Pressure still on oilsands sector despite silence after greenwashing law: think tank | Canada News Media
Connect with us

News

Pressure still on oilsands sector despite silence after greenwashing law: think tank

Published

 on

CALGARY – Canada’s oilsands industry remains under pressure to reduce its greenhouse gas footprint, even as companies have clamped down on public communications in the wake of new anti-greenwashing legislation.

The Pathways Alliance — a consortium of six companies that have jointly committed to achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions from oilsands production — has been largely silent since June, when the federal government passed an amendment to Canada’s Competition Act containing a new anti-greenwashing provision.

But clean energy think tank the Pembina Institute said concerns about the new law shouldn’t prevent Pathways from pulling the trigger on its proposed $16.5-billion carbon capture and storage project.

“(The greenwashing legislation) doesn’t preclude things like announcing final investment decisions on carbon capture projects or emissions reduction projects,” said Matt Dreis, the think tank’s senior oil and gas analyst.

“If we want to be leaders in that sector, we’re going to need to get projects like this across the finish line.”

It’s been three years since the Pathways Alliance first proposed building a massive carbon capture and storage network in northern Alberta to help reduce emissions from oilsands sites. While it has submitted a number of regulatory applications, the consortium has not yet given the project an official green light in the form of a final investment decision.

The industry group also removed virtually all of its content from its website after the passage of new greenwashing rules, which require corporations to provide evidence to support their environmental claims.

The bill’s wording says businesses must not make claims to the public about what they are doing to protect the environment or mitigate the effects of climate change unless those claims are based on “adequate and proper substantiation in accordance with internationally recognized methodology.”

In an emailed statement this week, Pathways Alliance president Kendall Dilling said the group continues to pursue its major project and is working with federal and provincial governments “to determine the most appropriate way to enable large investments into major projects such as ours.”

“The new law does not change the intent of Pathways Alliance nor the work we are doing,” Dilling said.

“However, the changes to the Competition Act do make it more difficult to publicly discuss our work, due to the vagueness of the law.”

A newly released survey by ATB Capital Markets found 53 per cent of oil and gas producers polled said the new anti-greenwashing rules in the Competition Act will be “very impactful” to their company’s environmental reporting practices.

The survey — conducted between Aug. 28 and Sept. 9 — also found a sizable reduction in the willingness of energy companies to invest in environmental technologies based on an ESG mandate over the next year. Just 17 per cent of respondents noted intentions to invest, down from 34 per cent in the spring 2024 survey.

Dreis said the lack of a final investment decision thus far from the Pathways Alliance is concerning given the oilsands industry is Canada’s heaviest-emitting sector and carbon capture and storage projects are already going forward elsewhere.

In June, Shell approved two projects that will capture and store carbon emissions from its Scotford refinery near Edmonton. In July, Strathcona Resources announced a partnership with the Canada Growth Fund that will see the federal entity contribute up to $2 billion in funding for the company’s carbon capture projects in Cold Lake and Lloydminster.

The Shell and Strathcona announcements came in the wake of the federal government’s finalization of an investment tax credit for carbon capture and storage projects, something heavy emitters such as the Pathways group had lobbied heavily for. But Dreis said it’s clear now the tax credit on its own isn’t enough to compel broad-based action by industry.

“We were hoping to see some more announcements regarding carbon capture projects moving forward after that was announced,” Dreis said, adding that is why Pembina supports the federal government’s proposed legislated cap on emissions from the oil and gas sector.

“It seems like the key pieces aren’t in place yet, so hopefully we can find a solution and start getting meaningful emissions reduction from this sector.”

The Pathways Alliance has previously said its carbon capture and storage network could help its member companies achieve a 32 per cent reduction from 2019 emissions levels by 2030. Dilling said last March that he is hopeful a final investment decision will be made before the end of 2025, with construction beginning in 2026.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 19, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Carolina Panthers’ early-season struggles not surprising to Proline players

Published

 on

It has been a difficult start to the NFL season for quarterback Bryce Young and the Carolina Panthers.

Carolina has dropped its opening two games after Sunday’s 26-3 loss to the Los Angeles Chargers. And Young, the first player taken in the ’23 NFL draft, was 18-of-26 passing for 84 yards with an interception while being sacked twice.

As a result, veteran Andy Dalton will start Sunday when Carolina faces the Las Vegas Raiders (1-1).

According to the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corp., the Chargers’ win was the most accurately predicted moneyline selection by Proline bettors. A whopping 92 per cent of wagers were on Los Angeles beating Carolina with 92 per cent also picking the Chargers to cover -4.5.

In other action that went in favour of Proline bettors: Kansas City edged Cincinnati 26-25 (86 per cent correctly selected the Chiefs to win); Houston got past Chicago 19-13 (81 per cent); the New York Jets defeated Tennessee 24-17 (78 per cent); Pittsburgh beat Denver 13-6 (76 per cent), Washington beat the New York Giants 21-18 (73 per cent); and Seattle toppled New England 23-20 (62 per cent).

However, only five per cent of bettors had the Raiders upsetting Baltimore 26-23.

And there was one winner of Proline’s second week main NFL pool of $407,613.

In NFL futures bets after the second week of the season, the odds for offensive player of the year got shorter for running backs Breece Hall (Jets) and Bijan Robinson (Atlanta) and Detroit receiver Amon-Ra St. Brown. But they got longer for running backs Kyren Williams (Rams), Christian McCaffrey (San Francisco) and Jonathan Taylor (Colts).

Quarterbacks Bo Nix (Denver), Jayden Daniels (Washington) and Caleb Williams (Chicago) all had their odds for offensive rookie of the year go up while they went down for running back Ray Davis (Buffalo), tight end Brock Bowers (Raiders) and receiver Malik Nabers (Giants).

Quarterbacks Patrick Mahones (Chiefs), Aaron Rodgers (Jets) and Jalen Hurts (Eagles) all had their odds for regular season MVP go up. But quarterbacks Jordan Love (Packers), Lamar Jackson (Baltimore) and Joe Burrow (Cincinnati) all saw theirs go down.

Kansas City, Philadelphia and Houston had their Super Bowl odds increase while Green Bay, Baltimore and Cincinnati all decreased.

Not surprising, the week’s top events were all NFL games. In order, they were; Buffalo-Miami, Chicago-Houston, Cincinnati-KC, Raiders-Ravens; and Saints-Cowboys.

A Proline retail player cashed in a $26,183 winner from a $10 bet on a 12-leg major-league baseball parlay. Another won $24,602 from a $10 wager on a 12-leg NFL parlay.

A third received $1,737 from a $3 bet on a six-leg NFL parlay.

A digital bettor earned $2,927 from a $25 bet on a five-leg NFL parlay while a second had a $704.35 return from a $1 wager on a seven-leg NFL parlay.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 19, 2024.

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

Detroit Lions coach Dan Campbell is selling his house to seek more privacy

Published

 on

BLOOMFIELD HILLS, Mich. (AP) — Lions coach Dan Campbell is selling his suburban Detroit home to get more privacy.

“There’s plenty of space, it’s on two acres, the home is beautiful,” Campbell told Crain’s Detroit Business. “It’s just that people figured out where we lived when we lost.”

He didn’t elaborate.

Campbell and wife Holly listed the 7,800-square-foot house in Bloomfield Hills for $4.5 million this week. A deal was pending within 24 hours, Crain’s reported.

Campbell was hired by the Lions in 2021. After a 3-13-1 record that season, the team has become one of the best in the NFL, reaching the NFC championship game last January.

Campbell’s home was built in 2013 for Igor Larionov, a Hockey Hall of Fame member who played for the Detroit Red Wings.

The likely buyers are “huge” Lions fans, said Ashley Crain, who is representing Campbell and the buyers in the sale.

___

AP NFL:

The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

News

How to recoup costs when you travel to an event that gets cancelled

Published

 on

Ariella Kimmel and Mandi Johnson were grabbing a bite to eat in Vienna, when their August trip to the Austrian capital was upended.

The Canadian duo had travelled to the city to see Taylor Swift in concert only to learn her shows would be cancelled because of two men plotting to launch an attack on fans outside the venue, Ernst Happel Stadium.

While Kimmel and Johnson were disappointed they weren’t going to be able to see Swift perform, they made the most of the remainder of their trip. However, the experience serves as a buyer’s beware for Canadians considering jet setting to see their favourite artists or teams.

“If you’re travelling to these concerts, it’s really hard to protect yourself,” said Kimmel, a Toronto-based vice-president at a public affairs firm who had previously travelled with Johnson to see Swift in Las Vegas, Nashville and Stockholm.

Such trips can make lifelong memories when they go off without a hitch, but cancellations and rescheduled events are common because of artist illnesses, poor ticket sales, security threats, unruly weather and natural disasters.

In the last year alone, Jennifer Lopez and the Black Keys scuttled touring plans after tickets had been sold, while Bruce Springsteen, Usher and Pink had to tell fans they couldn’t take the stage mere hoursbefore show time.

Between airfares, hotels, travel expenses and tickets, last-minute cancellations can leave globe-trotting eventgoers out hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars.

“Regrettably, unpredictability has always been a reality of the industry but it’s increasingly common that there might be things that are going to interrupt your plans, especially plans that you’re really excited about,” said Jenny Kost, the Calgary-based global director of strategic sales initiatives at Corporate Traveller Canada.

“It’s a tricky one because the airline or hotel understands the reason behind your travel but its likelihood of happening or not happening is a little bit outside of their purview.”

Because Swift is known to power through shows even when sick, Kimmel never imagined a concert she was headed to would ever be cancelled, but she always booked plane tickets and hotels that could be rescheduled or refunded — a move she recommends to others travelling for events.

“It’s like common sense, you never know what’s going to happen,” Kimmel said.

However, making use of the rescheduling and refund options her hotel booking and airline tickets had weren’t an option for Kimmel this time because she had already been in Austria for a few days and had very little of her stay left when Swift cancelled.

Had the show been nixed before Kimmel left home, the flexibility baked into the bookings would have been useful, though Kost said such arrangements aren’t cheap.

“There is a cost associated with that that’s not insignificant,” she warned, estimating these kinds of bookings can add hundreds of dollars to your bill and have lots of quirks in the fine print.

The better bet is travel insurance, Kost said. It’s often cheaper than flexible fares and hotel bookings and can reimburse customers for accommodations and flights they have to drop or swap when an event gets cancel or an emergency strikes.

Kost opted for such insurance when she journeyed to Paris to see Swift over the summer and bought it again in a cab on her way to Mexico for a wedding. The insurance cost her about $150 for a week, but when she had to extend her stay because she fell ill, it covered the cost of all of her accommodations.

She doesn’t encourage people to wait until the last minute to buy the insurance like she did because buying it early can provide some reprieve when an event you’re travelling to is cancelled well in advance.

Travel costs aside, people heading out-of-town for events that wind up cancelled also have to consider whether they will get the money they spent on entry fees and tickets back.

In Kimmel and Johnson’s case, they paid Ticketmaster about $300 per seat. They learned just after the cancellation that they would be refunded — but not for an $85 transaction fee they were charged when purchasing the tickets.

“We paid $85 to not see her but I guess that in the grand scheme of what we were going to pay, it’s not a lot at all,” Kimmel said.

They did not opt to buy insurance on their tickets, which Ticketmaster offers through Allianz Global Assistance for $8, plus tax. Allianz’s vice-president of marketing and insights Dan Keon said the insurance offers coverage up to $1,000 per ticket.

In addition to offering refunds if an event is cancelled by a venue or promoter, the coverage can provide a reimbursement for a variety of situations. Those include if you are facing a serious medical issue or death, have a family member in life-threatening condition, are summoned by the military or are delayed in arriving at the venue because of a common transportation carrier.

If you’re going to opt into the insurance, Keon said review the terms ahead of time, so you understand exactly what scenarios you will be covered in.

The insurance, for example, can’t be used in the event of a pandemic, war or natural disaster.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 19, 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Exit mobile version