Google’s latest affordable Pixel is a phenomenal little phone, delivering just enough of everything for most people at its mid-range price point. The Pixel 4a stands out in this segment thanks to its camera, which punches well above its weight thanks to Google’s HDR+ technology. However, the small size and fairly dull design may be a turn-off for some, and you’ll miss out on 5G connectivity for as long as you’re using it.
The OnePlus Nord offers a ridiculous amount of smartphone for £30 more than the Pixel. The display is larger, with a smooth 90Hz refresh rate, and the Nord also boasts a more attractive glass design and superior processor. However, the quad cameras can’t compare to the Pixel’s single shooter. Although OnePlus has a good software update track record, it’s unlikely to keep pace with Google’s day-one updates over time.
It’s a great time to buy a mid-range smartphone, with phones like the OnePlus Nord and Google Pixel 4a breaking cover in recent weeks. Both phones are similarly priced, and both overall are excellent choices — although buyers in the U.S. would need to import the Nord since it isn’t sold in the country. Nevertheless, each represents a very different set of priorities, so it’s going to take a deeper dive to figure out which one’s right for you.
OnePlus Nord vs. Google Pixel 4a Radically different choices
Source: Alex Dobie / Android Central
On both the inside and outside, there’s a stark contrast between the OnePlus Nord and Google Pixel 4a. There’s no question that the Nord has the more striking design of the two, especially in its trademark “blue marble” hue. While Google opts for a subdued matte black plastic chassis, OnePlus’s handset definitely has the appearance of a more premium smartphone thanks to its glass back and reflective mid-wall.
The Nord is considerably larger than its rival too, with a 6.44-inch display diagonal compared to the Pixel’s mere 5.8 inches. That makes one-handed use a little trickier, though if you’re used to modern, large-screened smartphones, the Nord won’t be a challenge to use. The Pixel 4a, conversely, is definitely the winner for fans of small phones, being one of the few high-profile Android phones around the same size as a smaller “Pro” model iPhone.
On the inside, the OnePlus Nord is clearly the technically superior phone. It features Qualcomm’s upper mid-range chipset, the Snapdragon 765G, boasting more computational horsepower in general, but especially in terms of graphics. The 765G also enables 5G connectivity for added future-proofing, which may not be a concern right now, but will ensure the Nord is equipped to run on next-generation networks as they roll out.
OnePlus also offers dual SIM support, whereas on the Pixel side you’ll need to switch your main SIM to an eSIM in order to use the single physical SIM slot in dual-SIM mode.
The Nord is the technically superior phone, but Google’s strengths lie elsewhere.
The single biggest performance advantage you’ll actually notice while using the Nord, however, comes from its display. The 6.44-inch panel packs a 90Hz refresh rate, which until recently have been exclusive to expensive flagship phones. The extra fluidity and responsiveness this brings is palpable, and it’s hard to go back to 60 once you’ve experienced it.
One area where the Pixel 4a pulls ahead of the Nord, though, is in audio. Not only does it pack a pretty loud and clear stereo speaker setup — combining a bottom-firing loudspeaker with the earpiece tweeter — but the 4a retains the good old 3.5mm headphone jack.
While the Pixel 4a comes in a single SKU with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of non-expandable storage, the OnePlus Nord can offer upgrades beyond its base 8GB/128GB configuration — up to 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. While 128GB should be enough for most people, the option to double it (for a price) is certainly nice to have.
On paper the Nord’s battery also bests the Pixel by a considerable margin. However due to a larger display and higher refresh rate, the Nord’s real-world lead is shorter than you might expect. With my usage patterns, both phones got me through a full 15- to 16-hour day of use, with the Pixel 4a clocking in between 4 and 4.5 hours of screen-on time and the Nord creeping closer to five. OnePlus also wins on charging speeds, thanks to its Warp Charge 30T spec, which promises zero to 70% charging in 30 minutes.
Google and OnePlus are both well known for their slick, fast Android software, and on the surface, the Nord and the Pixel 4a share a similar software aesthetic. Neither diverges too much from vanilla Android, but both have layered it with their own unique loadout of features.
Google’s Pixel software is all about tight integration with the company’s own services, particularly Google Assistant, which is at the heart of the phone’s intelligent capabilities. The Pixel 4a boasts the new-looking, faster Assistant that’s still unavailable outside of Google’s own smartphones. The Pixel software suite also includes on-device live transcription, which can intelligently turn spoken words in any app into captions. Extras like the Personal Safety app and car crash detection could be genuinely life-saving in the right (or wrong) situation.
OnePlus comes close, but you can’t beat the Pixel’s software support promise.
Google’s continuing to add to Pixels’ capabilities over time through its regular feature drops, the most recent of which included video blurring options for Duo video calls, and improvements to memory management to allow more apps to remain in memory.
There’s actually quite a bit of Google to be found in the OnePlus Nord, too. The Nord is the first OnePlus phone to use Google’s own phone dialer and Android Messages app for calls and texts by default. That means you get access to Google’s smart spam filtering options and caller ID features. Meanwhile, OnePlus also recently integrated the Google Feed into its home screen launcher, while all the company’s 2020 handsets have come bundled with Live Transcribe.
Where OnePlus sets itself apart is in the speed and fluidity of its OxygenOS software, as well as features inspired by its enthusiast community. Zen Mode helps you disconnect with enforced smartphone downtime. Lock screen gestures help you jump straight to favorite apps. And OxygenOS is endlessly customizable, even more so than vanilla Android 10 on the Pixel.
When it comes to software updates, Google leads the way with a full three years of platform updates for its Pixel phones from their U.S. launch date. Meanwhile OnePlus is no slouch, offering two years of platform updates and a third year of Android security patches. Nevertheless, OnePlus likely won’t be able to match the speed of update deployment to Google’s Pixels. During their supported lifespan, Pixel phones can update to new versions of Android from day one.
The greatest software edge for Google, however, might be the Pixel 4a’s camera. On paper it’s identical to the camera of the flagship-priced Pixel 4, only with slower photo processing because of the weaker chipset. There’s only one rear camera, as opposed to the four of the OnePlus Nord, but considering the price and the quality of that one camera, it’s a worthy trade-off.
The Nord’s Sony IMX586 sensor is a proven component, and combined with OnePlus’s software processing and HDR features, produces pleasing shots with ample dynamic range and vibrant colors. The Pixel’s main camera arguably produces more lifelike images, with less tendency to crush shadow detail. Google’s processing also produces shots with greater highlight detail, and a trademark grain effect when examined up close.
Both cameras offer impressive dedicated night modes. However, only the Pixel can boast Google’s astrophotography mode, which (with the help of a tripod or stand) allows extreme computational long exposures of stellar vistas.
Both phones pack flagship sensors, but Google pulls ahead with computational magic.
While the Nord’s main camera is no slouch in the photographic department, its secondary cameras are fairly weak, with even the 8-megapixel ultrawide producing blotchy images without much fine detail. Also, the lack of telephoto zoom feels like a missed opportunity in a phone with so many lenses — instead you’ll be getting 12-megapixel crops from that 48-megapixel sensor when you zoom in.
Google’s camera relies on computational zoom based on the movement of the lens, which is decent at up to around 2X, but beyond that can produce strange artifacts around certain objects.
Around the front, OnePlus offers two selfie cameras — one standard, and another ultrawide, for fitting more people or stuff into your images. That’s something Google doesn’t offer, however the Pixel’s front camera does benefit from Google’s software portrait mode and the excellent Night Sight mode.
OnePlus Nord vs. Google Pixel 4a A question of priorities
Source: Alex Dobie / Android Central
With the OnePlus Nord not being sold in the U.S., and the Pixel 4a limited to a handful of countries at present, there are only a few territories where both the Nord and the Pixel will be sold side-by-side. That means for many people, the question of which to buy will be answered by whichever one is available locally.
Provided you are in a country where both are sold, you really can’t go wrong with either. Both offer excellent value for money, great software, fast performance and long term software support. Instead, the choice between the two comes down to your own personal priorities.
If great photos are your main priority, I’d have to hand the win to Google. The 4a’s camera is that good, and such quality is unprecedented at this price point outside of the phone’s immediate predecessor, the Pixel 3a. Same deal if you want a great, small phone at this price. It doesn’t get any better than the Pixel 4a. The Pixel is also first in line for new Google features with its day-one Android updates and regular Pixel feature drops, so if you’re an Android nerd, that’s a big draw.
Superior photos and pocket-sized charm? Or souped-up specs and faster everything?
However, OnePlus is a step ahead in terms of sheer technology. So if you want more power for gaming, as well as the speed that only a fast refresh rate can deliver, it’s a clear win for the Nord. Likewise, spec fiends will appreciate the ability to bump up to 12GB of RAM and 128GB of storage, as well as real dual-SIM support and 5G connectivity. True to its heritage, OnePlus has the better and more powerful phone for enthusiasts.
Neither device delivers everything you could want. Are you a power-hungry enthusiast who lives for big screens and fast refresh rates, or are you swayed by the promise of a superior pocket-sized camera that doubles as an AI-equipped smartphone? Your priorities (as well as your location) will dictate which of these excellent mid-rangers is right for you.
The Google Pixel 4a lacks some of the Nord’s whizbang features, but is slightly cheaper, and still packs all the smartphone power most people will need. It’s also smaller — a bonus for fans of more pocket-friendly devices, and includes the best main camera you’re likely to find for less than $400, or even $500 or more. To top it off, you get Google’s excellent and helpful Android software, backed up by the best update track record outside of an iPhone.
The OnePlus Nord is exceptionally good value for money, and technically superior to the Pixel 4a in most respects. For £379, you get features previously reserved for expensive flagship phones, slick software, a striking glass-backed design and 5G future-proofing. But while the Nord boasts a total of six cameras (two up-front and four on the rear), only the main sensor is as performant as we’d like.
We may earn a commission for purchases using our links. Learn more.
LONDON (AP) — Most people have accumulated a pile of data — selfies, emails, videos and more — on their social media and digital accounts over their lifetimes. What happens to it when we die?
It’s wise to draft a will spelling out who inherits your physical assets after you’re gone, but don’t forget to take care of your digital estate too. Friends and family might treasure files and posts you’ve left behind, but they could get lost in digital purgatory after you pass away unless you take some simple steps.
Here’s how you can prepare your digital life for your survivors:
Apple
The iPhone maker lets you nominate a “ legacy contact ” who can access your Apple account’s data after you die. The company says it’s a secure way to give trusted people access to photos, files and messages. To set it up you’ll need an Apple device with a fairly recent operating system — iPhones and iPads need iOS or iPadOS 15.2 and MacBooks needs macOS Monterey 12.1.
For iPhones, go to settings, tap Sign-in & Security and then Legacy Contact. You can name one or more people, and they don’t need an Apple ID or device.
You’ll have to share an access key with your contact. It can be a digital version sent electronically, or you can print a copy or save it as a screenshot or PDF.
Take note that there are some types of files you won’t be able to pass on — including digital rights-protected music, movies and passwords stored in Apple’s password manager. Legacy contacts can only access a deceased user’s account for three years before Apple deletes the account.
Google
Google takes a different approach with its Inactive Account Manager, which allows you to share your data with someone if it notices that you’ve stopped using your account.
When setting it up, you need to decide how long Google should wait — from three to 18 months — before considering your account inactive. Once that time is up, Google can notify up to 10 people.
You can write a message informing them you’ve stopped using the account, and, optionally, include a link to download your data. You can choose what types of data they can access — including emails, photos, calendar entries and YouTube videos.
There’s also an option to automatically delete your account after three months of inactivity, so your contacts will have to download any data before that deadline.
Facebook and Instagram
Some social media platforms can preserve accounts for people who have died so that friends and family can honor their memories.
When users of Facebook or Instagram die, parent company Meta says it can memorialize the account if it gets a “valid request” from a friend or family member. Requests can be submitted through an online form.
The social media company strongly recommends Facebook users add a legacy contact to look after their memorial accounts. Legacy contacts can do things like respond to new friend requests and update pinned posts, but they can’t read private messages or remove or alter previous posts. You can only choose one person, who also has to have a Facebook account.
You can also ask Facebook or Instagram to delete a deceased user’s account if you’re a close family member or an executor. You’ll need to send in documents like a death certificate.
TikTok
The video-sharing platform says that if a user has died, people can submit a request to memorialize the account through the settings menu. Go to the Report a Problem section, then Account and profile, then Manage account, where you can report a deceased user.
Once an account has been memorialized, it will be labeled “Remembering.” No one will be able to log into the account, which prevents anyone from editing the profile or using the account to post new content or send messages.
X
It’s not possible to nominate a legacy contact on Elon Musk’s social media site. But family members or an authorized person can submit a request to deactivate a deceased user’s account.
Passwords
Besides the major online services, you’ll probably have dozens if not hundreds of other digital accounts that your survivors might need to access. You could just write all your login credentials down in a notebook and put it somewhere safe. But making a physical copy presents its own vulnerabilities. What if you lose track of it? What if someone finds it?
Instead, consider a password manager that has an emergency access feature. Password managers are digital vaults that you can use to store all your credentials. Some, like Keeper,Bitwarden and NordPass, allow users to nominate one or more trusted contacts who can access their keys in case of an emergency such as a death.
But there are a few catches: Those contacts also need to use the same password manager and you might have to pay for the service.
___
Is there a tech challenge you need help figuring out? Write to us at onetechtip@ap.org with your questions.
LONDON (AP) — Britain’s competition watchdog said Thursday it’s opening a formal investigation into Google’s partnership with artificial intelligence startup Anthropic.
The Competition and Markets Authority said it has “sufficient information” to launch an initial probe after it sought input earlier this year on whether the deal would stifle competition.
The CMA has until Dec. 19 to decide whether to approve the deal or escalate its investigation.
“Google is committed to building the most open and innovative AI ecosystem in the world,” the company said. “Anthropic is free to use multiple cloud providers and does, and we don’t demand exclusive tech rights.”
San Francisco-based Anthropic was founded in 2021 by siblings Dario and Daniela Amodei, who previously worked at ChatGPT maker OpenAI. The company has focused on increasing the safety and reliability of AI models. Google reportedly agreed last year to make a multibillion-dollar investment in Anthropic, which has a popular chatbot named Claude.
Anthropic said it’s cooperating with the regulator and will provide “the complete picture about Google’s investment and our commercial collaboration.”
“We are an independent company and none of our strategic partnerships or investor relationships diminish the independence of our corporate governance or our freedom to partner with others,” it said in a statement.
The U.K. regulator has been scrutinizing a raft of AI deals as investment money floods into the industry to capitalize on the artificial intelligence boom. Last month it cleared Anthropic’s $4 billion deal with Amazon and it has also signed off on Microsoft’s deals with two other AI startups, Inflection and Mistral.
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — The tiny Mideast nation of Kuwait has banned the release of the video game “Call of Duty: Black Ops 6,” which features the late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and is set in part in the 1990s Gulf War.
The video game, a first-person shooter, follows CIA operators fighting at times in the United States and also in the Middle East. Game-play trailers for the game show burning oilfields, a painful reminder for Kuwaitis who saw Iraqis set fire to the fields, causing vast ecological and economic damage. Iraqi troops damaged or set fire to over 700 wells.
There also are images of Saddam and Iraq’s old three-star flag in the footage released by developers ahead of the game’s launch. The game’s multiplayer section, a popular feature of the series, includes what appears to be a desert shootout in Kuwait called Scud after the Soviet missiles Saddam fired in the war. Another is called Babylon, after the ancient city in Iraq.
Activision acknowledged in a statement that the game “has not been approved for release in Kuwait,” but did not elaborate.
“All pre-orders in Kuwait will be cancelled and refunded to the original point of purchase,” the company said. “We remain hopeful that local authorities will reconsider, and allow players in Kuwait to enjoy this all-new experience in the Black Ops series.”
Kuwait’s Media Ministry did not respond to requests for comment from The Associated Press over the decision.
“Call of Duty,” which first began in 2003 as a first-person shooter set in World War II, has expanded into an empire worth billions of dollars now owned by Microsoft. But it also has been controversial as its gameplay entered the realm of geopolitics. China and Russia both banned chapters in the franchise. In 2009, an entry in the gaming franchise allowed players to take part in a militant attack at a Russian airport, killing civilians.
But there have been other games recently that won praise for their handling of the Mideast. Ubisoft’s “Assassin’s Creed: Mirage” published last year won praise for its portrayal of Baghdad during the Islamic Golden Age in the 9th century.
