Connect with us

Tech

OnePlus 9 Pro with Hasselblad Review: Ambition, With Room To Grow – PetaPixel

Published

 on


A renewed focus on camera output in the OnePlus 9 Pro underpins the company’s latest flagship phone, but it’s not the only reason why this is such a stellar alternative.

Hype isn’t often what follows OnePlus and its device launches — at least for the average consumer — and the company itself invited additional scrutiny by partnering with Hasselblad for its camera development. Hasselblad has been down this road before with Motorola in 2016, albeit with its Moto Mod camera attachment that failed to deliver anything groundbreaking.

Fast forward to 2021, and the Swedish company is back in the mobile market. The Hasselblad for Mobile system has a lot riding on it, particularly as the opening salvo in what is a three-year agreement with OnePlus. Both brands have something to gain provided the 9 Pro can shoot well, not just now, but in the months and years to come as well.

Design and Build

There is really no other way to put this than to say the OnePlus 9 Pro is a beauty. Anyone paying attention to the company’s more recent launches going back a few years won’t be surprised by that. The aesthetic appeal has a lot to do with how its designers have chosen vibrant colors, and how engineers have made it work with the solid components inside.

Granted, a colorful back always benefits from a gorgeous display, and the 6.7-inch OLED QHD+ with 120Hz refresh rate certainly lives up to that. This kind of congruency is what has signaled, at least to me, that OnePlus has moved up a few notches in design philosophy over time. Still, for a company that has largely eschewed glossy backs, my Morning Mist variant became an unfortunate fingerprint magnet right after admiring its shiny veneer. I kept thinking a matte finish would’ve been the better choice.

Whether by design or sheer circumstance, the rear camera array really stands out. Not just because Hasselblad’s logo is so obvious, but also because two of the lenses (main and ultra-wide) loom larger than usual. It’s one of those subtleties that is admittedly highly subjective. Someone might look at those lenses and assume camera performance is more elite, though I don’t know if that was OnePlus’ intention here.

Running on the Snapdragon 888 processor, my review unit had 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. The base 9 Pro has 8GB and 128GB, respectively. There is no memory card slot, so no way to expand that further. The dual-SIM slot is also gone, in case you were looking to use an extra SIM card for whatever reason.

In the United States, you will want to be sure that you get the most out of its connectivity. Despite Sub-6 and mmWave 5G support, the 9 Pro is only certified with T-Mobile’s 5G network. It won’t work with AT&T’s, and it remains to be seen where the device might land with Verizon should that 5G door open as well. The phone can do 4G LTE on any network.

Camera Features

Hasselblad is the photography partner here, though the guts inside are very much based on Sony technology. The 48MP main camera uses Sony’s IMX789, a pretty large 1/1.43-inch image sensor that, while the same size as the OnePlus 8 Pro last year, is otherwise very different. This is Sony’s newest mobile image sensor, and it’s the reason why this phone can shoot 4K video at 120 frames per second (FPS). Its bigger contribution may be how it handles HDR, including Sony’s Digital Overlap HDR, which takes multiple exposures simultaneously, rather than in a staggered sequence, helping to freeze moving subjects in place when using Nightscape mode.

It also manages 12-bit RAW photos when shooting in Pro mode. Regardless of the mode you use with the main camera, the autofocus is super quick. Hold your finger in place, and it locks focus, letting you make other adjustments, like exposure, for instance.

OnePlus added a 2MP monochrome camera to work together with the main lens to improve black and white photos. Except it’s not a standalone mode, you have to select the filter icon on the camera interface and swipe over to the grayscale options at the end.

The 50MP ultra-wide camera also got something of an overhaul spurred by Sony’s 1/1.56-inch IMX766 sensor. This is the same one used in both the main and ultra-wide cameras in the Oppo Find X3, only here in the OnePlus 9 Pro, it’s a “Freeform Lens” that the company says brings image distortion on the edges to a measly 1% (most phones are usually in the 10-20% range for ultra-wide shots).

OnePlus also adds a super-macro mode to the lens that works as close as 3-4 cm away from the subject. Interestingly, though, that same mode also pops up automatically with the main lens as well. Once you move in close, it kicks into gear, and applying it to both lenses has some benefit in the field.

Super-Macro

Rounding out the array is the 8MP telephoto lens, sporting a 3.3x optical zoom. And this is actual optical zoom, not the hybrid zoom that became the norm for OnePlus going back to the 8 series last year.

Software Features

Hasselblad’s input in this collaboration, at least thus far, is more software-focused than anything else. OnePlus aimed to constructively improve color output by making it look more natural and less saturated, as is now the trend. Even Samsung, the arguable instigator of the “saturate everything” movement has started to see the light in that regard, given how the Galaxy S21 Ultra is clearly moving toward natural color as well.

To get there, OnePlus enlisted Hasselblad’s help and coupled with the newer Sony sensors, there is a lot going on behind the scenes from a software perspective. It doesn’t hurt that the company’s own OxygenOS overlay suits Android so well. It’s become my favorite to use outside of stock Android (like in Google Pixel devices).

The camera app’s layout is familiar to any OnePlus user, with the various photo modes basically laid out in a row at the bottom. The only new addition is Tilt-Shift mode. Under Settings -> Custom modes, you can rearrange the order to better suit your preferences. The orange shutter button is new as a stylistic reference point, but otherwise, the interface didn’t get much of a makeover.

Image Quality

Main camera

There is no question color is different compared to previous OnePlus devices. “Muted” isn’t the word I would use — maybe neutral is more apt. For starters, I toggled off Smart Scene Recognition in the settings to reduce any overzealous processing. I found images struck a pretty good balance between cool and warm tones, especially in conditions like bright sunlight or gloomier clouds.

In optimal conditions — meaning good lighting — there is little to complain about. I could nitpick and point out how certain shots might be better on other phones, but there is a definite improvement in color from past efforts. The thing is, HDR is omnipresent, and that goes beyond just color when highlights and shadows are always in play. It’s unclear if Hasselblad has any input in how HDR processes an image on the 9 Pro, and if not, it may be time to look into that.

While it’s easy enough to manually turn HDR off in the interface, there’s no need to do it in good conditions. It’s when shooting in dimmer light that it starts overselling itself. One thing I’ve noticed over the last few years, with just about every phone camera, is that the exposure slider has never been more important than it is now as the only real way to pull back from blown-out highlights.

I’m not pointing all this out to denigrate the main camera. It’s actually really good, only the ‘Hasselblad effect’, if I can call it that, is hard to visually gauge apart from the color. HDR is nice to have, yet also capable of going awry awfully quick. Shoot in High-Res, and you get the full gamut of 48MP from the sensor, though it’s best to use it with well-lit subjects. By default, pixel binning has it shooting 12MP images with 2.24 Micron pixels.

Ultra-wide

Ramping up an ultra-wide lens to 50MP needs to have a payoff, and I would say there is one here. The f/2.2 Freeform Lens does deliver as advertised when it comes to reducing distortion or warping along the edges. To me, this makes a bigger difference when shooting with perspective in mind, be it tilted up for a majestic view, or down like a bird. Mind you, it won’t eliminate the ‘lean’ for subjects in the frame, especially when further away, but at least everything is visible and not prone to degradation the closer you get to the edges.

Unfortunately, none of that ultra-wide goodness applies to Pro mode. OnePlus told me it’s working on a future update that will bring the other lenses to that mode, only are holding off to make sure it meets “Hasselblad’s criteria for color calibration” with RAW files outside of the main camera. Despite that, it does work with most of the other modes, including the video ones. 

Telephoto and Hybrid Zoom

This is perhaps the weakest link in the array, though having proper optical zoom is always a plus. The challenge is that the zoom, while okay at 3.3x, doesn’t travel as far as other competitors. When you need not concern yourself with available light, you’re more than capable of getting good photos with it. When the night falls, however, the f/2.2 aperture starts to pose a problem and noise seeps in.

I’m no fan of any digital zoom, personally, and OnePlus plays up the 30x digital zoom, whose results are always horrible. It reminded me of how Huawei, Samsung, and others pushed digital zoom to obscene lengths, even though it was little more than just digitally cropping into the existing frame. Samsung has since improved on that with the Galaxy S21 Ultra thanks to a periscope lens and better software to at least produce something usable. Here, not so much.

Pro Mode

This is the mode that would truly show off Hasselblad’s mettle because of the 12-bit RAW output. I exclusively shot in RAW using Pro to see just how much I could get out of it, and for the most part, I came away impressed. OnePlus also wisely added focus peaking as an option in the settings within Pro mode. It works really well, and you can still tap to focus, if you like, though the red highlights will always appear onscreen.

Again, and this is a theme throughout, lighting matters a lot. Outdoor shots in daylight were fantastic, whereas night shots absolutely needed a tripod or flat surface. One thing Pro does better than all the other modes? Less sharpening.

When I processed some RAW images in Lightroom, I did find that color was easier to deal with, allowing more latitude in correcting or skewing temperature, tint, whites, and blacks. That wasn’t really the case with low-light or night shots, even if I did take them on a tripod. Noise creeped in fairly easily, forcing me to work with layers in Photoshop to retain the deeper blacks of the sky, while drawing out more color and detail from everything else.

The challenge — and this applies to all phones, not just the OnePlus 9 Pro — is how to also deal with bright highlights in low-light situations. I’ve seen more than a few street lamps or headlights offer no detail whatsoever in post-processing. If Hasselblad’s first act was to handle color calibration, it would be nice to see if it has some game-changing input for shadows and highlights.

Nightscape

Night photography is always extra work to find the right balance in settings. Nightscape, much like other night modes, emulates long exposure photography and makes it applicable to handheld scenarios. The interface does pop up to point out that a tripod would be better in some instances, but the general idea is that you can capture a darker scene like you would any other snapshot.

Since OnePlus first introduced it in the 6 series, it’s been an uphill climb to respectability, and that’s about all the company could hope for with what’s out of the box here. The 9 Pro is only marginally better at night shots than its predecessor, in my estimation. I’m not saying it’s terrible or unusable. Far from it. It’s just not clawing back enough previously lost ground, especially considering Google didn’t exactly make its Night Sight mode all that different with the Pixel 5.

One solution might be to allow users to control the exposure with some form of optional manual input, something Huawei has done with its Night mode going back to the P20 Pro. Since the phone takes multiple shots to stack exposures, stopping it in mid-process could hold back any excessive brightening. Or, like Huawei, why not offer ISO and shutter speed sliders to at least put up some guardrails on composition?

Video Features

The OnePlus 9 Pro can record video in 8K at 30 fps, but the more substantive feature is 4K video at 30, 60 or 120fps. Sadly, there is no 24fps to choose from here, though you do get to shoot in either 16:9 or 21:9 aspect ratios. Slow-Motion video has its own place in the menu bar in the interface, and acts independently of the 4K slow-motion capture at 120fps.

If you want to go even slower, Slow-Motion lets you select from 1080p at 240fps or 720p at 480fps. Unlike other competitors, video isn’t given as much precedence as still photography, which explains why the options are pretty slim. They’re not barren, though, as you can record clips using Nightscape for night or low-light footage, while Video Portrait adds some bokeh behind people in frame. Super Stable adds a crop factor to keep shake to a minimum. All three lenses are available to shoot video, but only with the standard video mode. The other modes only use the main lens.

Portrait Mode

A Solid Camera That Needs More

The OnePlus 9 Pro isn’t set back by gimmicks or poorly thought-out experiments. It’s just in need of fine-tuning to mitigate some of the software originally designed to actually improve output. Sharpening algorithms might look good at first glance on a small screen, but they’re hard to control once you unleash them. That’s what the company will have to address with future software updates because it doesn’t seem to me that the hardware is the issue.

There is a lot to like in this array, and OnePlus has proven to be proactive in updating its camera software, so some of the nits I’ve picked here may be resolved in due time. And they’ll have to be to put the 9 Pro’s camera onto a different plateau.

Are There Alternatives?

The OnePlus 9 is less expensive and matches its Pro brethren almost entirely spec-for-spec, save for a slightly smaller screen, slower wireless charging, and missing pieces in the rear camera array. It doesn’t have the Pro’s telephoto lens, nor the Sony IMX789 image sensor for the main camera; it uses the less capable IMX689 instead.

As for other competitors, the Google Pixel 5 looks like a bargain next to the 9 Pro, and the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra might fall in price soon to match or undercut OnePlus’ flagship sooner than later. If something with an Apple logo is more your speed, you might have to go as high as the iPhone 12 Pro Max to get something comparable from a feature set point of view.

Should You Buy It?

Yes, but there is nothing wrong with waiting for an update or two to improve low-light camera performance first. The cameras are good out of the box, only there is something of an “unfinished” feeling about how they perform right now. The rest of the phone is beautiful and functions superbly well, so we are talking about an excellent Android device, overall.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Canada’s Telesat takes on Musk and Bezos in space race to provide fast broadband

Published

 on

By Steve Scherer

OTTAWA (Reuters) – Canada’s Telesat is racing to launch a low-earth-orbit (LEO) satellite constellation to provide high-speed global broadband from space, pitting the satellite communications firm founded in 1969 against two trailblazing billionaires, Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos.

Musk, the Tesla Inc CEO who was only a year old when Telesat launched its first satellite, is putting the so-called Starlink LEO into orbit with his company SpaceX, and Amazon.com Inc, which Bezos founded, is planning a LEO called Project Kuiper. Bezos also owns Blue Origin, which builds rockets.

Despite the competition, Dan Goldberg, Telesat’s chief executive officer, voices confidence when he calls Telesat’s LEO constellation “the Holy Grail” for his shareholders – “a sustainable competitive advantage in global broadband delivery.”

Telesat’s LEO has a much lighter price tag than SpaceX and Amazon’s, and the company has been in satellite services decades longer. In addition, instead of focusing on the consumer market like SpaceX and Amazon, Telesat seeks deep-pocketed business clients.

Goldberg said he was literally losing sleep six years ago when he realized the company’s business model was in peril as Netflix and video streaming took off and fiber optics guaranteed lightning-fast internet connectivity.

Telesat’s 15 geostationary (GEO) satellites provide services mainly to TV broadcasters, internet service providers and government networks, all of whom were growing increasingly worried about the latency, or time delay, of bouncing signals off orbiters more than 35,000 km (22,200 miles) above earth.

Then in 2015 on a flight home from a Paris industry conference where latency was a constant theme, Goldberg wrote down his initial ideas for a LEO constellation on an Air Canada napkin.

Those ideas eventually led to Telesat’s LEO constellation, dubbed Lightspeed, which will orbit about 35 times closer to earth than GEO satellites, and will provide internet connectivity at a speed akin to fiber optics.

Telesat’s first launch is planned in early 2023, while there are already some 1,200 of Musk’s Starlink satellites in orbit.

“Starlink is going to be in service much sooner … and that gives SpaceX the opportunity to win customers,” said Caleb Henry, a senior analyst at Quilty Analytics.

Starlink’s “first mover” advantage is at most 24 months and “no one’s going to lock this whole market up in that amount of time,” Goldberg said.

Telesat in 2019 signed a launch deal with Bezos’ aerospace company Blue Origin. Discussions are ongoing with three others, said David Wendling, Telesat’s chief technical officer.

They are Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd, Europe’s ArianeGroup , and Musk’s SpaceX, which launches the Starlink satellites. Wendling said a decision would be taken in a matter of months.

Telesat aims to launch its first batch of 298 satellites being built by Thales Alenia Space in early 2023, with partial service in higher latitudes later that same year, and full global service in 2024.

‘SWEET SPOT’

The Lightspeed constellation is estimated to cost half as much as the $10 billion SpaceX and Amazon projects.

“We think we’re in the sweet spot,” Goldberg said. “When we look at some of these other constellations, we don’t get it.”

Analyst Henry said Telesat’s focus on business clients is the right one.

“You have two heavyweight players, SpaceX and Amazon, that are already pledging to spend $10 billion on satellite constellations optimized for the consumer market,” he said. “If Telesat can spend half that amount creating a high-performance system for businesses, then yeah, they stand to be very competitive.”

Telesat’s industry experience may also provide an edge.

“We’ve worked with many of these customers for decades … That’s going to give us a real advantage,” Goldberg said.

Telesat “is a satellite operator, has been a satellite operator, and has both the advantage of expertise and experience in that business,” said Carissa Christensen, chief executive officer of the research firm BryceTech, adding, however, that she sees only two to three LEO constellations surviving.

Telesat is nailing down financing – one-third equity and two-thirds debt – and will become publicly traded on the Nasdaq sometime this summer, and it could also list on the Toronto exchange after that. Currently, Canada’s Public Sector Pension Investment Board and Loral Space & Communications Inc are the company’s main shareholders.

France and Canada’s export credit agencies, BPI and EDC respectively, are expected to be the main lenders, Goldberg said. Quebec’s provincial government is lending C$400 million ($317 million), and Canada’s federal government has promised C$600 million to be a preferred customer. The company also posted C$246 million in net income in 2020.

Executing the LEO plan is what keeps Goldberg up at night now, he said.

“When we decided to go down this path, the two richest people in the universe weren’t focused on their own LEO constellations.”

($1 = 1.2622 Canadian dollars)

(Reporting by Steve Scherer in Ottawa; Editing by Matthew Lewis)

Continue Reading

Tech

$600K donation to boost online mental health programming in Nova Scotia

Published

 on

Nova Scotia Health’s mental health and addictions program hopes to offer more online support to people across the province after receiving a significant donation this week.

The QEII Foundation announced that RBC is contributing $600,000 toward the province’s e-mental health programming.

“It’s particularly important for the current time under all the strains of COVID,” said Dr. Andrew Harris, a psychiatrist and the senior medical director for the program.

The plan for online programming has been in the works for years, he said, but the pandemic expedited the push. Last June, the department launched a number of applications that can be used to help those with anxiety, depression and addictions.

Since then, as many as 3,000 Nova Scotians have used the site to access mental health services.

“There’s a persistent difficulty in accessing services,” Harris said of traditional models in Nova Scotia. He said those who don’t need intensive therapy may find the support they need through the online programs.

He uses the example of someone who can’t take time off work to speak to a clinician.

“It’s better for them to be able to access a service after hours or on the weekend. So our e-mental health services are tailored a little bit to meet that need.”

Calls to crisis line increase

Harris said the province’s mental health crisis line continues to see a 30 per cent increase in calls for help, so he’s trying to raise awareness that services can be accessed immediately online.

“I think everyone is aware that for a lot of people it’s much easier to talk about a physical illness than a mental illness. So there’s an allowance there for privacy, for some anonymity but still making available things that can help the person who is struggling in the community.”

The online portal has a list of programs that people can use, covering things like reducing stress, solving problems and becoming mindful. It mirrors a site in Newfoundland and Labrador that Harris said is used to help people in remote areas.

Harris said the donation from RBC will be used to continue to evaluate more services, and pay for the licensing of the products that are mostly developed by other organizations.

He encourages anyone who is struggling to test out the site, and use it as an entry point into the mental health system.

“It’s important for people to acknowledge when they’re struggling. It happens to all of us through our lives in different times.”

Anyone in Nova Scotia looking to access the tools can visit: https://mha.nshealth.ca.

Source:- CBC.ca

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Samsung’s cheapest 5G Galaxy phones yet are launching this month

Published

 on



Samsung

If you buy through our links, we may earn money from affiliate partners. Learn more.

  • Samsung is launching five new phones in its Galaxy A series this month.
  • Three of them will support 5G connectivity, and the most expensive phone is just $500.
  • The cheapest phone of the five still has three cameras but lacks 5G and other features.
  • See more buying advice on the Insider Reviews homepage.

Samsung may be best known for its high-end Galaxy S phones that rival the iPhone. But the tech giant is proving that it can appeal to cost-conscious customers with the launch of five new smartphones in the United States, the priciest of which only costs $500.

Samsung’s new lineup of budget phones, which debuted in other markets before coming to the US, are all launching this month. Some of them will be released as soon as this week, while the least expensive model will debut on April 29. The launch comes as competitors like Apple and Google have also been focusing on cheaper smartphones to boost sales.

Three of these new Samsung devices also support 5G, another sign that shoppers no longer have to pay a premium to get access to next-generation wireless networks. All five of the new phones also have the traditional headphone jack for wired listening and run on an octa-core processor.

Here’s a look at the new Samsung Galaxy A series phones that will be launching soon.

Samsung Galaxy A52 5G

Galaxy A52 5G_Awesome Black_Front_Back



Samsung

  • Release date: April 9
  • Price: $499.99

The Galaxy A52 5G is the most expensive smartphone of the bunch. It comes with a 6.5-inch FHD+ screen and a quad-camera system that includes some of the same features as Samsung’s more expensive Galaxy S phones. These include Single Take, which creates several different photos or video clips with different effects with a single press of the shutter button.

Its screen can also boost its refresh rate up to 120Hz for smoother scrolling and performance, a feature that has become common on pricier flagship phones but is rare on cheaper models. It’s also the only phone in this A-series lineup to include Samsung’s notch-free screen design.

Samsung Galaxy A42 5G

Galaxy A42 5G_Prism Dot Black_Front_Back



Samsung

  • Release date: April 8
  • Price: $399.99

The less expensive Galaxy A42 5G has a slightly larger screen than the A52 5G, but scales back on certain features when it comes to the camera and screen refresh rate.

Still, it has a triple-lens camera with high-resolution sensors, and like its pricier sibling it also supports Single Take.

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G

GalaxyA32 5G_Awesome Black_Front



Samsung

Release date: April 9

Price: $279.99

The Galaxy A32 5G is Samsung’s cheapest 5G smartphone to date. It has a large 6.5-inch screen, but it’s made from an LCD panel instead of Super AMOLED. That means it will likely lack some of the contrast and boldness of Samsung’s other devices. But Samsung hasn’t skimped on the camera considering this model has a quad-lens main camera, which is rare if not unheard of at that price.

Samsung Galaxy A12

Galaxy A12_Black_Back



Samsung

Release date: April 9

Price: $179.99

Samsung’s Galaxy A12 doesn’t come with 5G support, but it still gives you a lot for the price. For less than $200, you’re getting a quad-lens camera and a large 6.5-inch LCD screen. But remember this phone only has 32GB of storage, so it’s best suited for those who don’t store a lot of photos and videos on their device.

Samsung Galaxy A02s

Galaxy A02s_Black_Front



Samsung

  • Release date: April 29
  • Price: $109.99

The Galaxy A02s is Samsung’s cheapest phone, offering a 6.5-inch LCD screen and three main cameras. It doesn’t have 5G support or as much computing power or camera prowess as Samsung’s other A-series phones, but that’s to be expected for a device at this price. This phone is truly for those who just need the basics and little else.

Sign up for Insider Reviews’ weekly newsletter for more buying advice and great deals.

You can purchase syndication rights to this story here.

Disclosure: This post is brought to you by the Insider Reviews team. We highlight products and services you might find interesting. If you buy them, we get a small share of the revenue from the sale from our commerce partners. We frequently receive products free of charge from manufacturers to test. This does not drive our decision as to whether or not a product is featured or recommended. We operate independently from our advertising sales team. We welcome your feedback. Email us at reviews@businessinsider.com.

Two crossed lines that form an ‘X’. It indicates a way to close an interaction, or dismiss a notification.

Source:- Business Insider

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending