2025. Credit: NASA

“Oh, come on Daniel, space travel is so expensive, and pointless!” These were the words of my friend Max, during a Christmas party where I was discussing my thesis project: studying places on Earth where the living conditions are so extreme, they could hold lessons for future space missions.

This disdainful attitude toward space research is actually quite common.

Space exploration is currently booming. Just think of the Artemis missions, SpaceX’s ambitious plans for Mars, the deployment of the James Webb telescope or the recent “race to the moon.”

A number of large-scale projects are getting the green light now, mainly from NASA, including the Artemis II mission that will carry four astronauts to the moon, which will have Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen aboard. This will be a first since 1972. Incredibly, it’s been 50 years since the last human mission to Earth’s natural satellite.

Although many people find space exploration inspiring, others are skeptical and even angered by what they see as an unjustifiable waste of resources and money on an activity that only spreads pollution to another place. This sums up the feelings of my friend Max.

In this article, I will try to prove him wrong.

Humans are explorers first

My great curiosity has led me to travel to extreme places so I can study them. But I am not the only one with this desire to explore.

In my Grade 9 history class, my teacher stood on top of her desk and, with a grave and serious tone, went on to act out Jacques Cartier’s arrival in North America in her own, colorful style. A few years earlier, I had learned about how the first humans left their caves to climb mountains. One hundred and thirty years ago, humans sailed further and further south until they saw the glacial landscapes of Antarctica for the first time. At the same time, humans were attempting to dominate the skies and aiming for the beyond with planes and rockets—which is how we got to the moon.

What is the common denominator in our history? Exploration, of course.

Human nature is characterized by a propensity to travel, to look further and to discover. We are all curious by nature. If we stop wanting to explore, we stop being human.

The Earth has rings

So, my friend Max, let me invite you outside. It’s a beautiful, starry night with no moon. It’s a bit cold, but at least the atmosphere isn’t too humid, which makes the sky more transparent. We can see stars flickering. Some are blue, others are red. And the more our eyes adapt, the more the sky reveals its secrets.

Suddenly, something else stands out. It’s another light, but it’s not flashing, and it’s moving quite quickly. A shooting star? No, the atmosphere would have burned it up in a few seconds.

It’s a satellite, one of thousands that orbit the Earth like rings. These satellites are a direct consequence of space exploration. We would be living in a completely different world without them.

Space exploration is not a luxury, it's a necessity
Satellites are like our planet’s artificial rings (artistic view). Credit: European Space Agency, 10.1126/science.abi6892

Indeed, not an hour goes by in our lives when we don’t use a satellite.

On the one hand, you would likely have gotten lost on your way here, Max, because there would have been no GPS to show you which exit to take. And secondly, I wouldn’t have been able to help you find your way because there would be no wifi. We can push our thinking even further; agriculture, environmental monitoring, communications, the weather, even banks, all of these depend on satellites.

But how does this work? You have to understand that these satellites move so quickly they actually circle the Earth several times a day. Combined with a very large workforce, they provide a complete view of the globe. From the middle of the oceans to the highest mountains and the almost inaccessible poles, we have eyes everywhere. By drawing on this vast quantity of observations, we obtain data on changes to the earth’s surface, the spread of forest fires, the movement of winds, the melting of ice and many other things, while enabling global communication and credit card transactions.

Space exploration was the trigger that enabled us to develop and operate these technologies. And it doesn’t stop there.

Two birds, one stone

The practice of medicine in also benefits from space exploration. It’s not easy for communities in remote areas to access health care, especially since hospitals don’t always have the sophisticated equipment they need.

If you think about it, when astronauts explore space, they become a small population in a very, very remote region. It’s true. What happens if someone has a really bad stomach ache? Or breaks an arm? They don’t have time to come back home for treatment, so we have to react, and quickly.

Scientific research in telemedicine has developed to address this important issue, producing a number of innovative technologies. And if these are useful for astronauts, why not use them for rural populations, too?

A few years ago, three Québec researchers from different universities were working on a tiny probe that could rapidly analyze and diagnose a blood sample.

Although some prototypes are not yet on the market, others are already in widespread use, such as the ultrasound scanner designed by NASA. This scanner takes precise photos of organs and bones that can be transmitted to a doctor, who will then have crucial information on hand to recommend treatments.

In a way, space exploration provides us with opportunities to respond to urgent needs on Earth. So, Max, are you beginning to see the need for it?

Another perspective

Finally, I have to admit that I find it rather encouraging to see Russians, Americans, Japanese, Canadians and Europeans living together on the Space Station. Not so long ago, some of these countries were attacking each other with nuclear bombs. In space, no such borders exist.

Exploration brings people together. It opens our eyes to new perspectives. It shows us that we’re all in the same boat together. That’s pretty important, don’t you think, Max?

Our planet is magnificent and unique, an oasis of impossible life. But it is fragile. We need to protect it. That’s why exploring beyond the Earth should not be considered a luxury; it’s an investment in our shared humanity.

So, Max, when Jeremy Hansen and his crew take off in 2025, will you be there to watch them?

Provided by
The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.The Conversation

Citation:
Space exploration: A luxury or a necessity? (2024, April 16)
retrieved 16 April 2024
from https://phys.org/news/2024-04-space-exploration-luxury-necessity.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.


Explore further

Through astronaut eyes, virtual reality propels gateway forward



1 shares

Feedback to editors

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Science

Mysterious object that hit Florida man's roof was part of the International Space Station – CBC News

Published

 on



Science

When a strange object hit Alejandro Otero’s home in Florida, he had to return early from vacation. Once he got in touch with NASA, he learned it was a piece of space junk from the International Space Station.

The object was a piece of space junk that was expected to burn up in Earth’s atmosphere

Space debris appears in this undated picture that Alejandro Otero posted online after it struck his Florida home. At the time, he was trying to get in touch with NASA to retrieve the debris. (@Alejandro0tero/X)

NASA confirmed Monday that a mystery object that crashed through the roof of a Florida home last month was a chunk of space junk from equipment discarded at the International Space Station (ISS).

300x250x1

The cylindrical object that tore through the home in Naples on March 8 was subsequently taken to the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral for analysis.

A gloved hand is seen holding a piece of degraded metal in a lab.
This undated photo provided by NASA shows a recovered chunk of space junk from equipment discarded at the International Space Station. The cylindrical object that tore through a home in Naples, Fla., on March 8 was subsequently taken to the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral for analysis. (NASA/The Associated Press)

The space agency said it was a metal support used to mount old batteries on a cargo pallet for disposal. The pallet was jettisoned from the space station in 2021, and the load was expected to eventually fully burn up on entry into Earth’s atmosphere, but one piece survived.

The chunk of metal weighed 0.7 kilograms and was 10 centimetres tall and roughly four centimetres wide.

Homeowner Alejandro Otero told television station WINK at the time that he was on vacation when his son told him what had happened.

Otero came home early to check on the house, finding the object had ripped through his ceiling and torn up the flooring.

“I was shaking. I was completely in disbelief. What are the chances of something landing on my house with such force to cause so much damage,” Otero said. “I’m super grateful that nobody got hurt.”

A screenshot of a post on X (formerly Twitter), wherein Alejandro Otero says the space debris hit his roof and includes images of the damage.
Otero says he was ‘in complete disbelief’ after discovering the debris. (@Alejandro0tero/X)

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending