Connect with us

Tech

Provincial committee makes no recommendations after reviewing deaths of 3 children – Yahoo News Canada

Published

 on


Local Journalism Initiative

Council receives feasibility study for possible Ag Science Centre in North Perth

NORTH PERTH – A study on the feasibility of constructing an Agricultural Science Centre in North Perth was brought before council for discussion on Dec. 21. “I’d like to thank council for supporting our application to fund the feasibility study which did start as a children’s museum project,” said Jillian Lewis, chair of the Huron-Perth Ag Science Centre Steering Committee. “Our objective is to achieve federal, provincial and private financial support to build an agriculture-focused science centre here in North Perth.” The centre is intended to provide year-round education opportunities, primarily for children, their families and for school groups.  “It will supplement the sports and recreation programs we already enjoy,” said Lewis. “It will encourage more young families to live here. The Ag Science Centre will also build pride in agriculture which will hopefully help retain more youth in our community.” The plan for the centre is to attract both regional residents and tourists because the closest science centres are in Toronto and Sudbury. “There are federal and provincial capital funding programs that the committee will need to apply to for implementation of the Huron-Perth Ag Science Centre,” said Ted Silberberg, senior principal of LORD cultural resources.  He said a key issue for obtaining those funds will depend on demonstrating municipal support for the project.  “What we have recommended is allocating the land for the building and helping to pay for part of the annual operating cost,” said Silberberg. “We also think that an agriculture focus should help to increase the likelihood of private-sector support especially from the agriculture industry.”  The first recommendation for municipal support outlined in the plan is a donation of a municipally-owned site in North Perth with enough room for a building with about 15,000-square feet of useable space.  “I think that is large enough to be able to attract first-time and repeat visitors but modest enough to likely be implementable,” said Silberberg. “Capital costs for the building and exhibits are estimated at $13.8 million.” It was also recommended the Ag Science Centre be an independent, not-for-profit institution, but that the Municipality of North Perth own the building.  “The building would be paid for entirely by federal, provincial and private capital funds and be leased to the science centre for $1 per year,” he said. “However as the owner of the building, we would like the municipality to contribute to building occupancy costs similar to your operating costs for public library and recreation facilities. We estimate the value of the occupancy costs – those are utilities, repairs, maintenance and insurance – to be in the range of $130,000 to $140,000 per year.” Those costs are estimated within an annual operating budget for the Ag Science Centre of about $1 million.  “Annual operating funds are also going to be required from Perth County, Huron County, private donations and sponsorships and they are also going to want to know there is a municipal commitment to help with operating costs,” said Silberberg. “Earned income levels – that’s admissions, retail, rentals, birthday parties, memberships. We have projected those to cover about 55 per cent of operating revenues and that is in the same general range as other science centres and children’s museums and better than the performance of other museum types.” Lewis concluded the presentation by letting council know they are seeking support from the municipal council regarding the desirability of the Ag Science Centre in North Perth and a conditional municipal commitment to land and to support part of the operating cost of the centre.  “This will substantially increase the likelihood of success in receiving our federal and provincial funds,” she said. “The municipal commitment requested is conditional. If we are not successful in receiving federal and provincial funds  there would be no project and therefore no need for land in North Perth or annual financial support for the operations.” Mayor Todd Kasenberg asked why the project had been changed from a children’s museum to an agriculture science centre. “A children’s museum is oriented to very young children – usually it goes up to around eight,” said Silberberg. “A science centre will attract older children and also adults who are not accompanying children. Second, there is an issue of perceived duplication… there is no science centre in the region. The closest is in Toronto, the Ontario Science Centre, and then the next is Science North in Sudbury. However, there is a London Children’s Museum… it’s still in the region and it’s expanding so it’s important to avoid duplicating that.” Lewis said the agriculture focus of the science centre would be unique because there currently are no agriculture-focused science centres in Canada. Kasenberg asked CAO Kriss Snell what the process should be if council were to consider supporting the project. Snell said the most obvious outcome from the deliberations at the council meeting would be to refer the project to the ongoing 2021 budget committee process. Coun. Lee Anne Andriessen asked for clarification of the role the county would be involved in versus the local level of government.  “I think it’s an awesome project,” she said. “I’m excited about this type of focus but I just want to distinguish between those two roles. Certainly, it seems clear that the science centre would need to have land… from the lower tier but I’m just wondering around operating costs and support. Is that all from a shared county level as well? I saw in the report shared costs with Huron as well.” “It is called the Huron-Perth Ag Science Centre… so at this size, it can be of regional orientation,” said Silberberg. “Because it is in Perth, we’ve done a scenario of where operating funds would come from. We’ve identified building occupancy cost… for a municipally-owned building to be paid by the Municipality of North Perth, we’ve estimated those costs to be in the range of $130,000 to $140,000 per year.” It is also recommended $100,000 per year from Perth County and $50,000 per year from Huron County to support operating costs. Kasenberg said he thought Andriessen’s question was a political one the reason to reach out to Perth and Huron counties.  “I think the premise has been answered but the question is would those other jurisdictions wish to participate,” he said. “That would remain to be tested moving forward so I think you could make the argument that both of those upper-tier municipal organizations do undertake economic development activities and… for that reason, it is politically reasonable to request those two entities in the context of this service as a regional science centre.” Coun. Allan Rothwell said it is a very exciting concept.  “I am concerned however regarding the desire to strike out on our own as opposed to utilize or look specifically at the Stratford-Perth museum footprint as well as the Huron County footprint,” he said. “I understand that this is an agriculture science centre but there is the Country Heritage Park in Milton which was operated as the Ontario Agriculture Museum by the province of Ontario started in 1975 and then re-established as the Country Heritage Park by a non-profit corporation as I understand within a 90-minute drive of our location here. And that serves the whole province of Ontario.” Rothwell said there are other agricultural museums but then said they were different than an agricultural science centre.  “I think I want to hear as we move forward in terms of what you see as a museum versus an agriculture science centre,” he said. “Then whether the fact we have the International Plowing Match which happens throughout Ontario once per year, except of course in 2020.” Rothwell raised concerns about the operation and cost to establish and to maintain the operation with a staff of five plus additional support staff.  “I’m just not sure that in its form I see at the moment we’re going to be able to afford something going forward even from an operational cost,” he said. Coun. Julie Behrns agreed with Rothwell.  “I know it sounds like an exciting project and thank you for all the work that has been put into it,” she said. “Quite frankly I think given the current state of the economy and our country I’m not so sure that we can budget for this in 2021.”  She spoke of an estimated $13.8 million capital cost which the report said is to be covered by federal, provincial or private funding, or the project will not happen.  “We’re talking about the gifting of land,” said Behrns. “We’re talking about supporting operating costs in perpetuity both at the North Perth level and at the Perth County level.” Behrns said that there are two science centres in the province of Ontario, which she mentioned has a population just shy of 14 million people.  “I’m not so sure that a county of just 76,000 has the capabilities unfortunately to support it,” she said. “A lot of the other science centres around, whether it’s agriculture or whatever it usually has major corporate sponsors and I think there has got to be a little more legwork done and firm commitments on behalf of a number of the entities that were suggested in the report… unfortunately at this moment in time even though I think it’s a terrific idea I can’t support it at this time.” “The ask is not for 2021, the ask is for 2024,” said Silberberg. “That is when the building would be assumed to be opened. So the whole assumption is that there would be federal, provincial and private money for the capital. If there is not capital there would be no need for land and no need for operating support but to proceed they need an indication of support from the municipality that would be conditional upon all of the capital funds being there so I just wanted to clarify that.” Council received the report and referred the issue to the 2021 budget deliberations for further discussion.Colin Burrowes, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Listowel Banner

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Cyberpunk 2077 bans unauthorized Keanu Reeves sex – The Verge

Published

 on


Cyberpunk 2077 creator CD Projekt Red would kindly like modders to stop making Keanu Reeves into a sex object. Following a fan mod that allowed players to have sex with Reeves’ character, Johnny Silverhand, the developer told PC Gamer that user-generated content cannot be “harmful towards others” — especially when it comes to mods. “In the case of model swaps, especially those that involve explicit situations, it can be perceived as such by the people who lent us their appearance for the purpose of creating characters in Cyberpunk 2077,” the developer said.

It’s worth noting that Reeves’ character does have an in-game sex scene, though it plays out from his perspective. As Johnny, the player has sex with a blonde woman who inexplicably dumps good liquor onto her white top to a backdrop of guitar riffs, while Johnny bounces her around.

Eurogamer first reported on the Nexus Mods files that swapped a sex worker “joytoy” character model for Reeves’ Johnny. In the mod, Johnny — who remains clothed — is now the sexualized character seen through the players’ eyes. It also uses the joytoy’s voice acting throughout the brief scene.

It’s typical for players to personalize their experience through mods, and the Cyberpunk community has been doing so since the game’s release. CD Projekt Red just released official modding tools. However, the mod — which has since been hidden by the creator on Nexus Mods — crosses that boundary.

“For the characters we’ve invented for the game, we broadly permit you to tweak the game at will and just have fun,” CD Projekt Red told PC Gamer. “When it comes to models of real people whom we’ve asked to participate in the game, we kindly ask you to refrain from using them in any situation that might be found offensive if you don’t have their explicit permission.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Meet BMW’s Fastest Production Car, the New Limited-Edition 627 HP M5 CS – Robb Report

Published

 on


BMW’s M models are high-performance by definition, but that doesn’t mean there’s no room for improvement. Which is why the automaker will release an even more powerful variant of the M5 later this year.

Unveiled on Tuesday, the 2022 M5 CS is a lighter and more muscular version of the high-performance sedan—even with its souped up  Competition package. It’s also a limited-edition model that will only be available for one year and only select markets.

2022 BMW M5 CS 

BMW

The M5 doesn’t lack for power. The base model features a twin-turbocharged 4.4-liter V8 that delivers 600 horsepower and 553 ft lbs of torque. But the marque’s engineers have been able to take the mill and squeeze in an extra 27 horses (10 more than the M5 Competition). While some purists will roll their eyes at the lack of a manual transmission, the car’s acceleration numbers should more than make up for its exclusion. BMW claims the CS can rocket from zero to 60 mph in just 2.9 seconds, which is 0.2 seconds quicker than the M5 Competition and easily makes it the automaker’s quickest production car, according to CNET Roadshow. A top speed of 190 mph isn’t too shabby, either.

But credit for the car’s lightning-quick acceleration time also belongs to its reduced weight. The CS weighs a full 230 pounds less than M5 Competition. This is mainly due to new carbon-fiber elements, including the hood, front splitter, rear diffuser, rear splitter and mirror housings, as well as all four seats in the cabin. Engineers also cut down on the amount of sound deadening material throughout the car. These tweaks allowed the car to shed some serious pounds, all without having to sacrifice its all-wheel-drive system. And if you’re worried about the reduced weight changing how the car feels, fret not because BMW has adjusted the car’s springs and dampers accordingly.

2022 BMW M5 CS

2022 BMW M5 CS 

BMW

From the outside, the CS doesn’t look all that different from the M5 or M5 Competition, but it does feature several striking gold bronze accents, including on the kidney grilles, badging and forged 20-inch wheels. Inside, you’ll find special CS badging, illuminated M5 logos, Alcantara suede, the company’s latest iDrive 7 infotainment suite and a digital gauge cluster that’ll display even more info than the standard M5.

For the time being, BMW only plans to offer the M5 CS as part of the 2022 model year and only in the North America, UK, Germany and Russia markets. This exclusivity, along with a laundry list of performance and design upgrades, won’t come cheap. The sporty sedan will start at $142,995 when it goes on sale later this year, which is $36,000 more than the standard M5 and nearly $30,000 more than the M5 Competition.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Ring's new Video Doorbell is wired only and costs $80 – MobileSyrup

Published

 on


If you’re thinking about upgrading your doorbell to a video doorbell, you can now get one from Ring that connects to your existing doorbell wiring for $79.

Ring says this is its smallest video doorbell yet, but it still includes all of the features customers expect from its smart doorbells. This includes HD video, Two-Way Talk, advanced motion detection, and real-time alerts sent straight to your phone or Alexa device.

One of the keys to remember with this device is that it’s wired, so it gets power from your existing doorbell setup but won’t send sound to your current doorbell chime. You need to either have a phone, Alexa device or Ring Chime to hear it.

You can also add this doorbell to a Ring Protect subscription to record footage and get access to a few other features.

Overall, this is an appealing option for people who can fit in on their homes, plus the fact that it’s wired-only likely makes it less of a hassle given you don’t need to recharge the battery.

The Ring Video Doorbell Wired costs $79 CAD for the base model, and it ships on February 24th.

Source: Ring 

Let’s block ads! (Why?)



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending