Ominous News As The Economy Re-Opens - Forbes | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

Ominous News As The Economy Re-Opens – Forbes

Published

 on


Corporate decision making has begun to take an ominous turn. When the lockdowns began, most managers thought in terms of bridging the emergency – conserving cash and cutting costs but otherwise standing ready to resume previously high levels of production as soon as the virus-fighting strictures lifted. Little discussion of downsizing occurred. But as the quarantines and shutdowns persisted, business managers seem to have changed their views. More and more, they have begun to talk about downsizing layoffs and permanently shuttering less efficient facilities.

The news is spotty, mere straws in the wind so far, but even at that, the changing attitude is threatening. As long as companies had simply suspended operations, it was reasonable to look for an economic snapback when circumstances allowed. But once firms turn to more permanent shutdowns and layoffs, recovery will require the long and arduous process of rebuilding. Instead of a proverbial v-shaped recovery, the nation might suffer a U-shaped one or something with a still less encouraging shape.

Though as yet no statistical evidence of the change has emerged, the flow of anecdotes is discouraging. Such a shift, of course, should hardly surprise. As the lockdowns have continued, companies have quickly burned through their capital cushions and their ability to rely on lines of credit. Those with less financial backing face the stark possibility of bankruptcy. Those managers who only a few weeks ago remained firmly committed to only temporary furloughs for workers and efforts to maintain existing facilities have found themselves faced with a reality that has made such an encouraging approach impossible.

Here are some of the unsettling reports: Caterpillar has announced its decision to close one of its German factories permanently. The company has not yet announced anything ominous for the United States, but the German action is hardly encouraging. More stark are decisions by Polaris, Inc. and Goodyear Tire and Rubber, the first to completely shutter a boat and motorcycle manufacturing facility in Indiana, the second to close a plant in Alabama. Lennox China had identified the effect of the lockdowns and quarantines as a kind of last straw and decided to close its last domestic facility located in North Carolina. Maple Block Company, a medium-sized Michigan-based firm, at first issued temporary furloughs, but more recently has announced its decision to close of its facilities for good. Raytheon has hinted at “further reductions.” Less well-known small and medium-sized firms across the Mid West and in the North East have announced closures and bankruptcies. Other companies, if not making outright announcements, have issued warnings of a coming change from bridging the emergency to permanent downsizings. Typical is the announcement from MGM Resorts International. Its management has identified August as a deadline to make clear more permanent downsizing moves unless the nation’s reopening proceeds well.

Other ominous signs of impending bankruptcies have emerged. Credit rating agencies of reveled that increasing numbers of firms are moving toward what Wall Street calls “distressed debt exchanges.” In these, borrowers offer new or restructured debt in place of outstanding issues. Alternatively, firms buy back outstanding notes at substantial discounts. Such actions were common in 2008, often before bankruptcies. Research from New York University’s Salomon Center indicates that historically some 40% of such distressed exchanges precede bankruptcy. To be sure, these problems have roots that predate the coronavirus emergency. Because interest rates and bond yields have remained so low for so long, managements have actively borrowed to lock up long-term credit at favorable rates. Many have not used the funds but have kept them in cash as a kind of reserve for future investments. The income from those cash investments failed to cover the servicing requirements of the long-term borrowing but managers could justify the loss in terms of locking in historically low long-term rates.  But now that the lockdowns and quarantines stemming revenue flows, this debt has become an unsupportable burden. 

It is some comfort that these announced permanent closings and financial maneuvers have yet to become widespread. A successful re-opening for the general economy – one that perhaps adequately re-starts business by August (to use MGM’s date) – can head off these trends and justify the original plans to bridge the emergency with a temporary pause. But that is only a “perhaps,” not the least because there is no telling the direction of the virus and because political calculations often differ from those that might most help the economy.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version