If the economy crashes, let it burn – in fact, we got here by intervening too much By JOHN RAPLEY SPECIAL TO THE GLOBE AND MAIL | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Economy

If the economy crashes, let it burn – in fact, we got here by intervening too much By JOHN RAPLEY SPECIAL TO THE GLOBE AND MAIL

Published

 on

If a potential recession does come this year, maybe politicians and central bankers should simply step aside and let the market do its work.JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images

John Rapley is a political economist at the University of Cambridge and the managing director of Seaford Macro.

I recently met someone who called herself a perfectionist, boasting that she’d never failed at anything she tried. While that may be true, I thought it was an odd way to define perfection – being concerned with avoiding failure rather than attaining new heights.

Never failing isn’t actually all that hard. Stick to the beaten path, avoid risks. But as you do that, you’ll also avoid new things. You won’t break new ground or create new ideas.

For Joseph Schumpeter, a scholar of Austrian economics in the early 20th century, it was failure, and in particular business failure, that was essential to economic dynamism. He was the one who’d coined the phenomenon “creative destruction.” Market crashes killed off inefficient businesses and freed resources – their clients, capital and workers – to go toward the more promising firms.

That Austrian view of economics is today in the minority, held mostly by right-wing libertarians. The more dominant schools of thought, like neoclassical theory or the New Keynesianism of economists such as Paul Krugman, eschew the dog-eat-dog undertones which Schumpeter celebrated. It seems we now live in too compassionate a society to celebrate market crashes, business failures and unemployment as evolutionary processes that allow the most adaptable enterprises to thrive.

And there is a price to pay for this current definition of perfection embodied in today’s economics. Our determination to avoid pain has resulted in repeated market interventions across major economies to stem the effect of crashes. That has apparently inhibited dynamism and made economies worse off, more fragile and more in need of such intervention in the future.

If the predicted recession does come this year, maybe politicians and central bankers should simply step aside and let the market do its work.

Take the 2008 crash. The economics profession has spent the last decade patting itself on the back for having devised the economic models that prevented that crisis from turning into another Great Depression (conveniently eliding their having helped devise the models that caused the crash in the first place). Instead, repeated use of loose-money policies kept asset values from plunging, setting a floor under the economy, with the result being a relatively short and shallow recession.

But it’s also meant there’s been little rebound to follow. Since 2008, developed economies have bumped along bottom, never really taking off again. Instead of re-energizing the economy, cheap money has inflated asset prices, taking stock, bond and property markets to record highs. This has kept economies from collapsing into recessions. But it’s also kept “zombie firms” from going out of business, and made it harder for new ones to come into existence. Just as it’s getting ever more difficult to be a first-time home buyer, it’s gotten harder and harder to be a first-time business creator – the cost of rent alone will eat up all your revenues.

Growth has been slow because labour productivity has been near stagnant across the G7. Economists have been at pains to explain why things suddenly went south after 2008, but a recent study by Britain’s Centre for Cities may have solved the puzzle.

Focusing on London, the study found that the rising costs for office space, which have boomed in response to easy-money policies, “have been eating up business budgets and crowding out investment associated with innovation.” Similarly, rising house prices “have reduced London’s ability to compete for global talent.” Sound familiar? Over the last decade, labour productivity has all but stagnated in Canada, but property prices have roared ahead.

I recently encountered the other side of this effect in a conversation in South Africa (where I am living at the moment). A colleague here said he was thinking of migrating to London because he could double his earnings if he went there. I pointed out to him that he’d also take a step down in his lifestyle – which presently included a sprawling home with an Audi in the driveway – because most of his income would disappear to his landlord (or the bank, if he bought a house).

Stocks and bonds began the this year on something of a roll. However, they’ve recently come back under pressure, investors having realized that the battle against inflation is far from won. Property markets look vulnerable. Politicians and central bankers will no doubt be monitoring the situation carefully for strains, and will come under pressure to do something if prices start dropping sharply.

But if they just buckle up and get ready for the ride, the ultimate destination might be a better one for the economy, and for most of those trying to make their way forward in it.

Adblock test (Why?)

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Canada’s unemployment rate holds steady at 6.5% in October, economy adds 15,000 jobs

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – Canada’s unemployment rate held steady at 6.5 per cent last month as hiring remained weak across the economy.

Statistics Canada’s labour force survey on Friday said employment rose by a modest 15,000 jobs in October.

Business, building and support services saw the largest gain in employment.

Meanwhile, finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing experienced the largest decline.

Many economists see weakness in the job market continuing in the short term, before the Bank of Canada’s interest rate cuts spark a rebound in economic growth next year.

Despite ongoing softness in the labour market, however, strong wage growth has raged on in Canada. Average hourly wages in October grew 4.9 per cent from a year ago, reaching $35.76.

Friday’s report also shed some light on the financial health of households.

According to the agency, 28.8 per cent of Canadians aged 15 or older were living in a household that had difficulty meeting financial needs – like food and housing – in the previous four weeks.

That was down from 33.1 per cent in October 2023 and 35.5 per cent in October 2022, but still above the 20.4 per cent figure recorded in October 2020.

People living in a rented home were more likely to report difficulty meeting financial needs, with nearly four in 10 reporting that was the case.

That compares with just under a quarter of those living in an owned home by a household member.

Immigrants were also more likely to report facing financial strain last month, with about four out of 10 immigrants who landed in the last year doing so.

That compares with about three in 10 more established immigrants and one in four of people born in Canada.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Health-care spending expected to outpace economy and reach $372 billion in 2024: CIHI

Published

 on

 

The Canadian Institute for Health Information says health-care spending in Canada is projected to reach a new high in 2024.

The annual report released Thursday says total health spending is expected to hit $372 billion, or $9,054 per Canadian.

CIHI’s national analysis predicts expenditures will rise by 5.7 per cent in 2024, compared to 4.5 per cent in 2023 and 1.7 per cent in 2022.

This year’s health spending is estimated to represent 12.4 per cent of Canada’s gross domestic product. Excluding two years of the pandemic, it would be the highest ratio in the country’s history.

While it’s not unusual for health expenditures to outpace economic growth, the report says this could be the case for the next several years due to Canada’s growing population and its aging demographic.

Canada’s per capita spending on health care in 2022 was among the highest in the world, but still less than countries such as the United States and Sweden.

The report notes that the Canadian dental and pharmacare plans could push health-care spending even further as more people who previously couldn’t afford these services start using them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Economy

Trump’s victory sparks concerns over ripple effect on Canadian economy

Published

 on

 

As Canadians wake up to news that Donald Trump will return to the White House, the president-elect’s protectionist stance is casting a spotlight on what effect his second term will have on Canada-U.S. economic ties.

Some Canadian business leaders have expressed worry over Trump’s promise to introduce a universal 10 per cent tariff on all American imports.

A Canadian Chamber of Commerce report released last month suggested those tariffs would shrink the Canadian economy, resulting in around $30 billion per year in economic costs.

More than 77 per cent of Canadian exports go to the U.S.

Canada’s manufacturing sector faces the biggest risk should Trump push forward on imposing broad tariffs, said Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters president and CEO Dennis Darby. He said the sector is the “most trade-exposed” within Canada.

“It’s in the U.S.’s best interest, it’s in our best interest, but most importantly for consumers across North America, that we’re able to trade goods, materials, ingredients, as we have under the trade agreements,” Darby said in an interview.

“It’s a more complex or complicated outcome than it would have been with the Democrats, but we’ve had to deal with this before and we’re going to do our best to deal with it again.”

American economists have also warned Trump’s plan could cause inflation and possibly a recession, which could have ripple effects in Canada.

It’s consumers who will ultimately feel the burden of any inflationary effect caused by broad tariffs, said Darby.

“A tariff tends to raise costs, and it ultimately raises prices, so that’s something that we have to be prepared for,” he said.

“It could tilt production mandates. A tariff makes goods more expensive, but on the same token, it also will make inputs for the U.S. more expensive.”

A report last month by TD economist Marc Ercolao said research shows a full-scale implementation of Trump’s tariff plan could lead to a near-five per cent reduction in Canadian export volumes to the U.S. by early-2027, relative to current baseline forecasts.

Retaliation by Canada would also increase costs for domestic producers, and push import volumes lower in the process.

“Slowing import activity mitigates some of the negative net trade impact on total GDP enough to avoid a technical recession, but still produces a period of extended stagnation through 2025 and 2026,” Ercolao said.

Since the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement came into effect in 2020, trade between Canada and the U.S. has surged by 46 per cent, according to the Toronto Region Board of Trade.

With that deal is up for review in 2026, Canadian Chamber of Commerce president and CEO Candace Laing said the Canadian government “must collaborate effectively with the Trump administration to preserve and strengthen our bilateral economic partnership.”

“With an impressive $3.6 billion in daily trade, Canada and the United States are each other’s closest international partners. The secure and efficient flow of goods and people across our border … remains essential for the economies of both countries,” she said in a statement.

“By resisting tariffs and trade barriers that will only raise prices and hurt consumers in both countries, Canada and the United States can strengthen resilient cross-border supply chains that enhance our shared economic security.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 6, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version