Politics of hope - The Times of India Blog | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Politics of hope – The Times of India Blog

Published

 on


While the world is reeling with economic tremors, nature’s fury and political earthquakes – we have been driven into the trenches of truth, conscience and grit to finally own up to the collapse of old socio-economic institutions. 

Politics today constitutes ‘Us versus Them’ thinking – “My Party is better than your Party, your candidate is a criminal while mine is a saint, my philosophy is the only valid philosophy while yours is a hoax.” It is exhausting – these politics are built on malevolence, oppression, and dogma. Harnessing the powers of hatred, fear, bigotry, racism, and greed – in the coming days, will not withstand the surge of a new generation rising up to burn away Collective Hatred with Collective Love. Politicians, corporate authorities, tarnished institutions – will NOT survive the uprising of decency, dignity and inclusiveness.

The world is powerfully seeking politics that is not built on division, but on civic engagement, empathy, more social capital and peace. 

Polarized politics has paralysed societal well-being. We are helplessly witnessing our elected representatives scrabbling for the steering wheel, driving the bus with all of us jingbanging in it – straight into the abyss. 

Here’s a new approach.

Many believe that by getting rid of the ‘bad’ people, the system would be refreshed. But the problem is, when you shoot down one bad guy, another will simply take his place. There’s no shortage of ‘their’ kind! Why? Because, as a bunch of awakened social warriors have been pointing out to us- IT ISN’T THE BAD GUYS CREATING THIS SOCIAL SYSTEM. IT IS THE SOCIAL SYSTEM WHICH IS CREATING THE BAD GUYS. Bad guys are the external symptom of a deeper problem.

So what is the root cause of our systemic collapse? One answer – SEPARATION. A false sense of separation between ‘me’ and ‘you’, ‘us’ and ‘them’. Separation seeds seismic catastrophe. 

We have witnessed an international lurch towards pseudo-nationalism, politics of mocking and shaming, outrage, secession, economy founded on unfettered consumerism and irresponsible self-indulgence.

Our laws, governments and trade are built on an OUTDATED industrial era that promised equality, identity and dignity to all. But clearly, as we are seeing, this model isn’t working now. It worked once, creating massive industrial advance. It doubled life expectancy, promised all a sense of ‘belonging’ and ‘progress’, heralded a greater, better, free society. It ran out of steam though. Where do we stand today? 82% men and 92% women in India earn less than Rs 10,000 a month (2018 report by Azim Premji University). It isn’t a trivial statement to say that our system truly is one that keeps the rich getting richer and poor getting poorer. It’s time for a change. And it is within the power of this generation to eradicate poverty and create fairer systems for all.

The solution, however, does not lie in hating the authoritarians we have created. Oh yes, it’s us who have created them. This is where we return to the root cause of the ‘separatist mentality’. 

What if we had raised children by rewarding them for their kindness, concern and efforts to care for our society – instead of telling them they will only be respected if they are ‘richer’, ‘more clever and diplomatic’, ‘better’ than their peers?

What if we admired and respected people in society for their contribution to the collective, rather than fostering competition, drooling for individual attainment, oblivious to all else?

What if we stopped idolizing and bootlicking ‘The top 100 billionaires of the planet’, and started cherishing and emulating ‘the top 50 people who have made a maximum social impact in the world’, ‘the top 100 executives who have contributed the maximum to poverty eradication or housing or healthcare’, ‘the top 500 who have healed the planet’? What if we shift our world-views to prioritize collective upliftment instead of dog-eat-dog businesses, rat races, and crow feasts?

What if we prioritize ‘being human’ – before being Indian, Hindu, Muslim, Christian? What if we cared more for the planet instead of the industry? What if we spend more on people’s development than on militarization? What if corporate turnover traded-off mindless innovation and endless profit-making for social responsibility (what’s the point of expanding the economy if that economy is not reaching those who most need it!)? What if each and every one of us replaces obtuse consumerism with care for our community? What if we admire ‘that woman who fights for human rights’ more than the socialite concerned with nothing more than flaunting her luxury lifestyle? What if we gave up all this superficiality for more meaningful lives?

