All of a sudden, it seems as though practically everyone has discovered New Brunswick. Premier Blaine Higgs’s intervention over Policy 713 on sexual orientation and gender identity put the province on the map in the North American culture wars, attracting national and international attention. Yet most of the armchair analysts are outside observers and few have ever set foot in the province.
Media
Paul W. Bennett: What woke media get wrong about New Brunswick’s gender identity controversy
The Curse of Politics podcast hosted by the ribald and unfiltered David Herle provides the most outlandish example. “What I know about New Brunswick politics couldn’t fit in a drag queen’s brassiere,” quipped regular guest Scott Reid, before jumping into a discussion linking the policy change to the rise of “right-wing” populism in North America.
Discussing Policy 713 must be good for clicks and social media shares. Why else would the video of the hour-long show be titled “drag queen’s brassiere,” when the discussion of Policy 713 lasted a mere 10 minutes? Shooting from the lip, sprinkling comments with expletives and firing-off snap judgments were the order of the day. Informed viewers and listeners deserve better.
Two University of New Brunswick assistant professors, Andrea Garner and Melissa Dockrill Garrett, for example, were quick to produce a piece of instant analysis. New Brunswick’s LGBTQ “safe schools debate,” the headline declared, “makes false opponents of parents and teachers.”
They claimed that tampering with the policy put “students, families and allies who identify as 2SLGBTQIA+” at great risk. Awash in sweeping generalizations, the commentary closed with a flourish: “Schools must continue to be inclusive and foster cultures of equity, acceptance and compassion where each student is valued and honoured for who they are.” Anyone who questioned the policy was, by implication, undermining that article of faith.
A more recent Conversation commentary, produced by McMaster PhD candidate Noah Fry, painted Premier Higgs in shades of black, comparing him to Alberta Premier Danielle Smith. Fry, who’s now based in Ontario, earned his bachelor’s degree in philosophy, politics and economics from Mount Allison University in Sackville, N.B., which gives him some street cred. The Policy 713 debate, he claimed, revealed Higgs to be a politician with “a hard-line conservative record to make right-wing ideologues giddy.”
Fry dredged-up Higgs’ early flirtation with the Confederation of Regions (CoR) party, which opposed official bilingualism, and recited a litany of policies he claims are favourable to “top income earners” and hostile to underpaid nurses and Indigenous people. The young academic also insinuated that the premier was “proudly unilingual” and out to undermine French language education.
The Policy 713 controversy has brought the province’s social divisions into sharper relief, but they were always there, below the surface. Gender identity politics is radioactive and anyone daring to touch it gets burned, particularly among the Central Canadian chattering classes and in university common rooms. Even venturing a comment can make you persona non grata in the simmering culture wars.
Lindsay Jones, the Globe and Mail’s Atlantic reporter, took a more nuanced approach than most, choosing to focus on Premier Higgs’s actual intervention, his stated motives and the resulting cabinet divisions.
Most of her analysis is gleaned from Mount Allison University political science Prof. Geoff Martin, a Higgs critic who’s familiar with his CoR roots and attuned to social conservatism challenging “so-called woke policy.” Like most academics, he’s quick to associate the provincial upheaval with the broader political atmosphere across Canada and the United States.
After all this outpouring of drive-by political analysis, are we any the wiser? Reading between the lines, Premier Higgs’s surprising show of independence has pundits, academics and transgender advocates in a real tizzy. Surrounded on all sides by vocal critics, it’s hard to get a read on the so-called silent majority in a vast and disaggregated province like New Brunswick.
Political messages espousing family values have resonance in the province, especially in rural communities. A national Leger poll conducted at the outset of the Policy 713 controversy showed that 57 per cent of those surveyed agreed that schools should inform parents if school-aged children changed their pronouns. Just 18 per cent disagreed, while 25 per cent were unsure. Slightly over half of respondents, or 51 per cent, felt schools were “moving in the wrong direction.”
Few outside observers make any reference to the premier’s leadership style or to his parallel moves to revamp education governance that give parents less voice in the school system. It’s just not, pardon the expression, sexy enough to attract much sustained attention. Nor would they notice New Brunswick Child and Youth Advocate Kelly Lamrock’s measured critique that the changes were “shoddy” and “inadvertently discriminatory,” rather than purely reactive.
If there’s one thing Noah Fry got right, it’s that, “Higgs does not hide who he is. He is open with media and speaks his mind.” More people may be ready for that than the drive-by experts ever imagined.
Media
Bayo Onanuga battles yet another media – Punch Newspapers
[unable to retrieve full-text content]
Bayo Onanuga battles yet another media Punch Newspapers
Source link
Media
Blood In The Snow Film Festival Celebrates 13 Years!
|
|
|
|
Media
It’s time for a Halloween movie marathon. 10 iconic horror films
Sometimes, you just have to return to the classics.
That’s especially true as Halloween approaches. While you queue up your spooky movie marathon, here are 10 iconic horror movies from the past 70 years for inspiration, and what AP writers had to say about them when they were first released.
We resurrected excerpts from these reviews, edited for clarity, from the dead — did they stand the test of time?
“Rear Window” (1954)
“Rear Window” is a wonderful trick pulled off by Alfred Hitchcock. He breaks his hero’s leg, sets him up at an apartment window where he can observe, among other things, a murder across the court. The panorama of other people’s lives is laid out before you, as seen through the eyes of a Peeping Tom.
James Stewart, Grace Kelly, Thelma Ritter and others make it good fun.
— Bob Thomas
“Halloween” (1978)
At 19, Jamie Lee Curtis is starring in a creepy little thriller film called “Halloween.”
Until now, Jamie’s main achievement has been as a regular on the “Operation Petticoat” TV series. Jamie is much prouder of “Halloween,” though it is obviously an exploitation picture aimed at the thrill market.
The idea for “Halloween” sprang from independent producer-distributor Irwin Yablans, who wanted a terror-tale involving a babysitter. John Carpenter and Debra Hill fashioned a script about a madman who kills his sister, escapes from an asylum and returns to his hometown intending to murder his sister’s friends.
— Bob Thomas
“The Silence of the Lambs” (1991)
“The Silence of the Lambs” moves from one nail-biting sequence to another. Jonathan Demme spares the audience nothing, including closeups of skinned corpses. The squeamish had best stay home and watch “The Cosby Show.”
Ted Tally adapted the Thomas Harris novel with great skill, and Demme twists the suspense almost to the breaking point. The climactic confrontation between Clarice Starling and Buffalo Bill (Ted Levine) is carried a tad too far, though it is undeniably exciting with well-edited sequences.
Such a tale as “The Silence of the Lambs” requires accomplished actors to pull it off. Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins are highly qualified. She provides steely intelligence, with enough vulnerability to sustain the suspense. He delivers a classic portrayal of pure, brilliant evil.
— Bob Thomas
“Scream” (1996)
In this smart, witty homage to the genre, students at a suburban California high school are being killed in the same gruesome fashion as the victims in the slasher films they know by heart.
If it sounds like the script of every other horror movie to come and go at the local movie theater, it’s not.
By turns terrifying and funny, “Scream” — written by newcomer David Williamson — is as taut as a thriller, intelligent without being self-congratulatory, and generous in its references to Wes Craven’s competitors in gore.
— Ned Kilkelly
“The Blair Witch Project” (1999)
Imaginative, intense and stunning are a few words that come to mind with “The Blair Witch Project.”
“Blair Witch” is the supposed footage found after three student filmmakers disappear in the woods of western Maryland while shooting a documentary about a legendary witch.
The filmmakers want us to believe the footage is real, the story is real, that three young people died and we are witnessing the final days of their lives. It isn’t. It’s all fiction.
But Eduardo Sanchez and Dan Myrick, who co-wrote and co-directed the film, take us to the edge of belief, squirming in our seats the whole way. It’s an ambitious and well-executed concept.
— Christy Lemire
“Saw” (2004)
The fright flick “Saw” is consistent, if nothing else.
This serial-killer tale is inanely plotted, badly written, poorly acted, coarsely directed, hideously photographed and clumsily edited, all these ingredients leading to a yawner of a surprise ending. To top it off, the music’s bad, too.
You could forgive all (well, not all, or even, fractionally, much) of the movie’s flaws if there were any chills or scares to this sordid little horror affair.
But “Saw” director James Wan and screenwriter Leigh Whannell, who developed the story together, have come up with nothing more than an exercise in unpleasantry and ugliness.
— David Germain
Germain gave “Saw” one star out of four.
“Paranormal Activity” (2009)
The no-budget ghost story “Paranormal Activity” arrives 10 years after “The Blair Witch Project,” and the two horror movies share more than a clever construct and shaky, handheld camerawork.
The entire film takes place at the couple’s cookie-cutter dwelling, its layout and furnishings indistinguishable from just about any other readymade home constructed in the past 20 years. Its ordinariness makes the eerie, nocturnal activities all the more terrifying, as does the anonymity of the actors adequately playing the leads.
The thinness of the premise is laid bare toward the end, but not enough to erase the horror of those silent, nighttime images seen through Micah’s bedroom camera. “Paranormal Activity” owns a raw, primal potency, proving again that, to the mind, suggestion has as much power as a sledgehammer to the skull.
— Glenn Whipp
Whipp gave “Paranormal Activity” three stars out of four.
“The Conjuring” (2013)
As sympathetic, methodical ghostbusters Lorraine and Ed Warren, Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson make the old-fashioned haunted-house horror film “The Conjuring” something more than your average fright fest.
“The Conjuring,” which boasts incredulously of being their most fearsome, previously unknown case, is built very in the ’70s-style mold of “Amityville” and, if one is kind, “The Exorcist.” The film opens with a majestic, foreboding title card that announces its aspirations to such a lineage.
But as effectively crafted as “The Conjuring” is, it’s lacking the raw, haunting power of the models it falls shy of. “The Exorcist” is a high standard, though; “The Conjuring” is an unusually sturdy piece of haunted-house genre filmmaking.
— Jake Coyle
Coyle gave “The Conjuring” two and half stars out of four.
“Get Out” (2017)
Fifty years after Sidney Poitier upended the latent racial prejudices of his white date’s liberal family in “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner,” writer-director Jordan Peele has crafted a similar confrontation with altogether more combustible results in “Get Out.”
In Peele’s directorial debut, the former “Key and Peele” star has — as he often did on that satirical sketch series — turned inside out even supposedly progressive assumptions about race. But Peele has largely left comedy behind in a more chilling portrait of the racism that lurks beneath smiling white faces and defensive, paper-thin protestations like, “But I voted for Obama!” and “Isn’t Tiger Woods amazing?”
It’s long been a lamentable joke that in horror films — never the most inclusive of genres — the Black dude is always the first to go. In this way, “Get Out” is radical and refreshing in its perspective.
— Jake Coyle
Coyle gave “Get Out” three stars out of four.
“Hereditary” (2018)
In Ari Aster’s intensely nightmarish feature-film debut “Hereditary,” when Annie (Toni Collette), an artist and mother of two teenagers, sneaks out to a grief-support group following the death of her mother, she lies to her husband Steve (Gabriel Byrne) that she’s “going to the movies.”
A night out with “Hereditary” is many things, but you won’t confuse it for an evening of healing and therapy. It’s more like the opposite.
Aster’s film, relentlessly unsettling and pitilessly gripping, has carried with it an ominous air of danger and dread: a movie so horrifying and good that you have to see it, even if you shouldn’t want to, even if you might never sleep peacefully again.
The hype is mostly justified.
— Jake Coyle
Coyle gave “Hereditary” three stars out of four.
Read the full review here. ___
Researcher Rhonda Shafner contributed from New York.
-
News20 hours ago
Freeland says she’s ready to deal with Trump |
-
News20 hours ago
NASA astronauts won’t say which one of them got sick after almost eight months in space
-
News20 hours ago
43 monkeys remain on the run from South Carolina lab. CEO thinks they’re having an adventure
-
News20 hours ago
Freeland rallies a united front ahead of Trump’s return to White House
-
News20 hours ago
Deputy minister appointed interim CEO of AIMCo after Alberta government fires board
-
News20 hours ago
Montreal says Quebec-Canada dispute stalling much-needed funding to help homeless
-
News20 hours ago
S&P/TSX composite index down Friday, Wall St. extends post-election gains
-
News20 hours ago
Mitch Marner powers Matthews-less Maple Leafs over Red Wings