adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Investment

New Investment Opportunities For French And Other Foreign Investors In Quebec – Government, Public Sector – Canada – Mondaq News Alerts

Published

 on


To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The forced hiatus in business activity and the economic shock
caused by COVID-19 have hit many Quebec business owners hard. The
impact is especially heavy for owners saddled with the burden of
succession planning and finding no one to take over the reins.
Currently, 30 to 60,000 Quebec businesses are in danger of
disappearing within five years due to a lack of suitable
successors.1

Prior to the COVID-19 crisis, just under one in four owners of
small and medium enterprises (SMEs) intended to transfer their
businesses between 2017 and 2022. For Canada as a whole, the
proportion is only one in five SMEs.2 In many cases in
which owners expressed a willingness to transfer their business,
they had neither a succession plan nor a suitable successor. The
problem can be attributed to several factors, including a shortage
of entrepreneurial successors—the direct result of an ageing
population—and the retirement of many entrepreneurs.

300x250x1

The new reality will have direct consequences on the Quebec
economy and may hasten the premature closure of many
businesses.3 According to the Canadian Federation of
Independent Business (CFIB), roughly 25% of Quebec SMEs will close
after a few months due to the sharp drop in revenues caused by the
COVID-19 crisis.4 Therefore, it appears that the need
for business transfers and transferees will be much more pressing
and will only be intensified by the current crisis.

For many business owners without a succession or transfer plan,
the solution lies in a takeover or acquisition by foreign
investors. The business succession challenges in Quebec can and
should be seen as an opportunity for wealth creation. In this
context, Quebec’s rich and diversified market for business
transfers represents an opportunity for foreign investors insofar
as the Quebec government supports foreign investment.

1. Overview of Quebec’s rich and diverse market for
business transfers

In Quebec, business owners looking for successors come from all
industry sectors, but a significant number work in the
agribusiness, advanced manufacturing, pharmaceuticals and
cosmetics, aeronautics, tourism and specialized services
sectors.

Both in Quebec and in Canada as a whole, majority owners of SMEs
tend to favour external transfers of SMEs. In Quebec, 51% of
majority owners who intend to transfer an SME prefer an external
transfer, i.e. a transfer to someone who is neither a relative nor
internal to the company. In Canada, 59% of majority owners prefer
the external transfer method for SMEs.

Moreover, researchers have observed that nearly one-third of
Quebec SMEs originate from business transfers, while in Canada,
that proportion was one-quarter in 2017.5

2. Business transfers in Quebec: an opportunity for
foreign investors

The demand for SME successors is relatively higher in Quebec
than in other Canadian regions. Business transfers are a growing
feature of the Quebec business landscape and represent an
unprecedented business opportunity for foreign investors.

The influx of foreign capital into a business to be transferred
can be a major stimulus to its growth. In fact, the combination of
new capital and the foreign investor’s international network
and expertise is a major asset for both the transferred company and
the business ecosystem in Quebec.

“Field observations show that transferred SMEs often adopt
longer-term sustainability strategies that do not necessarily
promote high growth when the successor pursues a strategic renewal
process,” says Professor Louise Cadieux.6

Foreign investors, especially Europeans, often choose Quebec as
a gateway to North America. Aside from the favourable exchange
rate, their choice is driven by economic, political, geographic and
linguistic factors, among others.

Quebec has a dynamic economic environment and stands out for its
many tax advantages and other conditions favourable to the export
of goods and services. The business income tax rate is also among
the lowest in North America.

Quebec is a party to several trade agreements and is a signatory
to free trade agreements with major economic partners (CUSMA, CETA,
CPTPP), thus positioning Quebec well on the world stage.
Furthermore, the quality of its workforce, as well as its network
of higher education and business research and development
facilities, rank among the world’s best.

3. A government that helps attract foreign
investment

Attracting investment and boosting exports are current
government priorities.

  • Investissement Québec
    International
    offers programs to help companies carry out
    their investment projects and can provide development capital to
    companies looking to invest in Quebec.
  • Montréal
    International
    and Québec International promote
    the economic development of the metropolis and the
    Capitale-Nationale region, providing on-the-ground support to
    foreign companies or investors setting themselves up in
    Quebec.
  • Quebec’s Ministry of Economy and
    Innovation and the foreign representation offices of the Ministry
    of International Relations and La Francophonie provide information
    on entrepreneurship as well as on Quebec’s venture capital
    industry and potential investors. They also offer several training
    programs.7

The Quebec Government also supports business transfers through
the Centre de transfert d’entreprises du Québec
(CTEQ) and the Fonds de transfert d’entreprise du
Québec
(Quebec Business Transfer Fund). New
entrepreneurs looking to go into business will be able to benefit
from financial support tailored to business transfers, including
favourable financing terms.8

4. Unique ties for business transfers between Quebec and
France

Business ties are natural between Quebec and France, based on
their historical connection and shared language. In fact, the
economic relationship between Quebec and France is characterized by
extensive foreign investment. There are over 300 subsidiaries of
French companies operating in Quebec. Moreover, in recent years,
France has regularly ranked between 4th and
6th largest trading partner worldwide.