The Roosevelt Institute revealed that ~80% of corporate profits are used by companies for share buybacks, not for employee imbursement. About 25% goes to the CEO alone.  Instead of the mentality of ‘giving people employment’, like throwing grains to pigeons, what if corporate honchos came to the realization that ‘it is employees who make the company and create their business, instead of the other way round?’ What if there was transparency, no tax rebates for the elite and fairer distribution of profits?

We would see 100% poverty eradication in less than a decade. 

As for politics, we need to stop putting one man or one ideology on a pedestal. Here’s the only truth:

1) Every political party makes good decisions and bad decisions. It will forever be so. No one can please all.

2) Every political figure – is ultimately human. And like all humans, he will be a mosaic of good and bad, wise and unwise. So somewhere along the way, the ‘corrupt’ politician will take a few good steps, and the ‘self-sacrificing, moral’ politician- will err. It is human nature.

3) Society clinging to one person or one party, while de-humanizing and shaming others – is the formula for the downfall. Instead, what if we evaluated each policy individually for what it is, instead of hating the people behind that policy? What if we created platforms for more voices to be heard on every national decision, so the onus does not fall on one weak human being? The moment we let go of bias – either for or against a person/party – and focus on outcomes we want to create, the system will change

Our capacity for empathy can overcome almost any fault in our systems. What if each one of us celebrated leaders who stand for empathy – with each vote? We cannot fight this Crisis of Hate, Crisis of Truth and Crisis of Health – with MORE hatred, MORE violence and MORE outrage. What if we find ways to fight these battles with COMPASSION, even for the misguided ‘elite’ holding power?  What if we stopped weaponizing fear-mongering, simply put all hateful voices on mute- leaving them to fend for themselves instead of being punitive (eventually, they will make themselves obsolete) and instead start incentivizing fresh, powerful voices of inclusiveness and collective responsibility?

It would be a turning point, for sure.

DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author’s own.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

News

Virginia Democrats advance efforts to protect abortion, voting rights, marriage equality

Published

 on

 

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Democrats who control both chambers of the Virginia legislature are hoping to make good on promises made on the campaign trail, including becoming the first Southern state to expand constitutional protections for abortion access.

The House Privileges and Elections Committee advanced three proposed constitutional amendments Wednesday, including a measure to protect reproductive rights. Its members also discussed measures to repeal a now-defunct state constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and ways to revise Virginia’s process to restore voting rights for people who served time for felony crimes.

“This meeting was an important next step considering the moment in history we find ourselves in,” Democratic Del. Cia Price, the committee chair, said during a news conference. “We have urgent threats to our freedoms that could impact constituents in all of the districts we serve.”

The at-times raucous meeting will pave the way for the House and Senate to take up the resolutions early next year after lawmakers tabled the measures last January. Democrats previously said the move was standard practice, given that amendments are typically introduced in odd-numbered years. But Republican Minority Leader Todd Gilbert said Wednesday the committee should not have delved into the amendments before next year’s legislative session. He said the resolutions, particularly the abortion amendment, need further vetting.

“No one who is still serving remembers it being done in this way ever,” Gilbert said after the meeting. “Certainly not for something this important. This is as big and weighty an issue as it gets.”

The Democrats’ legislative lineup comes after Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin, to the dismay of voting-rights advocates, rolled back a process to restore people’s civil rights after they completed sentences for felonies. Virginia is the only state that permanently bans anyone convicted of a felony from voting unless a governor restores their rights.

“This amendment creates a process that is bounded by transparent rules and criteria that will apply to everybody — it’s not left to the discretion of a single individual,” Del. Elizabeth Bennett-Parker, the patron of the voting rights resolution, which passed along party lines, said at the news conference.

Though Democrats have sparred with the governor over their legislative agenda, constitutional amendments put forth by lawmakers do not require his signature, allowing the Democrat-led House and Senate to bypass Youngkin’s blessing.

Instead, the General Assembly must pass proposed amendments twice in at least two years, with a legislative election sandwiched between each statehouse session. After that, the public can vote by referendum on the issues. The cumbersome process will likely hinge upon the success of all three amendments on Democrats’ ability to preserve their edge in the House and Senate, where they hold razor-thin majorities.

It’s not the first time lawmakers have attempted to champion the three amendments. Republicans in a House subcommittee killed a constitutional amendment to restore voting rights in 2022, a year after the measure passed in a Democrat-led House. The same subcommittee also struck down legislation supporting a constitutional amendment to repeal an amendment from 2006 banning marriage equality.

On Wednesday, a bipartisan group of lawmakers voted 16-5 in favor of legislation protecting same-sex marriage, with four Republicans supporting the resolution.

“To say the least, voters enacted this (amendment) in 2006, and we have had 100,000 voters a year become of voting age since then,” said Del. Mark Sickles, who sponsored the amendment as one of the first openly gay men serving in the General Assembly. “Many people have changed their opinions of this as the years have passed.”

A constitutional amendment protecting abortion previously passed the Senate in 2023 but died in a Republican-led House. On Wednesday, the amendment passed on party lines.

If successful, the resolution proposed by House Majority Leader Charniele Herring would be part of a growing trend of reproductive rights-related ballot questions given to voters. Since 2022, 18 questions have gone before voters across the U.S., and they have sided with abortion rights advocates 14 times.

The voters have approved constitutional amendments ensuring the right to abortion until fetal viability in nine states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Ohio and Vermont. Voters also passed a right-to-abortion measure in Nevada in 2024, but it must be passed again in 2026 to be added to the state constitution.

As lawmakers debated the measure, roughly 18 members spoke. Mercedes Perkins, at 38 weeks pregnant, described the importance of women making decisions about their own bodies. Rhea Simon, another Virginia resident, anecdotally described how reproductive health care shaped her life.

Then all at once, more than 50 people lined up to speak against the abortion amendment.

“Let’s do the compassionate thing and care for mothers and all unborn children,” resident Sheila Furey said.

The audience gave a collective “Amen,” followed by a round of applause.

___

Associated Press writer Geoff Mulvihill in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, contributed to this report.

___

Olivia Diaz is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Trump chooses anti-vaccine activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as health secretary

Published

 on

 

NEW YORK (AP) — President-elect Donald Trump says he will nominate anti-vaccine activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, putting him in charge of a massive agency that oversees everything from drug, vaccine and food safety to medical research and the social safety net programs Medicare and Medicaid.

“For too long, Americans have been crushed by the industrial food complex and drug companies who have engaged in deception, misinformation, and disinformation when it comes to Public Health,” Trump said in a post on his Truth Social site announcing the appointment. Kennedy, he said, would “Make America Great and Healthy Again!”

Kennedy, a former Democrat who ran as an independent in this year’s presidential race, abandoned his bid after striking a deal to give Trump his endorsement with a promise to have a role in health policy in the administration.

He and Trump have since become good friends, with Kennedy frequently receiving loud applause at Trump’s rallies.

The expected appointment was first reported by Politico Thursday.

A longtime vaccine skeptic, Kennedy is an attorney who has built a loyal following over several decades of people who admire his lawsuits against major pesticide and pharmaceutical companies. He has pushed for tighter regulations around the ingredients in foods.

With the Trump campaign, he worked to shore up support among young mothers in particular, with his message of making food healthier in the U.S., promising to model regulations imposed in Europe. In a nod to Trump’s original campaign slogan, he named the effort “Make America Healthy Again.”

It remains unclear how that will square with Trump’s history of deregulation of big industries, including food. Trump pushed for fewer inspections of the meat industry, for example.

Kennedy’s stance on vaccines has also made him a controversial figure among Democrats and some Republicans, raising question about his ability to get confirmed, even in a GOP-controlled Senate. Kennedy has espoused misinformation around the safety of vaccines, including pushing a totally discredited theory that childhood vaccines cause autism.

He also has said he would recommend removing fluoride from drinking water. The addition of the material has been cited as leading to improved dental health.

HHS has more than 80,000 employees across the country. It houses the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Medicare and Medicaid programs and the National Institutes of Health.

Kennedy’s anti-vaccine nonprofit group, Children’s Health Defense, currently has a lawsuit pending against a number of news organizations, among them The Associated Press, accusing them of violating antitrust laws by taking action to identify misinformation, including about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines. Kennedy took leave from the group when he announced his run for president but is listed as one of its attorneys in the lawsuit.

__ Seitz reported from Washington.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

In Cyprus, Ukrainians learn how to dispose of landmines that kill and maim hundreds

Published

 on

 

NICOSIA, Cyprus (AP) — In a Cypriot National Guard camp, Ukrainians are being trained on how to identify, locate and dispose of landmines and other unexploded munitions that litter huge swaths of their country, killing and maiming hundreds of people, including children.

Analysts say Ukraine is among the countries that are the most affected by landmines and discarded explosives, as a result of Russia’s ongoing war.

According to U.N. figures, some 399 people have been killed and 915 wounded from landmines and other munitions since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022, equal to the number of casualties reported from 2014-2021. More than 1 in 10 of those casualties have been children.

The economic impact is costing billions to the Ukrainian economy. Landmines and other munitions are preventing the sowing of 5 million hectares, or 10%, of the country’s agricultural land.

Cyprus stepped up to offer its facilities as part of the European Union’s Military Assistance Mission to Ukraine. So far, almost 100 Ukrainian armed forces personnel have taken part in three training cycles over the last two years, said Cyprus Foreign Ministry spokesperson Theodoros Gotsis.

“We are committed to continuing this support for as long as it takes,” Gotsis told the Associated Press, adding that the Cyprus government has covered the 250,000 euro ($262,600) training cost.

Cyprus opted to offer such training owing to its own landmine issues dating back five decades when the island nation was ethnically divided when Turkey invaded following a coup that sought union with Greece. The United Nations has removed some 27,000 landmines from a buffer zone that cuts across the island, but minefields remain on either side. The Cypriot government says it has disposed of all anti-personnel mines in line with its obligations under an international treaty that bans the use of such munitions.

In Cyprus, Ukrainians undergo rigorous theoretical and practical training over a five-week Basic Demining and Clearance course that includes instruction on distinguishing and safely handling landmines and other explosive munitions, such as rockets, 155 mm artillery shells, rocket-propelled grenades and mortar shells.

Theoretical training uses inert munitions identical to the actual explosives.

Most of the course is comprised of hands-on training focusing on the on-site destruction of unexploded munitions using explosives, the chief training officer told the Associated Press. The officer spoke on condition of anonymity because he’s not authorized to disclose his identity for security reasons.

“They’re trained on ordnance disposal using real explosives,” the officer said. “That will be the trainees’ primary task when they return.”

Cypriot officials said the Ukrainian trainees did not want to be either interviewed or photographed.

Defusing discarded munitions or landmines in areas where explosive charges can’t be used — for instance, near a hospital — is not part of this course because that’s the task of highly trained teams of disposal experts whose training can last as long as eight months, the officer said.

Trainees, divided into groups of eight, are taught how to operate metal detectors and other tools for detecting munitions like prodders — long, thin rods which are used to gently probe beneath the ground’s surface in search of landmines and other explosive ordnance.

Another tool is a feeler, a rod that’s used to detect booby-trapped munitions. There are many ways to booby-trap such munitions, unlike landmines which require direct pressure to detonate.

“Booby-trapped munitions are a widespread phenomenon in Ukraine,” the chief training officer explained.

Training, primarily conducted by experts from other European Union countries, takes place both in forested and urban areas at different army camps and follows strict safety protocols.

The short, intense training period keeps the Ukrainians focused.

“You see the interest they show during instruction: they ask questions, they want to know what mistakes they’ve made and the correct way of doing it,” the officer said.

Humanitarian data and analysis group ACAPS said in a Jan. 2024 report that 174,000 sq. kilometers (67,182 sq. miles) or nearly 29% of Ukraine’s territory needs to be surveyed for landmines and other explosive ordnance.

More than 10 million people are said to live in areas where demining action is needed.

Since 2022, Russian forces have used at least 13 types of anti-personnel mines, which target people. Russia never signed the 1997 Ottawa Convention banning the use of anti-personnel mines, but the use of such mines is nonetheless considered a violation of its obligations under international law.

Russia also uses 13 types of anti-tank mines.

The International Campaign to Ban Landmines said in its 2023 Landmine Monitor report that Ukrainian government forces may have also used antipersonnel landmines in contravention of the Mine Ban Treaty in and around the city of Izium during 2022, when the city was under Russian control.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version