Online harms debate pits real threats against elaborate fears | Canada News Media
Connect with us

News

Online harms debate pits real threats against elaborate fears

Published

 on

Announcing the government’s new online harms legislation on Monday, Justice Minister Arif Virani led with the realities the bill is supposed to address.

After introducing two women who spoke about their own experiences with child abuse and harassment, Virani said his bill would create three “overarching obligations” for major online platforms: “a duty to protect children, a duty to act responsibly and the duty to remove the most egregious content.”

Specifically, Virani said, C-63 “targets the worst of what we see online, content that sexually victimizes children or revictimizes survivors, intimate content shared without consent, content that incites violence, extremism or terrorism, or foments hatred and content that is used to bully a child or induce a child to self-harm.”

Virani then made a point of underlining what he says the bill won’t do.

“It does not undermine freedom of speech,” the minister said.

That statement almost certainly was aimed at Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, who rejected the bill last week before getting a chance to read it.

Poilievre’s pre-emptive criticism

Asked about the impending legislation last Wednesday — five days before it was tabled in the House of Commons — Poilievre described it as “Justin Trudeau’s latest attack on freedom of expression,” part of a “woke authoritarian agenda” that would see Trudeau ban “unacceptable views.”

“Go down the list of things that Justin Trudeau disapproves of and you can imagine all of the things that will be criminalized,” Poilievre said.

The Conservative leader’s predictions had something in common with his party’s opposition to an earlier piece of legislation, the Online Streaming Act. The government introduced and passed that bill with the stated purpose of compelling major Internet platforms to promote and support Canadian content. The Conservatives said it was “censorship.”

It might be tempting to conclude that the Conservatives are simply opposed to all regulation of the Internet — and willing to indulge the worst fears of their supporters. But then, Poilievre also has said a government led by him would compel websites showing pornographic content to verify the ages of their users.

Online harms bill sparks personal attacks from opposition

 

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is taking aim at the prime minister and the government’s plan to fight online hate. Poilievre launched a very personal attack against his political rival, pointing to his past use of blackface. Justin Trudeau fought back, arguing Poilievre’s only plan is to sow division.

The Conservatives also can’t quite claim to be completely opposed to restrictions on speech. Poilievre was a minister in a Conservative government that made it a crime to promote terrorism. His deputy leader, Melissa Lantsman, has said that the “glorification of terror” should not be allowed.

What C-63 does and doesn’t do

Poilievre may have been disappointed on Monday afternoon when the legislation was finally tabled. After running their intentions through multiple rounds of consultations, the government ended up with a rather narrow piece of legislation.

Platforms will be required to produce “digital safety plans” to mitigate the risk that users will be exposed to harmful content, and they will be subjected to new oversight and transparency requirements. But they will only be required to remove two types of content — material that sexually victimizes a child and intimate content posted without consent.

The legislation does not deal with “misinformation” or “disinformation” and it does not cover private communication — thus avoiding some of the most fraught questions about the digital world.

The bill would create three new bodies to enforce these new rules and assist users. Some pundits will grumble about “bureaucracy.” On the other hand, rules don’t magically enforce themselves.

New online harms bill proposes changes to Criminal Code | Power & Politics

 

The Liberal government introduced its long-promised online harms bill Monday, proposing new regulatory bodies and changes to a number of laws in new legislation to tackle online abuse. Justice Minister Arif Virani discusses the new bill. Plus, Emily Laidlaw, Canada research chair in cybersecurity law weighs in.

In a written statement released on Tuesday, Poilievre suggested police and the courts should be sufficient to deal with harmful content. That might lead the government to restate part of the justification for its legislation — that the justice system isn’t nimble enough to deal with a fast-moving problem.

While the harms being targeted by the legislation are real, the onus is always on the government to tread carefully when it acts to regulate expression — and C-63 deserves to be thoroughly poked and prodded by a parliamentary committee. Even if experts in digital issues were largely pleased with what they saw on Monday, many acknowledged that the details will matter.

If anything is going to provoke a debate, it might be the government’s desire to restore the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s authority to hear complaints about hate speech. That could revive a fight from more than a decade ago that ended with Conservative MPs voting to repeal an earlier provision in the Canada Human Rights Act that was accused of putting a chill on free speech.

Virani argues that the legislation’s definition of “hatred” — involving “detestation and vilification,” not simply something that is insulting — is specific and narrow and informed by Supreme Court jurisprudence. But small armies of lawyers and civil liberties experts will now pore over the finer points.

In his written statement, Poilievre again raised the spectre of the government “banning opinions that contradict the Prime Minister’s radical ideology.” But if such a thing is plausibly foreseeable under the proposed legislation, it should be possible for someone to point to a specific part of the bill and explain how it might happen.

Given the real issues at play, the debate should be based in demonstrable reality. But given that the subject is the internet, it might be hard to keep the discussion grounded.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Bad traffic, changed plans: Toronto braces for uncertainty of its Taylor Swift Era

Published

 on

TORONTO – Will Taylor Swift bring chaos or do we all need to calm down?

It’s a question many Torontonians are asking this week as the city braces for the arrival of Swifties, the massive fan base of one of the world’s biggest pop stars.

Hundreds of thousands are expected to descend on the downtown core for the singer’s six concerts which kick off Thursday at the Rogers Centre and run until Nov. 23.

And while their arrival will be a boon to tourism dollars — the city estimates more than $282 million in economic impact — some worry it could worsen Toronto’s gridlock by clogging streets that already come to a standstill during rush hour.

Swift’s shows are set to collide with sports events at the nearby Scotiabank Arena, including a Raptors game on Friday and a Leafs game on Saturday.

Some residents and local businesses have already adjusted their plans to avoid the area and its planned road closures.

Aahil Dayani says he and some friends intended to throw a birthday bash for one of their pals until they realized it would overlap with the concerts.

“Something as simple as getting together and having dinner is now thrown out the window,” he said.

Dayani says the group rescheduled the gathering for after Swift leaves town. In the meantime, he plans to hunker down at his Toronto residence.

“Her coming into town has kind of changed up my social life,” he added.

“We’re pretty much just not doing anything.”

Max Sinclair, chief executive and founder of A.I. technology firm Ecomtent, suggested his employees avoid the company’s downtown offices on concert days, saying he doesn’t see the point in forcing people to endure potential traffic jams.

“It’s going to be less productive for us, and it’s going to be just a pain for everyone, so it’s easier to avoid it,” Sinclair said.

“We’re a hybrid company, so we can be flexible. It just makes sense.”

Swift’s concerts are the latest pop culture moment to draw attention to Toronto’s notoriously disastrous daily commute.

In June, One Direction singer Niall Horan uploaded a social media video of himself walking through traffic to reach the venue for his concert.

“Traffic’s too bad in Toronto, so we’re walking to the venue,” he wrote in the post.

Toronto Transit Commission spokesperson Stuart Green says the public agency has been working for more than a year on plans to ease the pressure of so many Swifties in one confined area.

“We are preparing for something that would be akin to maybe the Beatles coming in the ‘60s,” he said.

Dozens of buses and streetcars have been added to transit routes around the stadium, and the TTC has consulted the city on potential emergency scenarios.

Green will be part of a command centre operated by the City of Toronto and staffed by Toronto police leaders, emergency services and others who have handled massive gatherings including the Raptors’ NBA championship parade in 2019.

“There may be some who will say we’re over-preparing, and that’s fair,” Green said.

“But we know based on what’s happened in other places, better to be over-prepared than under-prepared.”

Metrolinx, the agency for Ontario’s GO Transit system, has also added extra trips and extended hours in some regions to accommodate fans looking to travel home.

A day before Swift’s first performance, the city began clearing out tents belonging to homeless people near the venue. The city said two people were offered space in a shelter.

“As the area around Rogers Centre is expected to receive a high volume of foot traffic in the coming days, this area has been prioritized for outreach work to ensure the safety of individuals in encampments, other residents, businesses and visitors — as is standard for large-scale events,” city spokesperson Russell Baker said in a statement.

Homeless advocate Diana Chan McNally questioned whether money and optics were behind the measure.

“People (in the area) are already in close proximity to concerts, sports games, and other events that generate massive amounts of traffic — that’s nothing new,” she said in a statement.

“If people were offered and willingly accepted a shelter space, free of coercion, I support that fully — that’s how it should happen.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 13, 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

‘It’s literally incredible’: Swifties line up for merch ahead of Toronto concerts

Published

 on

TORONTO – Hundreds of Taylor Swift fans lined up outside the gates of Toronto’s Rogers Centre Wednesday, with hopes of snagging some of the pop star’s merchandise on the eve of the first of her six sold-out shows in the city.

Swift is slated to perform at the venue from Thursday to Saturday, and the following week from Nov. 21 to Nov. 23, with concert merchandise available for sale on some non-show days.

Swifties were all smiles as they left the merch shop, their arms full of sweaters and posters bearing pictures of the star and her Eras Tour logo.

Among them was Zoe Haronitis, 22, who said she waited in line for about two hours to get $300 worth of merchandise, including some apparel for her friends.

Haronitis endured the autumn cold and the hefty price tag even though she hasn’t secured a concert ticket. She said she’s hunting down a resale ticket and plans to spend up to $600.

“I haven’t really budgeted anything,” Haronitis said. “I don’t care how much money I spent. That was kind of my mindset.”

The megastar’s merchandise costs up to $115 for a sweater, and $30 for tote bags and other accessories.

Rachel Renwick, 28, also waited a couple of hours in line for merchandise, but only spent about $70 after learning that a coveted blue sweater and a crewneck had been snatched up by other eager fans before she got to the shop. She had been prepared to spend much more, she said.

“The two prized items sold out. I think a lot more damage would have been done,” Renwick said, adding she’s still determined to buy a sweater at a later date.

Renwick estimated she’s spent about $500 in total on “all-things Eras Tour,” including her concert outfit and merchandise.

The long queue for Swift merch is just a snapshot of what the city will see in the coming days. It’s estimated that up to 500,000 visitors from outside Toronto will be in town during the concert period.

Tens of thousands more are also expected to attend Taylgate’24, an unofficial Swiftie fan event scheduled to be held at the nearby Metro Toronto Convention Centre.

Meanwhile, Destination Toronto has said it anticipates the economic impact of the Eras Tour could grow to $282 million as the money continues to circulate.

But for fans like Haronitis, the experience in Toronto comes down to the Swiftie community. Knowing that Swift is going to be in the city for six shows and seeing hundreds gather just for merchandise is “awesome,” she said.

Even though Haronitis hasn’t officially bought her ticket yet, she said she’s excited to see the megastar.

“It’s literally incredible.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 13, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Via Rail seeks judicial review on CN’s speed restrictions

Published

 on

OTTAWA – Via Rail is asking for a judicial review on the reasons why Canadian National Railway Co. has imposed speed restrictions on its new passenger trains.

The Crown corporation says it is seeking the review from the Federal Court after many attempts at dialogue with the company did not yield valid reasoning for the change.

It says the restrictions imposed last month are causing daily delays on Via Rail’s Québec City-Windsor corridor, affecting thousands of passengers and damaging Via Rail’s reputation with travellers.

CN says in a statement that it imposed the restrictions at rail crossings given the industry’s experience and known risks associated with similar trains.

The company says Via has asked the courts to weigh in even though Via has agreed to buy the equipment needed to permanently fix the issues.

Via said in October that no incidents at level crossings have been reported in the two years since it put 16 Siemens Venture trains into operation.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 13, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:CN)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version