adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

News

Police Brutality in Canada is been overlooked

Published

 on

Police Brutality

Black people and Indigenous peoples of Canada have been victims of Police Brutality In Canada. While there are many differences, there can, at times be overlooked or ignored by the very system that should protect them.

One trait of these lived realities is a refusal to accept it among many in the political class. Current and former political leaders, including Doug Ford and Stockwell Day, were quick to say that Canada is not a racist society.

Indigenous and Black people are overwhelmingly overrepresented in police-involved deaths in Canada. Between 2007 and 2017, Indigenous peoples represented one-third of people shot to death by RCMP police officers (Mercer, Fiddler, & Walsh, 2020). The Ontario Human Rights Commission found that a Black person was more than 20 times more likely to be shot and killed by the police compared to a white person (Ontario Human Rights Commission, 2018) and still nothing has been done to change this.

 

300x250x1

One in five Black people are not confident in police

Black people have and continue to experience various forms of racism, discrimination, and unfair treatment in Canada, many of which are specific to the criminal justice system. For example, Black people are overrepresented at many different stages of the criminal justice system, ranging from proactive and discretionary policing practices such as stops, charges, or arrests, through to incarceration (Owusu-Bempah et al. 2021Ontario Human Rights Commission 2021).

The 2020 General Social Survey (GSS) on Social Identity included questions on levels of confidence in various Canadian institutions, including the police and the justice system and courts.Note  While overall, more than half of people were confident in police, the proportions varied considerably between ethno-cultural groups. According to the 2020 GSS on Social Identity, seven in ten (70%) non-Indigenous, non-visible minority people 15 years of age and older were confident in the police, compared to about half of Black (54%) people (Table 1).

More than one in five (21%) Black people had little or no confidence in the police, which was the case for about one in ten (11%) non-Indigenous, non-visible minority people. The proportion of Black men (24%) and Black women (19%) who had little or no confidence in police did not differ significantly, but in both cases was higher than the proportions among non-Indigenous, non-visible minority men (12%) and women (8%).

Levels of confidence in the justice system and courts were similar among Black people and non-Indigenous, non-visible minority people, of whom just over half were confident (54% and 53%, respectively).

Certain measures of police performance more likely to be rated unfavourably by Black people

While the GSS on Social Identity asked more broadly about Canadian institutions, the GSS on Victimization focused more specifically on perceptions of different agents and aspects of the criminal justice system: namely, police, courts, prison, and parole. Respondents were asked if police, courts, prison, and parole were doing a good job, an average job, or a poor job across a variety of job or performance indicators. For the most part, police performance was evaluated similarly between Black people and those who were neither Indigenous nor visible minority people (Table 2).

Research on perceptions of police performance often distinguishes between operational and interpersonal elements (Sprott and Doob 2014Cotter 2015). Operational elements can include tasks that are, broadly speaking, more objectively measurable, such as promptly responding to calls and ensuring the safety of citizens. In contrast, interpersonal aspects are related to the relationship between police and the community they serve, such as being approachable or treating people fairly.

It was notable that while overall perceptions on operational measures were similar, there were significant differences in how police were seen in the interpersonal dimension. Black people were less likely to feel that police were doing a good job of being approachable and easy to talk to (41%) and treating people fairly (30%) compared with non-Indigenous, non-visible minority people (52% and 45%, respectively).

Black women and men had similar perceptions of these interpersonal measures. Four in ten Black women (42%E) and men (41%E) felt police were doing a good job being approachable, while three in ten (31%E each) felt police were doing a good job treating people fairly. Likewise, there were no significant differences between Black women and men for any of the operational measures included in the GSS (Chart 1).

Chart 1 start

Chart 1 Perceptions of police performance among the Black population, by gender, Canada, 2019

Data table for Chart 1

Chart 1 end

In all, three in ten Black (30%) people rated at least one element of local police performance poorly, a higher proportion than among non-Indigenous, non-visible minority people (19%). Similar proportions of Black women (32%) and men (26%) rated at least one aspect poorly.

Canadian-born Black people have more negative perceptions of police

Research and data on perceptions has shown that recent immigrants tend to be more positive in their perceptions of institutions, and perceptions tend to align more with the non-immigrant population over time and subsequent generations (Statistics Canada 2021bOwusu-Bempah et al. 2021Roder and Muhlau 2011). This was apparent when it came to perceptions of police performance among the Black population, with those born in Canada having considerably more negative perceptions. Among the Black Canadian-born population, 58%E rated at least one element of police performance poorly, compared with 20% of the non-Indigenous, non-visible minority population born in Canada.

In contrast, 15% of Black immigrants rated at least one aspect of police performance poorly, a result that was not different from the non-Indigenous, non-visible minority population and far below the proportion among Canadian-born Black people. For five of the six measures of police performance measured by the GSS, Black immigrants were more likely than Canadian-born Black people to state police were doing a good job (Chart 2).

Chart 2 start

Chart 2 Perceptions of police performance among the Black population, by immigrant status, Canada, 2019

Data table for Chart 2

Chart 2 end

Black people under 40 years of age view police more negatively

Black people under the age of 40 were more likely to rate at least one element of police performance poorly, when compared with their non-Indigenous, non-visible minority counterparts (41%E versus 24%). Specifically, three in ten (29%E) Black people under 40 felt that police were doing a poor job treating people fairly, three times higher than the proportion of non-Indigenous, non-visible minority people under 40 (9%).

When looking at the perceptions of those 40 years of age and over, however, Black people (17%) and non-Indigenous, non-visible minority people (17%) were equally likely to state that police were performing poorly in at least one aspect of their job. Previous analysis of perceptions of police has found that, in general, older people have more positive perceptions of police (Ibrahim 2020).

One-third of Black people had contact with police in past 12 months, similar to non-Indigenous, non-visible minority people

Recent analysis of the 2019 GSS found that recent encounters with police were associated with perceptions of police performance, even when controlling for other socio-economic and demographic characteristics (Ibrahim 2020). Largely due to the public-facing nature of their work, when people do come into direct contact with the justice system, it is most commonly with the police. This direct contact can have a considerable impact on general perceptions, in particular if this contact is perceived to be negative. Despite this, as many people do not have direct contact with police, factors other than contact can inform perceptions.

One-third (32%) of Black people had contact with police, a proportion that was not statistically different from non-Indigenous, non-visible minority people (36%) (Table 3). Contact with police could be for a variety of reasons, including through work, volunteering, or public information sessions, traffic violations, as a victim or witness to a crime, by being arrested, or due to personal or family-related problems with emotions, mental health, drugs, or alcohol. Though overall levels of contact were similar, when looking at the specific reasons for contact with police, Black people were less likely than non-Indigenous, non-visible minority people to have had contact through a public information session (3% versus 6%) or as a witness to a crime (3% versus 5%).

In addition to the type of contact, whether the interaction with police is seen as positive or negative can have an impact on overall perceptions of and confidence in police. Regardless of ethno-cultural group, according to the GSS, the majority of interactions with police in Canada were perceived as positive. Eight in ten (81%E) Black people felt that their experience with police was, on the whole, positive, not statistically different from the non-Indigenous, non-visible minority population (89%).

Although contact with police, particularly negative contact, can influence overall views of police, the majority of Black people did not have contact with police – and, those who did most often felt it was positive. This suggests that the more negative perceptions of police and lower levels of confidence among Black people are related to factors beyond individual experiences.

One potential factor is experiences of discrimination or other negative interactions, which can influence overall views of police. Furthermore, when discrimination or unfair treatment targets a particular group or community broadly, the negative impacts are felt by others who are part of that group, beyond the individuals who are directly impacted. Data from the 2019 GSS show that Black people were more likely than those who were non-Indigenous, non-visible minority to have been discriminated against in an interaction with police (Cotter 2022).

Of all Black people 15 years of age and older in Canada, 7% indicated having been discriminated against by police. This was similar to the proportion among Indigenous people (7%). Both Black and Indigenous people were far more likely than other visible minority (2%) or non-Indigenous, non-visible minority people (0.6%) to have experienced discrimination in this context.

Black immigrants have more positive perceptions of criminal courts in Canada

Many people, regardless of population group, stated that they did not know if courts or the prison or parole systems were doing a good, average, or poor job at a variety of aspects (Table 4). This may, in part, reflect the fact that relatively few Canadians have direct experience with the criminal courts.

Among those who did provide their perception of the work of criminal courts, Black people generally had a more positive perception than non-Indigenous, non-visible minority people. For example, the proportion of Black people who felt criminal courts were doing a good job at providing justice quickly (20%) and helping victims (28%) was more than double that among the non-Indigenous, non-visible minority population (8% and 12%, respectively).

These more positive perceptions were largely driven by the perspectives of Black immigrants, who were more likely to rate the performance of courts favourably than were Canadian-born Black people (Chart 3). Black immigrants were more likely than Canadian-born Black people to feel courts were doing a good job providing justice quickly, helping victims, and determining whether the accused person is guilty or not.

Chart 3 start

Chart 3 Perceptions of Canadian court performance among the Black population, by immigrant status, Canada, 2019

The notion of police being there to serve and protect in times of need often does not apply to Indigenous, Black or other racialized minorities in Canada.

Police need to be held accountable for their actions in 21st-century Canada.

 

News

Ontario Legislature keffiyeh ban remains, though Ford and opposition leaders ask for reversal – CBC.ca

Published

 on


Keffiyehs remain banned in the Ontario Legislature after a unanimous consent motion that would have allowed the scarf to be worn failed to pass at Queen’s Park Thursday.

That vote, brought forth by NDP Leader Marit Stiles, failed despite Premier Doug Ford and the leaders of the province’s opposition parties all stating they want to see the ban overturned. Complete agreement from all MPPs is required for a motion like this to pass, and there were a smattering of “nos” after it was read into the record.

In an email on Wednesday, Speaker Ted Arnott said the legislature has previously restricted the wearing of clothing that is intended to make an “overt political statement” because it upholds a “standard practice of decorum.”

300x250x1

“The Speaker cannot be aware of the meaning of every symbol or pattern but when items are drawn to my attention, there is a responsibility to respond. After extensive research, I concluded that the wearing of keffiyehs at the present time in our Assembly is intended to be a political statement. So, as Speaker, I cannot authorize the wearing of keffiyehs based on our longstanding conventions,” Arnott said in an email.

Speaking at Queen’s Park Thursday, Arnott said he would reconsider the ban with unanimous consent from MPPs.

“If the house believes that the wearing of the keffiyeh in this house, at the present time, is not a political statement, I would certainly and unequivocally accept the express will of the house with no ifs, ands or buts,” he said.

Keffiyehs are a commonly worn scarf among Arabs, but hold special significance to Palestinian people. They have been a frequent sight among pro-Palestinian protesters calling for an end to the violence in Gaza as the Israel-Hamas� war continues.

Premier calls for reversal

Ford said Thursday he’s hopeful Arnott will reverse the ban, but he didn’t say if he would instruct his caucus to support the NDP’s motion.

In a statement issued Wednesday, Ford said the decision was made by the speaker and nobody else.

“I do not support his decision as it needlessly divides the people of our province. I call on the speaker to reverse his decision immediately,” Ford said.

WATCH | Ford talks Keffiyeh ban: 

Ford says division over keffiyeh ‘not healthy’

12 hours ago

Duration 1:20

Ontario Premier Doug Ford reiterated Thursday that he does not support Speaker Ted Arnott banning keffiyehs in the Ontario Legislature because they are “intended to be a political statement,” as Arnott said in an email Wednesday.

PC Party MPP Robin Martin, who represents Eglinton–Lawrence, voted against the unanimous consent motion Thursday and told reporters she believes the speaker’s initial ruling was the correct one.

“We have to follow the rules of the legislature, otherwise we politicize the entire debate inside the legislature, and that’s not what it’s about. What it’s about is we come there and use our words to persuade, not items of clothing.”

When asked if she had defied a directive from the premier, Martin said, “It has nothing to do with the premier, it’s a decision of the speaker of the legislative assembly.”

Stiles told reporters Thursday she’s happy Ford is on her side on this issue, but added she is disappointed the motion didn’t pass.

“The premier needs to talk to his people and make sure they do the right thing,” she said.

Robin Martin answers questions from reporters.
PC Party MPP Robin Martin voted against a unanimous consent motion Thursday that would have overturned a ban on Keffiyehs at Queen’s Park. (Pelin Sidki/CBC)

Stiles first urged Arnott to reconsider the ban in an April 12 letter. She said concerns over the directive first surfaced after being flagged by members of her staff, however they have gained prominence after Sarah Jama, Independent MPP for Hamilton Centre, posted about the issue on X, formerly Twitter.

Jama was removed from the NDP caucus for her social media comments on the Israel-Hamas war shortly after Oct. 7. 

Jama has said she believes she was kicked out of the party because she called for a ceasefire in Gaza “too early” and because she called Israel an “apartheid state.”

Arnott told reporters Thursday that he began examining a ban on the Keffiyeh after one MPP made a complaint about another MPP, who he believes was Jama, who was wearing one.

Liberals also call for reversal

Ontario Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie also called for a reversal of the ban on Wednesday night.

“Here in Ontario, we are home to a diverse group of people from so many backgrounds. This is a time when leaders should be looking for ways to bring people together, not to further divide us. I urge Speaker Arnott to immediately reconsider this move to ban the keffiyeh,” Crombie said.

WATCH | An explainer on the cultural significance of keffiyehs:  

Keffiyeh: How it became a symbol of the Palestinian people

4 months ago

Duration 3:08

Keffiyehs are a common garment across the Arab world, but they hold a special meaning in the Palestinian resistance movement.

Stiles said MPPs have worn kilts, kirpans, vyshyvankas and chubas in the legislature, saying such items of clothing not only have national and cultural associations, but have also been considered at times as “political symbols in need of suppression.”

She said Indigenous and non-Indigenous members have also dressed in traditional regalia and these items cannot be separated from their historical and political significance. 

“The wearing of these important cultural and national clothing items in our Assembly is something we should be proud of. It is part of the story of who we are as a province,” she said.

“Palestinians are part of that story, and the keffiyeh is a traditional clothing item that is significant not only to them but to many members of Arab and Muslim communities. That includes members of my staff who have been asked to remove their keffiyehs in order to come to work. This is unacceptable.”

Stiles added that House of Commons and other provincial legislatures allow the wearing of keffiyehs in their chambers and the ban makes Ontario an “outlier.”

Suppression of cultural symbols part of genocide: MPP

Jama said on X that the ban is “unsurprising” but “nonetheless concerning” in a country that has a legacy of colonialism. “Part of committing genocide is the forceful suppression of cultural identity and cultural symbols,” she said in part. 

Sarah Jama
Sarah Jama, Independent MPP for Hamilton Centre, is pictured here outside her office in the Ontario Legislature wearing a keffiyeh. (Sarah Jama/Twitter)

“Seeing those in power in this country at all levels of government, from federal all the way down to school boards, aid Israel’s colonial regime with these tactics in the oppression of Palestinian people proves that reconciliation is nothing but a word when spoken by state powers,” she said.

Amira Elghawaby, Canada’s Special Representative on Combatting Islamophobia, said on X that it is “deeply ironic” on that keffiyehs were banned in the Ontario legislature on the 42nd anniversary of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

“This is wrong and dangerous as we have already seen violence and exclusion impact Canadians, including Muslims of Palestinian descent, who choose to wear this traditional Palestinian clothing,” Elghawaby said.

Protesters who blocked a rail line in Toronto on Tuesday wear keffiyehs. The protest was organized by World Beyond War on April 16, 2024.
Protesters who blocked a rail line in Toronto on Tuesday are shown here wearing keffiyehs. The protest was organized by World Beyond War on April 16, 2024. (Evan Mitsui/CBC)

Arnott said the keffiyeh was not considered a “form of protest” in the legislature prior to statements and debates that happened in the House last fall.

“These items are not absolutes and are not judged in a vacuum,” he said.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Best in Canada: Jets Beat Canucks to Finish Season as Top Canadian Club – The Hockey News

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Best in Canada: Jets Beat Canucks to Finish Season as Top Canadian Club  The Hockey News

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Health Canada sperm donation rules changing for gay men – CTV News

Published

 on


Health Canada will change its longstanding policy restricting gay and bisexual men from donating to sperm banks in Canada, CTV News has learned.

The federal health agency has adopted a revised directive removing the ban on gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, effective May 8.

The policy change would remove the current donor screening criteria, allowing men who have sex with men to legally donate sperm for the first time in more than 30 years, as part of the anonymous donation process.

300x250x1

This update comes after CTV News first reported last year that a gay man was taking the federal government to court, challenging the constitutionality of the policy on the basis that it violates the right to equality in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 

According to an email Health Canada sent stakeholders informing them of the upcoming amendments to the federal directive, “sperm donors will instead be asked gender-neutral, sexual behaviour-based donor screening questions,” more in-line with the 2022 change made by Canadian Blood Services to its donation policy. 

However, instead of entirely eradicating restrictions for gay and bisexual men, lawyer Gregory Ko – whose client, Aziz M., brought the case – cautioned that Health Canada will continue to bar donations from those who have had new or multiple partners in the last three months, based on rules regarding anal sex. CTV News has agreed to protect the full identity of Aziz M. out of concerns for his privacy.

Ko said while the update is an important milestone, his client intends to maintain his challenge against the Health Canada directive, “and the continued discrimination contained in this latest revision.”

“Based on our understanding of the science, there is no scientific justification for screening criteria that continues to discriminate on the basis of sexual activity and sexual orientation, since the testing and quarantine protocols already in place allow sperm banks to detect relevant infections and exclude such donations,” Ko said.

Currently, a Health Canada directive prohibits gay and bisexual men from donating sperm to a sperm bank for general use, unless they’ve been abstinent for three months or are donating to someone they know.

For example, it stops any gay man who is sexually active from donating, even if they are in a long-term monogamous relationship.

Under the “Safety of Sperm and Ova Regulation,” sperm banks operating in Canada must deem these prospective donors “unsuitable,” despite all donations being subject to screening, testing and a six-month quarantine before they can be used.

While the directive does not mention transgender or non-binary donors, the policy also applies to individuals who may not identify as male but would be categorized as men under the directive.

It’s a blanket policy that the Toronto man bringing the lawsuit said made him feel like a “second-class citizen,” and goes to the heart of the many barriers that exist for LGBTQ2S+ Canadians looking to have children.

When CTV News first reported on the lawsuit, Health Canada and various federal ministers said they would be “exploring” a policy change, citing the progress made on blood donation rules.

The update comes following “the consultations held in August 2023 and January 2024,” according to Health Canada.

This is a breaking news story, more to come… 

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending