Opinion by The Globe and Mail: A harsh truth Real fixes to Canada's economy are difficult and politically unpopular | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

Opinion by The Globe and Mail: A harsh truth Real fixes to Canada’s economy are difficult and politically unpopular

Published

 on

Open this photo in gallery:

A podium is photographed ahead of a federal housing announcement, in Ajax, Ont., on Nov. 30.Christopher Katsarov/The Canadian Press

Claude Lavoie was director-general of economic studies and policy analysis at the Department of Finance from 2008 to 2023. He has represented Canada at OECD meetings and has received many honours, including the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee Medal.

Workers in Canada are less productive than those in many other countries. In the time a Canadian worker produces $1 worth of goods and services, a French worker produces $1.20, and an American $1.30 – a 30-per-cent advantage. And it’s getting worse – in 2000 the U.S. advantage was only 20 per cent. This means our standard of living has deteriorated relative to that of other countries as productivity is directly related to per-capita income.

Canadians work more hours than many in other advanced economies and Canada’s share of people with college or university credentials ranks at the top in the world. So, the reason isn’t laziness or lack of intelligence, and it’s not related to industrial composition either. Canadians are less productive than Americans even across similar industries.

The Canadian work force is less productive because our firms invest less in technology and have less efficient business practices. As a share of the economy, Canada’s business investments in R&D, and on software, hardware and data are less than half those in the United States.

Our productivity problem is not new, and governments have tried to address it. It was noted in the early 1990s and has been a topic that most Liberal and Conservative budgets and economic growth plans have attempted to address since then.

So why have we not succeeded in turning things around? Because it is a hard nut to crack – economists do not have a good idea how to boost long-term growth – but also because some of the identified solutions are politically difficult. Year after year governments implement the same politically easy policies: giving subsidies, limiting environmental protections and lowering corporate taxes. This is despite evidence showing these measures are not very effective in raising productivity. Canada ranks ahead of all Group of Seven countries on the International Tax Competitiveness index and our subsidies to R&D are among the most generous. Yet our productivity continues to lag.

Analyses suggest that the key factors behind our poor productivity include a weaker competition environment and lower entrepreneurship skills. Competition increases productivity by driving low-productivity companies out of the market and encouraging entrepreneurs to pull out their “A” game. Canada needs to become feistier. However, our competition framework leaves a lot to be desired.

Canada’s barriers to foreign competition, particularly in sectors such as telecommunications and transportation, are among the highest in the OECD. For example, in these two sectors we hang tight to rules restricting foreign ownership and limiting the operation of foreign companies. It should be no surprise that the cost of flying between two Canadian cities is usually much more expensive than flying between two European cities or between a Canadian and an international city, where foreign air carriers can operate. Or that our wireless rates are among the most expensive. There are many other examples of barriers to competition, such as our agricultural supply management system and numerous internal trade barriers that are estimated by the IMF to reduce our GDP per capita by 4 per cent.

Excessive government subsidies for small- and medium-sized businesses are not helping, they simply allow poorly performing companies to survive. Canada has a larger share than many other countries of so-called zombie firms – those older than 10 years that would be insolvent without a constant infusion of new capital (often from the government). Letting these companies fail would raise our productivity by an additional 5 per cent, according to Statistics Canada.

Reducing subsidies and changing the competition framework takes time, and will face a lot of opposition from business and labour associations – not politically enticing propositions. As a result, Canada continues to favour an interventionist approach aimed at protecting the interests of incumbent companies. Boosting business literacy in our school curriculum would also help, but the payoff is beyond what the electoral system can deliver and won’t provide a sexy quick fix.

Some of the changes to the competition policy announced in the 2023 Fall Economic Statement and Bill C-56 are good, but many also take us in the wrong direction. Research shows the more independent a country’s competition regulator is from political influence, the more their environment is competitive. Several of the announced changes will make the Competition Bureau even more politically dependent.

We can fix our productivity problem if governments adopt a long-term vision that is disruptive and not political – qualities not evident in our politicians these days. Instead, we’re stuck in a Mobius strip of doing the same thing and expecting a different result: Einstein’s definition of insanity.

Editor’s note: A previous version of this article incorrectly identified doing the same thing and expecting a different result as “Einstein’s definition of insanity”, which was not, in fact, coined by Einstein. This version has been updated.

 

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

September merchandise trade deficit narrows to $1.3 billion: Statistics Canada

Published

 on

OTTAWA – Statistics Canada says the country’s merchandise trade deficit narrowed to $1.3 billion in September as imports fell more than exports.

The result compared with a revised deficit of $1.5 billion for August. The initial estimate for August released last month had shown a deficit of $1.1 billion.

Statistics Canada says the results for September came as total exports edged down 0.1 per cent to $63.9 billion.

Exports of metal and non-metallic mineral products fell 5.4 per cent as exports of unwrought gold, silver, and platinum group metals, and their alloys, decreased 15.4 per cent. Exports of energy products dropped 2.6 per cent as lower prices weighed on crude oil exports.

Meanwhile, imports for September fell 0.4 per cent to $65.1 billion as imports of metal and non-metallic mineral products dropped 12.7 per cent.

In volume terms, total exports rose 1.4 per cent in September while total imports were essentially unchanged in September.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 5, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version