adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Tech

Provincial committee makes no recommendations after reviewing deaths of 3 children – Yahoo News Canada

Published

 on


Local Journalism Initiative

Council receives feasibility study for possible Ag Science Centre in North Perth

NORTH PERTH – A study on the feasibility of constructing an Agricultural Science Centre in North Perth was brought before council for discussion on Dec. 21. “I’d like to thank council for supporting our application to fund the feasibility study which did start as a children’s museum project,” said Jillian Lewis, chair of the Huron-Perth Ag Science Centre Steering Committee. “Our objective is to achieve federal, provincial and private financial support to build an agriculture-focused science centre here in North Perth.” The centre is intended to provide year-round education opportunities, primarily for children, their families and for school groups.  “It will supplement the sports and recreation programs we already enjoy,” said Lewis. “It will encourage more young families to live here. The Ag Science Centre will also build pride in agriculture which will hopefully help retain more youth in our community.” The plan for the centre is to attract both regional residents and tourists because the closest science centres are in Toronto and Sudbury. “There are federal and provincial capital funding programs that the committee will need to apply to for implementation of the Huron-Perth Ag Science Centre,” said Ted Silberberg, senior principal of LORD cultural resources.  He said a key issue for obtaining those funds will depend on demonstrating municipal support for the project.  “What we have recommended is allocating the land for the building and helping to pay for part of the annual operating cost,” said Silberberg. “We also think that an agriculture focus should help to increase the likelihood of private-sector support especially from the agriculture industry.”  The first recommendation for municipal support outlined in the plan is a donation of a municipally-owned site in North Perth with enough room for a building with about 15,000-square feet of useable space.  “I think that is large enough to be able to attract first-time and repeat visitors but modest enough to likely be implementable,” said Silberberg. “Capital costs for the building and exhibits are estimated at $13.8 million.” It was also recommended the Ag Science Centre be an independent, not-for-profit institution, but that the Municipality of North Perth own the building.  “The building would be paid for entirely by federal, provincial and private capital funds and be leased to the science centre for $1 per year,” he said. “However as the owner of the building, we would like the municipality to contribute to building occupancy costs similar to your operating costs for public library and recreation facilities. We estimate the value of the occupancy costs – those are utilities, repairs, maintenance and insurance – to be in the range of $130,000 to $140,000 per year.” Those costs are estimated within an annual operating budget for the Ag Science Centre of about $1 million.  “Annual operating funds are also going to be required from Perth County, Huron County, private donations and sponsorships and they are also going to want to know there is a municipal commitment to help with operating costs,” said Silberberg. “Earned income levels – that’s admissions, retail, rentals, birthday parties, memberships. We have projected those to cover about 55 per cent of operating revenues and that is in the same general range as other science centres and children’s museums and better than the performance of other museum types.” Lewis concluded the presentation by letting council know they are seeking support from the municipal council regarding the desirability of the Ag Science Centre in North Perth and a conditional municipal commitment to land and to support part of the operating cost of the centre.  “This will substantially increase the likelihood of success in receiving our federal and provincial funds,” she said. “The municipal commitment requested is conditional. If we are not successful in receiving federal and provincial funds  there would be no project and therefore no need for land in North Perth or annual financial support for the operations.” Mayor Todd Kasenberg asked why the project had been changed from a children’s museum to an agriculture science centre. “A children’s museum is oriented to very young children – usually it goes up to around eight,” said Silberberg. “A science centre will attract older children and also adults who are not accompanying children. Second, there is an issue of perceived duplication… there is no science centre in the region. The closest is in Toronto, the Ontario Science Centre, and then the next is Science North in Sudbury. However, there is a London Children’s Museum… it’s still in the region and it’s expanding so it’s important to avoid duplicating that.” Lewis said the agriculture focus of the science centre would be unique because there currently are no agriculture-focused science centres in Canada. Kasenberg asked CAO Kriss Snell what the process should be if council were to consider supporting the project. Snell said the most obvious outcome from the deliberations at the council meeting would be to refer the project to the ongoing 2021 budget committee process. Coun. Lee Anne Andriessen asked for clarification of the role the county would be involved in versus the local level of government.  “I think it’s an awesome project,” she said. “I’m excited about this type of focus but I just want to distinguish between those two roles. Certainly, it seems clear that the science centre would need to have land… from the lower tier but I’m just wondering around operating costs and support. Is that all from a shared county level as well? I saw in the report shared costs with Huron as well.” “It is called the Huron-Perth Ag Science Centre… so at this size, it can be of regional orientation,” said Silberberg. “Because it is in Perth, we’ve done a scenario of where operating funds would come from. We’ve identified building occupancy cost… for a municipally-owned building to be paid by the Municipality of North Perth, we’ve estimated those costs to be in the range of $130,000 to $140,000 per year.” It is also recommended $100,000 per year from Perth County and $50,000 per year from Huron County to support operating costs. Kasenberg said he thought Andriessen’s question was a political one the reason to reach out to Perth and Huron counties.  “I think the premise has been answered but the question is would those other jurisdictions wish to participate,” he said. “That would remain to be tested moving forward so I think you could make the argument that both of those upper-tier municipal organizations do undertake economic development activities and… for that reason, it is politically reasonable to request those two entities in the context of this service as a regional science centre.” Coun. Allan Rothwell said it is a very exciting concept.  “I am concerned however regarding the desire to strike out on our own as opposed to utilize or look specifically at the Stratford-Perth museum footprint as well as the Huron County footprint,” he said. “I understand that this is an agriculture science centre but there is the Country Heritage Park in Milton which was operated as the Ontario Agriculture Museum by the province of Ontario started in 1975 and then re-established as the Country Heritage Park by a non-profit corporation as I understand within a 90-minute drive of our location here. And that serves the whole province of Ontario.” Rothwell said there are other agricultural museums but then said they were different than an agricultural science centre.  “I think I want to hear as we move forward in terms of what you see as a museum versus an agriculture science centre,” he said. “Then whether the fact we have the International Plowing Match which happens throughout Ontario once per year, except of course in 2020.” Rothwell raised concerns about the operation and cost to establish and to maintain the operation with a staff of five plus additional support staff.  “I’m just not sure that in its form I see at the moment we’re going to be able to afford something going forward even from an operational cost,” he said. Coun. Julie Behrns agreed with Rothwell.  “I know it sounds like an exciting project and thank you for all the work that has been put into it,” she said. “Quite frankly I think given the current state of the economy and our country I’m not so sure that we can budget for this in 2021.”  She spoke of an estimated $13.8 million capital cost which the report said is to be covered by federal, provincial or private funding, or the project will not happen.  “We’re talking about the gifting of land,” said Behrns. “We’re talking about supporting operating costs in perpetuity both at the North Perth level and at the Perth County level.” Behrns said that there are two science centres in the province of Ontario, which she mentioned has a population just shy of 14 million people.  “I’m not so sure that a county of just 76,000 has the capabilities unfortunately to support it,” she said. “A lot of the other science centres around, whether it’s agriculture or whatever it usually has major corporate sponsors and I think there has got to be a little more legwork done and firm commitments on behalf of a number of the entities that were suggested in the report… unfortunately at this moment in time even though I think it’s a terrific idea I can’t support it at this time.” “The ask is not for 2021, the ask is for 2024,” said Silberberg. “That is when the building would be assumed to be opened. So the whole assumption is that there would be federal, provincial and private money for the capital. If there is not capital there would be no need for land and no need for operating support but to proceed they need an indication of support from the municipality that would be conditional upon all of the capital funds being there so I just wanted to clarify that.” Council received the report and referred the issue to the 2021 budget deliberations for further discussion.Colin Burrowes, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Listowel Banner

