adplus-dvertising
Connect with us

Media

Public editor: Media trust rising thanks to COVID-19 coverage, but more needs to be done – The Globe and Mail

Published

 on


The positive shift in media trust, plus climbing vaccination rates, tells the Globe’s public editor, that the vast majority of the public appreciates factual science-based reporting.Carlos Osorio/Reuters

Some good news about the media this month: In its tenth year, a report from the Reuters Institute and the University of Oxford found more readers and viewers trusted the media, based on polling data from 46 markets (not Canada).

Senior research associate Nic Newman wrote in his summary: ”Trust in the news has grown, on average, by six percentage points in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic – with 44 per cent of our total sample saying they trust most news most of the time. This reverses, to some extent, recent falls in average trust – bringing levels back to those of 2018. Finland remains the country with the highest levels of overall trust (65 per cent), and the USA now has the lowest levels (29 per cent) in our survey.”

I found it heartening that people around the world understand the public service value of news, which currently is largely focused on giving readers the evolving science on COVID-19 and the vaccines. This positive shift in media trust, plus climbing vaccination rates, tells me that despite the few throwing despicable hate and vitriol at health care workers, politicians and journalists (especially those of colour and women), the vast majority of the public appreciates factual science-based reporting. (Though we do see trust levels are still mired in the mud in the United States.)

300x250x1

I think a big reason for this positive shift is that journalists, even though some have worked in a specialty such as health reporting for years, know they aren’t the experts and seek out the most knowledgeable people they can find. That push for science and public health shines through.

The report notes that: “this crisis has also shown the value of accurate and reliable information at a time when lives are at stake. In many countries we see audiences turning to trusted brands – in addition to ascribing a greater confidence in the media in general. The gap between the ‘best and the rest’ has grown, as has the trust gap between the news media and social media.”

That gap was exposed in a recent Globe and Mail feature about people who were hesitant to get the COVID-19 vaccine, but recently went ahead.

One woman, Caroline Hartley, said while she heard positive things about the COVID-19 vaccine from the AM radio station she listened to, her Facebook feed was crowded with shared misinformation about its effectiveness. She said her husband’s friends were sharing all kinds of nonsense. But ultimately she was able to discern which information to trust.

Another, Irene Brucculeri, saw friends getting the disease and so began reading more about COVID-19 in the press. Eventually, she got the vaccine, believing it to be safe and effective.

To build on this greater openness, we must do a better job explaining how the media works. Respondents who said they generally trust the news media also said it’s important to know about reporters’ expertise.

The Globe includes bio info on opinion pieces by outside contributors, but perhaps it should be included on major news articles and staff columns as well. Readers are able to see Globe staff bios by clicking on hyperlinked bylines on the website.

And while The Globe has published background pieces on how major stories came about, such as this one by Tom Cardoso on how he investigated bias in Canada’s prison system, I, for one, would like to see more of these.

The report isn’t full of good news of course. It also noted “worrying inequalities in both consumption and trust – with the young, women, people from ethnic minorities and political partisans often feeling less fairly represented by the media.”

It’s a good reminder that we in the media have room to improve in increasing the trust of readers and consumers.

Turning to another issue, I’ve had a number of readers complain about too much front page/main news coverage of the Rogers saga, rather than keeping it on the business pages.

This is a common complaint on any breaking news event where some readers aren’t invested while others read every word. In this case, Rogers is not only an important telecom company in Canada, it’s a consumer company. The family is well known and the arc of what happens to family businesses is a fascinating one to many, hence the comparisons to the series Succession or Game of Thrones.

The Globe has published many exclusives, which have given a rare insider look at a business in the midst of a power struggle. It’s also a major news story, not a just business one, and it is far from over. Notably, in the list of trending articles on The Globe homepage in the mornings lately, Rogers stories are inevitably in the top five.

Any thoughts on these or other issues, please e-mail me at publiceditor@globeandmail.com.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

DJT Stock Rises. Trump Media CEO Alleges Potential Market Manipulation. – Barron's

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

DJT Stock Rises. Trump Media CEO Alleges Potential Market Manipulation.  Barron’s

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

DJT Stock Rises. Trump Media CEO Alleges Potential Market Manipulation. – Barron's

Published

 on


[unable to retrieve full-text content]

DJT Stock Rises. Trump Media CEO Alleges Potential Market Manipulation.  Barron’s

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Media

Three drones downed after explosions heard in Iran’s Isfahan: State media – Al Jazeera English

Published

 on


Iran’s air defences have brought down three small drones over the central city of Isfahan, state media reported, hours after United States broadcasters, quoting senior US officials, said Israeli missiles had hit an Iranian site.

Iranian state television reported explosions in Isfahan as air defences were activated and flights across several areas, including the capital, Tehran, and Isfahan, were suspended.

Airspace was reopened about four and a half hours after the incident and there were no reports of casualties.

300x250x1

Second Brigadier General Siavash Mihandoust, the top military official in Isfahan, told state media that air defence batteries hit “a suspicious object” and there was no damage.

ABC News and CBS News had reported earlier that Israel had carried out a military operation in Iran.

Italy’s Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said the US told the Group of Seven (G7) foreign ministers that it had been “informed at the last minute” by Israel about an attack on Iran.

“But there was no sharing of the attack by the US. It was a mere information,” Tajani told reporters in Capri, Italy, where the G7 ministers met.

However, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken refused to confirm reports about the Israeli attack, during a news conference in Capri.

“I’m not going to speak to that, except to say that the United States has not been involved in any offensive operation,” Blinken said.

The top US diplomat said the G7’s focus is on de-escalation. Asked to describe the current US-Israel relationship, Blinken noted that Israel makes its own decisions, but the US is committed to its security.

Iranian media said no strikes were launched on Iran from outside the country, and the attack was believed to have been carried out using small quadcopters that would have to have been launched from inside Iran.

Reporting from Tehran, Al Jazeera’s Dorsa Jabbari said Iranian media were downplaying the incident.

“The location in Isfahan province is an Iranian military airbase that belongs to the country’s army, and not the Revolutionary Guards [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, IRGC]. I think it’s important to highlight that,” she said. “This base houses multiple squadrons of F-14 Tomcat fighter aircraft.”

“We also understand that the air defence systems over the city of Tabriz in the northwestern part of Iran were also activated,” Jabbari reported.

A military factory belonging to the Iranian army in Isfahan was attacked by multiple quadcopters in January 2023, failing to damage the facility that was protected by air defence batteries and mesh wiring on its roof to counter small unmanned aerial vehicles.

Iran blamed Israel for that attack and arrested four people, executing one of them in January 2024, for operating on behalf of Mossad, the Israeli spy agency.

Israel had promised to respond after Iran launched a barrage of drones and missiles on the country on April 13, after a suspected Israeli attack on Iran’s consulate compound in Damascus killed 16 people, including two IRGC senior generals.

Governments around the world urged restraint and a push to de-escalate tensions across the region.

Isfahan is considered a strategically important city and one that is host to several important sites, including military research and development facilities, as well as bases. The nearby city of Natanz is the location of one of Iran’s nuclear enrichment sites.

In a speech in Damghan, in central Iran, Iran’s President Ebrahim Raisi made no mention of Isfahan but praised the Iranian attacks on Israel, saying they gave the country strength and unity.

Kioumars Heydari, the commander-in-chief of the ground forces of the Iranian army, said Iran remains vigilant to confront any other potential aerial threats.

“If suspicious flying objects appear in the sky of the country, they will be targeted by our powerful air defence,” he was quoted as saying by the state-run IRNA  news agency ahead of Friday prayers in Tehran.

‘No damage’ to nuclear facilities

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that “there is no damage” to Iranian nuclear sites as the United Nations nuclear watchdog’s chief Rafael Grossi called for restraint and said nuclear facilities should never be targeted in military conflicts.

The reported attack “was far more limited than many expected”, Iranian arms control expert Ali Ahmadi told Al Jazeera, adding that Israel “has much more limitations in its operational range” than many think.

“Certainly, after Iran’s retaliatory capacity was criticised, it benefits from advertising how ineffective what Israel did was as well. Iran also needs to prepare the public for a much softer reaction than it has talked about in the last couple of days,” he pointed out.

Ahmadi said that prior to today’s incident, Iran was preparing several options for a massive retaliation, including getting allies involved.

But considering the limited scope and impact of the alleged attack, which he described as a “security sabotage” rather than a “military assault”, it would be a mistake to carry out a significant response, he stressed.

There were also reports of explosions in Iraq and Syria, with Iranian state media saying there were explosions at multiple military-linked sites in Syria.

Syria’s official news agency SANA quoted a military source as saying that missile strikes in the early hours of the morning caused material damage to air defence sites in the country’s southern region. The report did not specify the exact location and the extent of the damage but blamed Israel.

The US and a number of European countries had been calling on Israel not to respond to Iran’s attack.

On Thursday, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres painted a dark picture of the situation in the Middle East, warning that spiralling tensions over Israel’s war on Gaza and Iran’s attack on Israel could descend into a “full-scale regional conflict”.

“The Middle East is on a precipice. Recent days have seen a perilous escalation – in words and deeds,” Guterres told the UN Security Council.

“One miscalculation, one miscommunication, one mistake, could lead to the unthinkable – a full-scale regional conflict that would be devastating for all involved,” he said, calling on all parties to exercise “maximum restraint”.

Adblock test (Why?)

728x90x4

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending