adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

Canadian media group Overstory sheds jobs as staff push back

Published

 on

Nearly two years ago, a journalism startup made bold promises to reshape community news in Canada, announcing plans to hire more than 200 journalists and open 50 new publications across the country.

But this month, as they culled nearly half the staff from their most successful publication, executives from the Overstory media group admitted that – despite the cascade of recent failures across the industry – they had thought turning a profit in local journalism would be “a lot simpler”. The job cuts have raised larger questions over the company’s future, and about that of alternative models of experimental journalism.

With legacy publications around the world in turmoil – just last month, Canada’s Postmedia Network Corp announced it would cut 11% of its editorial staff – a growing number of startups have emerged, all hopeful that they can find the right formula to reinvent journalism.

Copies of Postmedia-owned newspapers the Vancouver Sun and the Province are displayed at a store in Burnaby, Canada, Tuesday, Jan. 19, 2016. Postmedia has cut approximately 90 jobs and merged newsrooms in four cities as it steps up plans to slash costs amid mounting revenue Postmedia has cut approximately 90 jobs and merged newsrooms in four cities as it steps up plans to slash costs amid mounting revenue losses, according to the Canadian Press. (Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press via AP) MANDATORY CREDIT
Fifty new outlets, 250 journalists: Canadian startup unveils plan to revive local news
Read more

Last summer, Overstory solicited millions in investment capital to expand into small and mid-size North American cities. “These local markets are wide open and we intend to take them,” the company said in a pitch deck obtained by the Logic.

300x250x1

Since launching in 2021, however, the company has fallen far short of its ambitious expansion goals. With growth slowing in recent months, Overstory began cutting jobs. The deepest came in early February at Capital Daily, after the publication lost four of its employees, bringing its staff to three. The Victoria-based publication had repeatedly been held up as the company’s exemplar of an award-winning, profit-making publication.

Amid deteriorating finances, the outlet was also caught in a larger battle over the future of its operations, with executives weighing a shift to more frequent daily stories and staff pushing for longer, more time-consuming investigative articles.

“We know the daily newsletter is the most profitable part of the operation. And we were willing to play ball with this idea of shorter, quicker and more responsive pieces,” said Jimmy Thomson, the former managing editor of Capital Daily, who was among those fired. “But we also really felt that our community needs and values the longer stuff. And we really loved doing it.”

The layoffs quickly morphed into a broader public feud, after company cofounders posted a series of tweets seen as both naive about the journalism industry and dismissive of their employees.

Cofounder Andrew Wilkinson tweeted the executives were “guilty of being overly optimistic” in their goals.

“Not fun. News is hard,” he wrote.

The Overstory CEO, Farhan Mohamed, prompted indignation when he tweeted: “Many journalists don’t understand business. But worse? They don’t care to.” He later apologized to staff for his remarks.

But employees pushed back, saying the cuts left them “blindsided” and confused over the direction of the company, according to audio from a 6 February meeting.

Mohamed, who previously ran the news and entertainment media outlet Daily Hive, told staff the past weeks have been among the worst in his career.

“Maybe we underestimated this business and how hard it actually is. I thought it would be easier, thought it was going to be a lot simpler than it actually turned out to be,” Mohamed told staff, according to the recording. “We made some big bets, and a lot of them haven’t paid off.”

The firings in early February came a day before Overstory staff announced they were unionizing, but those involved in the efforts don’t believe the events are linked.

As it tried to quickly expand across the country, Overstory faced growth challenges, including questions over recruitment efforts.

Gabrielle Drolet, a Montreal-based freelance writer, said she spoke with Mohamed two years ago, hoping for an internship at Overstory. Instead, he suggested she run a publication.

“I had never been in a newsroom before. I didn’t have much editing experience … I could not believe it was happening.”

Drolet turned down the offer.

“It’s frustrating to see people who don’t know much about journalism assume that the industry is failing because of journalists, and not because of wider issues,” she said.

In a separate row, journalists and senior staff at the Ontario-based Queen’s Park Briefing resigned last week over allegations of editorial interference by company owners.

Days later, other reporters were also laid off.

But the cuts at Overstory have also raised broader questions about the company’s model, which aimed to rapidly turn a profit in an industry where publications struggle to survive.

Emma Gilchrist, editor in chief and cofounder of the environmentally focused publication the Narwhal, said pursuing nonprofit status made sense when she and colleague Carol Linnitt launched in 2018.

“When we started, we looked around and saw that other outlets were all operating as for-profit entities – but they weren’t making any profit. They were technically for profit, but they’re operating like a nonprofit without any of the benefits of being a nonprofit,’ she said.

