Gus Carlson is a New York-based columnist for The Globe and Mail
The numbers were eye-popping even for the movers and shakers in the rarefied air of the world’s fine-art markets.
The Christie’s New York fall auction of Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen’s collection last week cleared US$1.5-billion, including five works that sold for more than US$100-million apiece. A Sotheby’s New York auction of the collection of CBS founder William Paley took in almost US$50-million this week, including US$37.5-million for Pablo Picasso’s Guitar on a Table, purchased by the media tycoon in 1946.
Beyond the wow power of the big names and the big price tags, the sales shone a bright light on an increasingly popular investment strategy, even for people who don’t know their Klimt from their Klee: art as a hedge in an inflationary time, when financial markets are choppy and recession looms.
“Art is so stable because its value is not tied to the economy or how it performs,” said Emily Greenspan, the founder of TAG ARTS, a Los Angeles art consultancy, who has seen an uptick in interest from clients looking to diversify their portfolios with something other than the usual stocks and bonds. “It really is a safe, solid place to put your money – safer than the stock market or real estate.”
Art experts say there have been only two meaningful downward blips in the market over the past two decades: the financial crisis of 2007-08 and the pandemic.
To be sure, while art has real appeal as a tangible asset, caveat emptor. The market is not regulated, so if a collector buys a work that does not increase in value, no one will make them whole. As well, the art market’s 2022 price spike is daunting to new investors.
And then of course there’s the risk of buying a fake. Even respected galleries have been burned by greedy fraudsters and highly skilled counterfeiters. In the US$80-million case involving New York’s Knoedler & Company, painter Pei-Shen Qian was able to fool countless collectors and dealers with works claimed to be those of artists such as Mark Rothko and Jackson Pollock.
Another issue is that just because an investor has money doesn’t mean they can walk into a gallery and buy what they like. There is a credential-building process because there are often waiting lists for popular artists, and novice collectors must get in line behind museums and recognized collectors.
“Galleries want to see the value of the art and the artists protected over the long term,” Ms. Greenspan said. “They want to know if you’re for real and what you plan to do with the work over time.”
And unlike real estate, flipping is considered taboo in the art world. Flippers risk being blackballed by galleries and will have to fight it out at auction.
But there is no question that art as an investment is becoming more popular. Investors themselves are a more diverse group these days – from young tech entrepreneurs to foreign investors to young families looking to diversify their holdings and get personal enjoyment from the art as well.
That is because there are many ways to get in, even for those who have no interest or experience in collecting – or the money to buy expensive pieces at auction.
Art funds are becoming more popular as ways for average investors to diversify without having to learn anything about art. Investors bank on the market expertise of the fund managers, who buy and sell art, to increase the value of the portfolio and deliver returns.
For investors who are also wannabe collectors, Ms. Greenspan advises to wait for off-peak auctions and sales, where there is a good chance to find works by up-and-comers and unheralded works by famous artists. As she says, even a lesser-known Picasso will always be a Picasso.
“Watch the trends like you would in any investment market,” she said. Still, “it is a crapshoot as to who will be the next hot commodity.”
As for what’s hot now, the Black Lives Matter movement generated a boom for African-American artists such as Derek Fordjour, Charles Gaines, Mark Bradford and Kehinde Wiley. Black women artists are in especially high demand, among them: Mickalene Thomas, Amy Sherald and Njideka Akunyili Crosby.
“Art is a cultural touchstone,” Ms. Greenspan said, “and museums try to reflect that in their collections.”
LONDON (AP) — With a few daubs of a paintbrush, the Brontë sisters have got their dots back.
More than eight decades after it was installed, a memorial to the three 19th-century sibling novelists in London’s Westminster Abbey was amended Thursday to restore the diaereses – the two dots over the e in their surname.
The dots — which indicate that the name is pronounced “brontay” rather than “bront” — were omitted when the stone tablet commemorating Charlotte, Emily and Anne was erected in the abbey’s Poets’ Corner in October 1939, just after the outbreak of World War II.
They were restored after Brontë historian Sharon Wright, editor of the Brontë Society Gazette, raised the issue with Dean of Westminster David Hoyle. The abbey asked its stonemason to tap in the dots and its conservator to paint them.
“There’s no paper record for anyone complaining about this or mentioning this, so I just wanted to put it right, really,” Wright said. “These three Yorkshire women deserve their place here, but they also deserve to have their name spelled correctly.”
It’s believed the writers’ Irish father Patrick changed the spelling of his surname from Brunty or Prunty when he went to university in England.
Raised on the wild Yorkshire moors, all three sisters died before they were 40, leaving enduring novels including Charlotte’s “Jane Eyre,” Emily’s “Wuthering Heights” and Anne’s “The Tenant of Wildfell Hall.”
Rebecca Yorke, director of the Brontë Society, welcomed the restoration.
“As the Brontës and their work are loved and respected all over the world, it’s entirely appropriate that their name is spelled correctly on their memorial,” she said.