Netflix's elevation of Ted Sarandos to co-CEO pushes company closer to its true home: Hollywood - CNBC | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Business

Netflix's elevation of Ted Sarandos to co-CEO pushes company closer to its true home: Hollywood – CNBC

Published

 on


Netflix Chief Content Officer Ted Sarandos (L) and then-Walt Disney Company CEO Bob Iger in 2015 in Los Angeles.

Charley Gallay | Getty Images for LACMA

There used to be a debate about Netflix: Is it a technology or media company?

That debate has fizzled in recent years and clearly ended on Thursday, with Netflix’s announcement that Ted Sarandos would join Reed Hastings as co-CEO. Sarandos, who lives in Los Angeles, has spent two decades at Netflix, leading the company’s mammoth move into original content. 

“It’s a unique company in that they really have almost two headquarters,” said Gil Simon, chief investment officer at San Francisco-based SoMa Equity Partners, which has nearly 10% of its almost $3 billion in assets in Netflix shares. “Clearly the core competency of the company is acquiring and producing content.”

Netflix said Thursday that it added over 10 million global subscribers in the second quarter, bringing its total to 192 million. BMO Capital Markets estimated Netflix would spend more than $17 billion on content this year and more than $26 billion by 2028. Only Disney’s film and TV budget significantly outpaces Netflix. 

Sarandos is the person responsible for putting Netflix’s money to work. From last year’s Martin Scorsese hit “The Irishman” to Netflix’s new action film, “Extraction,” Sarandos has been doing the deals, even with Hastings as CEO, operating out of the company’s official headquarters in Silicon Valley.

“While Reed was the visionary, Ted is the future,” Simon said. “He’s networked within the creative community and his ability to bring on A-list showrunners and film producers is the secret sauce.”

Netflix CEO Reed Hastings speaks during Netflix Slate Event 2018 at JW Marriot on October 9, 2018 in Bogota, Colombia.

Gabriel Aponte | Getty Images

Over the past few years, all the other big content companies have started to look more like Netflix, creating their own streaming services and platforms to capture eyeballs. Now Netflix’s digital service, once an island in the cable TV universe, is the leader in a very crowded space. The result is Netflix increasingly looks more similar to every large media company.

Sarandos told GQ seven years ago that Netflix’s goal was “to become HBO faster than HBO can become us.” He succeeded. AT&T, which acquired HBO in its Time Warner deal two years ago, is now trying to turn HBO into something that resembles Netflix, broadening out HBO to HBO Max, a service that includes family shows and mainstream sitcoms. 

Trades like an internet company

Where Netflix wants to avoid the media comparisons is on Wall Street.

Netflix trades much more like a high-growth tech company than a content behemoth. With a market cap of over $230 billion as of Thursday’s close, it’s now among the 20 most-valuable U.S. companies. Netflix has a comparable market value to AT&T, even with one-ninth the revenue, and it carries a price-to-earnings ratio of 106, compared with 41 for Disney, which has streaming growth opportunities of its own with Disney+ and ESPN+.

But Netflix continues to show that its hefty content investments are paying off. Operating income surged 92% in the second quarter from a year earlier, and net earnings per share jumped to $1.59 from 60 cents. 

Sarandos doesn’t talk much about the stock price, but he can spend hours discussing Netflix’s ability to invest so much more than anyone else on a film while still making it profitable. At an investor event with UBS in December, Sarandos described his work with Scorsese and “The Irishman,” a 3½ hour mobster film that was viewed by more than 26 million people in its first week. It was a movie that even Scorsese acknowledged couldn’t make it into the theater.

“We’re basically making the movies that would otherwise be difficult to make,” Sarandos said. “They’re premiering on Netflix and being produced the way that the filmmaker wanted to make it and we could make it.”

Robert De Niro, Al Pacino and Ray Romano star in Martin Scorsese’s “The Irishman.”

Netflix

As his budget gets bigger, one area that excites Sarandos is animation. At the December event, he said 2022 and 2023 will be big years for the company on that front. 

He expects animation features “maybe four to six times a year” bringing in “everyone who’s created great animation for every animation studio during the last decade.”

That was all before the coronavirus, however, which has forced the film industry to halt much of its production.

Netflix said Thursday it has made the most progress resuming production in Asia Pacific and never fully shut down in Korea. It has resumed some production in Europe as well as two stop-motion animation projects in Oregon and two films in California. The company warned that “current infection trends create more uncertainty for our productions in the US.”

WATCH: Netflix sinks after earnings miss

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Business

Natural gas producers await LNG Canada’s start, but will it be the fix for prices?

Published

 on

 

CALGARY – Natural gas producers in Western Canada have white-knuckled it through months of depressed prices, with the expectation that their fortunes will improve when LNG Canada comes online in the middle of next year.

But the supply glut plaguing the industry this fall is so large that not everyone is convinced the massive facility’s impact on pricing will be as dramatic or sustained as once hoped.

As the colder temperatures set in and Canadians turn on their furnaces, natural gas producers in Alberta and B.C. are finally starting to see some improvement after months of low prices that prompted some companies to delay their growth plans or shut in production altogether.

“We’ve pretty much been as low as you can go on natural gas prices. There were days when (the Alberta natural gas benchmark AECO price) was essentially pennies,” said Jason Feit, an advisor at Enverus Intelligence Research, in an interview.

“As a producer, it would not be economic to have produced that gas . . . It’s been pretty worthless.”

In the past week, AECO spot prices have hovered between $1.20 and $1.60 per gigajoule, a significant improvement over last month’s bottom-barrel prices but still well below the 2023 average price of $2.74 per gigajoule, according to Alberta Energy Regulator figures.

The bearish prices have come due to a combination of increased production levels — up about six per cent year-over-year so far in 2024 —as well as last year’s mild winter, which resulted in less natural gas consumption for heating purposes. There is now an oversupply of natural gas in Western Canada, so much so that natural gas storage capacity in Alberta is essentially full.

Mike Belenkie, CEO of Calgary-headquartered natural gas producer Advantage Energy Ltd., said companies have been ramping up production in spite of the poor prices in order to get ahead of the opening of LNG Canada. The massive Shell-led project nearing completion near Kitimat, B.C. will be Canada’s first large-scale liquefied natural gas export facility.

It is expected to start operations in mid-2025, giving Western Canada’s natural gas drillers a new market for their product.

“In practical terms everyone’s aware that demand will increase dramatically in the coming year, thanks to LNG Canada . . . and as a result of that line of sight to increased demand, a lot of producers have been growing,” Belenkie said in an interview.

“And so we have this temporary period of time where there’s more gas than there is places to put it.”

In light of the current depressed prices, Advantage has started strategically curtailing its gas production by up to 130 million cubic feet per day, depending on what the spot market is doing.

Other companies, including giants like Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. and Tourmaline Oil Corp., have indicated they will delay gas production growth plans until conditions improve.

“We cut all our gas growth out of 2024, once we’d had that mild winter. We did that back in Q2, because this is not the right year to bring incremental molecules to AECO,” said Mike Rose, CEO of Tourmaline, which is Canada’s largest natural gas producer, in an interview this week.

“We moved all our gas growth out into ’25 and ’26.”

LNG Canada is expected to process up to 2 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of natural gas per day once it reaches full operations. That represents what will be a significant drawdown of the existing oversupply, Rose said, adding that is why he thinks the future for western Canadian natural gas producers is bright.

“That sink of 2 Bcf a day will logically take three-plus years to fill. And then if LNG Canada Phase 2 happens, then obviously that’s even more positive,” Rose said.

While Belenkie said he agrees LNG Canada will lift prices, he’s not as convinced as Rose that the benefits will be sustained for a long period of time.

“Our thinking is that markets will be healthy for six months, a year, 18 months — whatever it is — and then after that 18 months, because prices will be healthy, supply will grow and probably overshoot demand again,” he said, adding he’s frustrated that more companies haven’t done what Advantage has done and curtailed production in an effort to limit the oversupply in the market.

“Frankly, we’ve been very disappointed to see how few other producers have chosen to shut in with gas prices this low. . . you’re basically dumping gas at a loss,” Belenkie said.

Feit, the analyst for Enverus, said there’s no doubt LNG Canada’s opening will be a major milestone that will help to support natural gas pricing in Western Canada. He added there are other Canadian LNG projects in the works that would also provide a boost in the longer-term, such as LNG Canada’s proposed Phase 2, as well as potential increased demand from the proliferation of AI-related data centres and other power-hungry infrastructure.

But Feit added that producers need to be disciplined and allow the market to balance in the near-term, otherwise supply levels could overshoot LNG Canada’s capacity and periods of depressed pricing could reoccur.

“Obviously selling gas at pennies on the dollar is not a sustainable business model,” Feit said.

“But there’s an old industry saying that the cure for low gas prices is low gas prices. You know, eventually companies will have to curtail production, they will have to make adjustments.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 25, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TOU; TSX:AAV, TSX:CNQ)

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Corus Entertainment reports Q4 loss, signs amended debt deal with banks

Published

 on

 

TORONTO – Corus Entertainment Inc. reported a fourth-quarter loss compared with a profit a year ago as its revenue fell 21 per cent.

The broadcaster says its net loss attributable to shareholders amounted to $25.7 million or 13 cents per diluted share for the quarter ended Aug. 31. The result compared with a profit attributable to shareholders of $50.4 million or 25 cents per diluted share in the same quarter last year.

Revenue for the quarter totalled $269.4 million, down from $338.8 million a year ago.

On an adjusted basis, Corus says it lost two cents per share for its latest quarter compared with an adjusted loss of four cents per share a year earlier.

The company also announced that it has signed an deal to amend and restate its existing syndicated, senior secured credit facilities with its bank group.

The restated credit facility was changed to reduce the total limit on the revolving facility to $150 million from $300 million and increase the maximum total debt to cash flow ratio required under the financial covenants.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 25, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:CJR.B)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Hiring Is a Process of Elimination

Published

 on

Job seekers owe it to themselves to understand and accept; fundamentally, hiring is a process of elimination. Regardless of how many applications an employer receives, the ratio revolves around several applicants versus one job opening, necessitating elimination.

Essentially, job gatekeepers—recruiters, HR and hiring managers—are paid to find reasons and faults to reject candidates (read: not move forward) to find the candidate most suitable for the job and the company.

Nowadays, employers are inundated with applications, which forces them to double down on reasons to eliminate. It’s no surprise that many job seekers believe that “isms” contribute to their failure to get interviews, let alone get hired. Employers have a large pool of highly qualified candidates to select from. Job seekers attempt to absolve themselves of the consequences of actions and inactions by blaming employers, the government or the economy rather than trying to increase their chances of getting hired by not giving employers reasons to eliminate them because of:

 

  • Typos, grammatical errors, poor writing skills.

 

“Communication, the human connection, is the key to personal and career success.” ― Paul J. Meyer.

The most vital skill you can offer an employer is above-average communication skills. Your resume, LinkedIn profile, cover letters, and social media posts should be well-written and error-free.

 

  • Failure to communicate the results you achieved for your previous employers.

 

If you can’t quantify (e.g. $2.5 million in sales, $300,000 in savings, lowered average delivery time by 6 hours, answered 45-75 calls daily with an average handle time of 3 and a half minutes), then it’s your opinion. Employers care more about your results than your opinion.

 

  • An incomplete LinkedIn profile.

 

Before scheduling an interview, the employer will review your LinkedIn profile to determine if you’re interview-worthy. I eliminate any candidate who doesn’t have a complete LinkedIn profile, including a profile picture, banner, start and end dates, or just a surname initial; anything that suggests the candidate is hiding something.  

 

  • Having a digital footprint that’s a turnoff.

 

If an employer is considering your candidacy, you’ll be Google. If you’re not getting interviews before you assert the unfounded, overused excuse, “The hiring system is broken!” look at your digital footprint. Employers are reading your comments, viewing your pictures, etc. Ask yourself, is your digital behaviour acceptable to employers, or can it be a distraction from their brand image and reputation? On the other hand, not having a robust digital footprint is also a red flag, particularly among Gen Y and Gen Z hiring managers. Not participating on LinkedIn, social media platforms, or having a blog or website can hurt your job search.

 

  • Not appearing confident when interviewing.

 

Confidence = fewer annoying questions and a can-do attitude.

It’s important for employers to feel that their new hire is confident in their abilities. Managing an employee who lacks initiative, is unwilling to try new things, or needs constant reassurance is frustrating.

Job searching is a competition; you’re always up against someone younger, hungrier and more skilled than you.

Besides being a process of elimination, hiring is also about mitigating risk. Therefore, being seen as “a risk” is the most common reason candidates are eliminated, with the list of “too risky” being lengthy, from age (will be hard to manage, won’t be around long) to lengthy employment gaps (raises concerns about your abilities and ambition) to inappropriate social media postings (lack of judgement).

Envision you’re a hiring manager hiring for an inside sales manager role. In the absence of “all things being equal,” who’s the least risky candidate, the one who:

  • offers empirical evidence of their sales results for previous employers, or the candidate who “talks a good talk”?
  • is energetic, or the candidate who’s subdued?
  • asks pointed questions indicating they’re concerned about what they can offer the employer or the candidate who seems only concerned about what the employer can offer them.
  • posts on social media platforms, political opinions, or the candidate who doesn’t share their political views?
  • on LinkedIn and other platforms in criticizes how employers hire or the candidate who offers constructive suggestions?
  • has lengthy employment gaps, short job tenure, or a steadily employed candidate?
  • lives 10 minutes from the office or 45 minutes away?
  • has a resume/LinkedIn profile that shows a relevant linear career or the candidate with a non-linear career?
  • dressed professionally for the interview, or the candidate who dressed “casually”?

An experienced hiring manager (read: has made hiring mistakes) will lean towards candidates they feel pose the least risk. Hence, presenting yourself as a low-risk candidate is crucial to job search success. Worth noting, the employer determines their level of risk tolerance, not the job seeker, who doesn’t own the business—no skin in the game—and has no insight into the challenges they’ve experienced due to bad hires and are trying to avoid similar mistakes.

“Taking a chance” on a candidate isn’t in an employer’s best interest. What’s in an employer’s best interest is to hire candidates who can hit the ground running, fit in culturally, and are easy to manage. You can reduce the odds (no guarantee) of being eliminated by demonstrating you’re such a candidate.

_____________________________________________________________________

 

Nick Kossovan, a well-seasoned veteran of the corporate landscape, offers “unsweetened” job search advice. You can send Nick your questions to artoffindingwork@gmail.com.

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version