The approach has paid off, with more than 6,000 readers contributing in 2022, enough to expand.

“People come to us to find stories they can’t find anywhere else,” Gilchrist said. “You need to have an audience and you need to have a growing audience. They need to be loyal and they need to be coming back.”

Other newly launched outlets have taken the nonprofit route, including the Investigative Journalism Foundation, which styles itself as the “future of Canadian journalism”.

Wilkinson, the Overstory cofounder, tweeted that he had lost C$5m (US$3.75m) of his own money in the venture, adding that nonprofit status “doesn’t mean you can lose money endlessly without cutting costs”.

Amid the tumult, former and current staff have also expressed concern about the future of the brand.

“There’s an opportunity here for Overstory. But they need to meet us in good faith and be a part of this solution together,” said Martin Bauman, a spokesperson for the Overstory media guild and a reporter at the Coast, which is owned by Overstory.

“We still believe in the vision of community news. We want to see they still do too. At this point, we’re looking for actions, not words.”

… as you’re joining us today from Canada, we have a small favour to ask. Tens of millions have placed their trust in the Guardian’s fearless journalism since we started publishing 200 years ago, turning to us in moments of crisis, uncertainty, solidarity and hope. More than 1.5 million supporters, from 180 countries, now power us financially – keeping us open to all, and fiercely independent. Will you make a difference and support us too?

Unlike many others, the Guardian has no shareholders and no billionaire owner. Just the determination and passion to deliver high-impact global reporting, always free from commercial or political influence. Reporting like this is vital for democracy, for fairness and to demand better from the powerful.

And we provide all this for free, for everyone to read. We do this because we believe in information equality. Greater numbers of people can keep track of the events shaping our world, understand their impact on people and communities, and become inspired to take meaningful action. Millions can benefit from open access to quality, truthful news, regardless of their ability to pay for it.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Twitter source code partially leaked online, court filing says – Al Jazeera English

Published

 on


GitHub removed code shared without permission after request by social media giant, court filing says.

Twitter’s source code has partially leaked online, according to a legal filing by the social media giant.

Twitter asked GitHub, an online software development platform, to remove the code after it was posted online without permission earlier this month, the legal document filed in the US state of California showed on Sunday.

300x250x1

GitHub complied with Twitter’s request to remove the code after the social media company on March 24 issued a subpoena to identify a user known as “FreeSpeechEnthusiast”, according to the filing with the US District Court of the Northern District of California. San Francisco-based Twitter noted in the filing that the postings infringe on the platform’s intellectual property rights.

The filing was first reported by The New York Times.

The leak of the code is the latest hiccup at the social media giant since its purchase by Elon Musk, whose tenure has been marked by mass layoffs, outages, sweeping changes to content moderation and heated debate about the proper balance between free speech and online safety.

Musk, who bought Twitter for $44bn last October, said recently that Twitter would open the source code used to recommend tweets on March 31. Musk, who also runs Tesla and several other companies, said the platform’s algorithm was overly complex and predicted people would find “many silly things” once the code was made public. It is not clear if the leaked source relates to the code used to recommend tweets.

“Providing code transparency will be incredibly embarrassing at first, but it should lead to rapid improvement in recommendation quality,” he wrote on Twitter. “Most importantly, we hope to earn your trust.”

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Utah is first US state to limit teen social media access

Published

 on

Child on phoneGetty Images

Utah has become the first US state to require social media firms get parental consent for children to use their apps and verify users are at least 18.

The governor said he signed the two sweeping measures to protect young people in the state.

The bills will give parents full access to their children’s online accounts, including posts and private messages.

The move comes amidst heightened concern over the impact of social media on children’s mental health.

300x250x1

Under the measures enacted on Thursday, a parent or guardian’s explicit consent will be needed before children can create accounts on apps such Instagram, Facebook and TikTok.

The bills also impose a social media curfew that blocks children’s access between 22:30 and 06:30, unless adjusted by their parents.

Under the legislation, social media companies will no longer be able to collect a child’s data or be targeted for advertising.

The two bills – which are also designed to make it easier to take legal action against social media companies – will take effect on March 1, 2024.

Governor Spencer Cox, a Republican, wrote on Twitter: “We’re no longer willing to let social media companies continue to harm the mental health of our youth.

“As leaders, and parents, we have a responsibility to protect our young people.”

Children’s advocacy group Commons Sense Media welcomed the governor’s move to curtail some of social media’s most addictive features, calling it a “huge victory for kids and families in Utah”.

“It adds momentum for other states to hold social media companies accountable to ensure kids across the country are protected online,” said Jim Steyer, Common Sense Media’s founder and CEO.

Similar regulations are being considered in four other Republican-led states – Arkansas, Texas, Ohio and Louisiana – and Democratic-led New Jersey.

But Common Sense Media and other advocacy groups warned some parts of the new legislation could put children at risk.

Ari Z Cohn, a free speech lawyer for TechFreedom, said the bill posed “significant free speech problems”.

“There are so many children who might be in abusive households,” he told the BBC, “who might be LGBT, who could be cut-off from social media entirely.”

In response, Meta, Facebook’s parent company, said it has robust tools to keep children safe.

A spokesperson told the BBC: “We’ve developed more than 30 tools to support teens and families, including tools that let parents and teens work together to limit the amount of time teens spend on Instagram, and age verification technology that helps teens have age-appropriate experiences.”

There has been other US bipartisan support for social media legislation aimed at protecting children.

President Joe Biden’s State of the Union address in February called for laws banning tech companies from collecting data on children.

Last year, California state lawmakers passed their own child data law. Among other measures, the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act requires digital platforms to make the highest privacy features for under-18 users a default setting.

The passage of the Utah bills coincides with a bruising congressional hearing for TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew.

 

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

The digital media rollup dream is dead for the moment — now it’s all about core brand strength

Published

 on

 

BuzzFeed CEO Jonah Peretti stands in front of the Nasdaq market site in Times Square as the company goes public through a merger with a special-purpose acquisition company on December 06, 2021 in New York City.
Spencer Platt | Getty Images

When a marriage or an engagement fails, it’s common for the participants to take time to work on themselves.

That’s where the digital media industry finds itself today.

After years of focusing on consolidating to better compete with Google and Facebook for digital advertising dollars, many of the most well-known digital media companies have abandoned consolidation efforts to concentrate on differentiation.

300x250x1

“What you’re finding is companies are trying to find a non-substitutable core,” said Jonathan Miller, the CEO of Integrated Media, which specializes in digital media investments. “The era of trying to put these companies together is over, and I don’t think it’s coming back.”

A 90% decline in BuzzFeed shares since the company went public in 2021, a failed sales process from Vice, the collapse of special purpose acquisition companies, and a choppy advertising market have made digital media executives rethink their companies’ futures. For the moment, executives have decided that more concentrated investment is better than attempts to gain scale.

“Right now, everyone’s trying to get through a tougher market by focusing on their strengths,” BuzzFeed CEO Jonah Peretti said in an interview with CNBC. “We’re in this period now where we should just focus on innovating for the future and building more efficient, stronger, better companies.”

What’s happening in the digital media space echoes trends from the biggest media companies, including Netflix, Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery. After losing nearly half their market values, or more, in 2022, those companies have emphasized what makes them different, whether it be distribution, brand or quality of programming, after years of global expansion and mega-mergers. Disney CEO Bob Iger said the word “brand” more than 25 times at a Morgan Stanley media conference this month.

“I think brands matter,” Iger said. “The more choice people have, the more important brands become because of what they convey to consumers.”

Making strategic decisions based on consumer demand rather than investor pressure is a pivot for the industry, said Bryan Goldberg, CEO of Bustle Digital Group, which has acquired and developed a number of brands and sites aimed at women, including Nylon, Scary Mommy, Romper and Elite Daily.

“Too many of the mergers were driven by investor needs as opposed to consumer needs,” Goldberg said in an interview.

The rollup dream’s rise and fall

From late 2018 to early 2022, the digital media industry had a shared goal. Pushed by venture capitalist and private equity investors who had made sizeable investments in the industry during the 2010s, companies such as BuzzFeed, Vice, Vox Media, Group Nine, and Bustle Digital Group, or BDG, were talking to each other, in various combinations, about merging to gain scale.

“If BuzzFeed and five of the other biggest companies were combined into a bigger digital media company, you would probably be able to get paid more money,” Peretti told The New York Times in November 2018, kicking off a multiyear effort to consolidate.

The rationale was twofold. First, digital media companies needed more scale to compete with Facebook and Google for digital advertising dollars. Adding sites and brands under one corporate umbrella would boost overall eyeballs for advertisers. Cost-cutting from M&A synergies was an added benefit for investors.

Second, longtime shareholders wanted to exit their investments. Large legacy media companies such as Disney and Comcast‘s NBCUniversal invested hundreds of millions in digital media in the early and mid-2010s. Disney invested more than $400 million in Vice. NBCUniversal put a similar amount into BuzzFeed. By the end of the decade, after seeing the value of those investments fall, legacy media companies made it clear to digital media executives that they weren’t interested in being acquirers.

With no strategic buyer available, merging with each other using publicly traded stock could give VC and PE shareholders a chance to cash out of investments that were well past the standard hold time of seven years. Digital media companies eyed special purpose acquisition companies — also known as SPACs or blank-check companies — as a way to go public quickly. The popularity of SPACs picked up steam in 2020 and peaked in 2021.

Deal flow accelerated. Vox acquired New York Magazine in September 2019. About a week later, Vice announced it had acquired Refinery29, a digital media company focused on younger women. BuzzFeed bought news aggregator and blog HuffPost in 2020 and then acquired digital publisher Complex Networks in 2021 as part of a SPAC transaction to go public. Vox and Group Nine agreed to a merger later that year.

BuzzFeed, generally thought by industry executives at the time to have the strongest balance sheet with the best growth narrative, successfully went public via SPAC in December 2021. Shares immediately tanked, falling 24% in their first week of trading. The coming weeks and months were even worse. BuzzFeed opened at $10 per share. The stock currently trades at about $1 — a 90% loss of value.

BuzzFeed’s underwhelming performance coincided with the implosion of the SPAC market in early 2022 as interest rates rose. Other companies that planned to follow BuzzFeed shut down their efforts to go public completely. Vice tried and failed. Now it’s trying for the second time in two years to find a buyer. BDG and Vox, meanwhile, abandoned considerations to go public. Vox instead sold a 20% stake in itself in February to Penske Media, which owns Rolling Stone and Variety.

The industry turns inward

Consolidation was always a flawed strategy because digital media could never become big enough to compete with Facebook and Google, said Integrated Media’s Miller.

“You have to have sufficient amount of scale to matter, but that’s not a winning formula by itself,” Miller said.

Vice’s deal for Refinery29 is a prime example of a deal motivated by scale that lacked consumer rationale, said BDG’s Goldberg.

“The digital media rollup has proven successful only when assets are thoughtfully combined with an eye toward consumers,” Goldberg said. “In what world did Vice and Refinery29 make sense in combination?”

Vice is engaged in sale talks with a number of buyers that fall outside the digital media landscape, CNBC previously reported. It’s also considering selling itself in pieces if there’s more interest in parts of the company, such as its TV production assets and its ad agency, Virtue.

Vice is a cautionary tale of what happens to a digital media company when its brand loses luster, Miller said. Valued at $5.7 billion in 2017, Vice is now considering selling itself for around $500 million, according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be named because the sale discussions are private.

A Vice spokesperson declined to comment.

“In the old days of media, with TV networks, if you were down, you could revive yourself with a hit,” said Miller. “In the internet age, everything is so easily substitutable. If Vice goes down, the audience just moves on to something else.”

Companies such as BuzzFeed, Vox and BDG are now trying to find an enduring relevancy amid a myriad of information and entertainment options. BuzzFeed has chosen to lean in to artificial intelligence, touting new AI-generated quizzes and other content that fuses the work of staff writers with AI databases.

BDG has chosen to primarily target female audiences across lifestyle categories.

Vox has focused on journalism and information across a number of different verticals. That’s a strategy that hasn’t really changed even as the market has turned against digital media, allowing Vox CEO Jim Bankoff the opportunity to continue to hunt for deals. Just don’t expect the partners to be Vice, BDG or BuzzFeed.

“We want to be the leading modern media company with the strongest portfolio of brands that serve their audiences on modern platforms — websites, podcasts, streaming services — while building franchises through multiple revenue streams,” Bankoff said. “There’s no doubt M&A is part of our playbook, and we expect it will continue to be in the future.”

Finding an exit

While executives may be making strategy decisions with a sharper eye toward the consumer, the problem of finding an exit for investors remains. Differentiation may open up the pool of potential buyers beyond the media industry. BuzzFeed’s emphasis on artificial intelligence could attract interest from technology platforms, for instance.

It’s also possible that there will be an eventual second wave of peer-to-peer mergers. While Integrated Media’s Miller doesn’t expect a future industry rollup, BuzzFeed’s Peretti hasn’t closed the door on the concept if market conditions improve. As executives invest in fewer ideas and verticals, the end result could be healthier companies that are more attractive merger partners, he said.

“If everyone invests in what they’re best at, if you put them back together, you’d have that diversified digital media company with real scale,” Peretti said. “That helps drive commerce for all parts of a unified company. I think it’s still possible.”

Disclosure: Comcast’s NBCUniversal is the parent company of CNBC.

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending