Portrait of Pauline Boty by Lewis Morley, 1962. Courtesy of Lewis Morley and Gazelli Art House.
As a beautiful blonde woman, whose looks frequently distracted from her talent and intelligence, British Pop artist Pauline Boty felt a natural affinity with Marilyn Monroe. Boty painted her on a number of occasions, but while Andy Warhol and other male Pop artists tended to focus on Monroe as a passive sex symbol, Boty’s portrayals are more empathetic. In Colour Her Gone (1962), for instance, painted shortly after Monroe’s tragic death by suicide, Boty surrounds her heroine with roses, two grey abstract panels on either side. Only four years later, Boty herself would be dead at only 28 years old. Diagnosed with cancer while pregnant, she refused the treatment which may have saved her in order to save her child.
After her death, Boty fell into obscurity, although thankfully her sister-in-law Bridget Boty saved her paintings. It wasn’t until the 1990s, thanks to the work of art historians such as Sue Tate and David Alan Mellor, that the art world slowly began to appreciate her significance.
Pauline Boty, Colour Her Gone, 1962. Courtesy of Gazelli Art House.
Advertisement
Now, over two decades later, Boty finally seems poised to claim her rightful place in the canon. Last year she broke her auction record when With Love to Jean-Paul Belmondo (1962), her lustful portrayal of the French New Wave actor, sold for £1.2 million ($1.5 million) at Sotheby’s. In October, a new biography, Pauline Boty: British Pop Art’s Sole Sister, was published by journalist Marc Kristal, and a documentary, Boty: The Life and Times of a Forgotten Artist, is currently in production. The film will preview next February at Gazelli Art House in London, which is currently holding a Boty retrospective, “Pauline Boty: A Portrait.” Collectors, disappointed to discover that it was not a selling show, have joined a lengthy waiting list.
Nonetheless, the show is a comprehensive retrospective that allows visitors to see Boty’s portraits of film stars such as Belmondo and Monroe alongside her more political works, early collages, and stained-glass pieces. “What we have tried to do with this show is to portray an all-encompassing portrait of Pauline Boty,” Mila Askarova, director of Gazelli Art House and curator of the show, told Artsy via email. “We tried to incorporate the hard work that has been done to date of building on her legacy, and to champion this alongside the recent and ongoing projects that only feed into the importance of Boty as an artist and as a seminal figure representative of the times.”
Pauline Boty, With Love to Jean-Paul Belmondo, 1962. Courtesy of Gazelli Art House.
Boty’s star shined bright in her all-too-short career. She exhibited with all the leading figures of British Pop, including its godfather Peter Blake, and had a well-received solo show in London in 1963. She can be seen dancing joyfully with Blake in Ken Russell’s 1962 documentary Pop Goes the Easel and has a cheeky cameo opposite Michael Caine in the classic 1966 movie Alfie. Challenging societal stereotypes, she fearlessly embraced female sexuality, both in life and work, and brought a uniquely feminist perspective to British Pop art, which was virtually an all-boys club at the time.
“In a male-dominated movement, making work from a female perspective was truly radical,” Sue Tate, author of Pauline Boty: Pop Artist and Woman, said in an interview with Artsy. Boty’s feminism is perhaps most overt in It’s a Man’s World I (1964) and II (1964–65). The first painting is a collage painting of male figures from Elvis to Einstein, juxtaposed with images of fighter planes and the Kennedy assassination, while the second contains painted female nudes of the type that would appear in men’s magazines. The message, criticized by the work: Men can be sexually attractive and powerful while women are only allowed to be sex objects.
Pauline Boty, Monica Vitti with Heart, 1963. Courtesy of Gazelli Art House.
Not that Boty allowed this to affect her. “Boty spoke unusually openly about sex and explicitly linked women’s sexual repression to their social and political oppression,” said Tate. Being the very opposite of repressed, Boty discussed with her then-boyfriend how a female orgasm might be depicted visually. Describing hers as a series of orange balloons streaming out with a popping sound, she encoded this reference in the painting Red Manoeuvre (1962). Elsewhere, in 5-4-3-2-1 (1963), she celebrated the pleasure of dancing to pop music and the sexual anticipation it brought. A judiciously cropped banner on the right reads: “Oh For A FU…,” the phrase left cheekily unfinished.
But her feminism and sex-positive attitude was not the only thing that made Boty unique. “She was also very well-read and intellectual, mixing high and low culture in an innovative way that was unusual in Pop,” said Tate. “Avant-garde writers like Proust and Rimbaud feature in her work, alongside Elvis, Marilyn, and the Beatles.” While much Pop art reveled uncritically in mass culture, Tate noted that Boty brought a political critique to her work. Cuba Si (1963) salutes the Cuban revolution, while Count Down to Violence (1964) documents male violence across historical and geographical frames.
However, Boty’s refusal to conform to societal norms affected both her contemporary and posthumous reputation. “She didn’t fit into the prevailing stereotype of what a ‘woman artist’ should be—that is, someone unrelievedly serious and personally modest,” journalist Marc Kristal said in an interview with Artsy. As a result, he said, she was “portrayed in the press as more of a good-time dolly bird than a committed and original art-maker.”
Pauline Boty, Cuba Si, 1963. Courtesy of Gazelli Art House
Kristal noted that others weren’t always sure what to make of her: “Boty didn’t stick to one thing—she was an actress, activist, and social commentator—which, as her contemporary Derek Boshier observed, left many observers baffled,” he said.
“Boty was a very diverse artist, incorporating collage, lithography, stained glass, painting, and film: Each time, regardless of medium, she would bring in new elements—be it references to pop culture imagery or Victoriana,” said Gazelli Art House’s Askarova. “I think that willingness and ability to experiment, yet still retain a distinctive style, separated her into a league of her own.”
LONDON (AP) — With a few daubs of a paintbrush, the Brontë sisters have got their dots back.
More than eight decades after it was installed, a memorial to the three 19th-century sibling novelists in London’s Westminster Abbey was amended Thursday to restore the diaereses – the two dots over the e in their surname.
The dots — which indicate that the name is pronounced “brontay” rather than “bront” — were omitted when the stone tablet commemorating Charlotte, Emily and Anne was erected in the abbey’s Poets’ Corner in October 1939, just after the outbreak of World War II.
They were restored after Brontë historian Sharon Wright, editor of the Brontë Society Gazette, raised the issue with Dean of Westminster David Hoyle. The abbey asked its stonemason to tap in the dots and its conservator to paint them.
“There’s no paper record for anyone complaining about this or mentioning this, so I just wanted to put it right, really,” Wright said. “These three Yorkshire women deserve their place here, but they also deserve to have their name spelled correctly.”
It’s believed the writers’ Irish father Patrick changed the spelling of his surname from Brunty or Prunty when he went to university in England.
Raised on the wild Yorkshire moors, all three sisters died before they were 40, leaving enduring novels including Charlotte’s “Jane Eyre,” Emily’s “Wuthering Heights” and Anne’s “The Tenant of Wildfell Hall.”
Rebecca Yorke, director of the Brontë Society, welcomed the restoration.
“As the Brontës and their work are loved and respected all over the world, it’s entirely appropriate that their name is spelled correctly on their memorial,” she said.