OPEC Can't Kill U.S. Shale - OilPrice.com | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Business

OPEC Can't Kill U.S. Shale – OilPrice.com

Published

 on



OPEC Can’t Kill U.S. Shale | OilPrice.com

Salman Ghouri

Dr. Salman Ghouri is an oil and gas industry advisor with expertise in long-term forecasting, macroeconomic analysis and market assessments.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Premium Content

OPEC’s strategy in the past has been to alter its oil production in order to bring about market stability. However, the rise of U.S. shale oil forced the cartel to alter its strategy in favor of market share even at the cost of lower oil prices.

During the cartel’s last meeting, Russia decided not to collaborate with OPEC’s production cuts. This led to Saudi Arabia utilizing their spare capacity to increase oil production in an attempt to win market share by driving high-cost producers out of business. This strategy was designed to destabilize the oil market and target the US shale oil industry in particular. The market reacted immediately, with WTI collapsing to around $31.13/bbl on March 9 from a high of $47.18/bbl on March 3, before dipping to 22.84/bbl by March 18, 2020. The steep drop in prices can largely be attributed to COVID-19, which has taken a tremendous toll on global markets by weakening global oil demand and causing an unprecedented glut. One should not forget that OPEC failed to bring down US shale when it used a similar strategy in 2014/16. At the end of Dec 2019, US shale oil production had reached 9.12 mmbd compared to 5.11 mmbd in Sept 2016.

Methodology and data

Since the new objective of OPEC seems to be the destruction of the US shale oil industry through lower oil prices, it seems sensible to analyze the sensitivities of US regional shale oil producers. In an effort to explore the possible implications of this price crash for US shale oil, we have used an econometric model and used different possible oil price paths. Three scenarios are used. Firstly, what if oil prices are allowed to gradually increase through Dec 2022 reaching $56/bbl? (Reference case) Second, what if oil prices remain weak over the forecast period below $39/bbl? (Low case) Finally, what if oil prices are allowed to increase reaching $74/bbl by Dec 2022 (High Case)? The objective is to check the possible threshold at which US shale oil production survives/perishes.

We have used monthly data for the U.S.’s seven shale regions (Anadarko, Appalachia, Bakken, Eagle Ford, Haynesville, Permian, and Niobrara) from January 2007 to Dec 2019. Figure-1 illustrates the oil price actual average monthly West Texas Intermediary (WTI) data (January 2007 to Feb 2020). Figure-2 depicts WTI forecast prices until December 2022 under alternative scenarios. The oil production for each region is run against monthly average WTI prices from January 2007 to January 2020.

The historical data reveals that there is a lag structure involved with changes in oil prices. When oil prices decrease/increase, the production does not decrease/increase instantly—rather it takes a number of months. The timings of response vary from region to region but generally, there are six to eight months before the full impact materializes. We have run several polynomial distribution lag models (Almon) with various lag structures and (Koyack) model. Each regression is run with and without constants and also used an autoregressive/moving average scheme to correct autocorrelation problems if required. The best-estimated model for each region was selected and then re-run to forecast respective regions’ shale oil production under alternative price scenarios. Related: Russia, Saudi Arabia, ‘Very Close’ To Reaching Oil Output Deal

Shale oil production forecast alternative price scenarios

Figures-2 to 9 depict shale oil production from different US shale regions forecast under alternative oil price scenarios. Based on our best-estimated models, U.S. shale oil production is expected to decline in all the regions in response to plunging oil prices. Generally, US shale oil production revives in almost all the regions once oil prices reach $49-50/bbl, although Appalachia production only revives when oil prices hit $59/bbl.

When oil prices increase, US shale oil production under the reference case is expected to increase after a lag of eight to ten months.  However, responses vary from region to region. For example, Anadarko, Bakken, Eagle Ford bottomed in November 2020. Permian bottomed in October 2020 while Niobrara bottomed in May 2021. All the regions failed to recover their respective Dec 2019 production levels. 

Summary of forecast

Table-1 illustrates the summary of US shale oil production forecasts under alternative oil price scenarios. Under the low oil price scenario, production declined in all the regions and revived with the gradual increase in oil prices, but did not return to their respective Dec 2019 production levels. In this scenario, oil prices are assumed to remain between $20 and $39/bbl. This strategy could hurt US shale oil production as by Dec 2022 shale production would decrease by 1.72 mmbd compared to Dec 2019. Generally, all the regions under the high oil price scenario surpass their Dec 2019 production level. Anadarko, and surprisingly the US’s most prolific Permian region, failed to regain Dec 2019 level of production. US total shale oil production increases to 9.56 mmbd in Dec 2022 under the high oil price scenario compared to 9.12 mmbd in Dec 2019.  

Table-1: Summary of US Regions Shale Oil Production Forecast – alternative oil prices scenarios

Implications on the oil industry

There is no doubt that this strategy will affect US shale oil producers provided OPEC is prepared to maintain oil prices in the $20 – $39/bb range or even in the range of $20 – $54/bbl (Reference) till Dec 2022. If oil prices were to surpass fifty dollars, the US shale industry generally would revive successfully. Unlike in the past, this time the US government is prepared to support the shale oil industry. In fact, the US government already decided to buy 77 million barrels for the strategic petroleum reserve (SPR), a move to insulate US shale oil producers from possible bankruptcies. Therefore, the fallout of continuing to pursue this strategy will be more harmful to OPEC and other oil-exporting countries than the US shale industry.

Why is this strategy going to be short-lived?

Saudi Arabia is not only losing oil revenues due to lower oil prices but also due to lavish discounts to capture market share.  In addition, to avoid the widespread impact of COVID-19 the government has put a ban on Umrah (pilgrimage) which is adversely affecting the hotel/tourism industry. The fallout is quite substantial as economic activities have stagnated. Millions of pilgrims who used to spend millions of dollars every day on goods and services during their stay are no longer spending. Additionally, the Saudi government requires $80/bbl oil to balance its budget and has no option but to tap its sovereign wealth fund to keep its economy afloat. The real question is, how long can Riyadh afford to do so? Saudi Arabia’s decisions are also having a devastating impact on other OPEC members and non-OPEC oil exporters. Most of which do not have enough resources in sovereign funds to support the low oil price scenario. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly reduced oil revenues and requires enormous amounts of additional public spending.   Related: OPEC’s Plan To Take Over The Global Oil Industry

The above analysis concluded that the U.S. shale oil industry is insensitive to changes in oil prices in the short-term, but will be impacted in the longer term with an increase or decrease in oil prices. When oil prices increase, shale oil production increases but when prices decline it takes time before the impact fully materializes. Under the high case scenario, all the regions except Anadarko and Permian generally recover their lost share in production and also surpasses their respective production level of Dec 2019. However, under a persistently lower oil price regime the U.S. shale oil industry loses 23.4 percent of its production compared to Dec 2019. The question remains whether OPEC will pursue its price strategy over the longer-term. I doubt that Saudi Arabia and OPEC can pursue such a strategy any longer because the oil industry needs trillions of dollars of investment in order to sustain and enhance future oil production. If Saudi Arabia and its partners decide to maintain their current strategy, it may inflict permanent damage on the oil industry. I strongly believe that this low-price strategy will be reversed soon and that the oil market will find its natural way based on demand/supply fundamentals, allowing the oil industry to breathe again. A strategy reversal is crucial for any oil country to deal with COVID-19 and overcome its tremendous impact. 

The oil industry should be prepared to live in an environment in which oil prices hover between $30-$50/bbl or maybe even less. The sector shouldn’t forget the quick penetration of electric vehicles (EVs) and the possible fallout on global oil demand that could possibly displace 38 mmbd by 2040. Now is a good time to develop strategies to diversify oil-based economies rather than spending on unsuccessful market intervention.

By Salman Ghouri for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today


Back to homepage

<!–

Trending Discussions

–>

Related posts

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Business

Telus prioritizing ‘most important customers,’ avoiding ‘unprofitable’ offers: CFO

Published

 on

 

Telus Corp. says it is avoiding offering “unprofitable” discounts as fierce competition in the Canadian telecommunications sector shows no sign of slowing down.

The company said Friday it had fewer net new customers during its third quarter compared with the same time last year, as it copes with increasingly “aggressive marketing and promotional pricing” that is prompting more customers to switch providers.

Telus said it added 347,000 net new customers, down around 14.5 per cent compared with last year. The figure includes 130,000 mobile phone subscribers and 34,000 internet customers, down 30,000 and 3,000, respectively, year-over-year.

The company reported its mobile phone churn rate — a metric measuring subscribers who cancelled their services — was 1.09 per cent in the third quarter, up from 1.03 per cent in the third quarter of 2023. That included a postpaid mobile phone churn rate of 0.90 per cent in its latest quarter.

Telus said its focus is on customer retention through its “industry-leading service and network quality, along with successful promotions and bundled offerings.”

“The customers we have are the most important customers we can get,” said chief financial officer Doug French in an interview.

“We’ve, again, just continued to focus on what matters most to our customers, from a product and customer service perspective, while not loading unprofitable customers.”

Meanwhile, Telus reported its net income attributable to common shares more than doubled during its third quarter.

The telecommunications company said it earned $280 million, up 105.9 per cent from the same three-month period in 2023. Earnings per diluted share for the quarter ended Sept. 30 was 19 cents compared with nine cents a year earlier.

It reported adjusted net income was $413 million, up 10.7 per cent year-over-year from $373 million in the same quarter last year. Operating revenue and other income for the quarter was $5.1 billion, up 1.8 per cent from the previous year.

Mobile phone average revenue per user was $58.85 in the third quarter, a decrease of $2.09 or 3.4 per cent from a year ago. Telus said the drop was attributable to customers signing up for base rate plans with lower prices, along with a decline in overage and roaming revenues.

It said customers are increasingly adopting unlimited data and Canada-U.S. plans which provide higher and more stable ARPU on a monthly basis.

“In a tough operating environment and relative to peers, we view Q3 results that were in line to slightly better than forecast as the best of the bunch,” said RBC analyst Drew McReynolds in a note.

Scotiabank analyst Maher Yaghi added that “the telecom industry in Canada remains very challenging for all players, however, Telus has been able to face these pressures” and still deliver growth.

The Big 3 telecom providers — which also include Rogers Communications Inc. and BCE Inc. — have frequently stressed that the market has grown more competitive in recent years, especially after the closing of Quebecor Inc.’s purchase of Freedom Mobile in April 2023.

Hailed as a fourth national carrier, Quebecor has invested in enhancements to Freedom’s network while offering more affordable plans as part of a set of commitments it was mandated by Ottawa to agree to.

The cost of telephone services in September was down eight per cent compared with a year earlier, according to Statistics Canada’s most recent inflation report last month.

“I think competition has been and continues to be, I’d say, quite intense in Canada, and we’ve obviously had to just manage our business the way we see fit,” said French.

Asked how long that environment could last, he said that’s out of Telus’ hands.

“What I can control, though, is how we go to market and how we lead with our products,” he said.

“I think the conditions within the market will have to adjust accordingly over time. We’ve continued to focus on digitization, continued to bring our cost structure down to compete, irrespective of the price and the current market conditions.”

Still, Canada’s telecom regulator continues to warn providers about customers facing more charges on their cellphone and internet bills.

On Tuesday, CRTC vice-president of consumer, analytics and strategy Scott Hutton called on providers to ensure they clearly inform their customers of charges such as early cancellation fees.

That followed statements from the regulator in recent weeks cautioning against rising international roaming fees and “surprise” price increases being found on their bills.

Hutton said the CRTC plans to launch public consultations in the coming weeks that will focus “on ensuring that information is clear and consistent, making it easier to compare offers and switch services or providers.”

“The CRTC is concerned with recent trends, which suggest that Canadians may not be benefiting from the full protections of our codes,” he said.

“We will continue to monitor developments and will take further action if our codes are not being followed.”

French said any initiative to boost transparency is a step in the right direction.

“I can’t say we are perfect across the board, but what I can say is we are absolutely taking it under consideration and trying to be the best at communicating with our customers,” he said.

“I think everyone looking in the mirror would say there’s room for improvement.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:T)

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

TC Energy cuts cost estimate for Southeast Gateway pipeline project in Mexico

Published

 on

 

CALGARY – TC Energy Corp. has lowered the estimated cost of its Southeast Gateway pipeline project in Mexico.

It says it now expects the project to cost between US$3.9 billion and US$4.1 billion compared with its original estimate of US$4.5 billion.

The change came as the company reported a third-quarter profit attributable to common shareholders of C$1.46 billion or $1.40 per share compared with a loss of C$197 million or 19 cents per share in the same quarter last year.

Revenue for the quarter ended Sept. 30 totalled C$4.08 billion, up from C$3.94 billion in the third quarter of 2023.

TC Energy says its comparable earnings for its latest quarter amounted to C$1.03 per share compared with C$1.00 per share a year earlier.

The average analyst estimate had been for a profit of 95 cents per share, according to LSEG Data & Analytics.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TRP)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

BCE reports Q3 loss on asset impairment charge, cuts revenue guidance

Published

 on

 

BCE Inc. reported a loss in its latest quarter as it recorded $2.11 billion in asset impairment charges, mainly related to Bell Media’s TV and radio properties.

The company says its net loss attributable to common shareholders amounted to $1.24 billion or $1.36 per share for the quarter ended Sept. 30 compared with a profit of $640 million or 70 cents per share a year earlier.

On an adjusted basis, BCE says it earned 75 cents per share in its latest quarter compared with an adjusted profit of 81 cents per share in the same quarter last year.

“Bell’s results for the third quarter demonstrate that we are disciplined in our pursuit of profitable growth in an intensely competitive environment,” BCE chief executive Mirko Bibic said in a statement.

“Our focus this quarter, and throughout 2024, has been to attract higher-margin subscribers and reduce costs to help offset short-term revenue impacts from sustained competitive pricing pressures, slow economic growth and a media advertising market that is in transition.”

Operating revenue for the quarter totalled $5.97 billion, down from $6.08 billion in its third quarter of 2023.

BCE also said it now expects its revenue for 2024 to fall about 1.5 per cent compared with earlier guidance for an increase of zero to four per cent.

The company says the change comes as it faces lower-than-anticipated wireless product revenue and sustained pressure on wireless prices.

BCE added 33,111 net postpaid mobile phone subscribers, down 76.8 per cent from the same period last year, which was the company’s second-best performance on the metric since 2010.

It says the drop was driven by higher customer churn — a measure of subscribers who cancelled their service — amid greater competitive activity and promotional offer intensity. BCE’s monthly churn rate for the category was 1.28 per cent, up from 1.1 per cent during its previous third quarter.

The company also saw 11.6 per cent fewer gross subscriber activations “due to more targeted promotional offers and mobile device discounting compared to last year.”

Bell’s wireless mobile phone average revenue per user was $58.26, down 3.4 per cent from $60.28 in the third quarter of the prior year.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Companies in this story: (TSX:BCE)

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version