Let’s block ads! (Why?)

300x250x1

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Nothing Ear And Nothing Ear (a) Earbuds Are 1st With ChatGPT Integration – Forbes

Published

 on


London-based Nothing Tech has just launched new earbuds, two pairs, in fact. The Nothing Ear and more affordable Nothing Ear (a) have just gone on sale—you can read Forbes contributor Mark Sparrow’s review of both pairs here. And now, the company has announced a cool new feature: and industry-first integration with ChatGPT. It comes with strings, though.

The new earbuds have just been announced and are available to pre-order from nothing.tech now and go on sale from Monday, April 22. If you’re in London, and you want to be among the very first to get the earbuds, you can snap them up in the Nothing Store Soho a little bit sooner, from Saturday, April 20 (click-and-collect is available).

From launch, the company said, “it will enhance its overall user experience with industry-first ChatGPT integrations in its audio and smartphone products.”

300x250x1

Nothing goes on that it wants “to advance consumer tech products’ transition to AI, as well as simplify and enhance the user experience.”

It means users will be able to pinch the earbud to directly speak to ChatGPT to ask questions and hear responses in the earbuds. Nothing is also introducing new elements to Nothing phones, such as widgets which make it easy to talk to ChatGPT on the handsets. Other features include being able to send screenshots directly to ChatGPT and a clipboard shortcut for sending text.

So, what are the catches?

Although the Bluetooth new earbuds will work with any iPhone or Android phone, and there are dedicated Nothing apps for each platform, the ChatGPT integration is more limited for now.

function loadConnatixScript(document)
if (!window.cnxel)
window.cnxel = ;
window.cnxel.cmd = [];
var iframe = document.createElement(‘iframe’);
iframe.style.display = ‘none’;
iframe.onload = function()
var iframeDoc = iframe.contentWindow.document;
var script = iframeDoc.createElement(‘script’);
script.src = ‘//cd.elements.video/player.js’ + ‘?cid=’ + ’62cec241-7d09-4462-afc2-f72f8d8ef40a’;
script.setAttribute(‘defer’, ‘1’);
script.setAttribute(‘type’, ‘text/javascript’);
iframeDoc.body.appendChild(script);
;
document.head.appendChild(iframe);

loadConnatixScript(document);

(function()
function createUniqueId()
return ‘xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx’.replace(/[xy]/g, function(c) 0x8);
return v.toString(16);
);

const randId = createUniqueId();
document.getElementsByClassName(‘fbs-cnx’)[0].setAttribute(‘id’, randId);
document.getElementById(randId).removeAttribute(‘class’);
(new Image()).src = ‘https://capi.elements.video/tr/si?token=’ + ’44f947fb-a5ce-41f1-a4fc-78dcf31c262a’ + ‘&cid=’ + ’62cec241-7d09-4462-afc2-f72f8d8ef40a’;
cnxel.cmd.push(function ()
cnxel(
playerId: ’44f947fb-a5ce-41f1-a4fc-78dcf31c262a’,
playlistId: ‘aff7f449-8e5d-4c43-8dca-16dfb7dc05b9’,
).render(randId);
);
)();

The earbuds must be paired with a Nothing handset. From today, the feature works with the premium model, the Nothing Phone (2), providing it’s running the latest software. The earlier Nothing Phone (1) and more recent, more affordable model, Nothing Phone (2a) will need to wait for a software update, which Nothing says is “coming soon”.

Also coming in the future is compatibility with earlier Nothing earbuds, that is the Ear (1), Ear (2) and Ear (Stick).

The new earbuds are very keenly priced. Ear costs $149 (£129 in the U.K.), while Ear (a) is $99 (£99 in the U.K.). Both pairs have active noise-cancelling, which is not commonplace at this price point. The more expensive Ear has a wireless charging case and a feature to create a personal sound profile. Both pairs come in black and white finishes, with Nothing’s trademark transparent design in the earbuds and charging case. But the Nothing Ear (a) has an eye-catching extra: a tremendous yellow-finish option.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

U of T Engineering PhD student is working to improve the sustainable treatment of Ontario's drinking water – U of T Engineering News – U of T Engineering News

Published

 on


Growing up in a small neighbourhood in Cameroon, Maeva Che (CivMin PhD student) was aware of challenges of accessing clean drinking water. 

“Experiencing that exposure to water issues and challenges with sustainable access to safe drinking water ignited my interest in water treatment,” Che says.  

Che’s drive to improve water quality around the globe brought her to the Drinking Water Research Group (DWRG) at University of Toronto’s Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, where she is researching innovative solutions to address local water issues.  

300x250x1

Che is working under the supervision of Professor Ron Hofmann (CivMin), who is a member of the DWRG. Her research focuses on removing unpleasant taste and odour compounds in Ontario’s drinking water by promoting the biodegradation of these compounds through granular activated carbon (GAC) filtration. 

The project is supported by a five-year Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Alliance grant called Advanced and Emerging Issues in Drinking Water Treatment. 

GAC filtration is a water treatment process that uses granular activated carbon, which is made from organic materials that are high in carbon, such as wood, coal or coconut shells. These materials are heated in the absence of oxygen through a process known as pyrolysis and prompted chemically or physically to produce the activated carbon. The activation enhances the material’s adsorption properties, making it productive to remove contaminants from water.  

While GAC filtration is an effective treatment process, its adsorptive capacity is limited. The adsorptive capacity of GAC is expected to become exhausted after about three years in service and drinking water treatment utilities must replace the GAC. Aside from the inconvenience, replacing GAC is costly.  

Che is working on alternative ways to remove contaminants using GAC filtration, specifically through biodegradation. When the filtration has been in service for a while, there is the growth of micro-organisms on the GAC, which can be useful for removing contaminants.   

PhD student Maeva Che works with filtration systems research at the Drinking Water Lab in the Department of Civil & Mineral Engineering. (photo by Galina Nikitina)

“Think of biodegradation as the useful bacteria on the GAC feeding on the contaminants in the water, thereby removing them,” says Che. 

“If the GAC has enough good bacteria that is biodegrading the compounds, the GAC may not need to be replaced when its adsorptive capacity becomes exhausted. This can extend the filter’s lifetime, resulting in cost benefits for treatment utilities.” 

In other words, biodegradation can potentially enhance the performance of GAC filters. 

Che and the DWRG will collaborate with water treatment plants to determine methods that can enhance the biodegradation of taste and odour compounds within their GAC filters.  

Currently in its initial phase, the project is taking place alongside the Peterborough Utilities Group’s drinking water treatment plant, where Che is conducting pilot-scale filtration studies with support from the Peterborough Utilities Commission. They plan to extend this research to other partner treatment plants in the future. 

Working with various water treatment plants across Ontario, Che will also assess the effectiveness of GAC filters in removing non-traditional taste and odour compounds, which are not commonly monitored. 

To achieve this, she’ll evaluate filter performance for two common taste and odour compounds — 2-methylisoborneal and geosmin — and eight additional non-traditional compounds that can cause taste and odour events. This involves collecting GAC and water samples from the plants and conducting lab-scale filtration tests, called minicolumn tests. This test, developed by the DWRG, allows to differentiate between adsorption and biodegradation in GAC filters. 

Minicolumn tests provide crucial insights into the performance of the GAC filters in terms of the adsorption and biodegradation of contaminants. To distinguish between these mechanisms, researchers use parallel minicolumns. One minicolumn operates under conditions where the biological activity of micro-organisms is suppressed, which isolates the adsorption process. The second minicolumn operates without biological suppression, allowing both adsorption and biodegradation to occur. 

“Many plants are unaware of their filters’ performance for other compounds, aside from the two common ones, that also contribute to taste and odour events in water. Our project, therefore, plays a crucial role in expanding the understanding of this,” Che says. 

Project partners include the Ajax Water Supply Plant and the Barrie Surface Water Treatment Plant.  

The DWRG is made of approximately 30 graduate students, post-doctoral fellows, research managers and associates who collaborate with local, national and international industry and government organizations to address a wide range of projects related to municipal drinking water. 

Che credits her experience as a master’s student with the research group as a major factor in her decision to pursue a PhD at the University of Toronto.  

“During my master’s degree with the DWRG, I worked on projects that improved drinking water quality, gaining hands-on experience at treatment plants. Seeing the results of my research reinforced my decision to pursue my PhD here,” Che says. 

Ultimately, Che hopes to make a significant impact in the field — and the DWRG provides opportunities to achieve this, with a supportive community of researchers and supervisors.  

“My goal is to continue researching and developing sustainable solutions for drinking water treatment that benefit communities in need,” she says. 

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Huawei's latest flagship smartphone contains no world-shaking silicon surprises – The Register

Published

 on


When Huawei debuted its Mate 60 smartphone in mid-2023, it turned heads around the world after teardown artists found it contained a system-on-chip manufactured by Chinese chipmaker Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) using a 7nm process.

SMIC was thought not to be able to build that sort of thing. So while the Mate 60 didn’t differ markedly from every other modern smartphone, its very existence called into question the effectiveness of US-led efforts to prevent advanced chipmaking tech reach the Middle Kingdom.

Much speculation has therefore concerned what Huawei would deliver next, and this week the world got its answer – in the form of the Pura 70.

300x250x1

Chinese media report that early users of the device have posted details of its innards, naming the SoC as Kirin 9010 with four efficient cores running at 1.55GHz, half a dozen performance cores at 2.18GHz, and a couple of high-performance cores zipping along at 2.30GHz. All cores are Arm v8. A third-party spec sheet suggests it’s a 7nm chip – meaning Chinese chipmakers appear not to have made another unexpected advance.

Early tests suggest it outperforms the Kirin 9000 found in the Mate 60, but independent assessments are yet to emerge. The crowdsourced evaluations currently available are sometimes dubious.

What we can say with confidence is that the Pura 70 has a 6.6-inch OLED display with 120Hz refresh rate and resolution of 2,760 x 1,256. It has 12GB RAM aboard, and buyers can choose from 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage.

The three rear-facing cameras on the base models can capture 50, 12, and 13 megapixels apiece.

The Pura range derives from Huawei’s P-Series handsets that stretched from the midrange to the low-end of premium, but are now focussed – pardon the pun – on photography enthusiasts. The device comes on four variants, each priced to match the four editions of Apple’s iPhone 15.

The screen on the high-end “Ultra” model grows to 6.8 inches and 2,844 × 1,260 pixels, with two rear cameras that shoot at 50 megapixels and one at 40. One of the 50MP snappers is retractable, to enhance its zooming powers.

Importantly, all models of the Pura 70 run HarmonyOS 4.2 – Huawei’s not-Android operating system.

China is all-in on HarmonyOS as the nation pursues indigenous alternatives to Western tech. In recent weeks Chinese media and government agencies have noted the growing proliferation of native HarmonyOS apps, trumpeting that developer enthusiasm for the platform means local buyers now have a more patriotic alternative.

That alternative appears to be welcome: after the debut of the Mate 60, analyst firm IDC saw Huawei’s smartphone market share improve by 36.2 percent. ®

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending