Politics, as usual, resumes in Quebec assembly, as opposition blocks recovery bill - iPolitics.ca | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Politics, as usual, resumes in Quebec assembly, as opposition blocks recovery bill – iPolitics.ca

Published

 on


QUEBEC – The three opposition parties in the Quebec National Assembly combined Friday to block a bill that would have given the provincial government sweeping powers to speed up $3 billion in infrastructure projects.

The defeat of Bill 61, “to restart Québec’s economy and to mitigate the consequences of the public health emergency” comes three months after the first pandemic news conference of Premier François Legault.

READ MOREQuebec to accelerate environment assessments, expropriations to restart economy

Before the showdown, opposition members praised Legault for his handling of the COVID-19 crisis, recalling how they stepped aside to give the premier the spotlight and a leadership role.

They also recalled how, in the background, opposition members maintained contacts with ministers in the Coalition Avenir Québec government and proposed ideas that the government followed up on.

Pascal Bérubé, interim Parti Québécois leader, did note that Legault seemed annoyed in their telephone conversation when Montreal Gazette reporter Aaron Derfel reported a high number of deaths in Maison Herron, a West Island Montreal seniors’ residence.

“It was major and showed the vulnerability in long-term care,” Bérubé said.

Bérubé said Quebecers had confidence in the premier in dealing with the pandemic, and that confidence extended to the opposition parties.

All that changed with the introduction of Bill 61, which under assembly rules required unanimous consent. In the Quebec assembly bills introduced after mid-May can only be adopted unanimously. 

And Bérubé, who was a close collaborator of Legault when they were both in the PQ, said that in his recent media briefings, Legault has been less concerned with public health and more concerned with his political agenda.

As Manon Massé of Québec solidaire noted, with 5,148 deaths, Quebec counts for more than half Canada’s COVID-19 fatalities.

Deaths per 100,000 in Quebec from COVID-19 stand at 628, compared with 258 per 100,000 for Canada as a whole.

Legault, presenting a motion Friday calling for a minute of silence for those who have died, noted that of the total about 500 were in the general population, with deaths in long-term care accounting for 90 per cent of the total and another 8 per cent among other seniors, 60 and over.

Still, Legault’s stewardship is well regarded by Quebecers.

A Léger poll last week indicated 90 per cent satisfaction among French speakers and 83 per cent satisfaction overall.

Legault’s CAQ won a majority government in 2018, with 37.4 per cent of the vote.

In the Léger poll, the CAQ scored 54 per cent, or 64 per cent among the francophone majority.

Perhaps feeling invincible, with that satisfaction rating, Legault’s government in Bill 61 proposed measures to reduce what Legault termed delays of 11 months to secure environmental approval for a new long-term care residence, school or hospital, and another 18 months for expropriation.

His ministers said it could take five to seven years to build a new hospital.

One sticking point was a section of Bill 61, dropped in an effort to mollify opposition to the bill, that would have allowed the government to modify or suspend the rules for public contracts by cabinet order, allowing contracts to be awarded without bids.

At public hearings, this shortcut was seen as a possible return to the corruption and collusion that has plagued Quebec’s construction sector.

The public health emergency, granting powers to the Quebec health minister to deal with the pandemic, and empowering police to enforce rules restricting public gatherings, was first declared March 13.

It now must be renewed every 11 days.

READ MOREQuebec assembly resumes, new Liberal leader makes debut

Bill 61 proposed that it be extended as long as the government deemed fit, with Treasury Board President Christian Dubé saying it could last two years, and for some aspects as long as five years.

The Quebec Bar, representing lawyers in the province, said in testimony at the assembly that there is a reason the cabinet must regularly reconsider emergency powers, as a safeguard.

Dubé proposed an amendment limiting the emergency to Oct. 2, but still renewable.

In addition to public hearings, in her annual report Quebec’s auditor-general revealed that the Quebec Transport Department still lacks 255 engineers and technicians, needed to monitor and control costs on construction projects.

Auditor-General Guylaine Leclerc also told the committee Quebec’s health department has 1,000 different information technology systems, none of which can communicate with the others.

And Quebec’s sustainable development commissioner in his report this week said Quebec will not meet its goal of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions by 37.5 per cent in 2030, still below the Paris Agreement’s target of a 50-per-cent reduction by 2030.

Environmentalist groups said shortcuts to secure environmental approval could further endanger the state of nature in Quebec and in particular wetlands.

Dubé presented his amendments after the hearings, but the opposition parties judged them inadequate.

Liberal Gaétan Barrette and Vincent Marissal, of Québec solidaire, presented stripped-down versions of Bill 61, removing the contentious sections and adding anti-corruption safeguards, in a bid to compromise.

But the government dug in, pointing out that Quebec’s mayors, in particular Montreal Mayor Valérie Plante and Quebec City’s Régis Labeaume, were calling for the adoption of Bill 61.

When the government proposed a vote on second reading, approval in principle, the opposition parties said they would not agree.

READ MOREQuebec budget promises $6.7-billion investment in green economy

Deputy Speaker Maryse Gaudreault asked if there was consent to continue the debate, and in the absence of consent, Gaudreault adjourned the assembly, as planned, until Sept. 15.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Politics

Beyoncé, whose ‘Freedom’ is Harris’ campaign anthem, is expected at Democrat’s Texas rally on Friday

Published

 on

 

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Beyoncé is expected to appear Friday in her hometown of Houston at a rally for Vice President Kamala Harris, according to three people familiar with the matter.

Harris’ presidential campaign has taken on Beyonce’s 2016 track “Freedom” as its anthem, and the singer’s planned appearance brings a high-level of star power to what has become a key theme of the Democratic nominee’s bid: freedom.

Harris will head to the reliably Republican state just 10 days before Election Day in an effort to refocus her campaign against former President Donald Trump on reproductive care, which Democrats see as a make-or-break issue this year.

The three people were not authorized to publicly discuss the matter and spoke on condition of anonymity. The Harris campaign did not immediately comment.

Beyoncé‘s appearance was expected to draw even more attention to the event — and to Harris’ closing message.

Harris’ Houston trip is set to feature women who have been affected by Texas’ restrictive abortion laws, which took effect after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. She has campaigned in other states with restrictive abortion laws, including Georgia, among the seven most closely contested states.

Harris has centered her campaign around the idea that Trump is a threat to American freedoms, from reproductive and LGBTQ rights to the freedom to be safe from gun violence.

Beyonce gave Harris permission early in her campaign to use “Freedom,” a soulful track from her 2016 landmark album “Lemonade,” in her debut ad. Harris has used its thumping chorus as a walk-out song at rallies ever since.

Beyoncé’s alignment with Harris isn’t the first time that the Grammy winner has aligned with a Democratic politician. Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, danced as Beyoncé performed at a presidential inaugural ball in 2009.

In 2013, she sang the national anthem at Obama’s second inauguration. Three years later, she and her husband Jay-Z performed at a pre-election concert for Democrat Hillary Clinton in Cleveland.

“Look how far we’ve come from having no voice to being on the brink of history — again,” Beyoncé said at the time. “But we have to vote.”

A January poll by Ipsos for the anti-polarization nonprofit With Honor found that 64% of Democrats had a favorable view of Beyonce compared with just 32% of Republicans. Overall, Americans were more likely to have a favorable opinion than an unfavorable one, 48% to 33%.

Speculation over whether the superstar would appear at this summer’s Democratic National Convention in Chicago reached a fever pitch on the gathering’s final night, with online rumors swirling after celebrity news site TMZ posted a story that said: “Beyoncé is in Chicago, and getting ready to pop out for Kamala Harris on the final night of the Democratic convention.” The site attributed it to “multiple sources in the know,” none of them named.

About an hour after Harris ended her speech, TMZ updated its story to say, “To quote the great Beyoncé: We gotta lay our cards down, down, down … we got this one wrong.” In the end, Harris took the stage to star’s song, but that was its only appearance.

Last year, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, attended Beyoncé’s Renaissance World Tour in Maryland after getting tickets from Beyonce herself. “Thanks for a fun date night, @Beyonce,” Harris wrote on Instagram.

___

Long and Kinnard reported from Washington. Associated Press writer Linley Sanders in Washington contributed to this report. Kinnard can be reached at

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP promises to work with Ottawa on homeless supports if elected

Published

 on

 

PRINCE ALBERT, Sask. – Saskatchewan NDP Leader Carla Beck says her party would collaborate with the federal government to work out the best deal for solving homelessness if elected on Monday.

Federal Housing Minister Sean Fraser has said he sent a letter last month to provinces and territories asking them to work with Ottawa to find shelter for those experiencing homelessness.

The minister has said the government plans to directly hand out funding to Regina and Saskatoon since the province hadn’t responded to the offer before entering an election period.

Beck says it’s important to have a provincial leader who would sit down with federal officials to work out proper deals for Saskatchewan residents.

She says Saskatchewan should be working with municipalities and the federal government to ensure they can provide services for homeless populations.

Beck has said an NDP government would introduce rent caps, make vacant provincial housing units available to families and increase the supply of rental units.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 24, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

NDP plan motion to push back against anti-abortion ‘creep’ from Conservatives

Published

 on

 

OTTAWA – The NDP is taking aim at the Conservatives on abortion by putting forward a motion to push back against what it calls a “creep” of legislation, petitions and threats aimed at reducing access to abortion.

Leader Jagmeet Singh says his party will use its next opposition day to force the House of Commons to debate and vote on a motion calling for urgent action to improve abortion access.

Singh claimed that anti-choice Conservative MPs are “often calling the shots” in the Official Opposition, and that leader Pierre Poilievre has “let his MPs bring in anti-choice laws, anti-choice motions.”

“There is a real threat from the Conservatives,” he said, speaking to the media at a news conference in Montreal.

A spokesperson for Poilievre did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The NDP in its press release cited several examples of what it called “anti-choice” moves from the Tories, including a petition presented earlier this year by a Conservative MP that claimed more than 98 per cent of abortions “are for reasons of social or personal convenience.”

Poilievre said at the time he disagreed with the petition.

He has previously called himself “pro-choice” and said he would not pass laws that restrict reproductive choices if he is elected.

“When I am prime minister, no laws or rules will be passed that restrict women’s reproductive choices. Period,” Poilievre said in a statement in June addressing the petition.

Conservative MP Cathy Wagantall introduced a private member’s bill last year to encourage judges to consider a victim’s pregnancy as an aggravating factor in sentencing.

The Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada urged MPs to vote against the bill on the grounds that it promoted fetal rights, even though the bill’s text didn’t mention fetal rights.

Liberal ministers called the bill an effort to reopen the abortion debate in Canada.

Wagantall, who has been clear that she opposes abortion, said Bill C-311 had nothing to do with abortion.

At the time, a spokesperson for Poilievre said he planned to vote in favour of the bill.

Speaking in Montreal on Thursday, Singh also called out the governing Liberals, saying they haven’t done enough to improve abortion access in Canada.

“This vote is very important, but it’s also important that the vote on this motion is about not just the Conservative threat, but the lack of action of the Liberals,” said Singh, adding that access to abortion in Canada is “getting worse, not better.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 24, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version