Elon Musk is buying Twitter and has promised to rededicate the site to untrammeled free speech. Meanwhile, former president Barack Obama, citing the dangerous spread of “misinformation,” has called for governmental content regulation of social media. Both claim to be defending democracy and truth.
Politics
Opinion | Truth and politics don't necessarily go together. Good luck fixing that. – The Washington Post
Who’s right? The answer is: Jonathan Haidt. Also, Hannah Arendt.
Haidt is a social psychologist at New York University and author of a cover story in the Atlantic about the destructive political impact of social media.
While sharing Obama’s assessment of social media’s harms, Haidt is more realistic about how hard it would be to design government-mandated content controls without sacrificing social media’s benefits — or devolving into censorship. It’s more important, Haidt convincingly argues, to fortify people’s independent ability to evaluate social media content than to control their access to it.
That means changing platform architecture to slow the spread of fake or anger-generating content, perhaps by modifying the “share” function on Facebook, a substantively neutral reform that would infringe no one’s free expression but could create time for that basic democratic act: deliberation.
This gets at what’s genuinely new about social media — its sheer velocity and “virality” — as compared with past innovations in communications technology that also caused worries about democracy. Haidt also calls for ridding social media of bots and fake accounts by making “verification … a precondition for gaining the algorithmic amplification that social media offers” — or, in Musk’s more succinct formulation, “authenticating all humans.”
That was a good promise for Musk to make. His error may be overconfidence about maintaining a Twitterverse that consistently practices the free speech absolutism he preaches but still makes money — whether through selling ads, selling subscriptions or some other means.
Musk may soon have to decide whether to let former president Donald Trump back on Twitter, which would certainly be a pro-free speech move. Either way Musk goes, however, could infuriate, and alienate, millions. Musk has said he would soften, but not abandon, content moderation, which seems like it would keep Twitter in the business of facing dilemmas and managing trade-offs.
And that brings us to Arendt, the 20th century student of totalitarianism and author of a classic 1967 essay, “Truth and Politics.”
“No one has ever doubted that truth and politics are on rather bad terms with each other,” she wrote, “and no one … has ever counted truthfulness among the political virtues.”
From the demagogue’s bigotry, to the candidate’s unkeepable promise, to the diplomat’s white lie, some form of mis- and disinformation has forever been enmeshed in political discourse and activity and always will be. To this “commonplace” observation, Arendt added the admonition: “Nothing would be gained by simplification or moral denunciation.”
Gloomy words, but a useful corrective to Obama’s belief in “public oversight” of social media, which is so reminiscent of Walter Lippmann’s proposal — a century ago — for a “specialized class” of advisers to mediate between propaganda-prone voters and government officials.
As a sheer matter of unalienable individual rights, Musk’s free speech maximalism is preferable to Obama’s neo-Lippmannism. Yet to the extent the case for free speech hinges on its social benefits as well as individual fulfillment, Arendt splashed some cold water on it, too.
A Jew who had witnessed the collapse of Weimar Germany and fled the Nazi regime, she knew democracies were vulnerable to extremists bent on using freedom of speech and assembly to destabilize and destroy the system. “The chances of factual truth surviving the onslaught of power are very slim indeed,” she wrote, “it is always in danger of being maneuvered out of the world not only for a time but, potentially, forever.”
Arendt placed her hope in intellectuals — artists, scientists, historians, judges and journalists — whose vocations centered on the pursuit of truth, however inevitably imperfect, and thus “require non-commitment and impartiality, freedom from self-interest in thought and judgment.”
The more apolitical these professionals are, Arendt argued, the more paradoxically useful and necessary they are to “the political realm,” as sources of trusted information, analysis and ideas.
Painful and lonely though it can be to stand apart from the community and its political contests, Arendt wrote, impartial pursuit of truth has its rewards. One, she posits, is to be a part of an ancient tradition that began when Homer, reporting in verse on the Trojan War, chose to praise both the Greek hero Achilles and his enemy Hector of Troy, and continued when Herodotus acknowledged “the great and wondrous deeds of the Greeks and barbarians” alike.
These notions seem anything but realistic today, when academia has embraced social activism, judicial nominations are subjected to partisan vetting and many journalists disclaim “bothsidesism.”
Still, Arendt reminds us that seeking truth requires a willingness to consider opposing points of view, a form of empathy that is at “the root of … this curious passion, unknown outside Western civilization, for intellectual integrity at any price.”
American society needs to rededicate itself to that tradition, without which ownership changes and technical tweaks to social media will not make much difference anyway.
Politics
Moe visiting Yorkton as Saskatchewan election campaign continues
Saskatchewan Party Leader Scott Moe is set to be on the road today as the provincial election campaign continues.
Moe is set to speak in the city of Yorkton about affordability measures this morning before travelling to the nearby village of Theodore for an event with the local Saskatchewan Party candidate.
NDP Leader Carla Beck doesn’t have any events scheduled, though several party candidates are to hold press conferences.
On Thursday, Moe promised a directive banning “biological boys” from using school changing rooms with “biological girls” if re-elected.
The NDP said the Saskatchewan Party was punching down on vulnerable children.
Election day is Oct. 28.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 18, 2024.
The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
Politics
Saskatchewan Party’s Moe pledges change room ban in schools; Beck calls it desperate
REGINA – Saskatchewan Party Leader Scott Moe is promising a directive banning “biological boys” from using school changing rooms with “biological girls” if re-elected, a move the NDP’s Carla Beck says weaponizes vulnerable kids.
Moe made the pledge Thursday at a campaign stop in Regina. He said it was in response to a complaint that two biological males had changed for gym class with girls at a school in southeast Saskatchewan.
He said the ban would be his first order of business if he’s voted again as premier on Oct. 28.
It was not previously included in his party’s campaign platform document.
“I’ll be very clear, there will be a directive that would come from the minister of education that would say that biological boys will not be in the change room with biological girls,” Moe said.
He added school divisions should already have change room policies, but a provincial directive would ensure all have the rule in place.
Asked about the rights of gender-diverse youth, Moe said other children also have rights.
“What about the rights of all the other girls that are changing in that very change room? They have rights as well,” he said, followed by cheers and claps.
The complaint was made at a school with the Prairie Valley School Division. The division said in a statement it doesn’t comment on specific situations that could jeopardize student privacy and safety.
“We believe all students should have the opportunity to learn and grow in a safe and welcoming learning environment,” it said.
“Our policies and procedures align with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Saskatchewan Human Rights Code.”
Asked about Moe’s proposal, Beck said it would make vulnerable kids more vulnerable.
Moe is desperate to stoke fear and division after having a bad night during Wednesday’s televised leaders’ debate, she said.
“Saskatchewan people, when we’re at our best, are people that come together and deliver results, not divisive, ugly politics like we’ve seen time and again from Scott Moe and the Sask. Party,” Beck said.
“If you see leaders holding so much power choosing to punch down on vulnerable kids, that tells you everything you need to know about them.”
Beck said voters have more pressing education issues on their minds, including the need for smaller classrooms, more teaching staff and increased supports for students.
People also want better health care and to be able to afford gas and groceries, she added.
“We don’t have to agree to understand Saskatchewan people deserve better,” Beck said.
The Saskatchewan Party government passed legislation last year that requires parents consent to children under 16 using different names or pronouns at school.
The law has faced backlash from some LGBTQ+ advocates, who argue it violates Charter rights and could cause teachers to out or misgender children.
Beck has said if elected her party would repeal that legislation.
Heather Kuttai, a former commissioner with the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission who resigned last year in protest of the law, said Moe is trying to sway right-wing voters.
She said a change room directive would put more pressure on teachers who already don’t have enough educational support.
“It sounds like desperation to me,” she said.
“It sounds like Scott Moe is nervous about the election and is turning to homophobic and transphobic rhetoric to appeal to far-right voters.
“It’s divisive politics, which is a shame.”
She said she worries about the future of gender-affirming care in a province that once led in human rights.
“We’re the kind of people who dig each other out of snowbanks and not spew hatred about each other,” she said. “At least that’s what I want to still believe.”
Also Thursday, two former Saskatchewan Party government members announced they’re endorsing Beck — Mark Docherty, who retired last year and was a Speaker, and Glen Hart, who retired in 2020.
Ian Hanna, a speech writer and senior political adviser to former Saskatchewan Party premier Brad Wall, also endorsed Beck.
Earlier in the campaign, Beck received support from former Speaker Randy Weekes, who quit the Saskatchewan Party earlier this year after accusing caucus members of bullying.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 17, 2024.
— With files from Aaron Sousa in Edmonton
Politics
Promise tracker: What the Saskatchewan Party and NDP pledge to do if they win Oct. 28
REGINA – Saskatchewan‘s provincial election is on Oct. 28. Here’s a look at some of the campaign promises made by the two major parties:
Saskatchewan Party
— Continue withholding federal carbon levy payments to Ottawa on natural gas until the end of 2025.
— Reduce personal income tax rates over four years; a family of four would save $3,400.
— Double the Active Families Benefit to $300 per child per year and the benefit for children with disabilities to $400 a year.
— Direct all school divisions to ban “biological boys” from girls’ change rooms in schools.
— Increase the First-Time Homebuyers Tax Credit to $15,000 from $10,000.
— Reintroduce the Home Renovation Tax Credit, allowing homeowners to claim up to $4,000 in renovation costs on their income taxes; seniors could claim up to $5,000.
— Extend coverage for insulin pumps and diabetes supplies to seniors and young adults
— Provide a 50 per cent refundable tax credit — up to $10,000 — to help cover the cost of a first fertility treatment.
— Hire 100 new municipal officers and 70 more officers with the Saskatchewan Marshals Service.
— Amend legislation to provide police with more authority to address intoxication, vandalism and disturbances on public property.
— Platform cost of $1.2 billion, with deficits in the first three years and a small surplus in 2027.
—
NDP
— Pause the 15-cent-a-litre gas tax for six months, saving an average family about $350.
— Remove the provincial sales tax from children’s clothes and ready-to-eat grocery items like rotisserie chickens and granola bars.
— Pass legislation to limit how often and how much landlords can raise rent.
— Repeal the law that requires parental consent when children under 16 want to change their names or pronouns at school.
— Launch a provincewide school nutrition program.
— Build more schools and reduce classroom sizes.
— Hire 800 front-line health-care workers in areas most in need.
— Launch an accountability commission to investigate cost overruns for government projects.
— Scrap the marshals service.
— Hire 100 Mounties and expand detox services.
— Platform cost of $3.5 billion, with small deficits in the first three years and a small surplus in the fourth year.
—
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct .17, 2024.
The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
-
News24 hours ago
One Direction was the internet’s first boy band, and Liam Payne its grounding force
-
News18 hours ago
B.C. faces a rain-soaked election day after a campaign drenched in negativity
-
News24 hours ago
Former NFL quarterback Jay Cutler charged with DUI, possession of handgun after traffic accident
-
News24 hours ago
Fledgling Northern Soccer League expected to announce first player signings soon
-
News24 hours ago
Alberta unveils new municipal election and political party rules |
-
News18 hours ago
AFN votes on way forward after $47.8 billion child welfare reform deal is defeated
-
News24 hours ago
Canada’s Auger-Aliassime ousted in quarterfinals of European Open
-
News18 hours ago
Indian diplomats ‘clearly on notice’ after high commissioner expulsion: Joly