adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Politics

Petty politics in Harbour Grace: A fight, video surveillance and a judge's admonishment – CBC.ca

Published

 on


A scuffle between Coun. Kevin Williams and citizen Tom Rose in the foyer of Harbour Grace Town Hall was captured on video. (Security footage provided to CBC)

The night an angry councillor chased a one-legged man with a heart condition out of the town hall in 2019 is a meeting people in Harbour Grace still talk about. 

The mayor himself had to break up what the grappling gentlemen would have called “fisticuffs” back in their day, and the RCMP arrived to warn both men to grow up, security video captured the contretemps (which would later be used as evidence).

300x250x1

And then there’s Bridget Rose. She is the unlikely legal protagonist in this yarn who would show that, sometimes, yes, you actually can fight town hall. 

But before we get to the judge’s gavel, let’s get to the meeting of Feb. 11, 2019, when Mayor Don Coombs brought down the hammer to stop a confusing altercation that looked like an assault. 

Starts as a heckle, ends as a tussle

Heckling from public galleries in Newfoundland is one of those violations of decorum for which a good number of electors in this province appear to have acquired a natural talent. Citizen Tom Rose was crammed into Harbour Grace’s intimate chambers when he got to his feet, set to deliver a rather unsubtle evaluation about the nature of Coun. Kevin Williams’s working relationship with Coombs. 

“Kevin, you’ve got shit on your neck,” he said. 

Williams blanched as Rose started to leave but managed to find a retort to defend his honour. It wasn’t much, but possibly better than nothing.

“You’ve got some brown on your nose too, Tom.”

Perhaps Williams felt he had been bested, or maybe the councillor was disappointed with the qualitative descent of political discourse in Harbour Grace that night; for whatever reason, Williams darted to follow Rose as he limped through the door into the lobby. That’s when both men found themselves in an unfriendly clasp that quickly turned into an ugly dance. 

Bridget Rose, wife of Tom Rose, proved to have a sharp, and successful, line of questioning that led to the judge to dismiss the legal application from Williams. (Eddy Kennedy/CBC)

The video clearly shows Williams opening the door to go after Rose, who quickly pivots on his good leg and manages to pin Williams back to the door. Rose raises his arm and makes a fist but just who is assaulting whom in this municipal melee is ambiguous. 

That’s when Coombs arrives at the entrance. His worship intercedes, grabbing Williams and hustling him back toward the town’s meeting space. 

The story could have ended there, and while you may think we passed bizarre a few paragraphs ago, this is where the story gets weird.

Williams came to view himself as the victim that night and so hired a lawyer to try to obtain a peace bond. He wanted a judge to determine that Tom Rose posed a threat to his personal safety, and his aim was to get a court restricting Rose’s movements — presumably to keep him from returning to the visitors’ gallery at the town hall.  

Don Coombs is the mayor of Harbour Grace. (Eddy Kennedy/CBC)

Bridget Rose’s courtroom debut

After the usual delays, cancellations and postponements, a court date was set for Sept. 19, and Bridget Rose, Tom’s wife, finally enters this story. 

The couple could not afford a lawyer, so Bridget studied up on peace bonds and entered the Harbour Grace courthouse prepared to defend her husband. 

Williams had lawyered up, and Coombs sat quietly in the hallway waiting to testify on his friend’s behalf.  

After Williams swore on the Bible, his lawyer had him recount the events described above. Williams — who was 77 years old at the time — went into detail about his diabetes (he required 180 units of insulin per day), his pills for high blood pressure, the two implants in his eyes, as well as his puffer use. 

The relative health problems of the two combatants would come up during Bridget Rose’s first-ever cross-examination. What follows is taken directly from the court’s audio recording. It tells the rest of the story.

Bridget Rose and Tom Rose are seen in this artist’s rendering during the, albeit brief, court proceedings.  (Illustration by Pete Soucy)

B. Rose: “When Mr. Rose said, ‘You have shit on your shoulders,’ can you tell the court what your reply was?”

Williams: “I can’t seem to remember.”

B. Rose: “You are 77?”

Williams: “Yes.”

B. Rose: “Mr. Rose is 62.… We understand you’re up there in your age and you’ve got complications. Mr. Rose here, he worked for this town for 25 years, you know, also got broken up. Multiple injuries to back, neck, hip. An amputated leg, seven heart attacks, high blood pressure. When this happened that night, you knew he had an artificial leg. It did not stop you from going after him, did it?”

Williams, seen here during court proceedings, did not comment for this story.  (Illustration by Pete Soucy)

Williams: “No.”

B. Rose: “You’re trying to tell this court that you fear my husband because of your health conditions, but he also has health conditions and a majority of things wrong with him… On February 11th when you went after him, did you show fear? Were you afraid?”

Williams: “No, I wasn’t aggressive.”

B. Rose: “Were you angry?”

Williams: “That’s natural.”

B. Rose: “You were not afraid, you were angry?” 

This is where Williams fell into Mrs. Rose’s trap. He said: “I’m not afraid of this man.”

A somewhat flummoxed Judge Greg Brown raised his hands, and with a somewhat chastising tone, told Williams and his lawyer, “He just under oath told me he is not afraid of the man. And for that reason I am going to dismiss this application.”

Brown went further: “It looks to me very much as though he was angry as he said he was.… He was pursuing Mr. Rose to essentially confront him.”

As the dispute between the one-legged man with the heart condition and the angry councillor came to a close, the judge offered advice to the courtroom and everyone in Harbour Grace about settling arguments: “Sometimes, taking a deep breath is better than rushing after someone.”

Author’s postscript: I started working on this story in February, right before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sadly, Tom Rose died a short time after. Bridget Rose has asked the Town of Harbour Grace to apologize to her family members for putting them through what she considers a frivolous legal process. Mayor Don Coombs told CBC News the town did lower flags to half-mast when Tom Rose died, as a sign of respect for his 25 years’ employment with the town. Efforts to contact Coun. Kevin Williams have so far been unsuccessful. 

Read more from CBC Newfoundland and Labrador

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Michael Taube: How a eulogy for a father made one political career — and perhaps another – National Post

Published

 on


The similarities between Caroline Mulroney’s eulogy for her father and Justin Trudeau’s homage to his ‘Papa’ were impossible to ignore

Article content

There were many heartfelt tributes to former prime minister Brian Mulroney during his state funeral at Montreal’s Notre-Dame Basilica on March 23. One that caught significant attention was the eulogy by his daughter, Caroline, a cabinet minister in Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s government.

The legion of family, friends and political cohorts that day had a good laugh over a particular remark that Mulroney made. “Speeches were such a major part of his life,” she said, “that he told us that when it was his turn to go up to what he called that great political rally in the sky, he wanted us to bury him with his podium.”

Advertisement 2

Article content

Article content

Indeed, it’s a great line — and it rings true in every fibre of its being!

That’s not what struck me about Mulroney’s speech, however. Rather, it was the passionate words, raw emotion and cadence she employed when describing her late father. She had lived in his massive (and unavoidable) shadow. His formidable presence followed her in every step she took — but in a good way. What he specifically meant to her, the family and our country was mapped out on one of the biggest stages she’ll ever encounter in her life.

So much so, that one person sitting in the Basilica — who also gave a eulogy — may have felt, if but for a fleeting moment, that he was experiencing déjà vu: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. (We’ll get to him shortly.)

“There was a destiny attached to my father, that even in his youth, no one could deny,” Mulroney said in one poignant moment. “Even prime minister (John) Diefenbaker at the peak of his powers, wrote a letter to my grandfather, extolling his son’s potential after his first encounter with my dad.”

She continued, “My dad saw the world in a bigger way than most. His humanity defined him. Which is why he transcended politics and connected with people in a way that left an indelible mark on their hearts and souls. In our grief, our family is comforted and so grateful for the universal outpouring of affection and admiration for what my father meant to them and to Canada.”

Article content

Advertisement 3

Article content

Her concluding lines tugged at the heartstrings of one’s soul. “We are heartbroken by our loss. We adored him. I miss you daddy.”

It was a wonderful eulogy that her father — who I knew, admired and respected — would have been proud of. Words mattered to him. He loved language and prose, and mastered them to perfection. The art of writing, speaking and storytelling were gifts from God.

When I watched Mulroney speak at the state funeral of her beloved father, I was instantly reminded of Trudeau’s eulogy at the state funeral of his beloved father.

The man who would become Canada’s 23rd prime minister was a relatively unknown figure when he walked to the lectern on Oct. 4, 2000. There had been various images of him in the media, but he had largely avoided the spotlight. His father’s massive shadow and formidable presence, much like Caroline Mulroney’s father, was always there — but in a good way.

When Trudeau spoke that day, it was the biggest audience of his young life. He did extremely well. His speech was emotional, powerful and deeply personal.

“Pierre Elliott Trudeau. The very words convey so many things to so many people,” he said. “Statesman, intellectual, professor, adversary, outdoorsman, lawyer, journalist, author, prime minister. But more than anything, to me, he was dad. And what a dad. He loved us with the passion and the devotion that encompassed his life. He taught us to believe in ourselves, to stand up for ourselves, to know ourselves and to accept responsibility for ourselves. We knew we were the luckiest kids in the world. And we had done nothing to actually deserve it.”

Advertisement 4

Article content

Recommended from Editorial

  1. Prime Minister Brian Mulroney with his wife Mila and Mikhail Gorbachev, at 24 Sussex Drive on May 29, 1990.

    Michael Taube: From trade to personal liberties, Brian Mulroney stood for freedom

  2. Caroline Mulroney speaks during the state funeral of her father, late former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney at Notre-Dame Basilica in Montreal on March 23, 2024.

    ‘There was a destiny attached to my father’: Read Caroline Mulroney’s eulogy for Brian Mulroney

There’s also this passage which perfectly encapsulates Trudeau’s love for his father and what he believed he did for the nation. “My father’s fundamental belief never came from a textbook. It stemmed from his deep love for and faith in all Canadians and over the past few days, with every card, every rose, every tear, every wave and every pirouette, you returned his love … He left politics in ’84, but he came back for Meech, he came back for Charlottetown, he came back to remind us of who we are and what we’re all capable of.”

And finally, this concluding sentiment. “But he won’t be coming back any more. It’s all up to us — all of us — now. The woods are lovely, dark and deep. He has kept his promises and earned his sleep. Je t’aime, Papa.”

Mulroney and Trudeau, much like their fathers, are different people with different strengths, weaknesses and political ideologies. The similarities are equally impossible to ignore. Scions of two impressive public figures. Children who walk in the giant footsteps their fathers left behind. Two impressive eulogies at different points in their lives and careers that will be remembered forever.

There’s one other similarity that could be on the horizon. Trudeau used his eulogy to springboard into the public eye, politics and leadership. Mulroney is already in the public eye and politics. She unsuccessfully ran for the Ontario PC leadership in 2019, but didn’t have the presence, confidence or speaking ability that she did during her eulogy. That moment has finally arrived, and it’s up to her to use it as wisely as Trudeau did.

National Post

Article content

Comments

Join the Conversation

This Week in Flyers

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Holder bows out of politics ahead of election – Telegraph-Journal

Published

 on


Former cabinet minister is the latest Tory rebel to exit politics

Article content

Progressive Conservative stalwart Trevor Holder, the province’s longest-serving MLA in the legislature, is bowing out of politics, becoming the latest Tory rebel to make that call ahead of the provincial election.

Advertisement 2

Article content

In the legislature Thursday, Holder, who has served the Saint John riding of Portland-Simonds for the last 25 years and was a cabinet minister under three premiers, made the announcement, thanking all his colleagues “regardless of political stripe” who later rose in the House to give him a round of applause.

Article content

“All I ever wanted – along with all of you – was a chance to help make (New Brunswick) better than it already is,” said Holder, who described himself as a “north-end kid” from Saint John.

Holder didn’t make himself available to the media after his announcement. He also didn’t formally resign on Thursday, sending a note out to reporters that he “won’t be back in May” but hasn’t “set the official date yet” for his resignation.

News of his exit comes less than a year after Holder resigned as the province’s minister of post-secondary education, training and labour, citing the impact of Premier Blaine Higgs’s top-down leadership style on caucus decision-making.

Holder was the second minister to resign from cabinet last June amid Tory caucus infighting over changes to the province’s gender identity policy for public school students.

Fellow Saint John MLA and Tory stalwart Dorothy Shephard was the first to resign from cabinet last summer, giving up her post as minister of social development before announcing last week she won’t reoffer in the upcoming election this fall.

Shephard also cited Higgs’s leadership style in her decision to leave cabinet.

Article content

Advertisement 3

Article content

During his speech Thursday, Holder made a point to thank Higgs “for the conversations over the last number of days leading up to my decision here.”

Higgs later told media he didn’t know Holder’s exact plans for the future but knew the Saint John MLA had “opportunities.”

“He’s a great statesman in the legislature and certainly his care for his community is genuine,” the premier said.

When asked if he had addressed Holder’s concerns about caucus decision-making, Higgs said he thought so but acknowledged he’s “always struggled with things not getting done at a certain level of pace.”

“It’s rare if you ever come out of caucus or cabinet with unanimous decisions,” he said.

“There’s always a degree of differences, and that’s not going to change, but leadership requires real decisions and you’re not everything to everybody, so you do what you believe is right and you do with it conviction and you hope it’s just the right thing to do.”

Holder ‘a truly progressive conservative’: Coon

Both opposition leaders spoke glowingly of Holder’s commitment to provincial politics.

“He was a real asset to the legislature, he was a real pleasure to work with, so it’s a loss to see him leaving the legislative assembly,” Liberal leader Susan Holt told media Thursday.

That was echoed by Green leader David Coon.

“(Holder’s) very committed to improving our system of government and he’s made real contributions to doing so,” Coon said. “I’m sad to see him go. He’s truly a progressive conservative in the truest meaning of that term.”

Advertisement 4

Article content

In his 16-minute speech, Holder spoke of the importance of bipartisanship, describing his relationship with former Liberal cabinet minister Victor Boudreau.

They used to “tear each other” up in the House, Holder recalled, but “when I was in opposition, (Boudreau) helped me with my constituents, and when I was in government, I did my best to do the same for him – and this is how this legislature needs to work.”

First elected at the age of 25 in June 1999, Holder has won a total of six elections over the course of his 25-year provincial political career. He’s a former minister of environment and local government, tourism and parks, wellness, culture and sport, and tourism, heritage and culture. He also served as deputy speaker.

Holder thanked his wife Brenda Thursday, along with their two daughters, Margaret and Katherine, for their support over the course of his political career.

Holder’s and Shephard’s departure announcements are the latest in a string of changes within the Tory caucus ahead of the election.

In February, fellow Saint John colleague Arlene Dunn abruptly resigned from her ministerial and MLA duties. Meanwhile, colleagues Daniel Allain, Jeff Carr and Ross Wetmore – who were part of the Tory rebels who supported a Liberal motion on Policy 713 changes – have announced they won’t reoffer in the next election.

Wetmore had announced his retirement intentions before the Policy 713 kerfuffle.

Fellow rebel Andrea Anderson-Mason, MLA for Fundy-The Isles-Saint John West, has yet to announce her plans.

Article content

Comments

Join the Conversation

This Week in Flyers

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Opinion: Canada's foreign policy and its domestic politics on Israel's war against Hamas are shifting – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


The vote in the House of Commons last week on Israel’s war against Hamas represents a shift in both Canada’s foreign policy and its domestic politics.

The Liberal government is now markedly more supportive of the rights of Palestinians and less supportive of the state of Israel than in the past. That shift mirrors changing demographics, and the increasing importance of Muslim voters within the Liberal coalition.

Both the Liberal and Conservative parties once voiced unqualified support for Israel’s right to defend itself from hostile neighbours. But the Muslim community is growing in Canada. Today it represents 5 per cent of the population, compared with 1 per cent who identify as Jewish.

300x250x1

Although data is sparse prior to 2015, it is believed that Muslim Canadians tended to prefer the Liberal Party over the Conservative Party. They were also less likely to vote than the general population.

But the Conservative Party under Stephen Harper deeply angered the community with talk about “barbaric cultural practices” and musing during the 2015 election campaign about banning public servants from wearing the niqab. Meanwhile, Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau was promising to bring in 25,000 Syrian refugees to Canada if elected.

These factors galvanized community groups to encourage Muslims to vote. And they did. According to an Environics poll, 79 per cent of eligible Muslims cast a ballot in the 2015 election, compared with an overall turnout of 68 per cent. Sixty-five per cent of Muslim voters cast ballots for the Liberal Party, compared with 10 per cent who voted for the NDP and just 2 per cent for the Conservatives. (Telephone interviews of 600 adults across Canada who self-identified as Muslim, were conducted between Nov. 19, 2015 and Jan. 23, 2016, with an expected margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points 19 times out of 20.)

Muslim Canadians also strongly supported the Liberals in the elections of 2019 and 2021. The party is understandably anxious not to lose that support. I’m told that Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly often mentions the large Muslim community in her Montreal riding. (According to the 2021 census, 18 per cent of the people in Ahuntsic-Cartierville identify as Muslim.)

This is one reason why the Liberal leadership laboured so mightily to find a way to support last week’s NDP motion that would, among other measures, have recognized the state of Palestine. The Liberal caucus was deeply divided on the issue. My colleague Marieke Walsh reports that dozens of Liberal MPs were prepared to vote for the NDP motion.

In the end, almost all Liberal MPs ended up voting for a watered-down version of the motion – statehood recognition was taken off the table – while three Liberal MPs voted against it. One of them, Anthony Housefather, is considering whether to remain inside the Liberal caucus.

This is not simply a question of political calculation. Many Canadians are deeply concerned over the sufferings of the people in Gaza as the Israel Defence Forces seek to root out Hamas fighters.

The Conservatives enjoy the moral clarity of their unreserved support for the state of Israel in this conflict. The NDP place greater emphasis on supporting the rights of Palestinians.

The Liberals have tried to keep both Jewish and Muslim constituencies onside. But as last week’s vote suggests, they increasingly accord a high priority to the rights of Palestinians and to the Muslim community in Canada.

As with other religious communities, Muslims are hardly monolithic. Someone who comes to Canada from Senegal may have different values and priorities than a Canadian who comes from Syria or Pakistan or Indonesia.

And the plight of Palestinians in Gaza may not be the only issue influencing Muslims, who struggle with inflation, interest rates and housing affordability as much as other voters.

Many new Canadians come from societies that are socially conservative. Some Muslim voters may be uncomfortable with the Liberal Party’s strong support for the rights of LGBTQ Canadians.

Finally, Muslim voters for whom supporting the rights of Palestinians is the ballot question may be drawn more to the NDP than the Liberals.

Regardless, the days of Liberal/Conservative bipartisan consensus in support of Israel are over. This is the new lay of the land.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending