Power politics on display amid pandemic - The Tribune India | Canada News Media
Connect with us

Politics

Power politics on display amid pandemic – The Tribune India

Published

 on


Radhika Ramaseshan

Senior journalist

After the unsettling moments, Uddhav Thackeray is set to legitimise his constitutional position by getting elected as a member of the legislative council. It was not an easy passage for the Maharashtra Chief Minister to secure a place in the council as he battles hard to contain the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic in India’s worst-hit state.

Evidently, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), his ally of yore, has not forgotten that Uddhav had weaselled out of a long partnership just when the BJP was readying to anoint its former CM, Devendra Fadnavis, for a second term after the last Maharashtra elections. The Governor, BS Koshyari, sat on a recommendation from the state cabinet to nominate Uddhav to the council from his discretionary quota. Social distancing made it practically impossible to hold the scheduled elections and fill in the vacancies to the lower house of the legislature. With the deadline of May 28 for Uddhav’s nomination fast approaching, he had no choice but to seek Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s intervention. The move resulted in an ‘order’ from the Election Commission to conduct the legislative council elections and pave the way for a berth for Uddhav, who had initially toyed with the idea of contesting an assembly seat and then abandoned it. For a while, it looked as though Maharashtra would plunge into an unwanted constitutional crisis. In normal circumstances, the BJP might have been tempted to muddy the waters, which its state leaders badly wanted even in the extraordinary circumstances of the present day, but evidently, better sense prevailed on the Central brass.

Power politics amidst a pandemic? What’s to stop parties from playing the sport? Maharashtra seems to be a favourite target any which way. The Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) coalition government was apparently caught off-guard when, on April 27, the Centre notified that the sought-after International Financial Services Centre Authority (IFSCA) will be headquartered at Gandhinagar instead of Mumbai, the original earmarked site. A take-in? Hard to tell. The preceding BJP-Shiv Sena dispensation had been persuaded to forfeit the land set aside for the IFSCA for a bullet train terminal. Birthed in 2006 by the Manmohan Singh government, Mumbai was chosen because its time zone was uniquely positioned mid-way between those of the two major IFSCs at London and Singapore. Bankers and economic analysts estimated that the authority could have created at least 100,000 jobs in the primary financial sector and an equal number in the tertiary. The IFSCA will be a unified authority to regulate financial service centres in India, including banking, the capital markets and insurance that are currently monitored by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and the Insurance Regulatory an Development Authority of India.

The MVA could do nothing except register a token protest because Uddhav’s election became an over-riding consideration. However, the critical decision that empowers the IFSCA to administer financial products (securities, deposits, insurance contracts) and financial services and institutions was interpreted in political quarters as the product of a historical legacy: the Maharashtra-Gujarat rivalry, sowed by the demand for a separate state of the Gujarati-speaking population. It resulted in the carving of Gujarat from the bilingual Bombay Presidency in 1960. Gujarat had to live with the ‘ignominy’ of ‘ceding’ Mumbai (originally Bombay), India’s financial capital, to Maharashtra in return for getting the tribal-dominated Dang region.

Maharashtra was not the only centre for a subtle but inescapable game of political one-upmanship. The exodus of people who left their home states to seek employment in urban agglomerates — and were literally pushed out once the national lockdown extracted a cruel economic toll — eluded rational thinking and tentative solutions. Instead, states used it to earn plaudits over the others. Uttar Pradesh and Bihar were examples.

Nitish Kumar, the Bihar Chief Minister, mulishly refused to open his state’s borders to the throng of migrants desperately wanting to return home, after walking or cycling back thousands of miles. His apprehension was that they were potential Covid-19 vectors although there was no hard data to prove that those who were fortunate to come back had transmitted the virus. Health management was evidently Nitish’s bane because his government was severely critiqued for failing to stem an encephalitis outbreak in 2019. This time, he had to contend with not just a huge population of the working class and the poor but students from Bihar who went to study in Rajasthan, Karnataka and other states but were left high and dry once their places of learning closed indefinitely. He was unmoved by their plight as well. Pressure exerted by the BJP, his ally, did not work.

Trust politics to play here as well. The BJP was afraid that its middle-class base in Bihar would be angered if the students, from relatively well-off families, were left hanging. It used its chief ministers, Yogi Adityanath in Uttar Pradesh and Shivraj Singh Chouhan in Madhya Pradesh, to beam a signal to their Bihar counterpart. Adityanath and Chouhan organised buses to ferry back the students stranded in Rajasthan’s Kota. That message too was not picked up by Nitish who wouldn’t budge from his stated position. He reiterated that the Centre’s enshrined guidelines, drawn from the Disaster Management Act, did not allow inter-state movement during the lockdown. Finally, he was compelled to relent after the Union Home Ministry amended the norms and allowed the migrants to travel back through specially requisitioned transport.

Madhya Pradesh paid a huge price for the power politics on display after the Congress government was dislodged for a BJP-led one by engineering defections. The spectacle was staged when the pandemic had begun ravaging India although MP was not among the first casualty. The failure to constitute a cabinet — Chouhan ran a solo show until recently — and the bureaucracy’s apathy caused an unforeseen spike in the Covid cases in MP. Mercifully, Maharashtra escaped a similar fate.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Politics

‘Disgraceful:’ N.S. Tory leader slams school’s request that military remove uniform

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston says it’s “disgraceful and demeaning” that a Halifax-area school would request that service members not wear military uniforms to its Remembrance Day ceremony.

Houston’s comments were part of a chorus of criticism levelled at the school — Sackville Heights Elementary — whose administration decided to back away from the plan after the outcry.

A November newsletter from the school in Middle Sackville, N.S., invited Armed Forces members to attend its ceremony but asked that all attendees arrive in civilian attire to “maintain a welcoming environment for all.”

Houston, who is currently running for re-election, accused the school’s leaders of “disgracing themselves while demeaning the people who protect our country” in a post on the social media platform X Thursday night.

“If the people behind this decision had a shred of the courage that our veterans have, this cowardly and insulting idea would have been rejected immediately,” Houston’s post read. There were also several calls for resignations within the school’s administration attached to Houston’s post.

In an email to families Thursday night, the school’s principal, Rachael Webster, apologized and welcomed military family members to attend “in the attire that makes them most comfortable.”

“I recognize this request has caused harm and I am deeply sorry,” Webster’s email read, adding later that the school has the “utmost respect for what the uniform represents.”

Webster said the initial request was out of concern for some students who come from countries experiencing conflict and who she said expressed discomfort with images of war, including military uniforms.

Her email said any students who have concerns about seeing Armed Forces members in uniform can be accommodated in a way that makes them feel safe, but she provided no further details in the message.

Webster did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

At a news conference Friday, Houston said he’s glad the initial request was reversed but said he is still concerned.

“I can’t actually fathom how a decision like that was made,” Houston told reporters Friday, adding that he grew up moving between military bases around the country while his father was in the Armed Forces.

“My story of growing up in a military family is not unique in our province. The tradition of service is something so many of us share,” he said.

“Saying ‘lest we forget’ is a solemn promise to the fallen. It’s our commitment to those that continue to serve and our commitment that we will pass on our respects to the next generation.”

Liberal Leader Zach Churchill also said he’s happy with the school’s decision to allow uniformed Armed Forces members to attend the ceremony, but he said he didn’t think it was fair to question the intentions of those behind the original decision.

“We need to have them (uniforms) on display at Remembrance Day,” he said. “Not only are we celebrating (veterans) … we’re also commemorating our dead who gave the greatest sacrifice for our country and for the freedoms we have.”

NDP Leader Claudia Chender said that while Remembrance Day is an important occasion to honour veterans and current service members’ sacrifices, she said she hopes Houston wasn’t taking advantage of the decision to “play politics with this solemn occasion for his own political gain.”

“I hope Tim Houston reached out to the principal of the school before making a public statement,” she said in a statement.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saskatchewan NDP’s Beck holds first caucus meeting after election, outlines plans

Published

 on

 

REGINA – Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck says she wants to prove to residents her party is the government in waiting as she heads into the incoming legislative session.

Beck held her first caucus meeting with 27 members, nearly double than what she had before the Oct. 28 election but short of the 31 required to form a majority in the 61-seat legislature.

She says her priorities will be health care and cost-of-living issues.

Beck says people need affordability help right now and will press Premier Scott Moe’s Saskatchewan Party government to cut the gas tax and the provincial sales tax on children’s clothing and some grocery items.

Beck’s NDP is Saskatchewan’s largest Opposition in nearly two decades after sweeping Regina and winning all but one seat in Saskatoon.

The Saskatchewan Party won 34 seats, retaining its hold on all of the rural ridings and smaller cities.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 8, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nova Scotia election: Liberals say province’s immigration levels are too high

Published

 on

 

HALIFAX – Nova Scotia‘s growing population was the subject of debate on Day 12 of the provincial election campaign, with Liberal Leader Zach Churchill arguing immigration levels must be reduced until the province can provide enough housing and health-care services.

Churchill said Thursday a plan by the incumbent Progressive Conservatives to double the province’s population to two million people by the year 2060 is unrealistic and unsustainable.

“That’s a big leap and it’s making life harder for people who live here, (including ) young people looking for a place to live and seniors looking to downsize,” he told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

Anticipating that his call for less immigration might provoke protests from the immigrant community, Churchill was careful to note that he is among the third generation of a family that moved to Nova Scotia from Lebanon.

“I know the value of immigration, the importance of it to our province. We have been built on the backs of an immigrant population. But we just need to do it in a responsible way.”

The Liberal leader said Tim Houston’s Tories, who are seeking a second term in office, have made a mistake by exceeding immigration targets set by the province’s Department of Labour and Immigration. Churchill said a Liberal government would abide by the department’s targets.

In the most recent fiscal year, the government welcomed almost 12,000 immigrants through its nominee program, exceeding the department’s limit by more than 4,000, he said. The numbers aren’t huge, but the increase won’t help ease the province’s shortages in housing and doctors, and the increased strain on its infrastructure, including roads, schools and cellphone networks, Churchill said.

“(The Immigration Department) has done the hard work on this,” he said. “They know where the labour gaps are, and they know what growth is sustainable.”

In response, Houston said his commitment to double the population was a “stretch goal.” And he said the province had long struggled with a declining population before that trend was recently reversed.

“The only immigration that can come into this province at this time is if they are a skilled trade worker or a health-care worker,” Houston said. “The population has grown by two per cent a year, actually quite similar growth to what we experienced under the Liberal government before us.”

Still, Houston said he’s heard Nova Scotians’ concerns about population growth, and he then pivoted to criticize Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for trying to send 6,000 asylum seekers to Nova Scotia, an assertion the federal government has denied.

Churchill said Houston’s claim about asylum seekers was shameful.

“It’s smoke and mirrors,” the Liberal leader said. “He is overshooting his own department’s numbers for sustainable population growth and yet he is trying to blame this on asylum seekers … who aren’t even here.”

In September, federal Immigration Minister Marc Miller said there is no plan to send any asylum seekers to the province without compensation or the consent of the premier. He said the 6,000 number was an “aspirational” figure based on models that reflect each province’s population.

In Halifax, NDP Leader Claudia Chender said it’s clear Nova Scotia needs more doctors, nurses and skilled trades people.

“Immigration has been and always will be a part of the Nova Scotia story, but we need to build as we grow,” Chender said. “This is why we have been pushing the Houston government to build more affordable housing.”

Chender was in a Halifax cafe on Thursday when she promised her party would remove the province’s portion of the harmonized sales tax from all grocery, cellphone and internet bills if elected to govern on Nov. 26. The tax would also be removed from the sale and installation of heat pumps.

“Our focus is on helping people to afford their lives,” Chender told reporters. “We know there are certain things that you can’t live without: food, internet and a phone …. So we know this will have the single biggest impact.”

The party estimates the measure would save the average Nova Scotia family about $1,300 a year.

“That’s a lot more than a one or two per cent HST cut,” Chender said, referring to the Progressive Conservative pledge to reduce the tax by one percentage point and the Liberal promise to trim it by two percentage points.

Elsewhere on the campaign trail, Houston announced that a Progressive Conservative government would make parking free at all Nova Scotia hospitals and health-care centres. The promise was also made by the Liberals in their election platform released Monday.

“Free parking may not seem like a big deal to some, but … the parking, especially for people working at the facilities, can add up to hundreds of dollars,” the premier told a news conference at his campaign headquarters in Halifax.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 7, 2024.

— With files from Keith Doucette in Halifax

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version