Of note, the Mouvement pour les jeunes entrepreneurs
(Moovjee), founded in Paris in 2009 and the Quebec Moovjee, which
followed in 2019 have become a source of inspiration to young
French and Quebecois entrepreneurs wanting to start or take over a
business.9

5. The role of Langlois lawyers in foreign acquisitions
in Quebec

For many years, Langlois lawyers have been acting for
foreign—particularly French—buyers in Quebec
acquisitions that typically stem from the lack of a successor
within the family. This experience allows us to advise our clients
on legal and regulatory matters pertaining to the structure of the
acquisition, the nuances of due diligence, the labour relations
environment, and the preparation and negotiation of key contracts.
In a setting in which acquisitions of this nature are likely to
increase significantly as a result of the COVID-19 crisis, we will
continue to guide buyers on their approach to doing business in
Quebec and on the business environment in general.

Footnotes

1 https://www.lexpress.fr/emploi/gestion-carriere/le-mouvement-pour-les-jeunes-entrepreneurs-s-implante-au-quebec_2080646.html

2 Marc Duhamel, François Bouard, Louis Cadieux,
Frédéric Laurin, Portrait du repreneuriat de PME
au Québec en 2017
(French only), École de
gestion de l’Université du Québec à
Trois-Rivières and Centre de transfert d’entreprise du
Québec, 2019.

3 According to Kristalina Georgieva, Managing Director of
the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the impact of the current
pandemic on the global economy is the worst economic fallout since
the Great Depression that followed the crash of 1929 (see, in
particular, https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1692403/fmi-pires-consequences-economiques-grande-depression-georgieva).

4 https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1670315/economie-pme-covid-19-impact-fcei

5 https://www.newswire.ca/fr/news-releases/une-etude-quantitative-du-repreneuriat-au-quebec-une-primeur-du-cteq-844538589.html

6 https://www.newswire.ca/fr/news-releases/une-etude-quantitative-du-repreneuriat-au-quebec-une-primeur-du-cteq-844538589.html

7 https://www2.gouv.qc.ca/entreprises/portail/quebec/investir?lang=fr&x=investir&e=1384428485

8 The Fonds de transfert d’entreprise du
Québec
is a limited partnership established under the
laws of the Province of Quebec and whose funds are managed by
Investissement Québec (see, in particular, http://www.fteq.ca/index.php/en-bref).

9 https://www.lexpress.fr/emploi/gestion-carriere/le-mouvement-pour-les-jeunes-entrepreneurs-s-implante-au-quebec_2080646.html

Originally published 24 July, 2020

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Taxes should not wag the tail of the investment dog, but that’s what Trudeau wants

Published

 on

Kim Moody: Ottawa is encouraging people to crystallize their gains and pay tax. That’s a hell of a fiscal plan

The Canadian federal budget has been out for a week, which is plenty of time to absorb just how terrible it is.

300x250x1

The problems start with weak fiscal policy, excessive spending and growing public-debt charges estimated to be $54.1 billion for the upcoming year. That is more than $1 billion per week that Canadians are paying for things that have no societal benefit.

Next, the budget clearly illustrates this government’s continued weak taxation policies, two of which it apparently believes  are good for entrepreneurs. But the proposed $2-million Canadian Entrepreneurs Incentive (CEI) and $10-million capital gains exemption for transfers to an employee ownership trust (EOT) are both laughable.

Why? Well, for the CEI, virtually every entrepreneurial industry (except technology) is not eligible. If you happen to be in an industry that qualifies, the $2-million exemption comes with a long, stringent list of criteria (which will be very difficult for most entrepreneurs to qualify for) and it is phased in over a 10-year period of $200,000 per year.

For transfers to EOTs, an entrepreneur must give up complete legal and factual control to be eligible for the $10-million exemption, even though the EOT will likely pay the entrepreneur out of future profits. The commercial risk associated with such a transfer is likely too great for most entrepreneurs to accept.

Capital gains tax hike

But the budget’s highlight proposal was the capital gains inclusion rate increase to 66.7 per cent from 50 per cent for dispositions effective after June 24, 2024. The proposal includes a 50 per cent inclusion rate on the first $250,000 of annual capital gains for individuals, but not for corporations and trusts. Oh, those evil corporations and trusts.

There is a lot wrong with this proposed policy. The first is that by not putting individuals, corporations and trusts on the same taxation footing for capital gains taxation, the foundational principle of integration (the idea that the corporate and individual tax systems should be indifferent to whether an investment is held in a corporation or directly by the taxpayer) is completely thrown out the window. This is wrong.

Some economists have come out in strong favour of the proposal, mainly because of equity arguments (a buck is a buck), but such arguments ignore the real world of investing where investors look at overall risk, liquidity and the time value of money.

If capital gains are taxed at a rate approaching wage taxation rates, why would entrepreneurs and investors want to risk their capital when such investments might be illiquid for a long period of time and be highly risky?

They will seek greener pastures for their investment dollars and they already are. I’ve been fielding a tremendous number of questions from investors over the past week and I’d invite those academics and economists who support the increased inclusion rate to come live in my shoes for a day to see how the theoretical world of equity and behaviour collide. It’s not good and it certainly does nothing to help Canada’s obvious productivity challenges.

Of course, there has been the usual chatter encouraging such people to leave (“don’t let the door hit you on the way out,” some say) from those who don’t understand basic economics and taxation policy, but these cheerleaders should be careful what they wish for. The loss of successful Canadians and their investment dollars affects all of us in a very negative way.

The government messaging around this tax proposal has many people upset, including me. Specifically, it is the following paragraph in the budget documents that many supporters are parroting that is upsetting:

“Next year, 28.5 million Canadians are not expected to have any capital gains income, and 3 million are expected to earn capital gains below the $250,000 annual threshold. Only 0.13 per cent of Canadians with an average income of $1.4 million are expected to pay more personal income tax on their capital gains in any given year. As a result of this, for 99.87 per cent of Canadians, personal income taxes on capital gains will not increase.” (This is supposedly about 40,000 taxpayers.)

Bluntly, this is garbage. It outright ignores several facts.

For one thing, there are hundreds of thousands of private corporations owned and controlled by Canadian resident individuals. Those corporations will be subject to the increased capital gains inclusion rate with no $250,000 annual phase-in. Because of the way passive income is taxed in these Canadian-controlled private corporations, the increased tax load on realized capital gains will be felt by individual shareholders on the dividend distribution required to recover certain refundable corporate taxes.

Furthermore, public corporations that have capital gains will pay tax at a higher inclusion rate and this results in higher corporate tax, which means decreased amounts are available to be paid out as dividends to individual shareholders (including those held by individuals’ pensions).

The budget documents simply measured the number of corporations that reported capital gains in recent years and said it is 12.6 per cent of all corporations. That measurement is shallow and not the whole story, as described above.

Tax hit for cottages

There are also millions of Canadians who hold a second real estate property, either a cottage-type and/or rental property. Those properties will eventually be sold, with the probability that the gain will exceed the $250,000 threshold.

Upon death, an individual will often have their largest capital gains realized as a result of deemed dispositions that occur immediately prior to death. This will have the distinct possibility of capital gains that exceed $250,000.

And people who become non-residents of Canada — and that is increasing rapidly — have deemed dispositions of their assets (with some exceptions). They will face the distinct possibility that such gains will be more than $250,000.

The politics around the capital gains inclusion rate increase are pretty obvious. The government is planning for Canadian taxpayers to crystallize their inherent gains prior to the implementation date, especially corporations that will not have a $250,000 annual lower inclusion rate. For the current year, the government is projecting a $4.9-billion tax take. But next year, it dramatically drops to an estimated $1.3 billion.

This is a ridiculous way to shield the government’s tremendous spending and try to make them look like they are holding the line on their out-of-control deficits. The government is encouraging people to crystallize their gains and pay tax. That’s a hell of a fiscal plan.

There’s an old saying that tax should not wag the tail of the investment dog, but that is exactly what the government is encouraging Canadians to do in the name of raising short-term taxation revenues. It is simply wrong.

I hope the government has some second sober thoughts about the capital gains proposal, but I’m not holding my breath.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Everton search for investment to complete 777 deal – BBC.com

Published

 on

By


Getty Images
  • 2 hours ago

Everton are searching for third-party investment in order to push through a protracted takeover by 777 Partners.

The Miami-based firm agreed a deal to buy the Toffees from majority owner Farhad Moshiri in September, but are yet to gain approval from the Premier League.

On Monday, Bloomberg reported the club’s main financial adviser Deloitte has been seeking fresh funding from sports-focused investors and lenders to get 777’s deal over the line.

300x250x1

BBC Sport has been told this is “standard practice contingency planning” and the process may identify other potential lenders to 777.

Sources close to British-Iranian businessman Moshiri have told BBC Sport they remain “working on completing the deal with 777”.

It is understood there are no other parties waiting in the wings to takeover should the takeover fall through and the focus is fully on 777.

The Americans have so far loaned £180m to Everton for day-to-day operational costs, which will be turned into equity once the deal is completed, but repaying money owed to MSP Sports Capital, whose deal collapsed in August, remains a stumbling block.

777 says it can stump up the £158m that is owed to MSP Sports Capital and once that is settled, it is felt the deal should be completed soon after.

Related Topics

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Investment

Warren Buffett Predicts 'Bad Ending' for Bitcoin — Is It a Doomed Investment? – Yahoo Finance

Published

 on

By


NanoStockk / Getty Images

Currently sitting in sixth on Forbes’ Real-Time Billionaires List, Berkshire Hathaway co-founder, chairman and CEO Warren Buffett is a first-rate example of an investor who stuck to his core financial beliefs early in life to become not only a success but a once-in-a-lifetime inspiration to those who followed in his footsteps.

One of the most trusted investors for decades, the 93-year-old Buffett isn’t shy to pontificate on his investment philosophy, which is centered around value investing, buying stocks at less than their intrinsic value and holding them for the long term.

Read Next: Warren Buffett: 6 Best Pieces of Money Advice for the Middle Class
Find Out: 5 Genius Things All Wealthy People Do With Their Money

300x250x1

He’s also quite vocal on investments he deems worthless. And one of those is Bitcoin.

Sponsored: Protect Your Wealth With A Gold IRA. Take advantage of the timeless appeal of gold in a Gold IRA recommended by Sean Hannity.

Buffett’s Take on Bitcoin

Over the past decade, it’s been clear that the crypto craze isn’t something Buffett wants any part of. He described Bitcoin as “probably rat poison squared” back in 2018.

“In terms of cryptocurrencies, generally, I can say with almost certainty that they will come to a bad ending,” Buffett said in 2018. And his stance hasn’t wavered since. According to Benzinga, Buffett believes that cryptocurrencies aren’t a viable or valuable investment.

“Now if you told me you own all of the Bitcoin in the world and you offered it to me for $25, I wouldn’t take it because what would I do with it? I’d have to sell it back to you one way or another. It isn’t going to do anything,” Buffett said at the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting in 2022.

Although the Oracle of Omaha has his misgivings about the unpredictable investment, does that mean crypto is doomed as an investment? Not necessarily.

For You: 10 Valuable Stocks That Could Be the Next Apple or Amazon

Is Buffett Wrong About Bitcoin?

Bitcoin bulls argue that while it’s not government-issued, cryptocurrency is as fungible, divisible, secure and portable as fiat currency and gold. Because they occupy a digital space, cryptocurrencies are decentralized, scarce and durable. They can last as long as they can be stored.

Crypto boosters continue to predict massive growth in the coin’s value. Earlier this year, SkyBridge Capital founder and former White House director of communications Anthony Scaramucci told reporters that Bitcoin could exceed $170,000 by mid-2025, and Ark Invest CEO Cathie Wood predicts Bitcoin will hit $1.48 million by 2030, according to Fortune.

“They really don’t understand the concept and the whole history of money,” Scaramucci said of crypto critics like Buffett on a recent episode of Jason Raznick’s “The Raz Report.” Because we place a value on “traditional” currency, it is essentially worthless compared with the transparent and trustworthy digital Bitcoin, Scaramucci said.

Currently trading around the $66,000 mark, Bitcoin is up nearly 50% in 2024. This means it’s massively outperforming most indexes this year, including the S&P 500, which is up about 6% in 2024.

Although Berkshire Hathaway has invested heavily in Bitcoin-related Brazilian fintech company Nu Holdings, which has its own cryptocurrency called Nucoin, it’s possible Buffett will never come around fully to crypto, despite its recent surge in value. It’s contrary to the reliable investment strategy that has served him very well for decades.

“The urge to participate in something where it looks like easy money is a human instinct which has been unleashed,” Buffett said. “People love the idea of getting rich quick, and I don’t blame them … It’s so human, and once unleashed you can’t put it back in the bottle.”

More From GOBankingRates

This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: Warren Buffett Predicts ‘Bad Ending’ for Bitcoin — Is It a Doomed Investment?

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending