adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Sports

NBA Finals 2020: Who is the front-runner for Finals MVP entering Game 5? – NBA CA

Published

 on


Up 3-1 against the Miami Heat in the 2020 NBA Finals, the Los Angeles Lakers are one win away from their first championship in a decade.

What happens in Game 5 could impact the Finals MVP race, but who is the favourite right now?

Our NBA.com Staff discusses.

300x250x1

Scott Rafferty (@crabdribbles): As incredible as Jimmy Butler has been, it’s between LeBron James and Anthony Davis entering Game 5.

Assuming the Lakers win, which one of them should be crowned Finals MVP?

I get that saying it’s a toss-up might seem like a cop-out, but I really do think this could come down to which one of them plays better here on out.

Put it this way: If we were to score the Finals through four games as though it were a fight, it would be 2-2 between Davis and James. Davis was the Lakers’ best player in Game 1 and Game 2, whereas James was quite clearly their best player in Game 3 and Game 4.

Now, Davis hurt his case a little with his performance in Game 3 – he scored 15 points and the Heat outscored the Lakers by 26 points in his 32 minutes on the court – but he made up for it with his performance in Game 4.

Not only did he knock down a clutch 3-pointer to end the Heat’s hope of making a late push…

…he took on the assignment of guarding Butler following his historic 40-point triple-double in Game 3 and slowed him down.

Ultimately, both James and Davis have been incredible. James carries a bigger load offensively, leading the Lakers in scoring, rebounds and assists, but the Heat still haven’t had an answer for Davis and he’s been a monster defensively. This really could go either way.

Carlan Gay (@TheCarlanGay): LeBron James is averaging 27.8 points, 11.0 rebounds and 8.5 assists on 54.1 percent shooting from the field and 36.4 percent from 3, and it feels like he’s having an average Finals run. That’s the standard we hold him to, which is absurd.

LeBron continues to make the extraordinaire look ordinary. It wasn’t until I looked up his stats that I realized he was enjoying another incredible postseason. The Lakers haven’t needed the offensive explosion we’ve become accustomed to seeing from him in the playoffs with Anthony Davis there to carry some of the offensive burden, but that shouldn’t prevent us from rewarding LeBron for his sustained excellence.

I’ll admit if it wasn’t for Davis’ subpar Game 3 I would have said him, but that’s how thin the margin is for these Finals MVP votes. LeBron’s been consistently better throughout and deserves the honour again.

Juan Estévez (@JuanEstevez90): Even though he wasn’t himself in Game 3, I’m convinced that Davis has been the Lakers’ most important player in these Finals.

Offensively, LeBron has the advantage. It’s close, but he has the edge. But when you factor in the other end of the court, I think the scales tip in Davis’ favour. Game 4 was a very clear example of this, with Davis being the most dominant player on the court despite scoring “only” 22 points.

The statistics do not quite do Davis justice when it comes to how valuable he is defensively. His rebounds, blocks and steals tell some of the story, but they don’t take into account how many actions he blows up simply by being in the right spot or how many shots he alters around the rim.

Davis’ postseason has been extraordinary by all accounts, even coming up big in the clutch a number of times, and the Finals has been no exception.

Benyam Kidane (@BenyamKidane): Anthony Davis was out in front for the award after two games, but I’ve got to roll with LeBron James here.

Not discounting Davis’ phenomenal play on both ends of the floor, as illustrated by his job on Jimmy Butler in Game 4, but when you take a step back, LeBron has been controlling every facet of the series to date.

As Carlan mentioned, the bar we set for LeBron is on another level and through four games, his numbers are more than worthy of Finals MVP. However, what puts him over the top for me is his impact on his teammates.

In addition to giving his team 27.8 points per game, the 35-year-old has created 94 points off of assists through four games, generating open look after open look, while effortlessly controlling the pace and tempo of each game.

When you add in the fact that his production has largely remained the same win or lose, that type of elite consistency is hard to ignore.

Yash Matange (@yashmatange2694): Anthony Davis.

Like my colleagues have mentioned, LeBron James has been more consistent and leads both teams in points and rebounds but I believe Davis has been the ‘most valuable’ player of the Finals. When he’s got it going, the Lakers look in command and win.

First two games, he dominated by averaging 33.0 points and 11.5 rebounds, being the difference maker as the Heat simply had no answer for his size. In Game 4, he sealed the game with clutch plays on both ends. More importantly, it was the Lakers’ adjustment to put him on Butler in Game 4 that seemed to bother the Heat’s offense.

James and AD have played nearly the same number of total minutes through the four games but the Lakers’ net rating is +7.2 when AD is on the floor while with James on the floor, that number is at +3.3. The off-court net rating numbers are evident of the impact. When AD is off the floor, the Lakers’ net rating is -2.7 while it sits at a huge +9.0 when James is off the floor.

By no means, I’m I implying that AD is a better player than James or anything along those lines but specifically, for this Finals series against the Heat, AD is ‘more valuable’.

The views on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of the NBA or its clubs.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Need to Know: Bruins at Maple Leafs | Game 3 | Boston Bruins – NHL.com

Published

 on


Familiar Territory

James van Riemsdyk has played his fair share of playoff contests here in Toronto – but all of them have come in blue and white. On Wednesday night, he would be on the other side for the first time if he indeed makes his Bruins postseason debut, which appeared to be a strong possibility based on the Black & Gold’s morning skate.

“It’s always special to play in this building,” said van Riemsdyk, who played in 20 postseason games with Toronto, including nine at Scotiabank Arena. “In this rivalry, it’s always a lot of fun. This time of year is always amazing, no matter where you’re at – if you’re at a 500-seat arena or a rink with all the tradition and history like this. It’s always fun and always a great opportunity to get in there.”

van Riemsdyk was a healthy scratch for the first two games of this series, following a trend across the second half of the regular season, during which he sat out several games.

300x250x1

“Playoff time of year is always the best time of year,” said van Riemsdyk, who has 20 goals and 31 points in 71 career playoff games between Philadelphia and Toronto. “Obviously, in this rivalry, it’s always a lot of fun – two fun buildings to play in. You cherish every opportunity you get.

“This time of year, you learn that along the way, it’s all about the team. Whatever the team’s asking you to do, that’s always got to be your mindset and approach…you stay at it every day and just take it one day at a time.”

Montgomery said that if van Riemsdyk does re-enter the lineup, he’ll be looking for the veteran winger to help the Bruins’ offensive game. He also complimented van Riemsdyk’s professionalism throughout a trying second half.

“I guess getting his stick on more pucks,” Montgomery said on what he wants to see from van Riemsdyk. “We’ve talked about it a lot of times internally. Him and [Kevin] Shattenkirk have been great. They’re true pros. Every day come to work, come to get better. It’s not an easy situation, but he’s been great.”

van Riemsdyk concurred with his coach’s sentiments about helping Boston’s offensive attack, saying that he’ll be aiming to be around the net as much as possible.

“I think you’ve got to stay true to who you are as a player and play with good details and manage the game well and play to your strengths as a player,” he said. “This time of year, being around the net is always an important trait. You see all the goals being scored, it’s all within 5-10 feet of the net. That’s an area that I pride myself on, so going to be doing my best to get there and have an impact there.”

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

NHL teams, take note: Alexandar Georgiev is proof that anything can happen in the playoffs

Published

 on

It’s hard to say when, exactly, Alexandar Georgiev truly began to win some hearts and change some minds on Tuesday night.

Maybe it was in the back half of the second period; that was when the Colorado Avalanche, for the first time in their first-round Stanley Cup playoff series against the Winnipeg Jets, actually managed to hold a lead for more than, oh, two minutes or thereabouts. Maybe it was when the Avs walked into the locker room up 4-2 with 20 minutes to play.

Maybe it was midway through the third, when a series of saves by the Avalanche’s beleaguered starting goaltender helped preserve their two-goal buffer. Maybe it was when the buzzer sounded after their 5-2 win. Maybe it didn’t happen until the Avs made it into their locker room at Canada Life Centre, tied 1-1 with the Jets and headed for Denver.

At some point, though, it should’ve happened. If you were watching, you should’ve realized that Colorado — after a 7-6 Game 1 loss that had us all talking not just about all those goals, but at least one of the guys who’d allowed them — had squared things up, thanks in part to … well, that same guy.

300x250x1

Georgiev, indeed, was the story of Game 2, stopping 28 of 30 shots, improving as the game progressed and providing a lesson on how quickly things can change in the playoffs — series to series, game to game, period to period, moment to moment. The narrative doesn’t always hold. Facts don’t always cooperate. Alexandar Georgiev, for one night and counting, was not a problem for the Colorado Avalanche. He was, in direct opposition to the way he played in Game 1, a solution. How could we view him as anything else?

He had a few big-moment saves, and most of them came midway through the third period with his team up 4-2. There he was with 12:44 remaining, stopping a puck that had awkwardly rolled off Nino Niederreiter’s stick; two missed posts by the Avs at the other end had helped spring Niederreiter for a breakaway. Game 1 Georgiev doesn’t make that save.

There he was, stopping Nikolaj Ehlers from the circle a few minutes later. There wasn’t an Avs defender within five feet, and there was nothing awkward about the puck Ehlers fired at his shoulder. Game 1 Georgiev gets scored on twice.

(That one might’ve been poetic justice. It was Ehlers who’d put the first puck of the night on Georgiev — a chip from center ice that he stopped, and that the crowd in Winnipeg greeted with the ol’ mock cheer. Whoops.)

By the end of it all, Georgiev had stared down Connor Hellebuyck and won, saving nearly 0.5 goals more than expected according to Natural Stat Trick, giving the Avalanche precisely what they needed and looking almost nothing like the guy we’d seen a couple days before. Conventional wisdom coming into this series was twofold: That the Avs have firepower, high-end talent and an overall edge — slight as it may be — on Winnipeg, and that Georgiev is shaky enough to nuke the whole thing.

That wasn’t without merit, either. Georgiev’s .897 save percentage in the regular season was six percentage points below the league average, and he hadn’t broken even in expected goals allowed (minus-0.21). He’d been even worse down the stretch, putting up an .856 save percentage in his final eight appearances, and worse still in Game 1, allowing seven goals on 23 shots and more than five goals more than expected. That’s not bad; that’s an oil spill. Writing him off would’ve been understandable. Writing off Jared Bednar for rolling him out there in Game 2 would’ve been understandable. Writing the Avs off — for all of Nathan MacKinnon and Cale Makar’s greatness — would’ve been understandable.

It just wouldn’t have been correct.

The fact that this all went down now, four days into a two-month ordeal, is a gift — because the postseason thus far has been short on surprises, almost as a rule. The Rangers and Oilers are overwhelming the Capitals and Kings. The Hurricanes are halfway done with the Islanders. The Canucks are struggling with the Predators. PanthersLightning is tight, but one team is clearly better than the other. BruinsMaple Leafs is a close matchup featuring psychic baggage that we don’t have time to unpack. In Golden KnightsStars, Mark Stone came back and scored a huge goal.

None of that should shock you. None of that should make you blink.

Georgiev being good enough for Colorado, though? After what we saw in Game 1? Strange, surprising and completely true. For now.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

"Laugh it off": Evander Kane says Oilers won’t take the bait against Kings | Offside

Published

 on

The LA Kings tried every trick in the book to get the Edmonton Oilers off their game last night.

Hacks after the whistle, punches to the face, and interference with line changes were just some of the things that the Oilers had to endure, and throughout it all, there was not an ounce of retaliation.

All that badgering by the Kings resulted in at least two penalties against them and fuelled a red-hot Oilers power play that made them pay with three goals on four chances. That was by design for Edmonton, who knew that LA was going to try to pester them as much as they could.

That may have worked on past Oilers teams, but not this one.

300x250x1

“We’ve been in a series now for the third year in a row with these guys,” Kane said after practice this morning. “We know them, they know us… it’s one of those things where maybe it makes it a little easier to kind of laugh it off, walk away, or take a shot.

“That type of stuff isn’t gonna affect us.”

Once upon a time, this type of play would get under the Oilers’ skin and result in retaliatory penalties. Yet, with a few hard-knock lessons handed down to them in the past few seasons, it seems like the team is as determined as ever to cut the extracurriculars and focus on getting revenge on the scoreboard.

Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, the longest-tenured player on this Oilers team, had to keep his emotions in check with Kings defender Vladislav Gavrikov, who punched him in the face early in the game. The easy reaction would be to punch back, but the veteran Nugen-Hopkins took his licks and wound up scoring later in the game.

“It’s going to be physical, the emotions are high, and there’s probably going to be some stuff after the whistle,” Nugent-Hopkins told reporters this morning. “I think it’s important to stay poised out there and not retaliate and just play through the whistles and let the other stuff just kind of happen.”

Oilers head coach Kris Knoblauch also noticed his team’s discipline. Playoff hockey is full of emotion, and keeping those in check to focus on the larger goal is difficult. He was happy with how his team set the tone.

“It’s not necessarily easy to do,” Knoblauch said. “You get punched in the face and sometimes the referees feel it’s enough to call a penalty, sometimes it’s not… You just have to take them, and sometimes, you get rewarded with the power play.

“I liked our guy’s response and we want to be sticking up for each other, we want to have that pack mentality, but it’s really important that we’re not the ones taking that extra penalty.”

There is no doubt that the Kings will continue to poke and prod at the Oilers as the series continues. Keeping those retaliations in check will only get more difficult, but if the team can continue to succeed on the scoreboard, it could get easier.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending